This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
There is such a radical difference between an operation performed with intruments connected with the positive pole of a galvanic battery and one performed with instruments connected with the negative pole, that both should not be designated by the one common name "electrolysis." I would like to suggest that we call the operation performed with instruments connected with the negative pole—cathode, catelectrode—"catelectrolysis," and that with the positive pole—anode—"anelectrolysis." The development of oxygen at the positive pole, when the current is closed, makes it impossible to use a steel needle, or jeweler's broach, in anelectrolysis, nor can there be made such a fine, strong and springy instrument out of gold, platinum, iridium or silver. This is a mechanical disadvantage only, but anelectrolysis has little intrinsic value—in fact, it acts like a simple cauterization by heat. It is entirely different with catelectrolysis. What we can accomplish here is this: We can charge,
LEVISEUR FJ. NOTES ON CATELECTROLYSIS (ELECTROLYSIS) IN THE TREATMENT OF SKIN DISEASES. JAMA. 1900;XXXIV(2):74–76. doi:10.1001/jama.1900.24610020010002b
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: