This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Knickbocker, Texas, May 23, 1900.
To the Editor:
—I have long been of the opinion that doctors are too often not sufficiently frank with their patients. It is a matter of every-day experience that patients very often are not entirely frank with their medical advisers. I do not hold it to be a duty of the doctor to tell the patient the name and properties of the medicament which he prescribes. To do so is virtually to take the patient into counsel as to the merits or demerits of the remedy in question, and few laymen possess the requisite technical knowledge to qualify them to consult with the doctor on such matters. The exceptional instances only prove the rule. Yet the doctor must be both frank and explicit in his direction as to dietary, mode of life, administration of remedies, etc. To do less than this would be to fall
Professional Frankness from the Standpoint of Ethics. MAY THE DIAGNOSIS OF PULMONARY CONSUMPTION EVER BE ETHICALLY WITHHELD FROM THE PATIENT BY HIS MEDICAL COUNSELOR? JAMA. 1900;XXXIV(24):1573–1574. doi:10.1001/jama.1900.02460240065022
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: