[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
February 1, 1965

Professional Ethics

Author Affiliations


JAMA. 1965;191(5):420-421. doi:10.1001/jama.1965.03080050066029

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor:—  In noting, in an otherwise most excellent discussion of a difficult subject, that Dr. Ignacio Chávez (JAMA190:226 [Oct 19] 1964) omitted to state anything about the patient's having knowledge of an experimental situation or having consented to the procedure or drug, I hope that he does not mean to imply that such experimental procedures or drugs should be administered without such knowledge and consent.Difficult although this may be, to my way of thinking it is mandatory and in keeping with all ethical considerations that patients (or their legal guardians) give consent to the use of any experimental procedure or drug beforehand, and preferably in writing. Moreover, the complete nature of the risk and all other pertinent details ought to be explained to the patient (or guardian) in the vernacular and also in such a manner that no possible misconstruction can be made as to

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview