[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
February 1, 1965

Complications of Direct-Current Countershock

JAMA. 1965;191(5):421. doi:10.1001/jama.1965.03080050067031

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor:—  In the communication by Rabbino, Likoff, and Dreifus on complications and limitations of direct-current precordial countershock (JAMA190:417 [Nov 2] 1964) there are three examples of ventricular fibrillation.The preshock electrocardiographic tracing of case 1 is described in the text and in Fig 1 as paroxysmal atrial tachycardia with 2:1 atrioventricular block. A close examination of the tracing, however, reveals a double tachycardia, with a regular atrial rate of 250 beats per minute, and a regular nodal mechanism at 150 beats per minute, with complete dissociation and heart block. It seems necessary to correct this error since a final list of indications and contraindications for this valuable form of therapy must take into account the exact electrocardiographic mechanism of the arrhythmia.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview