[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
February 8, 1965

To Have Been or Not to Have Been

JAMA. 1965;191(6):504. doi:10.1001/jama.1965.03080060078028

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor:—  Your editorial writer suggests making to have been a has been. The haves and the have nots should agree on such passivity passing. This grammatic crusade deserves much accolade. While we're passing on passives, let's not be passe. Let's pass the passive passage into the past.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview