[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
May 10, 1965

The Clinical Chief

Author Affiliations

Professor of Pathology Albany, NY

JAMA. 1965;192(6):576. doi:10.1001/jama.1965.03080190142044

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor:—  Sometime ago I wrote a brief editorial on the changing practice in surgical pathology. Recently John R. Herman, MD, indicated the need for departmental separation of clinical and research functions (JAMA191:1022 [March 22] 1965). Although I agree in general, it is important to be somewhat more critical in the definition of "clinical chief." Such an individual should be a competent clinician broadly interested in the application of proven basic investigative techniques to clinical disease. This means he should be laterally trained and a sort of general practitioner in basic research, interested in both biologic and physical sciences. He should develop a split personality in order to approach each patient as a sympathetic practitioner, or as a clinical scientist using investigative tools to study disease in a primate colony. Actually, we should support scientific basic investigation without additional cost to the patient. In contrast, basic research

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview