This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Today most physicians subscribe to the opinion that too much is being published too often in too many journals. Our abstract conviction of the existence of a "publication explosion" is strengthened by the concrete fact that we cannot keep up to date in subjects which interest us. Sir Theodore Fox, in his unofficial valedictory as editor of the Lancet, makes a thoughtful, witty assessment of this crisis in communication, and advocates a plan to resolve the crisis.
Fox defines two basic functions of medical journals: one, to record the minutiae of scientific data; the other to interpret recent research and synthesize it with the findings of other sciences. Most journals today combine, in varying proportions, both functions. In the future, Fox contends, communications intended for the record, particularly those containing the data of basic science, should not be published at all. Instead, abstracts should be circulated or published and the
Roland CG. Crisis in Communication: The Functions and Future of Medical Journals. JAMA. 1965;193(4):323. doi:10.1001/jama.1965.03090040067029
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.