This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:—
In your editorial (JAMA192:778 [May 31] 1965) you affirm that "the important investigator is the one who convinces the world."Certainly the historian occasionally finds that a sure determination of prior claims of discovery and invention is virtually impossible. Despite this difficulty, one should not erase the innovator from our histories nor transfer our admiration for his achievement to the publicist, if not plagiarist, "who convinces the world." Following your "more pragmatic approach," Darwin would yield his laurels to Huxley, Auenbrugger to Corvisart, Mendel to DeVries, Correns, Tschernak, and we should rewrite our history.That this "pragmatic approach" does actually prevail we can see in the present proliferation of the medical press, in which one can detect a myriad of authors rewriting the self-same paper in ingenious permutations and combinations, and all to bring conviction to the world.
Gilson SB. Convincing the World. JAMA. 1965;193(6):545. doi:10.1001/jama.1965.03090060135019
Browse and subscribe to JAMA Network podcasts!
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: