This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
First, may I thank through these columns the several hundred correspondents who have taken the time to put into writing their feelings about "The Rape of the Phallus." To the vast majority who supported me, my thanks; to the few who were abusive, scurrilous, and occasionally anonymous, my sympathy; to those three who saw fit to mention my meager effort and H. L. Mencken in the same breath, my intense gratitude; and to the Editor and his staff, the laurel crown for realizing that the function of the press, medical or otherwise, is to educate and not to propagandize. As for those who deplore the use of satire in a medical topic such as this, I recommend the writings of Aristophanes, Juvenal, Swift, Voltaire, and Baltimore's own H. L. Mencken. And to the several correspondents who queried my qualifications to express an opinion on this subject, may I remind them
Morgan WKC. The Rape of the Phallus —A Sequel. JAMA. 1965;194(3):311. doi:10.1001/jama.1965.03090160087039
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: