[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
May 16, 1966

Anthology of Orthopaedics

JAMA. 1966;196(7):668. doi:10.1001/jama.1966.03100200108046

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


Every specialty has its eponyms. But ask who was the person after whom this or that disease or test was named, or what did he actually say about it, and we will realize that most proper nouns have lost their special signification. They remain only as a sound, which serves to identify a disease or sign but not to convey any historical meaning. Similarly with many conditions without eponyms. If we ask who first described a particular disease, or what did it originally signify, we realize that for most practitioners the past is a closed book.

Many educators have regretted this state of affairs and a few have even tried to remedy the situation. There are many books on medical history, many anthologies of original writings. The present book, restricted to the specialty of orthopedics, is extraordinarily successful. Dr. Rang has, after some general introductory remarks, divided the field into

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview