This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
—When a fire breaks out in a village, every person considers it a duty to give a general alarm, and, especially, prompt notice of it to the fire departments, and all citizens coöperate for the speedy extinction of the fire. If this were not done, the property in the village would be quite generally endangered by the possible spread of the fire. Why is it that when a dangerous communicable disease breaks out—one which may spread and endanger quite generally the lives of persons in the village—there is, so frequently, no such general alarm and prompt notice to a well-organized department of the village government, and no general coöperation for the extinction of the disease? Is not a person's life of more consequence than his property? Is not the saving of the lives of their children of as much consequence to the inhabitants of the village, as the saving of
A Plea for Public Health in Villages. JAMA. 1892;XIX(22):646. doi:10.1001/jama.1892.02420220024007
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: