Context Physical activity is important for health, yet few studies have examined
the effectiveness of physical activity patient counseling in primary care.
Objective To compare the effects of 2 physical activity counseling interventions
with current recommended care and with each other in a primary care setting.
Design The Activity Counseling Trial, a randomized controlled trial with recruitment
in 1995-1997, with 24 months of follow-up.
Setting Eleven primary care facilities affiliated with 3 US clinical research
centers.
Participants Volunteer sample of 395 female and 479 male inactive primary care patients
aged 35 to 75 years without clinical cardiovascular disease.
Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: advice (n = 292),
which included physician advice and written educational materials (recommended
care); assistance (n = 293), which included all the components received by
the advice group plus interactive mail and behavioral counseling at physician
visits; or counseling (n = 289), which included the assistance and advice
group components plus regular telephone counseling and behavioral classes.
Main Outcome Measures Cardiorespiratory fitness, measured by maximal oxygen uptake
(O2max), and self-reported total physical activity, measured by a 7-day
Physical Activity Recall, compared among the 3 groups and analyzed separately
for men and women at 24 months.
Results At 24 months, 91.4% of the sample had completed physical activity and
77.6% had completed cardiorespiratory fitness measurements. For women at 24
months, O2max was significantly higher in the assistance
group than in the advice group (mean difference, 80.7 mL/min; 99.2% confidence
interval [CI], 8.1-153.2 mL/min) and in the counseling group than in the advice
group (mean difference, 73.9 mL/min; 99.2% CI, 0.9-147.0 mL/min), with no
difference between the counseling and assistance groups and no significant
differences in reported total physical activity. For men, there were no significant
between-group differences in cardiorespiratory fitness or total physical activity.
Conclusions Two patient counseling interventions differing in type and number of
contacts were equally effective in women in improving cardiorespiratory fitness
over 2 years compared with recommended care. In men, neither of the 2 counseling
interventions was more effective than recommended care.
Physical activity is important for health,1
and many national organizations recommend that physicians and other health
care practitioners counsel patients on physical activity.2-8
The US adult averages about 3 medical office visits annually,9
and patients report that they want information about physical activity from
physicians.10 Health care practitioners do
not routinely counsel patients about physical activity,11
although they are more likely to counsel patients at high risk for or with
a known disease.12-17
Studies of physical activity interventions in primary care have been short
term or have lacked control groups,18-20
and effectiveness of patient education and counseling in primary care on physical
activity and fitness has been inadequately tested.
The Activity Counseling Trial (ACT) was sponsored by the National Heart,
Lung, and Blood Institute to test patient education and counseling approaches
for physical activity in the primary care setting.21-23
The objective was to determine the effects of 2 patient education and counseling
interventions compared with current recommended care, and with each other,
on cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity in inactive adult patients.
The ACT was a multicenter randomized clinical trial with 3 randomized
groups: 2 patient education and counseling groups, termed "assistance" and
"counseling," and a recommended care "advice" comparison group. There were
2 primary outcome measures: cardiorespiratory fitness measured as maximal
oxygen uptake (O2max) by a treadmill exercise test and self-reported
physical activity measured by the 7-day Physical Activity Recall (PAR) interview.24,25 The study was designed to answer
the research question separately in men and women, because of the possibility
that effects of interventions to promote physical activity may vary by sex,
and to test the effects of interventions delivered for 24 months.22,23
Participants were adult patients at 11 primary care facilities (ie,
hospital-associated outpatient clinics, multispecialty group practices, internal
medicine clinics, and family practice clinics) seen by 51 physicians, 2 physician
assistants, and 1 nurse practitioner. The primary care facilities were affiliated
with 3 clinical centers, which were Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif;
University of Tennessee, Memphis; and the Cooper Institute in conjunction
with the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; the coordinating
center was Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; and
the project office was the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda,
Md. Participants gave written informed consent, institutional review boards
of all institutions approved the study, and a National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute–appointed data and safety monitoring board reviewed study
progress twice a year.
Participants were inactive (daily energy expenditure ≤35 kcal ·
kg-1 · day-1 from the 7-day PAR), 35 to 75 years
old, and in stable health, defined as an absence of serious chronic disease.
If the participants were taking medication for chronic disease, they had to
be continuing a stable dosage for at least 3 months. Patients with a history
of coronary heart disease or findings of ischemia during the study treadmill
test were excluded. Participants had to be planning or scheduled to see a
study clinician during the recruitment phase, able to read and write English,
independent in daily living, and able to increase their physical activity.
Recruitment took place over 18 months in 1995-1997.
Methods for identifying potential participants (N = 3910) included computerized
databases, appointment logs, medical record reviews, questionnaires, and responses
to invitation letters.26 Staff initiated prescreening
by telephone to elicit interest, obtain or verify demographic information,
and to determine potential study eligibility. Three screening/baseline visits
were implemented (Figure 1). At
the first visit, study requirements were described, informed consent for screening
was obtained, and a 7-day PAR was administered. Questionnaires on demographics,
medical history, psychosocial factors, and nutrition and a second informed
consent for randomization were given to participants for review and completion.
At the second visit, clinic staff reviewed the questionnaires, a cardiovascular-oriented
medical examination was conducted, a second 7-day PAR was administered, and
clinical measurements were performed, including a maximal treadmill exercise
test. The third visit included a submaximal treadmill test.
Eligible and consenting participants (N = 874) were randomized to the
3 groups (advice, assistance, or counseling) stratified by clinical center
and race/ethnicity. Randomization was performed by a computer-automated system
at the coordinating center accessed by touchtone telephone when participants
arrived at their appointments with their physicians, which were the first
intervention visits. Physicians were masked to randomized assignment.
Similar data collection was conducted at baseline and at 6 and 24 months
after the participants' randomization date. An interim 7-day PAR was administered
at 12 months by telephone.
At each follow-up contact, possible adverse events were assessed by
questionnaire (mailed at 18 months), including musculoskeletal injuries during
or following exercise and any potential cardiovascular events.
Physical activity was assessed as total energy expenditure estimated
by the 7-day PAR,24,25 a structured
interview in which participants recall specific activities to estimate amount
of time spent each 24-hour period during the previous 7 days in the following
5 categories of activity intensity: sleep (1.0 metabolic equivalent tasks
[METs]), light (1.1-2.9 METs), moderate (3.0-5.0 METs), hard (5.1-6.9 METs),
and very hard (≥7.0 METs). The amount of time in each category was multiplied
by that category's average MET value and the results for the categories summed
to obtain an estimate of total energy expenditure (kcal · kg-1 · day-1). Calories expended in and duration of moderate
activity and hard plus very hard (vigorous) activity were determined.
Interviewers were trained to use a standardized protocol for administering
the 7-day PAR. To improve precision at each time point, the 7-day PAR was
administered twice at least 7 days apart at baseline, 6 months (once in person
and once by telephone), and 24 months, with values for the 2 interviews at
each time point averaged.27
Cardiorespiratory fitness was assessed as measured maximal oxygen uptake
(O2max, mL/min) by a graded maximal exercise test on a treadmill.
After a short walking warm-up at 0% grade, the speed was increased until steady-state
heart rate of 60% of age-predicted maximum or a rating of perceived exertion
(RPE) of 11 to 13 (fairly light to somewhat hard physical activity) on the
Borg scale28 was maintained for 4 minutes.
The grade was elevated 2% in 2-minute stages and subsequently increased 1%
when the RPE was 17 (very hard physical activity) or above, until the participant
reached volitional fatigue or standard stopping criteria.29
The O2max was calculated as the mean of the highest consecutive
two 30-second oxygen uptake values near the end of the test.
To determine baseline characteristics of participants, conventional
cardiovascular disease risk factors were assessed. Blood pressure was recorded
using standard procedures and hypertension was defined as a systolic blood
pressure of 140 mm Hg or higher and/or a diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm
Hg or higher; participants also were considered to be hypertensive if they
were taking antihypertensive medication.5 Body
weight and height were measured and body mass index (BMI; calculated as the
weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared) was determined;
overweight was a BMI of 25 to 29.9 kg/m2 and obesity was a BMI
of 30 kg/m2or more.30 Fasting blood
lipid levels were measured and analyzed by a central laboratory; low-density
lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations were calculated.31
Hypercholesterolemia was defined as an LDL-C of 160 mg/dL or higher or if
the participant was taking lipid-lowering medication.4
Smoking status was assessed by self-report.
The staff who took the measurements were masked to participants' treatment
assignments and were trained at a central location and certified for measuring
primary and key secondary outcomes. Experts on the assessement of the 7-day
PAR and treadmill exercise test conducted yearly site visits to verify adherence
to measurement procedures and for refresher training and recertification.
Investigators at the coordinating center and in a study-wide measurement committee
monitored measurement quality.
The ACT interventions23 were designed
for feasible implementation in a primary care setting. Social cognitive theory
was used to select key personal (eg, self-efficacy), social (eg, social support
for exercise), and environmental (eg, access to facilities and resources)
factors as mediators of physical activity participation,32
which the interventions targeted using previously successful strategies, such
as goal setting, supportive feedback, and active problem solving.33 Except for the provision of physician advice, the
interventions were delivered by ACT health educators placed in the clinics
by the study.
All 3 groups were given the same physical activity targets based on
current national recommendations: 5 or more days a week of 30 minutes of moderate-intensity
physical activity (equivalent to brisk walking)34
or 3 or more days a week of 30 minutes of vigorous-intensity physical activity
(equivalent to running).35 This amount of activity
is equivalent to 2 kcal · kg-1 · day-1
or more in moderate-to-vigorous activity or approximately 1.5 to 2 miles/d
depending on body weight. Participants could choose the moderate or vigorous
activity and were advised to gradually increase their physical activity to
avoid injury.
A hierarchical design was used in which additional strategies were added
in the assistance group above those in the advice group, with further strategies
added in the counseling group.
Participants in the advice group received physician advice based on
national recommendations.7 Physicians received
training on a brief (2-4 minutes) advice process, consisting of assessing
activity level using a simple self-assessment tool; providing advice to increase
activity and select a long-term goal; and referring the participant to an
on-site health educator for further education or counseling.36
The health educator provided existing educational materials on physical activity,37 answered questions about the recommendations made
by the physician, and was available to be called with questions. At follow-up
physician visits, the physician gave advice and the health educator briefly
met with the participants. The advice from the health educator was limited
to information on the type and amount of physical activity; behavioral counseling
was not provided.
Participants in the assistance group received the same physician advice
and educational materials as those in the advice group. In addition, the health
educator conducted an initial 30- to 40-minute behavioral counseling session,
which included showing a motivational videotape, confirmation of physical
activity goals, discussion of benefits specific to the participant, and development
of an individualized physical activity plan. The health educators telephoned
the participants 1 week after the initial visit to provide advice and support.
An interactive-mail component consisted of a monthly newsletter to increase
cognitive and behavioral skills for physical activity; the newsletter included
a postage-paid mail-back card for reporting weekly physical activity, current
goals, and barriers to participation. Participants were given an electronic
step-counter (Digi-Walker, Model SW-200; Yamax, Kansas City, Mo) and a magnetic,
erasable monthly calendar, and they were instructed to record daily steps
and minutes of physical activity and to provide this information on their
monthly mail-back cards. Health educators then mailed back brief information
sheets addressing items submitted by participants on their mail-back cards.
The health educator called participants who returned less than 70% of mail-back
cards in a 6-month period to encourage involvement in the interactive mail
exchange. Inexpensive items, such as sports water bottles, were given as incentives
for returning mail-back cards. At the time of physician visits, participants
received brief behavioral counseling from health educators to assess activity
level, to provide feedback and reinforcement, and to problem-solve barriers
to activity.
Participants in the counseling group received all of the components
of the assistance intervention and in addition received health educator–initiated
telephone counseling biweekly, then monthly after 6 weeks during the first
year of intervention, with telephone contacts during the second year at a
negotiated frequency. Telephone counseling incorporated information from the
mail-back cards, evaluated and updated physical activity goals, problem-solved
barriers to adherence, planned for future barriers, and provided reinforcement
and social support. Weekly classes were provided at the centers by the health
educators on behavioral skills for adopting and maintaining physical activity.
Nine health educators were trained at a central location, with annual
retraining, by ACT behavioral scientists in intervention implementation and
documentation of intervention activities. Turnover of health educators was
low, and new health educators were trained using the same approach. Checklists,
structured scripts, and central auditing of session audiotapes were used for
intervention quality control. The ACT physicians and clinic staff were trained
in intervention procedures by trainers from each clinical center who also
monitored protocol adherence by physicians and clinic personnel.36
A computerized tracking system to prompt the health educators to deliver
protocol-specified intervention components to the appropriate participants
and to document participant contacts was developed by ACT. Total duration
of intervention contact was estimated by adding the durations of all health
educator visits and telephone calls, initial physician advice (estimated at
4 minutes), classes (1 hour each), and mail-back cards from the newsletters
(estimated at 5 minutes).
Statistical Power and Analysis Methods
Sample size calculations for α = .05, 2-sided, conducted separately
for men and women and adjusted for multiple comparisons for 3 pairwise comparisons
resulted in sample size estimates of 393 women and 417 men for 90% power to
detect a 1.1-kcal · kg−1· day−1 difference in total energy expenditure between any 2 of the randomized
groups, based on the goal of 2-kcal · kg−1·
day-1 average increase in the assistance and counseling groups
with some expected increases in the advice (comparison) group.22
These sample sizes provided 91% and 93% power to detect a 7% difference in O2max in women and men, respectively.
The a priori primary analysis method was repeated measures analyses
of covariance38 conducted separately for men
and women comparing the 3 randomized groups on each of the 2 primary end points.
All participants were analyzed according to the group to which they were assigned,
regardless of intervention attendance or compliance. Dependent variables were O2max or total physical activity by 7-day PAR. Independent variables
were randomization stratification factors (center and race/ethnicity), intervention
group, follow-up visit, and intervention × follow-up visit interaction.
Baseline level of O2max was included when O2max
was the dependent variable, and baseline level of total physical activity
was included when physical activity was the dependent variable. All participants
with a postrandomization measure at 6 months and/or 24 months were analyzed,
and all follow-up values were included in the analysis. The analysis takes
into account correlations between follow-up measures in the same person, and
6-month data contribute to the 24-month estimations. This analysis approach
provides unbiased estimates of the intervention effect even if the chance
of an observation being missing is dependent on other observed data, such
as participant baseline characteristics, baseline level of the outcome measure,
or interim value of the outcome measure. Intervention effect was tested by
contrasting adjusted means at the 24-month visit. P
values used to judge significance were adjusted for 6 multiple comparisons
(2 primary outcomes × 3 group pairwise comparisons), and 99.2% confidence
intervals (CIs) were calculated, which are consistent with the adjusted P value. Unadjusted P values and
standard 95% CIs also were calculated, as were percentages of the adjusted
baseline mean for between-group differences at 24 months.
The a priori statistical procedure assumes that missing data at 24 months
may be related to baseline characteristics and outcomes at 6 months.38,39 In case this assumption was not met,
2 secondary analyses were conducted in which data were imputed for participants
missing 24-month values. One analysis imputed 24-month data using a regression
model assuming missing data in all groups had the same distribution as observed
data in the advice group, and a second analysis carried forward baseline values
to 24 months assuming participants who did not return for follow-up measurement
had no change from baseline values. In addition, baseline-to-24-month within-group
changes, 95% CIs of the changes, and percentage change were calculated for
unadjusted differences in participants with 24-month data, and these results
also were calculated using each of the 2 imputation strategies in all participants
randomized.
To examine physical activity level in relation to current national recommendations,
the proportion of participants meeting physical activity goals (ie, 30 minutes
of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [≥3 METs] at least 5 days a week,
30 minutes of vigorous activity [>5 METs] at least 3 days a week, or at least
2 kcal · kg-1 · day-1 in moderate-to-vigorous
activity) and total calories expended in moderate-to-vigorous activity were
compared at 24 months as secondary outcomes.
For all outcome analyses, a Bonferroni procedure was used to preserve
an overall α = .05 type I error rate within sex, with P values adjusted for 6 comparisons within sex (2 primary outcome measures
and 3 pairwise comparisons).
Baseline characteristics were similar in the 3 randomized groups (Table 1). Mean age was approximately 51
to 52 years for both men and women. Nearly one third of the participants were
of minority race/ethnicity. More than 75% of women and approximately 90% of
men had some college education, and more than 40% of participants had annual
household incomes of $75 000 or more. By design, none of the participants
had a history of coronary heart disease. Approximately 85% of participants
had 1 or more cardiovascular disease risk factors in addition to being physically
inactive (ie, smoking, overweight/obesity, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia,
or history of diabetes mellitus).40 Mean (SD)
energy expenditure was 32.4 (0.9) kcal · kg-1 · day-1 in women and 32.9 (1.0) kcal · kg-1 · day-1 in men, mean O2max was 1628 (380) mL/min in women
and 2585 (552) mL/min in men. Less than 1% of women and approximately 1.5%
of men met the physical activity goals.
During the 2 years of intervention, the advice group averaged 3 intervention
contacts totaling 18 minutes, and the assistance group averaged 22 contacts
totaling almost 3 hours. The counseling group averaged 44 contacts totaling
9 hours for women and 38 contacts totaling 5.6 hours for men (Table 2).
Follow-up measurement rates at 24 months were 91.4% for the 7-day PAR
and 77.6% for O2max, with rates of 90.7%, 93.9%, and 89.6%
for the 7-day PAR and 80.1%, 78.5%, 74.0% for O2max in the
advice, assistance, and counseling groups, respectively (Figure 1). There were no significant differences in demographic
characteristics between participants with and those without 24-month measurements.
Results for cardiorespiratory fitness are shown in Figure 2 and Table 3.
For women, the a priori primary analysis resulted in an adjusted difference
at 24 months between the assistance and advice groups of 80.7 mL/min (99.2%
CI, 8.1-153.2; adjusted P = .02), between the counseling
and advice groups of 73.9 mL/min (99.2% CI, 0.9-147.0; adjusted P = .046), and between the assistance and counseling groups of −6.7
mL/min (99.2% CI, −80.9 to 67.5; adjusted P
= .99). For women, obtained differences between groups using imputation strategies
were consistent with the primary analysis (Table 3). Unadjusted within-group analyses from baseline to 24 months
showed a decrease of 16.2 mL/min (95% CI, −58.2 to 25.8) in the advice
group, an increase of 58.5 mL/min (95% CI, 11.5-105.4) in the assistance group,
and an increase of 62.9 mL/min in the counseling group (Table 3), for a net unadjusted difference between the assistance
and advice groups of 74.7 mL/min, between counseling and advice groups of
79.1 mL/min, and between assistance and counseling groups of −4.4 mL/min.
For men (data from the primary analysis are shown in Table 3) there were no significant differences between groups in
cardiorespiratory fitness at 24 months. Imputation strategies were not performed
for men because the a priori analysis did not result in any significant between-group
differences.
For both men and women, there were no significant differences in self-reported
total physical activity, except for in women at 6 months there was a significantly
higher value of 0.54 kcal · kg−1· day−1 in the counseling than in the assistance group (95% CI, 0.07-1.00;
adjusted P = .01) (Figure 3).
At 24 months, the secondary outcomes classifying participants according
to physical activity recommendations show that percentage of participants
engaging in 30 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at least
5 days a week or 30 minutes of vigorous activity at least 3 days a week for
women were 25.7% (28/109) in the counseling group, 9.9% (12/121) in the assistance
group, and 14.3% (17/119) in the advice group (counseling vs assistance, P = .005; other comparisons not significant), and for men
were 18.5% (28/151) in the counseling group, 29.9% (46/154) in the assistance
group, and 16.4% (24/146) in the advice group (assistance vs advice, P = .02; other comparisons not significant). There were
no significant differences between groups in proportion of participants engaging
in 2 kcal · kg−1· day−1 or
more of moderate-to-vigorous activity or energy expended in moderate-to-vigorous
activity (data not shown; available from the authors on request).
Safety assessment showed that musculoskeletal injuries related to exercise,
possible cardiovascular events, and physician visits and hospitalizations
due to these were similar in magnitude between the 3 randomized groups (Table 4). There was approximately a 60%
rate of musculoskeletal events during the 2 years, or approximately 30% per
year. The difference in number of hospitalizations for possible cardiovascular
events was significant across all 3 groups (P = .04),
with the pairwise comparison between the highest rate in the assistance group
and the lowest rate in the counseling group also significant (P = .05).
The role of physicians and other health care practitioners in advising
sedentary patients to become physically active is recognized by national organizations,2-8
but there are numerous barriers to counseling these patients.12-17
The ACT was designed to address this problem by developing and testing 2 patient
education and counseling interventions (received by the assistance and counseling
groups) feasible for use in primary care settings and comparing them with
current recommended care (received by the advice group).
For women, the assistance and the counseling interventions were similar
in significantly increasing cardiorespiratory fitness, resulting in an approximately
5% higher O2max at 2 years than in the advice group. The
assistance intervention achieved significant effects with about 3 hours of
total contact time over 2 years, divided over approximately 22 contacts. Despite
more frequent and longer total contact time, the counseling intervention did
not obtain significantly higher fitness levels than the assistance intervention.
Neither of these interventions had a greater effect on total reported physical
activity than that observed in the advice group. For men, neither the assistance
nor counseling intervention improved cardiorespiratory fitness or total physical
activity significantly above the level achieved by the advice group. There
was no evidence of increased adverse events, such as injuries, in the assistance
and counseling groups compared with the advice group. We conclude that the
assistance and counseling intervention programs were equally effective in
women, but for men these interventions were not more effective than the recommended
care of physician and health educator advice alone. Participants were volunteers
interested in increasing their physical activity levels who met various eligibility
criteria and had a relatively high socioeconomic status as defined by education
level, so the results may not be generalizable to the broader primary care
patient population.
The primary outcomes for ACT were total self-reported physical activity
and cardiorespiratory fitness. Physical activity reflects the behavioral aims
of the interventions, structured self-report instruments are an accepted method
for quantifying physical activity in population-based studies,41
and self-reported physical activity is associated with cardiovascular disease
in epidemiologic studies.1 Self-report measures,
however, may be biased or imprecise. Thus, the increases in self-reported
physical activity from baseline to 2 years seen in this study may not be attributable
to the interventions, although between-group comparisons are valid. Cardiorespiratory
fitness is measured more objectively, is correlated with change in physical
activity, and is inversely associated with cardiovascular disease mortality.42-44 Fitness measures
reflect longer-term activity levels than do 1-week activity recalls. Increases
in cardiorespiratory fitness were seen in men from baseline to 6 months, and
it may be that all of the interventions, including the recommended care received
by the advice group, increased fitness in men short-term.
Secondary analyses were conducted to determine the proportion of participants
meeting the physical activity recommendations regarding frequency, duration,
and intensity of activity, that is, 30 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous activity
5 or more days a week or 30 minutes of vigorous activity 3 or more days a
week. At the 24-month assessment, the highest group-specific percentages meeting
the recommendations were 26% in the counseling group for women and 30% in
the assistance group for men, compared with 1% to 2% at baseline. These proportions
are slightly higher than that achieved in Project Active, in which after 2
years of intervention, about 20% of participants achieved the target of 30
minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity on 5 or more days a week.45 National data indicate that approximately 20% of
US adults report participation in regular, sustained physical activity for
30 minutes 5 or more days a week.1 If interventions,
such as the assistance and counseling interventions in our study, could result
in 20% of the remaining sedentary population also meeting these targets, it
would have important public health implications.
Exercise training with vigorous aerobic exercise has been shown to result
in a 10% to 15% increase in O2max.46
A smaller effect can be expected from physical activity counseling interventions,
such as in ACT, targeting more modest activity intensities. The 5% net increase
in O2max achieved in women in the ACT is similar to increases
in other physical activity counseling trials targeting initially sedentary,
middle-aged women and men.45,47,48
Given the strong inverse gradient of mortality across levels of cardiorespiratory
fitness in epidemiologic studies, a 5% improvement in fitness should lower
mortality risk. Analyses of men have shown that a 1-minute increase in treadmill
time on tests 5 years apart, which is comparable with a 5% improvement in O2max in sedentary persons, is associated with a 9% reduction in multivariable-adjusted
mortality risk.49 In a study that examined
the association between cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality in men and
women, the 20% of women who were the least physically fit were more than twice
as likely to die during follow-up as the women who were most fit.50
The 30% annual rate of musculoskeletal problems seen in ACT is higher
than in other moderate-intensity physical activity intervention trials with
community-based populations of comparably aged sedentary adults.47,48,51
The difference could be due to differences in health status between community
vs primary care samples or to different ascertainment approaches. It is possible
that more musculoskeletal problems were reported in ACT because of the active
participation of primary care practitioners. The 24-month rates of serious
events requiring hospitalization were relatively low (2%-7%) and did not differ
appreciably between the randomized groups. There was no usual care or no-treatment
comparison group, so it is not possible to determine whether all 3 interventions
increased musculoskeletal problems.
In the ACT, the comparison group was the advice group; these participants
received physician advice regarding physical activity, which is recommended
by the US Preventive Services Task Force,7
and patient education materials. It is important to recognize, however, that
many primary care physicians do not follow these recommendations and do not
advise their patients regarding physical activity.11
Since all participants in ACT received physician advice regarding physical
activity, it was not possible to adequately determine effects of physician
advice per se. Given the 6-month fitness increases seen in men, it is possible
that the men in the advice group were receptive to this advice; however, it
would be useful to test physician advice itself further in randomized controlled
studies to determine its effectiveness. The ACT health educators placed in
primary care practices effectively delivered the interventions, and ACT clinicians
were able to incorporate the physical activity advice into their clinical
practice, which they report did not cause a burden.36
The time needed to provide advice was designed to be readily adaptable to
primary care settings,36,52-54
although it is longer than physicians report they spend on exercise advice55 and up to 5 times longer than was found in an analysis
of audiotaped patient encounters in a different sample.56
Compared with the advice intervention, the incremental cost of the assistance
intervention was approximately $500 per participant, and the incremental cost
of the counseling intervention was approximately $1100 per participant over
the 2 years of ACT. It is unknown whether the assistance and counseling interventions
could be incorporated feasibly into primary care practices using existing
resources.
The ACT assistance and counseling interventions demonstrated discernable
success with women but not with men. It would seem advisable to use these,
or similar, interventions for inactive women patients interested in increasing
their physical activity, while delivering physician advice and educational
materials to men, which is the current recommended care.
1.US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon
General. Atlanta, Ga: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National
Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1996.
2.Fletcher GF, Blair SN, Blumenthal J.
et al. Statement on exercise: benefits and recommendations for
physical activity programs for all Americans: a statement for health professionals
by the Committee on Exercise and Cardiac Rehabilitation of the Council on
Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association.
Circulation.1992;86:340-344.Google Scholar 3.Fletcher GF, Balady G, Blair SN.
et al. Statement on exercise: benefits and recommendations for physical activity
programs for all Americans.
Circulation.1996;94:857-862.Google Scholar 4.Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood
Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education
Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High
Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II).
JAMA.1993;269:3015-3023.Google Scholar 5.National High Blood Pressure Education Program. The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection,
Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.
Arch Intern Med.1997;157:2413-2446.Google Scholar 6.National Institutes of Health consensus Development Panel on Physical
Activity and Cardiovascular Health. Physical activity and cardiovascular health.
JAMA.1996;276:241-246.Google Scholar 7.Harris SS, Caspersen CJ, DeFriese GH, Estes Jr EH. Physical activity counseling for healthy adults as a primary preventive
intervention in the clinical setting: report for the US Preventive Services
Task Force.
JAMA.1989;261:3588-3598.Google Scholar 8.US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1997.
9.Woodwell DA. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1997 summary.
Adv Data.1999;305:1-28.Google Scholar 10.Godin G, Shephard R. An evaluation of the potential role of the physician in influencing
community exercise behavior.
Am J Health Promot.1990;4:225-229.Google Scholar 11.Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Physician counseling about exercise.
JAMA.1999;282:1583-1588.Google Scholar 12.Rosen MA, Logsdon DN, Demak MM. Prevention and health promotion in primary care: baseline results on
physicians from the INSURE Project on Lifecycle Preventive Health Services.
Prev Med.1984;13:535-548.Google Scholar 13.Bull FC, Schipper EC, Jamorzik K, Blanksby BA. Beliefs and behaviour of general practitioners regarding promotion
of physical activity.
Aust J Public Health.1995;19:300-304.Google Scholar 14.Wells KB, Lewis CE, Leake B, Schleiter MK, Brook RH. The practices of general and subspecialty internists in counseling
about smoking and exercise.
Am J Public Health.1986;76:1009-1013.Google Scholar 15.Wells KB, Lewis CE, Leake B, Ware Jr JE. Do physicians preach what they practice? a study of physicians' health
habits and counseling practices.
JAMA.1984;252:2846-2848.Google Scholar 16.Orleans CT, George LK, Houpt JL, Brodie KH. Health promotion in primary care: a survey of U.S. family practitioners.
Prev Med.1985;14:636-647.Google Scholar 17.Lewis CE, Clancy C, Leake B, Schwartz JS. The counseling practices of internists.
Ann Intern Med.1991;114:54-58.Google Scholar 18.Simons-Morton DG, Calfas KJ, Oldenburg B, Burton NW. Effects of interventions in health care settings on physical activity
or cardiorespiratory fitness.
Am J Prev Med.1998;15:413-430.Google Scholar 19.Goldstein MG, Pinto BM, Marcus BH.
et al. Physician-based physical activity counseling for middle-aged and older
adults: a randomized trial.
Ann Behav Med.1999;21:40-47.Google Scholar 20.Norris SL, Grothaus LC, Buchner DM, Pratt M. Effectiveness of physician-based assessment and counseling for exercise
in a staff model HMO.
Prev Med.2000;30:513-523.Google Scholar 21.Simons-Morton DG. The context of the Activity Counseling Trial.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.1998;30:1084-1085.Google Scholar 22.Blair SN, Applegate WB, Dunn AL.
et al. Activity Counseling Trial (ACT): rationale, design, and methods.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.1998;30:1097-1106.Google Scholar 23.King AC, Sallis JF, Dunn AL.
et al. Overview of the Activity Counseling Trial (ACT) intervention for promoting
physical activity in primary health care settings.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.1998;30:1086-1096.Google Scholar 24.Blair SN, Haskell WL, Ho P.
et al. Assessment of habitual physical activity by a seven-day recall in a
community survey and controlled experiments.
Am J Epidemiol.1985;122:794-804.Google Scholar 25.Sallis JF, Haskell WL, Wood PD.
et al. Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project.
Am J Epidemiol.1985;121:91-106.Google Scholar 26.Margitic S, Sevick MA, Miller M.
et al. Challenges faced in recruiting patients from primary care practices
into a physical activity intervention trial.
Prev Med.1999;29:277-286.Google Scholar 27.Pruitt LA, King AC, Obarzanek E.
et al. Stability of the 7-day physical activity recall by ethnicity and gender
in sedentary adults.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.2000;32:S328.Google Scholar 28.Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.1982;14:377-381.Google Scholar 29.American College of Sports Medicine. Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 5th ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1995.
30.Obesity Education Initiative Expert Panel. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment
of overweight and obesity in adults—the evidence report.
Obes Res.1998;6(suppl 2):51S-209S.Google Scholar 31.Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.
Clin Chem.1972;18:499-502.Google Scholar 32.Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
33.Dishman RK, Buckworth J. Increasing physical activity: a quantitative synthesis.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.1996;28:706-719.Google Scholar 34.Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN.
et al. Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine.
JAMA.1995;273:402-407.Google Scholar 35.American College of Sports Medicine. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and
maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in healthy adults.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.1990;22:265-274.Google Scholar 36.Albright CL, Cohen S, Gibbons L.
et al. Incorporating physical activity advice into primary care: physician-delivered
advice within the Activity Counseling Trial.
Am J Prev Med.2000;18:225-234.Google Scholar 37.National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, American Heart Association. Exercise and Your Heart: A Guide to Physical Activity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1993. NIH publication
93-1677.
38.Jennrich RI, Schluchter MD. Unbalanced repeated-measures models with structured covariance matrices.
Biometrics.1986;42:805-820.Google Scholar 39.Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis With Missing Data. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1987.
40.Simons-Morton DG, Hogan P, Dunn AL.
et al. Characteristics of inactive primary care patients: baseline data from
the Activity Counseling Trial.
Prev Med.2000;31:513-521.Google Scholar 41.Kriska AM, Caspersen CJ. Introduction to a collection of physical activity questionnaires.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.1997;29:S5-S9.Google Scholar 42.Blair SN, Kohl 3rd HW, Paffenbarger Jr RS, Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a prospective study of healthy
men and women.
JAMA.1989;262:2395-2401.Google Scholar 43.Ekelund LG, Haskell WL, Johnson JL, Whaley FS, Criqui MH, Sheps DS. Physical fitness as a predictor of cardiovascular mortality in asymptomatic
North American men: the Lipid Research Clinics Mortality Follow-up Study.
N Engl J Med.1988;319:1379-1384.Google Scholar 44.Lie H, Mundal R, Erikssen J. Coronary risk factors and incidence of coronary death in relation to
physical fitness: seven-year follow-up study of middle-aged and elderly men.
Eur Heart J.1985;6:147-157.Google Scholar 45.Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, Garcia ME, Kohl 3rd HW, Blair SN. Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical
activity and cardiorespiratory fitness: a randomized trial.
JAMA.1999;281:327-334.Google Scholar 46.American College of Sports Medicine. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and
maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy
adults.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.1998;30:975-991.Google Scholar 47.King AC, Haskell WL, Taylor CB, Kraemer HC, DeBusk RF. Group- vs home-based exercise training in healthy older men and women:
a community-based clinical trial.
JAMA.1991;266:1535-1542.Google Scholar 48.King AC, Haskell WL, Young DR, Oka RK, Stefanick ML. Long-term effects of varying intensities and formats of physical activity
on participation rates, fitness, and lipoproteins in men and women aged 50
to 65 years.
Circulation.1995;91:2596-2604.Google Scholar 49.Blair SN, Kohl 3rd HW, Barlow CE, Paffenbarger Jr RS, Gibbons LW, Macera CA. Changes in physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a prospective
study of healthy and unhealthy men.
JAMA.1995;273:1093-1098.Google Scholar 50.Blair SN, Kampert JB, Kohl 3rd HW.
et al. Influences of cardiorespiratory fitness and other precursors on cardiovascular
disease and all-cause mortality in men and women.
JAMA.1996;276:205-210.Google Scholar 51.King AC, Pruitt LA, Phillips WT, Oka RK, Rodenburg A, Haskell WL. Comparative effects of two physical activity programs on measured and
perceived physical functioning and other health-related quality of life outcomes
in older adults.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci.2000;55:M74-M83.Google Scholar 52.Long BJ, Calfas KJ, Wooten W.
et al. A multisite field test of the acceptability of physical activity counseling
in primary care: project PACE.
Am J Prev Med.1996;12:73-81.Google Scholar 53.Calfas KJ, Long BJ, Sallis JF, Wooten WJ, Pratt M, Patrick K. A controlled trial of physician counseling to promote the adoption
of physical activity.
Prev Med.1996;25:225-233.Google Scholar 54.Marcus BH, Goldstein MG, Jette A.
et al. Training physicians to conduct physical activity counseling.
Prev Med.1997;26:382-388.Google Scholar 55.Sherman SE, Hershman WY. Exercise counseling: how do general internists do?
J Gen Intern Med.1993;8:243-248.Google Scholar 56.Russell NK, Roter DL. Health promotion counseling of chronic-disease patients during primary
care visits.
Am J Public Health.1993;83:979-982.Google Scholar