Context Low cardiorespiratory fitness is an established risk factor for cardiovascular
and total mortality; however, mechanisms responsible for these associations
are uncertain.
Objective To test whether low fitness, estimated by short duration on a maximal
treadmill test, predicted the development of cardiovascular disease risk factors
and whether improving fitness (increase in treadmill test duration between
examinations) was associated with risk reduction.
Design, Setting, and Participants Population-based longitudinal cohort study of men and women 18 to 30
years of age in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA)
study. Participants who completed the treadmill examination according to the
Balke protocol at baseline were followed up from 1985-1986 to 2000-2001. A
subset of participants (n = 2478) repeated the exercise test in 1992-1993.
Main Outcome Measures Incident type 2 diabetes, hypertension, the metabolic syndrome (defined
according to National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel
III), and hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥160
mg/dL [4.14 mmol/L]).
Results During the 15-year study period, the rates of incident diabetes, hypertension,
the metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia were 2.8, 13.0, 10.2, and
11.7 per 1000 person-years, respectively. After adjustment for age, race,
sex, smoking, and family history of diabetes, hypertension, or premature myocardial
infarction, participants with low fitness (<20th percentile) were 3- to
6-fold more likely to develop diabetes, hypertension, and the metabolic syndrome
than participants with high fitness (≥60th percentile), all P<.001. Adjusting for baseline body mass index diminished the strength
of these associations to 2-fold (all P<.001).
In contrast, the association between low fitness and hypercholesterolemia
was modest (hazard ratio [HR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.7; P = .02) and attenuated to marginal significance after
body mass index adjustment (P = .13). Improved fitness
over 7 years was associated with a reduced risk of developing diabetes (HR,
0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-1.0; P = .04) and the metabolic
syndrome (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.7; P<.001), but
the strength and significance of these associations was reduced after accounting
for changes in weight.
Conclusions Poor fitness in young adults is associated with the development of cardiovascular
disease risk factors. These associations involve obesity and may be modified
by improving fitness.
Numerous clinical investigations have established a strong association
between low cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality.1-7 Cardiovascular
diseases (CVDs) account for a large proportion of mortality in adults older
than 45 years.8 Numerous risk factors for CVD,
including hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia, are suspected
to be influenced by fitness,9-13 and
these factors may mediate the association between low fitness and mortality.
However, this proposed association is complex because fitness modifies body
mass, which is also implicated in the development of CVD risk factors. While
previous research acknowledges the contribution of these risk factors on mortality,
relatively few studies have investigated the role of objectively determined
fitness on the development of CVD risk factors in healthy adults.
We investigated whether low cardiorespiratory fitness in young adults
(hereafter referred to as "fitness"), estimated by shorter duration on an
exercise treadmill test, was associated with the development of CVD risk factors
(ie, hypertension, diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, hypercholesterolemia)
independently or in association with obesity. Among participants who repeated
the exercise test 7 years after baseline, we examined whether improving fitness
was associated with a risk reduction.
The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study
is a multicenter longitudinal cohort study designed to investigate the development
of coronary heart disease risk factors in young adults. Black and white men
and women aged 18 to 30 years from 4 geographic areas (Birmingham, Ala; Chicago,
Ill; Minneapolis, Minn; and Oakland, Calif) were recruited and examined in
1985-1986 (n = 5115).14 Participants were reexamined
at years 2 (n = 3800 [84.7%]), 5 (n = 4177 [93.1%]), 7 (n = 3922 [87.4%]),
10 (n = 3804 [84.8%]), and 15 (n = 3550 [79.1%]). The majority of participants
returned to all 5 follow-up examinations (n = 2728 [60.8%]), while 935 (20.8%),
445 (9.9%), 159 (3.5%), and 220 (4.9%) returned to 4, 3, 2, and 1 examination,
respectively. At year 15, there were 132 verified deaths in this cohort. The
top 3 causes of mortality were AIDS (32%), homicide (17%), and unintentional
injury (11%), with only 3% due to coronary heart disease (3 definite coronary
heart disease and 1 definite stroke).
We excluded participants who did not complete the exercise treadmill
test at baseline (n = 214),15 women who were
pregnant at baseline (n = 3), participants who used β-blockers at baseline
(n = 2), and participants who did not return to follow-up examinations after
year 2 (n = 409). In this cohort of 4487, participants with a given prevalent
condition under study were excluded from incident analyses of that risk factor.
Analyses of incident hypertension, diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia
included 4392, 4464, 4272, and 4126 participants, respectively. The study
was approved by the institutional review board and written informed consent
was obtained from all participants.
Fitness Assessment. All medically eligible
participants underwent a graded symptom-limited maximal exercise test according
to a modified Balke protocol.15 Participants
were ineligible for the following reasons: history of ischemic heart disease,
use of cardiovascular medications other than antihypertensives, blood pressure
(BP) greater than 160/90 mm Hg, or febrile illness. The test included up to
nine 2-minute stages of progressively increasing difficulty. Participants
were encouraged to exercise as long as possible to maximal exertion. At the
end of each stage, heart rate and BP were measured.
Fitness was determined based on the duration of the treadmill test.
Participants in the lowest quintile (women: 0.2 to ≤6.4 minutes; men: 1.9
to ≤10 minutes) of sex-specific duration of testing were classified as
in the low fitness category, participants in the 20th to 60th percentile (women:
6.4-8.6 minutes; men: 10-12 minutes) were classified as moderately fit, and
participants above the 60th percentile of test duration were classified as
highly fit. These cutpoints were selected to emphasize the group at highest
risk (<20th percentile) and have been used in previous studies of the association
between fitness and mortality.5,16 Resting
heart rate was measured in the seated position. Heart rate increase from resting
to maximum was calculated as the difference between the standing heart rate
prior to the treadmill test and the maximum heart rate during the test. At
each stage, participants were asked to rate their level of exertion on the
Borg scale.17 Metabolic equivalent (MET) rate
of energy expenditure at peak exercise (equal to a multiple of oxygen consumption
of 3.5 mL × kg−1× min−1) was
estimated.
Fitness testing was conducted according to the same protocol at year
7 (1992-1993) in 2478 participants from the Chicago, Birmingham, and Oakland
study sites (participants from Minnesota were not included because of a protocol
violation).18 In this subset of participants,
changes in fitness were calculated as the difference in test duration between
the year 7 and baseline examinations. Fitness change was categorized by approximate
quintiles in the full sample, the lowest 20% decreased duration (−12
to −2.4 minutes), the middle 20th to 80th percentile (−2.4 to
0.4 minutes) remained stable, and the uppermost 20% increased duration (0.4-8.9
minutes).
Other Measurements. Participants were asked
to fast for at least 12 hours prior to examination and avoid smoking or engaging
in heavy physical activity for at least 2 hours before the examination. Laboratory
measurements of glucose and lipids19,20 were
collected according to standardized CARDIA procedures14 and
processed at central laboratories. After 5 minutes of rest, BP was measured
from participants in the seated position 3 times at 1-minute intervals; the
average of the last 2 measurements was used. Age, race, education, cigarette
smoking status, medication use, and first-degree family history of hypertension,
diabetes, and premature (age <60 years) myocardial infarction were ascertained
by interview. Height, weight, and waist circumference (the average of 2 measurements
at the minimum waist girth) were measured on participants in light examination
clothes and no shoes. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the ratio of
weight (kilograms) to standing height (meters) squared (kg/m2);
obesity was defined as BMI of at least 30. Self-reported physical activity
was assessed by a validated interview–administered questionnaire; activity
scores were computed by multiplying the frequency of participation by intensity
of the activity.21
CVD Risk Factors. The incidence of each CVD
risk factor was identified as a diagnosis of that condition at any follow-up
examination among the sample free from that condition at baseline. Diabetes
was defined as a fasting glucose level of at least 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L)
at examinations 7, 10, or 15 (glucose was not assayed in years 2 and 5) or
the self-reported use of oral hypoglycemic medications or insulin at any examination.
Hypertension was defined as systolic BP of at least 140 mm Hg, diastolic BP
of at least 90 mm Hg, or antihypertensive medication use.22
Participants were classified as having the metabolic syndrome according
to the National Cholesterol Education Program/Adult Treatment Panel III definition
of at least 3 of the following: glucose level at least 110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L);
high BP (systolic BP ≥130 or diastolic BP ≥85 mm Hg); waist circumference
greater than 88 cm (women) or greater than 102 cm (men); triglyceride level
at least 150 mg/dL (1.70 mmol/L); high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol
level less than 50 mg/dL (1.30 mmol/L) in women or less than 40 mg/dL (1.04
mmol/L) in men.23 Participants who reported
using diabetes or hypertension control medications were classified as having
high glucose or high BP components of the metabolic syndrome. Hypercholesterolemia
was defined as low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level of at least 160 mg/dL (4.14
mmol/L) at any follow-up examination.23
Baseline characteristics of the population were estimated by fitness
category for men and women. Trends in covariates by fitness (ie, test duration)
were estimated using F tests. Person-time was calculated from the baseline
examination until each risk factor developed or until the last examination,
whichever came first. Incidence rates (per 1000 person-years) were calculated
using Poisson regression. The proportional hazards assumption was confirmed
using log-log survival plots. We used Cox proportional hazards regression
to evaluate the risk of developing each risk factor by fitness category (using
2 indicator variables) and per-minute decrement in test duration.
We calculated the proportion of CVD morbidity in the population attributable
to low fitness (PAR) with the following formula: Pe × [1
– (1/HRadj)], where Pe is the proportion of persons
with the CVD risk factor (eg, hypertension) who are in the low fitness category
and HRadj is the multivariable adjusted hazards ratio (HR) for
low fitness and that CVD risk factor.24
Next, we tested the association between fitness change over 7 years
and the development of CVD risk factors using proportional hazards regression.
To evaluate whether the associations were similar across race, sex, and baseline
obesity, we included multiplicative interaction terms between each covariate
of interest and fitness and conducted stratified analyses. The presence of
interaction was determined by the significance of the interaction term and
stratum-specific estimates that differed markedly from each other. Because
results were consistent across race and sex, we present pooled analyses. However,
due to evidence of effect modification by baseline obesity, we present additional
estimates specific to strata of baseline obesity.
In a secondary analysis, we performed a propensity analysis25 in which we used a logistic regression model to predict
high vs moderate or low fitness. The following variables were selected to
calculate the score using forward stepwise modeling (P<.05):
age, race, sex, education, BMI, cigarette smoking, family history of premature
myocardial infarction, self-reported physical activity, waist circumference,
and total cholesterol level. We then evaluated the association between fitness
and each CVD risk factor adjusted for the predicted propensity score in a
proportional hazards model. Statistical significance for all analyses was
denoted at P<.05. All analyses were conducted
using the SAS statistical software, version 8.02 (SAS Inc, Cary, NC).
At baseline, less fit women (Table
1) and men (Table 2)
were slightly older than those in the moderate and high fitness categories,
had a lower education level, and CVD risk factors were often less favorable.
Exercise test parameters also varied by fitness category (Table 3). Most associations were consistent with expectations and
similar across sex.
Hypertension, diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia
developed in 648 (rate = 13/1000 person-years), 156 (rate = 2.8), 556 (rate
= 10.2), and 477 (rate = 11.7) persons, respectively. Low and moderate fitness
were strongly (3- to 6-fold risk elevation) associated with the development
of hypertension, diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome and modestly associated
with an increased risk for developing hypercholesterolemia (40% increase)
(Figure 1). Following adjustment
for baseline BMI, low and moderate fitness remained associated with a doubling
in risk for developing each CVD risk factor except hypercholesterolemia, which
attenuated to nonsignificance (low vs high, P = .13).
The number of persons in the low fitness category who developed hypertension,
diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia was 244 (38%),
74 (47%), 202 (36%), and 99 (21%), respectively, and the adjusted PAR of developing
each risk factor due to low fitness was 21%, 28%, 21%, and 4%. There was a
linear relation between fitness and CVD risk factors that remained significant
following adjustment for baseline BMI. The HRs of developing hypertension,
diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia were 1.19 (95%
CI, 1.14-1.24; P<.001), 1.12 (95% CI, 1.03-1.22; P = .01), 1.16 (95% CI, 1.11-1.21; P<.001), and 1.07 (95% CI, 1.02-1.12; P =
.01) per-minute decrement in test duration, respectively. When we adjusted
additionally for weight change over follow-up, the magnitude and significance
of the observed associations did not change.
The distribution of fitness varied by obesity status. Mean test duration
was 10.2 minutes (95% CI, 10.1-10.3 minutes) among participants who were not
obese and 6.7 minutes (95% CI, 6.5-6.9 minutes) among obese participants (P<.001). Only 518 (13%) nonobese participants were in
the low fitness category compared with 352 (68%) obese participants. Similar
differences were observed for moderate (1425 [36%] vs 148 [29%], not obese
vs obese), and highly fit (2022 [51%] vs 19 [4%], not obese vs obese) participants
(all P<.001). Obesity emerged as an effect modifier
of the association between fitness and the development of diabetes and the
metabolic syndrome. Low fitness was only associated with the development of
diabetes and the metabolic syndrome among participants who were not already
obese at baseline (Table 4). Patterns
were similar to those in the total population, including evidence of a dose
response.
In the subset of 2478 participants who repeated the treadmill test,
duration decreased, on average, 1 minute (95% CI, −1.1 to −0.9
minute) between examinations. As expected due to regression to the mean, participants
in the higher fitness category at baseline experienced significantly greater
declines in test duration (−1.4 minutes; 95% CI, −1.5 to –1.3)
compared with participants in the moderate category (−0.9 minutes; 95%
CI, −1.0 to −0.8), or low fitness category (−0.1 minutes;
95% CI, −0.3 to 0). A detailed description is published elsewhere.18
The rates of hypertension, diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia
in this subpopulation were 12.0 (n events = 362), 2.6 (n = 86), 10.0 (n =
306), and 12.5 (n = 293) per 1000 person-years, respectively. After adjustment
for age, sex, race, smoking status, and family history of diabetes, improving
fitness (increasing duration) was associated with an approximate 50% risk
reduction for developing diabetes and the metabolic syndrome, but was not
associated with the incidence of hypertension or hypercholesterolemia (Figure 2). Each minute of increase in treadmill
test duration was associated with nonsignificant reductions in the HRs for
developing hypertension (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.04; P = .63) and hypercholesterolemia (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.05; P = .70), a modest reduction in the risk of developing
diabetes (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-1.00; P = .05),
and a significant reduction in the metabolic syndrome (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93; P<.001).
In the subset of participants who performed the treadmill test at baseline
and 7 years after baseline, participants gained, on average, 7 kg (95% CI,
6.7-7.2 kg) over 7 years and 12.7 kg (95% CI, 12.3-13.1 kg) over 15 years.
Change in fitness was inversely correlated with weight gain over 7 years (r = −0.37) and 15 years (r =
−0.25) (both P <.001). Following adjustment
for baseline BMI and weight change over 15 years, the HR attenuated to marginal
significance for diabetes (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.01 per 1-minute increase; P = .06) and the metabolic syndrome (HR, 0.96; 95% CI,
0.90-1.02 per 1-minute increase; P = .20).
In the total study population (n = 4487), propensity scores were generated
from demographic, behavioral, and clinical measurements. Scores ranged from
0 to 0.98. Propensity score–adjusted HRs for developing incident CVD
risk factors (Table 5) did not
differ appreciably from multivariable adjusted results. The risk of developing
hypertension, diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome remained double among participants
in the low fitness category compared with the high fitness category.
Cardiorespiratory fitness in young men and women, estimated by the duration
of a maximal treadmill exercise test, was inversely associated with the risk
of developing hypertension, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia
in middle age. Our findings were only partly attributable to body mass and
weight maintenance, suggesting that fitness plays an important independent
protective role in the development of cardiovascular risk factors. However,
among those who became obese earlier in life (possibly during childhood or
adolescence), fitness does not protect against developing diabetes or metabolic
syndrome. Increasing treadmill test duration between visits was associated
with a lower risk for developing both diabetes and the metabolic syndrome,
suggesting that 2 very important risk factors for coronary heart disease and
mortality may be modified by improved fitness over time.
Persons who are physically fit maintain a more favorable caloric balance
and lower body weights, both of which protect against the development of CVD
risk factors. Previous observational and trial results demonstrate that leaner
persons and persons who lose weight are at markedly lower risk for developing
hypertension,26,27 diabetes,28 the metabolic syndrome,29 and
lipid disorders.30 A recent meta-analysis of
44 studies of the effect of physical fitness on BP reported BP declines with
fitness training in both lean and obese study subjects. Mechanisms suggested
to account for these observations are reduced systemic vascular resistance,
decreased cardiac output, and decreased plasma noradrenaline concentrations.31
Fitness promotes muscle insulin sensitivity,12 insulin-mediated
transport of glucose from blood to muscles,32 improved
autonomic nervous system function,33 and lower
heart rates, which each decrease the risk of developing diabetes, independent
of body mass. Increased lipoprotein lipase activity in active skeletal muscle,
which results in an enhanced clearance rate of plasma triglycerides; increased
transport of lipids and lipoproteins from the peripheral circulation and tissues
to the liver; and enhanced HDL cholesterol, are mechanisms by which lipids
may improve with fitness.10,34 The
relatively modest association between fitness and high LDL cholesterol levels
in this study may be attributable to the greater contribution of genetics
and diet than fitness to LDL levels.
Our results must be interpreted in light of several limitations. First,
in this study we used treadmill test duration as an estimate of fitness in
lieu of direct measurements of maximum oxygen consumption per unit time (O2). Previous research has demonstrated a strong correlation (r = 0.92) between test duration on a symptom-limited test and O2.35 Next, it is possible that our measure
of improving fitness, increasing duration of the exercise treadmill test 7
years later, may simply reflect increased familiarity with the apparatus among
participants using it for at least the second time. Finally, because physical
fitness reflects the combination of genetics and physical activity,36 fitness may not represent a truly modifiable behavior.
However, the strong association between self-reported participation in physical
activity and test duration suggests that we are at least in part capturing
the role of physical activity participation on health risk.
Our findings demonstrate the importance of low cardiorespiratory fitness
in young adulthood as a risk factor for developing cardiovascular comorbidities
in middle age. Previous work has demonstrated that engaging in a regular exercise
program can improve fitness.37 If the association
between fitness and CVD risk factor development is causal, and if all unfit
young adults had been fit, there may have been 21% to 28% fewer cases of hypertension,
diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. Given the current obesity epidemic and observations
of a decline in daily energy expenditure in the population,38 improving
cardiorespiratory fitness in young men and women and developing public health
policies that encourage physical activity should be important health policy
goals. Substantial public health benefits may be achieved in the prevention
of CVD morbidity by reversing adverse trends in the general level of fitness
in the population.
1.Lee CD, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory fitness and smoking-related and total cancer mortality
in men.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.2002;34:735-739.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11984287&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 2.Lee CD, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory fitness and stroke mortality in men.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.2002;34:592-595.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11932565&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 3.Ekelund LG, Haskell WL, Johnson JL, Whaley FS, Criqui MH, Sheps DS. Physical fitness as a predictor of cardiovascular mortality in asymptomatic
North American men: the Lipid Research Clinics Mortality Follow-up Study.
N Engl J Med.1988;319:1379-1384.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3185648&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 4.Blair SN, Kohl 3rd HW, Paffenbarger Jr RS, Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a prospective study of healthy
men and women.
JAMA.1989;262:2395-2401.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2795824&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 5.Wei M, Kampert JB, Barlow CE.
et al. Relationship between low cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality in
normal-weight, overweight, and obese men.
JAMA.1999;282:1547-1553.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10546694&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 6.Gulati M, Pandey DK, Arnsdorf MF.
et al. Exercise capacity and the risk of death in women: the St James Women
Take Heart Project.
Circulation.2003;108:1554-1559.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12975254&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 7.Mora S, Redberg RF, Cui Y.
et al. Ability of exercise testing to predict cardiovascular and all-cause
death in asymptomatic women: a 20-year follow-up of the Lipid Research Clinics
Prevalence Study.
JAMA.2003;290:1600-1607.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=14506119&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 8.Arias E, Smith BL. Deaths: Preliminary Data for 2001. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 2003.
9.Blair SN, Goodyear NN, Gibbons LW, Cooper KH. Physical fitness and incidence of hypertension in healthy normotensive
men and women.
JAMA.1984;252:487-490.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6737638&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 10.Kraus WE, Houmard JA, Duscha BD.
et al. Effects of the amount and intensity of exercise on plasma lipoproteins.
N Engl J Med.2002;347:1483-1492.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12421890&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 11.Sternfeld B, Sidney S, Jacobs Jr DR, Sadler MC, Haskell WL, Schreiner PJ. Seven-year changes in physical fitness, physical activity, and lipid
profile in the CARDIA study.
Ann Epidemiol.1999;9:25-33.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9915606&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 12.Wei M, Gibbons LW, Mitchell TL, Kampert JB, Lee CD, Blair SN. The association between cardiorespiratory fitness and impaired fasting
glucose and type 2 diabetes mellitus in men.
Ann Intern Med.1999;130:89-96.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10068380&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 13.Laaksonen DE, Lakka H-M, Salonen JT, Niskanen LK, Rauramaa R, Lakka TA. Low levels of leisure-time physical activity and cardiorespiratory
fitness predict development of the metabolic syndrome.
Diabetes Care.2002;25:1612-1618.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12196436&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 14.Friedman GD, Cutter GR, Donahue RP.
et al. CARDIA: study design, recruitment, and some characteristics of the
examined subjects.
J Clin Epidemiol.1988;41:1105-1116.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3204420&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 15.Sidney S, Haskell WL, Crow R.
et al. Symptom-limited graded treadmill exercise testing in young adults in
the CARDIA study.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.1992;24:177-183.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1549006&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 16.Blair SN, Kampert JB, Kohl 3rd HW.
et al. Influences of cardiorespiratory fitness and other precursors on cardiovascular
disease and all-cause mortality in men and women.
JAMA.1996;276:205-210.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8667564&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 17.Borg GA. Perceived exertion.
Exerc Sport Sci Rev.1974;2:131-153.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=4466663&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 18.Sidney S, Sternfeld B, Haskell WL, Quesenberry Jr CP, Crow RS, Thomas RJ. Seven-year change in graded exercise treadmill test performance in
young adults in the CARDIA study.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.1998;30:427-433.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9526890&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 19.Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.
Clin Chem.1972;18:499-502.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=4337382&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 20.Warnick GR, Benderson J, Albers JJ. Dextran sulfate-Mg2+ precipitation procedure for quantitation of high-density-lipoprotein
cholesterol.
Clin Chem.1982;28:1379-1388.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7074948&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 21.Jacobs DR, Hahn L, Haskell WL, Pirie P, Sidney S. Validity and reliability of short physical activity history: CARDIA
Study and the Minnesota Heart Health Program.
J Cardiopulm Rehabil.1989;9:448-459.Google Scholar 22.Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR.
et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection,
Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 Report.
JAMA.2003;289:2560-2571.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12748199&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 23. Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education
Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evalution, and Treatment of High
Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).
JAMA.2001;285:2486-2497.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11368702&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 24.Rothman KJ. Epidemiology: An Introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002.
25.D'Agostino Jr RB. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a
treatment to a non-randomized control group.
Stat Med.1998;17:2265-2281.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9802183&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 26.Juhaeri Not Available, Stevens J, Chambless LE.
et al. Associations between weight gain and incident hypertension in a bi-ethnic
cohort: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord.2002;26:58-64.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11791147&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 27.Stamler R, Stamler J, Riedlinger WF, Algera G, Roberts RH. Weight and blood pressure: findings in hypertension screening of 1
million Americans.
JAMA.1978;240:1607-1610.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=691146&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 28.Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, Field AE, Colditz G, Dietz WH. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity.
JAMA.1999;282:1523-1529.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10546691&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 29.Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, Heshka S, Carnethon MR, Heymsfield SB. The metabolic syndrome: prevalence and associated risk factor findings
in the US population from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey, 1988-1994.
Arch Intern Med.2003;163:427-436.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12588201&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 30.Durstine JL, Haskell WL. Effects of exercise training on plasma lipids and lipoproteins.
Exerc Sport Sci Rev.1994;22:477-521.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7925552&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 31.Fagard RH. Physical activity in the prevention and treatment of hypertension in
the obese.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.1999;31(11 suppl):S624-S630.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10593538&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 32.Perseghin G, Price TB, Petersen KF.
et al. Increased glucose transport-phosphorylation and muscle glycogen synthesis
after exercise training in insulin-resistant subjects.
N Engl J Med.1996;335:1357-1362.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8857019&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 33.Melanson EL, Freedson PS. The effect of endurance training on resting heart rate variability
in sedentary adult males.
Eur J Appl Physiol.2001;85:442-449.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11606013&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 34.Stefanick ML, Wood PD. Physical activity, lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, and lipid transport. In: Stevens T, ed. Physical Activity, Fitness and
Health: International Proceedings and Consensus Statement. Champaign,
Ill: Human Kinetics; 1994:417-428.
35.Pollock ML, Bohannon RL, Cooper KH.
et al. A comparative analysis of four protocols for maximal treadmill stress
testing.
Am Heart J.1976;92:39-46.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=961576&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 36. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General . Atlanta, Ga: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1996.
37.Petrella RJ, Koval JJ, Cunningham DA, Paterson DH. Can primary care doctors prescribe exercise to improve fitness? the
Step Test Exercise Prescription (STEP) project.
Am J Prev Med.2003;24:316-322.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12726869&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 38.Caspersen CJ, Pereira MA, Curran KM. Changes in physical activity patterns in the United States, by sex
and cross-sectional age.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.2000;32:1601-1609.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10994912&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar