[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Figure 1. Adjusted Hazard Ratios of the Association Between Fitness Category and Incident Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors
Image description not available.
Comparison for both models is high fitness category. Model 1: Adjusted for age, race, sex, current smoking, family history of hypertension (hypertension) or family history of diabetes (diabetes and the metabolic syndrome) or family history of myocardial infarction younger than 60 years of age (hypercholesterolemia). Model 2: Adjusted as for model 1 plus baseline body mass index.
*Incident low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥160 mg/dL (4.14 mmol/L).
Figure 2. Adjusted Hazard Ratios of the Association Between Change in Fitness and Incident Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors (n = 2478)
Image description not available.
Comparison for both models is decreased fitness. Model 1: Adjusted for age, race, sex, baseline smoking status, and family history of hypertension (hypertension) or family history of diabetes (diabetes and metabolic syndrome) or family history of myocardial infarction younger than 60 years of age (hypercholesterolemia). Model 2: Adjusted as for model 1 plus baseline body mass index and weight change over follow-up.
*Incident low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥160 mg/dL (4.14 mmol/L).
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population by Fitness Category Among Women (n = 2458)*
Image description not available.
Table 2. Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population by Fitness Category Among Men (n = 2029)*
Image description not available.
Table 3. Baseline Characteristics of the Exercise Test by Fitness Among Women and Men*
Image description not available.
Table 4. Adjusted Hazard Ratios of Baseline Fitness Categories and Incident Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors, Stratified by Baseline Obesity*
Image description not available.
Table 5. Propensity Score Adjusted Hazard Ratios of the Association Between Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors*
Image description not available.
1.
Lee CD, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory fitness and smoking-related and total cancer mortality in men.  Med Sci Sports Exerc.2002;34:735-739.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11984287&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
2.
Lee CD, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory fitness and stroke mortality in men.  Med Sci Sports Exerc.2002;34:592-595.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11932565&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
3.
Ekelund LG, Haskell WL, Johnson JL, Whaley FS, Criqui MH, Sheps DS. Physical fitness as a predictor of cardiovascular mortality in asymptomatic North American men: the Lipid Research Clinics Mortality Follow-up Study.  N Engl J Med.1988;319:1379-1384.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3185648&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
4.
Blair SN, Kohl 3rd HW, Paffenbarger Jr RS, Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a prospective study of healthy men and women.  JAMA.1989;262:2395-2401.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2795824&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
5.
Wei M, Kampert JB, Barlow CE.  et al.  Relationship between low cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality in normal-weight, overweight, and obese men.  JAMA.1999;282:1547-1553.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10546694&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
6.
Gulati M, Pandey DK, Arnsdorf MF.  et al.  Exercise capacity and the risk of death in women: the St James Women Take Heart Project.  Circulation.2003;108:1554-1559.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12975254&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
7.
Mora S, Redberg RF, Cui Y.  et al.  Ability of exercise testing to predict cardiovascular and all-cause death in asymptomatic women: a 20-year follow-up of the Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study.  JAMA.2003;290:1600-1607.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=14506119&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
8.
Arias E, Smith BL. Deaths: Preliminary Data for 2001. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 2003.
9.
Blair SN, Goodyear NN, Gibbons LW, Cooper KH. Physical fitness and incidence of hypertension in healthy normotensive men and women.  JAMA.1984;252:487-490.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6737638&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
10.
Kraus WE, Houmard JA, Duscha BD.  et al.  Effects of the amount and intensity of exercise on plasma lipoproteins.  N Engl J Med.2002;347:1483-1492.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12421890&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
11.
Sternfeld B, Sidney S, Jacobs Jr DR, Sadler MC, Haskell WL, Schreiner PJ. Seven-year changes in physical fitness, physical activity, and lipid profile in the CARDIA study.  Ann Epidemiol.1999;9:25-33.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9915606&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
12.
Wei M, Gibbons LW, Mitchell TL, Kampert JB, Lee CD, Blair SN. The association between cardiorespiratory fitness and impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes mellitus in men.  Ann Intern Med.1999;130:89-96.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10068380&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
13.
Laaksonen DE, Lakka H-M, Salonen JT, Niskanen LK, Rauramaa R, Lakka TA. Low levels of leisure-time physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness predict development of the metabolic syndrome.  Diabetes Care.2002;25:1612-1618.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12196436&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
14.
Friedman GD, Cutter GR, Donahue RP.  et al.  CARDIA: study design, recruitment, and some characteristics of the examined subjects.  J Clin Epidemiol.1988;41:1105-1116.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3204420&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
15.
Sidney S, Haskell WL, Crow R.  et al.  Symptom-limited graded treadmill exercise testing in young adults in the CARDIA study.  Med Sci Sports Exerc.1992;24:177-183.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1549006&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
16.
Blair SN, Kampert JB, Kohl 3rd HW.  et al.  Influences of cardiorespiratory fitness and other precursors on cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in men and women.  JAMA.1996;276:205-210.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8667564&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
17.
Borg GA. Perceived exertion.  Exerc Sport Sci Rev.1974;2:131-153.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=4466663&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
18.
Sidney S, Sternfeld B, Haskell WL, Quesenberry Jr CP, Crow RS, Thomas RJ. Seven-year change in graded exercise treadmill test performance in young adults in the CARDIA study.  Med Sci Sports Exerc.1998;30:427-433.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9526890&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
19.
Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.  Clin Chem.1972;18:499-502.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=4337382&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
20.
Warnick GR, Benderson J, Albers JJ. Dextran sulfate-Mg2+ precipitation procedure for quantitation of high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol.  Clin Chem.1982;28:1379-1388.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7074948&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
21.
Jacobs DR, Hahn L, Haskell WL, Pirie P, Sidney S. Validity and reliability of short physical activity history: CARDIA Study and the Minnesota Heart Health Program.  J Cardiopulm Rehabil.1989;9:448-459.Google Scholar
22.
Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR.  et al.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 Report.  JAMA.2003;289:2560-2571.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12748199&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
23.
 Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evalution, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).  JAMA.2001;285:2486-2497.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11368702&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
24.
Rothman KJ. Epidemiology: An IntroductionNew York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002.
25.
D'Agostino Jr RB. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.  Stat Med.1998;17:2265-2281.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9802183&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
26.
Juhaeri Not Available, Stevens J, Chambless LE.  et al.  Associations between weight gain and incident hypertension in a bi-ethnic cohort: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord.2002;26:58-64.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11791147&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
27.
Stamler R, Stamler J, Riedlinger WF, Algera G, Roberts RH. Weight and blood pressure: findings in hypertension screening of 1 million Americans.  JAMA.1978;240:1607-1610.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=691146&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
28.
Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, Field AE, Colditz G, Dietz WH. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity.  JAMA.1999;282:1523-1529.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10546691&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
29.
Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, Heshka S, Carnethon MR, Heymsfield SB. The metabolic syndrome: prevalence and associated risk factor findings in the US population from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994.  Arch Intern Med.2003;163:427-436.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12588201&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
30.
Durstine JL, Haskell WL. Effects of exercise training on plasma lipids and lipoproteins.  Exerc Sport Sci Rev.1994;22:477-521.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7925552&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
31.
Fagard RH. Physical activity in the prevention and treatment of hypertension in the obese.  Med Sci Sports Exerc.1999;31(11 suppl):S624-S630.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10593538&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
32.
Perseghin G, Price TB, Petersen KF.  et al.  Increased glucose transport-phosphorylation and muscle glycogen synthesis after exercise training in insulin-resistant subjects.  N Engl J Med.1996;335:1357-1362.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8857019&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
33.
Melanson EL, Freedson PS. The effect of endurance training on resting heart rate variability in sedentary adult males.  Eur J Appl Physiol.2001;85:442-449.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11606013&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
34.
Stefanick ML, Wood PD. Physical activity, lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, and lipid transport. In: Stevens T, ed. Physical Activity, Fitness and Health: International Proceedings and Consensus Statement. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics; 1994:417-428.
35.
Pollock ML, Bohannon RL, Cooper KH.  et al.  A comparative analysis of four protocols for maximal treadmill stress testing.  Am Heart J.1976;92:39-46.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=961576&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
36.
 Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General . Atlanta, Ga: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1996.
37.
Petrella RJ, Koval JJ, Cunningham DA, Paterson DH. Can primary care doctors prescribe exercise to improve fitness? the Step Test Exercise Prescription (STEP) project.  Am J Prev Med.2003;24:316-322.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12726869&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
38.
Caspersen CJ, Pereira MA, Curran KM. Changes in physical activity patterns in the United States, by sex and cross-sectional age.  Med Sci Sports Exerc.2000;32:1601-1609.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10994912&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
Original Contribution
December 17, 2003

Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Young Adulthood and the Development of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (Drs Carnethon and Liu); Nemours Cardiac Center and Department of Pediatrics, Thomas Jefferson University, Wilmington, Del (Drs Gidding and Nehgme); Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, Calif (Dr Sidney); and Division of Epidemiology, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis (Dr Jacobs).

JAMA. 2003;290(23):3092-3100. doi:10.1001/jama.290.23.3092
Abstract

Context Low cardiorespiratory fitness is an established risk factor for cardiovascular and total mortality; however, mechanisms responsible for these associations are uncertain.

Objective To test whether low fitness, estimated by short duration on a maximal treadmill test, predicted the development of cardiovascular disease risk factors and whether improving fitness (increase in treadmill test duration between examinations) was associated with risk reduction.

Design, Setting, and Participants Population-based longitudinal cohort study of men and women 18 to 30 years of age in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. Participants who completed the treadmill examination according to the Balke protocol at baseline were followed up from 1985-1986 to 2000-2001. A subset of participants (n = 2478) repeated the exercise test in 1992-1993.

Main Outcome Measures Incident type 2 diabetes, hypertension, the metabolic syndrome (defined according to National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III), and hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥160 mg/dL [4.14 mmol/L]).

Results During the 15-year study period, the rates of incident diabetes, hypertension, the metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia were 2.8, 13.0, 10.2, and 11.7 per 1000 person-years, respectively. After adjustment for age, race, sex, smoking, and family history of diabetes, hypertension, or premature myocardial infarction, participants with low fitness (<20th percentile) were 3- to 6-fold more likely to develop diabetes, hypertension, and the metabolic syndrome than participants with high fitness (≥60th percentile), all P<.001. Adjusting for baseline body mass index diminished the strength of these associations to 2-fold (all P<.001). In contrast, the association between low fitness and hypercholesterolemia was modest (hazard ratio [HR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.7; P = .02) and attenuated to marginal significance after body mass index adjustment (P = .13). Improved fitness over 7 years was associated with a reduced risk of developing diabetes (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-1.0; P = .04) and the metabolic syndrome (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.7; P<.001), but the strength and significance of these associations was reduced after accounting for changes in weight.

Conclusions Poor fitness in young adults is associated with the development of cardiovascular disease risk factors. These associations involve obesity and may be modified by improving fitness.

Numerous clinical investigations have established a strong association between low cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality.1-7 Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) account for a large proportion of mortality in adults older than 45 years.8 Numerous risk factors for CVD, including hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia, are suspected to be influenced by fitness,9-13 and these factors may mediate the association between low fitness and mortality. However, this proposed association is complex because fitness modifies body mass, which is also implicated in the development of CVD risk factors. While previous research acknowledges the contribution of these risk factors on mortality, relatively few studies have investigated the role of objectively determined fitness on the development of CVD risk factors in healthy adults.

We investigated whether low cardiorespiratory fitness in young adults (hereafter referred to as "fitness"), estimated by shorter duration on an exercise treadmill test, was associated with the development of CVD risk factors (ie, hypertension, diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, hypercholesterolemia) independently or in association with obesity. Among participants who repeated the exercise test 7 years after baseline, we examined whether improving fitness was associated with a risk reduction.

Methods
Study Population

The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study is a multicenter longitudinal cohort study designed to investigate the development of coronary heart disease risk factors in young adults. Black and white men and women aged 18 to 30 years from 4 geographic areas (Birmingham, Ala; Chicago, Ill; Minneapolis, Minn; and Oakland, Calif) were recruited and examined in 1985-1986 (n = 5115).14 Participants were reexamined at years 2 (n = 3800 [84.7%]), 5 (n = 4177 [93.1%]), 7 (n = 3922 [87.4%]), 10 (n = 3804 [84.8%]), and 15 (n = 3550 [79.1%]). The majority of participants returned to all 5 follow-up examinations (n = 2728 [60.8%]), while 935 (20.8%), 445 (9.9%), 159 (3.5%), and 220 (4.9%) returned to 4, 3, 2, and 1 examination, respectively. At year 15, there were 132 verified deaths in this cohort. The top 3 causes of mortality were AIDS (32%), homicide (17%), and unintentional injury (11%), with only 3% due to coronary heart disease (3 definite coronary heart disease and 1 definite stroke).

We excluded participants who did not complete the exercise treadmill test at baseline (n = 214),15 women who were pregnant at baseline (n = 3), participants who used β-blockers at baseline (n = 2), and participants who did not return to follow-up examinations after year 2 (n = 409). In this cohort of 4487, participants with a given prevalent condition under study were excluded from incident analyses of that risk factor. Analyses of incident hypertension, diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia included 4392, 4464, 4272, and 4126 participants, respectively. The study was approved by the institutional review board and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Data Collection

Fitness Assessment. All medically eligible participants underwent a graded symptom-limited maximal exercise test according to a modified Balke protocol.15 Participants were ineligible for the following reasons: history of ischemic heart disease, use of cardiovascular medications other than antihypertensives, blood pressure (BP) greater than 160/90 mm Hg, or febrile illness. The test included up to nine 2-minute stages of progressively increasing difficulty. Participants were encouraged to exercise as long as possible to maximal exertion. At the end of each stage, heart rate and BP were measured.

Fitness was determined based on the duration of the treadmill test. Participants in the lowest quintile (women: 0.2 to ≤6.4 minutes; men: 1.9 to ≤10 minutes) of sex-specific duration of testing were classified as in the low fitness category, participants in the 20th to 60th percentile (women: 6.4-8.6 minutes; men: 10-12 minutes) were classified as moderately fit, and participants above the 60th percentile of test duration were classified as highly fit. These cutpoints were selected to emphasize the group at highest risk (<20th percentile) and have been used in previous studies of the association between fitness and mortality.5,16 Resting heart rate was measured in the seated position. Heart rate increase from resting to maximum was calculated as the difference between the standing heart rate prior to the treadmill test and the maximum heart rate during the test. At each stage, participants were asked to rate their level of exertion on the Borg scale.17 Metabolic equivalent (MET) rate of energy expenditure at peak exercise (equal to a multiple of oxygen consumption of 3.5 mL × kg−1× min−1) was estimated.

Fitness testing was conducted according to the same protocol at year 7 (1992-1993) in 2478 participants from the Chicago, Birmingham, and Oakland study sites (participants from Minnesota were not included because of a protocol violation).18 In this subset of participants, changes in fitness were calculated as the difference in test duration between the year 7 and baseline examinations. Fitness change was categorized by approximate quintiles in the full sample, the lowest 20% decreased duration (−12 to −2.4 minutes), the middle 20th to 80th percentile (−2.4 to 0.4 minutes) remained stable, and the uppermost 20% increased duration (0.4-8.9 minutes).

Other Measurements. Participants were asked to fast for at least 12 hours prior to examination and avoid smoking or engaging in heavy physical activity for at least 2 hours before the examination. Laboratory measurements of glucose and lipids19,20 were collected according to standardized CARDIA procedures14 and processed at central laboratories. After 5 minutes of rest, BP was measured from participants in the seated position 3 times at 1-minute intervals; the average of the last 2 measurements was used. Age, race, education, cigarette smoking status, medication use, and first-degree family history of hypertension, diabetes, and premature (age <60 years) myocardial infarction were ascertained by interview. Height, weight, and waist circumference (the average of 2 measurements at the minimum waist girth) were measured on participants in light examination clothes and no shoes. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the ratio of weight (kilograms) to standing height (meters) squared (kg/m2); obesity was defined as BMI of at least 30. Self-reported physical activity was assessed by a validated interview–administered questionnaire; activity scores were computed by multiplying the frequency of participation by intensity of the activity.21

CVD Risk Factors. The incidence of each CVD risk factor was identified as a diagnosis of that condition at any follow-up examination among the sample free from that condition at baseline. Diabetes was defined as a fasting glucose level of at least 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) at examinations 7, 10, or 15 (glucose was not assayed in years 2 and 5) or the self-reported use of oral hypoglycemic medications or insulin at any examination. Hypertension was defined as systolic BP of at least 140 mm Hg, diastolic BP of at least 90 mm Hg, or antihypertensive medication use.22

Participants were classified as having the metabolic syndrome according to the National Cholesterol Education Program/Adult Treatment Panel III definition of at least 3 of the following: glucose level at least 110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L); high BP (systolic BP ≥130 or diastolic BP ≥85 mm Hg); waist circumference greater than 88 cm (women) or greater than 102 cm (men); triglyceride level at least 150 mg/dL (1.70 mmol/L); high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level less than 50 mg/dL (1.30 mmol/L) in women or less than 40 mg/dL (1.04 mmol/L) in men.23 Participants who reported using diabetes or hypertension control medications were classified as having high glucose or high BP components of the metabolic syndrome. Hypercholesterolemia was defined as low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level of at least 160 mg/dL (4.14 mmol/L) at any follow-up examination.23

Statistical Analysis

Baseline characteristics of the population were estimated by fitness category for men and women. Trends in covariates by fitness (ie, test duration) were estimated using F tests. Person-time was calculated from the baseline examination until each risk factor developed or until the last examination, whichever came first. Incidence rates (per 1000 person-years) were calculated using Poisson regression. The proportional hazards assumption was confirmed using log-log survival plots. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the risk of developing each risk factor by fitness category (using 2 indicator variables) and per-minute decrement in test duration.

We calculated the proportion of CVD morbidity in the population attributable to low fitness (PAR) with the following formula: Pe × [1 – (1/HRadj)], where Pe is the proportion of persons with the CVD risk factor (eg, hypertension) who are in the low fitness category and HRadj is the multivariable adjusted hazards ratio (HR) for low fitness and that CVD risk factor.24

Next, we tested the association between fitness change over 7 years and the development of CVD risk factors using proportional hazards regression. To evaluate whether the associations were similar across race, sex, and baseline obesity, we included multiplicative interaction terms between each covariate of interest and fitness and conducted stratified analyses. The presence of interaction was determined by the significance of the interaction term and stratum-specific estimates that differed markedly from each other. Because results were consistent across race and sex, we present pooled analyses. However, due to evidence of effect modification by baseline obesity, we present additional estimates specific to strata of baseline obesity.

In a secondary analysis, we performed a propensity analysis25 in which we used a logistic regression model to predict high vs moderate or low fitness. The following variables were selected to calculate the score using forward stepwise modeling (P<.05): age, race, sex, education, BMI, cigarette smoking, family history of premature myocardial infarction, self-reported physical activity, waist circumference, and total cholesterol level. We then evaluated the association between fitness and each CVD risk factor adjusted for the predicted propensity score in a proportional hazards model. Statistical significance for all analyses was denoted at P<.05. All analyses were conducted using the SAS statistical software, version 8.02 (SAS Inc, Cary, NC).

Results

At baseline, less fit women (Table 1) and men (Table 2) were slightly older than those in the moderate and high fitness categories, had a lower education level, and CVD risk factors were often less favorable. Exercise test parameters also varied by fitness category (Table 3). Most associations were consistent with expectations and similar across sex.

Hypertension, diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia developed in 648 (rate = 13/1000 person-years), 156 (rate = 2.8), 556 (rate = 10.2), and 477 (rate = 11.7) persons, respectively. Low and moderate fitness were strongly (3- to 6-fold risk elevation) associated with the development of hypertension, diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome and modestly associated with an increased risk for developing hypercholesterolemia (40% increase) (Figure 1). Following adjustment for baseline BMI, low and moderate fitness remained associated with a doubling in risk for developing each CVD risk factor except hypercholesterolemia, which attenuated to nonsignificance (low vs high, P = .13).

The number of persons in the low fitness category who developed hypertension, diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia was 244 (38%), 74 (47%), 202 (36%), and 99 (21%), respectively, and the adjusted PAR of developing each risk factor due to low fitness was 21%, 28%, 21%, and 4%. There was a linear relation between fitness and CVD risk factors that remained significant following adjustment for baseline BMI. The HRs of developing hypertension, diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia were 1.19 (95% CI, 1.14-1.24; P<.001), 1.12 (95% CI, 1.03-1.22; P = .01), 1.16 (95% CI, 1.11-1.21; P<.001), and 1.07 (95% CI, 1.02-1.12; P = .01) per-minute decrement in test duration, respectively. When we adjusted additionally for weight change over follow-up, the magnitude and significance of the observed associations did not change.

The distribution of fitness varied by obesity status. Mean test duration was 10.2 minutes (95% CI, 10.1-10.3 minutes) among participants who were not obese and 6.7 minutes (95% CI, 6.5-6.9 minutes) among obese participants (P<.001). Only 518 (13%) nonobese participants were in the low fitness category compared with 352 (68%) obese participants. Similar differences were observed for moderate (1425 [36%] vs 148 [29%], not obese vs obese), and highly fit (2022 [51%] vs 19 [4%], not obese vs obese) participants (all P<.001). Obesity emerged as an effect modifier of the association between fitness and the development of diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. Low fitness was only associated with the development of diabetes and the metabolic syndrome among participants who were not already obese at baseline (Table 4). Patterns were similar to those in the total population, including evidence of a dose response.

In the subset of 2478 participants who repeated the treadmill test, duration decreased, on average, 1 minute (95% CI, −1.1 to −0.9 minute) between examinations. As expected due to regression to the mean, participants in the higher fitness category at baseline experienced significantly greater declines in test duration (−1.4 minutes; 95% CI, −1.5 to –1.3) compared with participants in the moderate category (−0.9 minutes; 95% CI, −1.0 to −0.8), or low fitness category (−0.1 minutes; 95% CI, −0.3 to 0). A detailed description is published elsewhere.18

The rates of hypertension, diabetes, the metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia in this subpopulation were 12.0 (n events = 362), 2.6 (n = 86), 10.0 (n = 306), and 12.5 (n = 293) per 1000 person-years, respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, race, smoking status, and family history of diabetes, improving fitness (increasing duration) was associated with an approximate 50% risk reduction for developing diabetes and the metabolic syndrome, but was not associated with the incidence of hypertension or hypercholesterolemia (Figure 2). Each minute of increase in treadmill test duration was associated with nonsignificant reductions in the HRs for developing hypertension (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.04; P = .63) and hypercholesterolemia (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.05; P = .70), a modest reduction in the risk of developing diabetes (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-1.00; P = .05), and a significant reduction in the metabolic syndrome (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93; P<.001).

In the subset of participants who performed the treadmill test at baseline and 7 years after baseline, participants gained, on average, 7 kg (95% CI, 6.7-7.2 kg) over 7 years and 12.7 kg (95% CI, 12.3-13.1 kg) over 15 years. Change in fitness was inversely correlated with weight gain over 7 years (r = −0.37) and 15 years (r = −0.25) (both P <.001). Following adjustment for baseline BMI and weight change over 15 years, the HR attenuated to marginal significance for diabetes (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.01 per 1-minute increase; P = .06) and the metabolic syndrome (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.90-1.02 per 1-minute increase; P = .20).

In the total study population (n = 4487), propensity scores were generated from demographic, behavioral, and clinical measurements. Scores ranged from 0 to 0.98. Propensity score–adjusted HRs for developing incident CVD risk factors (Table 5) did not differ appreciably from multivariable adjusted results. The risk of developing hypertension, diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome remained double among participants in the low fitness category compared with the high fitness category.

Comment

Cardiorespiratory fitness in young men and women, estimated by the duration of a maximal treadmill exercise test, was inversely associated with the risk of developing hypertension, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia in middle age. Our findings were only partly attributable to body mass and weight maintenance, suggesting that fitness plays an important independent protective role in the development of cardiovascular risk factors. However, among those who became obese earlier in life (possibly during childhood or adolescence), fitness does not protect against developing diabetes or metabolic syndrome. Increasing treadmill test duration between visits was associated with a lower risk for developing both diabetes and the metabolic syndrome, suggesting that 2 very important risk factors for coronary heart disease and mortality may be modified by improved fitness over time.

Persons who are physically fit maintain a more favorable caloric balance and lower body weights, both of which protect against the development of CVD risk factors. Previous observational and trial results demonstrate that leaner persons and persons who lose weight are at markedly lower risk for developing hypertension,26,27 diabetes,28 the metabolic syndrome,29 and lipid disorders.30 A recent meta-analysis of 44 studies of the effect of physical fitness on BP reported BP declines with fitness training in both lean and obese study subjects. Mechanisms suggested to account for these observations are reduced systemic vascular resistance, decreased cardiac output, and decreased plasma noradrenaline concentrations.31

Fitness promotes muscle insulin sensitivity,12 insulin-mediated transport of glucose from blood to muscles,32 improved autonomic nervous system function,33 and lower heart rates, which each decrease the risk of developing diabetes, independent of body mass. Increased lipoprotein lipase activity in active skeletal muscle, which results in an enhanced clearance rate of plasma triglycerides; increased transport of lipids and lipoproteins from the peripheral circulation and tissues to the liver; and enhanced HDL cholesterol, are mechanisms by which lipids may improve with fitness.10,34 The relatively modest association between fitness and high LDL cholesterol levels in this study may be attributable to the greater contribution of genetics and diet than fitness to LDL levels.

Our results must be interpreted in light of several limitations. First, in this study we used treadmill test duration as an estimate of fitness in lieu of direct measurements of maximum oxygen consumption per unit time (O2). Previous research has demonstrated a strong correlation (r = 0.92) between test duration on a symptom-limited test and O2.35 Next, it is possible that our measure of improving fitness, increasing duration of the exercise treadmill test 7 years later, may simply reflect increased familiarity with the apparatus among participants using it for at least the second time. Finally, because physical fitness reflects the combination of genetics and physical activity,36 fitness may not represent a truly modifiable behavior. However, the strong association between self-reported participation in physical activity and test duration suggests that we are at least in part capturing the role of physical activity participation on health risk.

Our findings demonstrate the importance of low cardiorespiratory fitness in young adulthood as a risk factor for developing cardiovascular comorbidities in middle age. Previous work has demonstrated that engaging in a regular exercise program can improve fitness.37 If the association between fitness and CVD risk factor development is causal, and if all unfit young adults had been fit, there may have been 21% to 28% fewer cases of hypertension, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. Given the current obesity epidemic and observations of a decline in daily energy expenditure in the population,38 improving cardiorespiratory fitness in young men and women and developing public health policies that encourage physical activity should be important health policy goals. Substantial public health benefits may be achieved in the prevention of CVD morbidity by reversing adverse trends in the general level of fitness in the population.

References
1.
Lee CD, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory fitness and smoking-related and total cancer mortality in men.  Med Sci Sports Exerc.2002;34:735-739.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11984287&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
2.
Lee CD, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory fitness and stroke mortality in men.  Med Sci Sports Exerc.2002;34:592-595.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11932565&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
3.
Ekelund LG, Haskell WL, Johnson JL, Whaley FS, Criqui MH, Sheps DS. Physical fitness as a predictor of cardiovascular mortality in asymptomatic North American men: the Lipid Research Clinics Mortality Follow-up Study.  N Engl J Med.1988;319:1379-1384.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3185648&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
4.
Blair SN, Kohl 3rd HW, Paffenbarger Jr RS, Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a prospective study of healthy men and women.  JAMA.1989;262:2395-2401.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2795824&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
5.
Wei M, Kampert JB, Barlow CE.  et al.  Relationship between low cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality in normal-weight, overweight, and obese men.  JAMA.1999;282:1547-1553.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10546694&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
6.
Gulati M, Pandey DK, Arnsdorf MF.  et al.  Exercise capacity and the risk of death in women: the St James Women Take Heart Project.  Circulation.2003;108:1554-1559.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12975254&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
7.
Mora S, Redberg RF, Cui Y.  et al.  Ability of exercise testing to predict cardiovascular and all-cause death in asymptomatic women: a 20-year follow-up of the Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study.  JAMA.2003;290:1600-1607.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=14506119&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
8.
Arias E, Smith BL. Deaths: Preliminary Data for 2001. Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 2003.
9.
Blair SN, Goodyear NN, Gibbons LW, Cooper KH. Physical fitness and incidence of hypertension in healthy normotensive men and women.  JAMA.1984;252:487-490.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6737638&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
10.
Kraus WE, Houmard JA, Duscha BD.  et al.  Effects of the amount and intensity of exercise on plasma lipoproteins.  N Engl J Med.2002;347:1483-1492.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12421890&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
11.
Sternfeld B, Sidney S, Jacobs Jr DR, Sadler MC, Haskell WL, Schreiner PJ. Seven-year changes in physical fitness, physical activity, and lipid profile in the CARDIA study.  Ann Epidemiol.1999;9:25-33.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9915606&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
12.
Wei M, Gibbons LW, Mitchell TL, Kampert JB, Lee CD, Blair SN. The association between cardiorespiratory fitness and impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes mellitus in men.  Ann Intern Med.1999;130:89-96.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10068380&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
13.
Laaksonen DE, Lakka H-M, Salonen JT, Niskanen LK, Rauramaa R, Lakka TA. Low levels of leisure-time physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness predict development of the metabolic syndrome.  Diabetes Care.2002;25:1612-1618.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12196436&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
14.
Friedman GD, Cutter GR, Donahue RP.  et al.  CARDIA: study design, recruitment, and some characteristics of the examined subjects.  J Clin Epidemiol.1988;41:1105-1116.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3204420&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
15.
Sidney S, Haskell WL, Crow R.  et al.  Symptom-limited graded treadmill exercise testing in young adults in the CARDIA study.  Med Sci Sports Exerc.1992;24:177-183.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1549006&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
16.
Blair SN, Kampert JB, Kohl 3rd HW.  et al.  Influences of cardiorespiratory fitness and other precursors on cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in men and women.  JAMA.1996;276:205-210.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8667564&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
17.
Borg GA. Perceived exertion.  Exerc Sport Sci Rev.1974;2:131-153.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=4466663&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
18.
Sidney S, Sternfeld B, Haskell WL, Quesenberry Jr CP, Crow RS, Thomas RJ. Seven-year change in graded exercise treadmill test performance in young adults in the CARDIA study.  Med Sci Sports Exerc.1998;30:427-433.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9526890&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
19.
Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.  Clin Chem.1972;18:499-502.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=4337382&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
20.
Warnick GR, Benderson J, Albers JJ. Dextran sulfate-Mg2+ precipitation procedure for quantitation of high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol.  Clin Chem.1982;28:1379-1388.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7074948&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
21.
Jacobs DR, Hahn L, Haskell WL, Pirie P, Sidney S. Validity and reliability of short physical activity history: CARDIA Study and the Minnesota Heart Health Program.  J Cardiopulm Rehabil.1989;9:448-459.Google Scholar
22.
Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR.  et al.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 Report.  JAMA.2003;289:2560-2571.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12748199&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
23.
 Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evalution, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).  JAMA.2001;285:2486-2497.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11368702&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
24.
Rothman KJ. Epidemiology: An IntroductionNew York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002.
25.
D'Agostino Jr RB. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.  Stat Med.1998;17:2265-2281.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9802183&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
26.
Juhaeri Not Available, Stevens J, Chambless LE.  et al.  Associations between weight gain and incident hypertension in a bi-ethnic cohort: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord.2002;26:58-64.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11791147&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
27.
Stamler R, Stamler J, Riedlinger WF, Algera G, Roberts RH. Weight and blood pressure: findings in hypertension screening of 1 million Americans.  JAMA.1978;240:1607-1610.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=691146&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
28.
Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, Field AE, Colditz G, Dietz WH. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity.  JAMA.1999;282:1523-1529.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10546691&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
29.
Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, Heshka S, Carnethon MR, Heymsfield SB. The metabolic syndrome: prevalence and associated risk factor findings in the US population from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994.  Arch Intern Med.2003;163:427-436.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12588201&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
30.
Durstine JL, Haskell WL. Effects of exercise training on plasma lipids and lipoproteins.  Exerc Sport Sci Rev.1994;22:477-521.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7925552&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
31.
Fagard RH. Physical activity in the prevention and treatment of hypertension in the obese.  Med Sci Sports Exerc.1999;31(11 suppl):S624-S630.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10593538&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
32.
Perseghin G, Price TB, Petersen KF.  et al.  Increased glucose transport-phosphorylation and muscle glycogen synthesis after exercise training in insulin-resistant subjects.  N Engl J Med.1996;335:1357-1362.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8857019&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
33.
Melanson EL, Freedson PS. The effect of endurance training on resting heart rate variability in sedentary adult males.  Eur J Appl Physiol.2001;85:442-449.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11606013&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
34.
Stefanick ML, Wood PD. Physical activity, lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, and lipid transport. In: Stevens T, ed. Physical Activity, Fitness and Health: International Proceedings and Consensus Statement. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics; 1994:417-428.
35.
Pollock ML, Bohannon RL, Cooper KH.  et al.  A comparative analysis of four protocols for maximal treadmill stress testing.  Am Heart J.1976;92:39-46.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=961576&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
36.
 Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General . Atlanta, Ga: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1996.
37.
Petrella RJ, Koval JJ, Cunningham DA, Paterson DH. Can primary care doctors prescribe exercise to improve fitness? the Step Test Exercise Prescription (STEP) project.  Am J Prev Med.2003;24:316-322.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12726869&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
38.
Caspersen CJ, Pereira MA, Curran KM. Changes in physical activity patterns in the United States, by sex and cross-sectional age.  Med Sci Sports Exerc.2000;32:1601-1609.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10994912&dopt=AbstractGoogle Scholar
×