Effects of Different Doses of Physical Activity on Cardiorespiratory Fitness Among Sedentary, Overweight or Obese Postmenopausal Women With Elevated Blood Pressure: A Randomized Controlled Trial | Lifestyle Behaviors | JAMA | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.207.108.182. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Navigation Landing]
1.
Blair SN, Kohl HW III, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a prospective study of healthy men and women.  JAMA. 1989;262:2395-24012795824Google ScholarCrossref
2.
Blair SN, Kohl HW III, Barlow CE, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Gibbons LW, Macera CA. Changes in physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a prospective study of healthy and unhealthy men.  JAMA. 1995;273:1093-10987707596Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Stevens J, Evenson KR, Thomas O, Cai J, Thomas R. Associations of fitness and fatness with mortality in Russian and American men in the lipids research clinics study.  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:1463-147015365584Google ScholarCrossref
4.
Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing.  N Engl J Med. 2002;346:793-80111893790Google ScholarCrossref
5.
Gulati M, Pandey DK, Arnsdorf MF.  et al.  Exercise capacity and the risk of death in women: the St James Women Take Heart Project.  Circulation. 2003;108:1554-155912975254Google ScholarCrossref
6.
Mora S, Redberg RF, Cui Y.  et al.  Ability of exercise testing to predict cardiovascular and all-cause death in asymptomatic women: a 20-year follow-up of the lipid research clinics prevalence study.  JAMA. 2003;290:1600-160714506119Google ScholarCrossref
7.
Bouchard C. Genetics of aerobic power and capacity. In: Malina RM, Bouchard C, eds. Sport and Human Genetics. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics; 1986:59-88
8.
Bouchard C, Pérusse L. Heredity, activity level, fitness, and health. In: Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephens T, eds. Physical Activity, Fitness, and Health: International Proceedings and Consensus Statement. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1994:106-118
9.
Oja P. Dose response between total volume of physical activity and health and fitness.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:(suppl)  S428-S43711427767Google ScholarCrossref
10.
NIH Consensus Development Panel on Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health.  Physical activity and cardiovascular health.  JAMA. 1996;276:241-2468667571Google ScholarCrossref
11.
US Department of Health and Human Services.  Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1996
12.
Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN.  et al.  Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine.  JAMA. 1995;273:402-4077823386Google ScholarCrossref
13.
Fletcher GF, Balady G, Froelicher VF, Hartley LH, Haskell WL, Pollock ML. Exercise standards: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association writing group.  Circulation. 1995;91:580-6157805272Google ScholarCrossref
14.
Speroff L. A signal for the future. In: Lobo RA, ed. Treatment of the Postmenopausal Woman: Basic and Clinical Aspects. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1994:1-8
15.
Anderson RN, Smith BL. Deaths: leading causes for 2002.  Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2005;53:1-8915786629Google Scholar
16.
Centers for Disease Control.  Trends in leisure-time physical inactivity by age, sex, and race/ethnicity–United States, 1994-2004.  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54:991-99416208312Google Scholar
17.
Fleg JL, Morrell CH, Bos AG.  et al.  Accelerated longitudinal decline of aerobic capacity in healthy older adults.  Circulation. 2005;112:674-68216043637Google ScholarCrossref
18.
Morss GM, Jordan AN, Skinner JS.  et al.  Dose Response to Exercise in Women aged 45-75 yr (DREW): design and rationale.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:336-34414767260Google ScholarCrossref
19.
Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, Garcia ME, Kohl HW III, Blair SN. Reduction in cardiovascular disease risk factors: six-month results from Project Active.  Prev Med. 1997;26:883-8929388801Google ScholarCrossref
20.
Dunn AL, Garcia ME, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, Kohl HW III, Blair SN. Six-month physical activity and fitness changes in Project Active: a randomized trial.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:1076-10839662676Google ScholarCrossref
21.
 Food intake analysis system [computer program]. Version 3.0. Austin: University of Texas, Houston School of Public Health; 1996
22.
Blair SN, Kampert JB, Kohl HW.  et al.  Influences of cardiorespiratory fitness and other precursors on cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in men and women.  JAMA. 1996;276:205-2108667564Google ScholarCrossref
23.
Manson JE, Greenland P, LaCroix AZ.  et al.  Walking compared with vigorous exercise for the prevention of cardiovascular events in women.  N Engl J Med. 2002;347:716-72512213942Google ScholarCrossref
24.
Hu FB, Sigal RJ, Rich-Edwards JW.  et al.  Walking compared with vigorous physical activity and risk of type 2 diabetes in women: a prospective study.  JAMA. 1999;282:1433-143910535433Google ScholarCrossref
25.
Manson JE, Hu FB, Rich-Edwards JW.  et al.  A prospective study of walking as compared with vigorous exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease in women.  N Engl J Med. 1999;341:650-65810460816Google ScholarCrossref
26.
Stutts WC. Physical activity determinants in adults: perceived benefits, barriers, and self efficacy.  AAOHN J. 2002;50:499-50712465206Google Scholar
27.
Zunft HJ, Friebe D, Seppelt B.  et al.  Perceived benefits and barriers to physical activity in a nationally representative sample in the European Union.  Public Health Nutr. 1999;2:(1A)  153-16010933635Google Scholar
28.
Crombie IK, Irvine L, Williams B.  et al.  Why older people do not participate in leisure time physical activity: a survey of activity levels, beliefs and deterrents.  Age Ageing. 2004;33:287-29215082435Google ScholarCrossref
29.
Dergance JM, Calmbach WL, Dhanda R, Miles TP, Hazuda HP, Mouton CP. Barriers to and benefits of leisure time physical activity in the elderly: differences across cultures.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:863-86812757577Google ScholarCrossref
30.
Booth ML, Bauman A, Owen N, Gore CJ. Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians.  Prev Med. 1997;26:131-1379010908Google ScholarCrossref
31.
Institute of Medicine of the National Academies.  Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2002
32.
US Department of Health and Human Services and US Department of Agriculture.  Dietary Guidelines for Americans6th ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2005. Publication 1-1-2005
33.
Ross R, Janssen I, Dawson J.  et al.  Exercise-induced reduction in obesity and insulin resistance in women: a randomized controlled trial.  Obes Res. 2004;12:789-79815166299Google ScholarCrossref
34.
Kuk JL, Katzmarzyk PT, Nichaman MZ, Church TS, Blair SN, Ross R. Visceral fat is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in men.  Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14:336-34116571861Google ScholarCrossref
35.
Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R. Body mass index, waist circumference, and health risk: evidence in support of current National Institutes of Health guidelines.  Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2074-207912374515Google ScholarCrossref
36.
Ross R, Freeman J, Hudson R, Janssen I. Abdominal obesity, muscle composition, and insulin resistance in premenopausal women.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:5044-505112414870Google ScholarCrossref
37.
Blumenthal JA, Siegel WC, Appelbaum M. Failure of exercise to reduce blood pressure in patients with mild hypertension: results of a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA. 1991;266:2098-21041920698Google ScholarCrossref
38.
Stewart KJ, Bacher AC, Turner KL.  et al.  Effect of exercise on blood pressure in older persons: a randomized controlled trial.  Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:756-76215824294Google ScholarCrossref
39.
Cornelissen VA, Fagard RH. Effects of endurance training on blood pressure, blood pressure-regulating mechanisms, and cardiovascular risk factors.  Hypertension. 2005;46:667-67516157788Google ScholarCrossref
40.
Whelton SP, Chin A, Xin X, He J. Effect of aerobic exercise on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.  Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:493-50311926784Google ScholarCrossref
41.
Dart AM, Gatzka CD, Cameron JD.  et al.  Large artery stiffness is not related to plasma cholesterol in older subjects with hypertension.  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:962-96815031131Google ScholarCrossref
42.
Church TS, Kampert JB, Gibbons LW, Barlow CE, Blair SN. Usefulness of cardiorespiratory fitness as a predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in men with systemic hypertension.  Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:651-65611564389Google ScholarCrossref
43.
Maeder M, Wolber T, Atefy R.  et al.  Impact of the exercise mode on exercise capacity: bicycle testing revisited.  Chest. 2005;128:2804-281116236958Google ScholarCrossref
44.
Pollock ML, Foster C, Schmidt D, Hellman C, Linnerud AC, Ward A. Comparative analysis of physiologic responses to three different maximal graded exercise test protocols in healthy women.  Am Heart J. 1982;103:363-3737064770Google ScholarCrossref
Original Contribution
May 16, 2007

Effects of Different Doses of Physical Activity on Cardiorespiratory Fitness Among Sedentary, Overweight or Obese Postmenopausal Women With Elevated Blood Pressure: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author Affiliations
 

Author Affiliations: Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge (Drs Church and Earnest); Department of Kinesiology, Indiana University, Bloomington (Dr Skinner); and Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia (Dr Blair).

JAMA. 2007;297(19):2081-2091. doi:10.1001/jama.297.19.2081
Abstract

Context Low levels of cardiorespiratory fitness are associated with high risk of mortality, and improvements in fitness are associated with reduced mortality risk. However, a poor understanding of the physical activity–fitness dose response relation remains.

Objective To examine the effect of 50%, 100%, and 150% of the NIH Consensus Development Panel recommended physical activity dose on fitness in women.

Design, Setting, and Participants Randomized controlled trial of 464 sedentary, postmenopausal overweight or obese women whose body mass index ranged from 25.0 to 43.0 and whose systolic blood pressure ranged from 120.0 to 159.9 mm Hg. Enrollment took place between April 2001 and June 2005 in the Dallas, Tex, area.

Intervention Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: 102 to the nonexercise control group and 155 to the 4-kcal/kg, 104 to the 8-kcal/kg, and 103 to the 12-kcal/kg per week energy-expenditure groups for the 6-month intervention period. Target training intensity was the heart rate associated with 50% of each woman's peak O2.

Main Outcome Measure The primary outcome was aerobic fitness assessed on a cycle ergometer and quantified as peak absolute oxygen consumption (O2abs, L/min).

Results The mean (SD) baseline O2abs values were 1.30 (0.25) L/min. The mean (SD) minutes of exercising per week were 72.2 (12.3) for the 4-kcal/kg, 135.8 (19.5) for the 8-kcal/kg, and 191.7 (33.7) for the 12-kcal/kg per week exercise groups. After adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, weight, and peak heart rate, the exercise groups increased their O2abs compared with the control group by 4.2% in the 4-kcal/kg, 6.0% in the 8-kcal/kg, and 8.2% in the 12-kcal/kg per week groups (P<.001 for each vs control; P for trend <.001). There was no treatment × subgroup interaction for age, body mass index, weight, baseline O2abs, race/ethnicity, or baseline hormone therapy use. There were no significant changes in systolic or diastolic blood pressure values from baseline to 6 months in any of the exercise groups vs the control group.

Conclusion In this study, previously sedentary, overweight or obese postmenopausal women experienced a graded dose-response change in fitness across levels of exercise training.

Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00011193

×