APC indicates annual percentage change and it shows trend in incidence over time. aIndicates that the trend is statistically significant.
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Harjutsalo V, Sund R, Knip M, Groop P. Incidence of Type 1 Diabetes in Finland. JAMA. 2013;310(4):427–428. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.8399
Copyright 2013 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
The incidence of type 1 diabetes (T1D), one of the most prevalent chronic disease in children, has increased worldwide.1 The highest recorded incidence in children younger than 15 years was 64.2 per 100 000 person-years in Finland in 2005.2 We examined the incidence rates between 2006 and 2011 in Finnish children younger than 15 years as well as the 32-year trend (1980-2011).
All children with newly diagnosed T1D were ascertained using several nationwide registers as previously described.2 Age-standardized and age-specific annual incidence rates for age groups 0-4, 5-9, and 10-14 years were calculated.
Changes in trends between 1980 and 2011 were identified using the Joinpoint Regression Program version 4.0.1 (National Cancer Institute; http://surveillance.cancer.gov/joinpoint). The study was approved by the ethics committee of the National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland, as a part of the FinDM II database studies. A waiver of informed consent is not required for register-based studies in Finland.
A total of 14 069 children (7695 boys and 6374 girls) were diagnosed with T1D between 1980 and 2011, of whom 3332 were new cases between 2006 and 2011. The peak incidence of 64.9 (95% CI, 59.7-70.3) per 100 000 person-years was observed in 2006 (Table), whereas the mean incidence was 62.5 (95% CI, 60.2-64.4) per 100 000 person-years between 2006 and 2011, 68.4 (95% CI, 65.7-71.9) per 100 000 person-years for boys and 55.4 (95% CI, 52.7-58.4) per 100 000 person-years for girls.
The mean age-specific incidences were 55.0 (95% CI, 51.6-58.6) per 100 000 person-years for children aged 0-4 years, 71.5 (95% CI, 67.5-75.6) per 100 000 person-years for 5-9 years, and 60.6 (95% CI, 57.1-64.3) per 100 000 person-years for 10-14 years. Joinpoint regression highlighted 2 significant changes in the longer-term trend (Figure). After a modest increase until 1988, the incidence increased annually by 3.6% (95% CI, 2.9%-4.3%; P<.001) until 2005, followed by a plateau until the end of 2011.
The encouraging observation in this study is that the incidence of T1D in Finnish children younger than 15 years has ceased to increase after a period of accelerated increase. This may be due to changes in the environment,3 such as vitamin D intake. The amount of vitamin D recommended for supplementation in infants had been reduced to one-tenth since the 1950s, during which time the incidence of T1D increased 5-fold. The fortification of dairy products with vitamin D after 2003 may have contributed to the leveling off of T1D incidence.3
The increased prevalence of overweight and obesity also has been suggested to contribute to the increasing incidence of T1D. Overweight and obesity in children have increased in Finland during the past 2 decades; however, there is no evidence of a decrease in this risk factor since 2005.4 Enteroviruses are possibly involved in the pathogenesis of T1D. The number of severe enterovirus infections in Finland increased 10-fold from 2006 to 2010 and it is likely that milder infections increased as well5; however, the incidence of T1D did not increase during the same period.
The main limitation of this study is that we were not able to compare the changes in temporal incidence in children with older age groups. Therefore, we cannot determine whether the clinical manifestation is only shifted to older ages. The results should be interpreted with caution because it is possible that this is only a temporary phenomenon. Longer follow-up and studies that extend the coverage to older ages are warranted. Studies are also needed in other countries because the observations from Finland may not be generalizable. However, Sweden has also reported a similar plateau in incidence during 2005-2007.6
Corresponding Author: Valma Harjutsalo, PhD, Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Haartmaninkatu 8, PO Box 63, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland (email@example.com).
Author Contributions: Drs Harjutsalo and Sund had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: Harjutsalo, Sund, Knip, Groop.
Acquisition of data: Harjutsalo, Sund, Knip.
Analysis and interpretation of data: Harjutsalo, Sund, Knip, Groop.
Drafting of the manuscript: Harjutsalo, Groop.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Harjutsalo, Sund, Knip, Groop.
Statistical analysis: Harjutsalo, Sund.
Obtained funding: Groop.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Sund.
Study supervision: Knip, Groop.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Knip reported receiving lecture honoraria from Novo Nordisk; serving on the board for Vactech Ltd, a small biotech company developing vaccines against picornaviruses; and being a minor (<5%) shareholder of Vactech. Dr Groop reported receiving lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Genzyme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Merck Sharp Dohme Finland, Eli Lilly, and Medscape; serving on an advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Medscape; receiving investigator-initiated study grants from Eli Lilly and Roche; institutional grants from the Folkhälsan Research Foundation and the Wilhelm and Else Stockmann Foundation; and receiving payment for the development of educational presentations from Medscape. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: This research was supported by grants from the Folkhälsan Research Foundation, the Wilhelm and Else Stockmann Foundation, the Academy of Finland (134379), and the Liv och Hälsa Foundation.
Role of the Sponsor: The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.