[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Staessen  JA, Fagard  R, Thijs  L,  et al; The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators.  Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension.  Lancet. 1997;350(9080):757-764.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Beckett  NS, Peters  R, Fletcher  AE,  et al; HYVET Study Group.  Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older.  N Engl J Med. 2008;358(18):1887-1898.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
SHEP Cooperative Research Group.  Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension: final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP).  JAMA. 1991;265(24):3255-3264.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Institute of Medicine.  Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines-We-Can-Trust.aspx. Accessed November 4, 2013.
Hsu  CC, Sandford  BA.  The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus.  Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12(10). http://pareonline.net/pdf/v12n10.pdf. Accessed October 28, 2013.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine.  Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Finding-What-Works-in-Health-Care-Standards-for-systematic-Reviews.aspx. Accessed November 6, 2013.
Cushman  WC, Evans  GW, Byington  RP,  et al; ACCORD Study Group.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.  N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1575-1585.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Benavente  OR, Coffey  CS, Conwit  R,  et al; SPS3 Study Group.  Blood-pressure targets in patients with recent lacunar stroke: the SPS3 randomised trial.  Lancet. 2013;382(9891):507-515.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
JATOS Study Group.  Principal results of the Japanese trial to assess optimal systolic blood pressure in elderly hypertensive patients (JATOS).  Hypertens Res. 2008;31(12):2115-2127.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Ogihara  T, Saruta  T, Rakugi  H,  et al; Valsartan in Elderly Isolated Systolic Hypertension Study Group.  Target blood pressure for treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly: Valsartan in Elderly Isolated Systolic Hypertension Study.  Hypertension. 2010;56(2):196-202.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Verdecchia  P, Staessen  JA, Angeli  F,  et al; Cardio-Sis investigators.  Usual versus tight control of systolic blood pressure in non-diabetic patients with hypertension (Cardio-Sis): an open-label randomised trial.  Lancet. 2009;374(9689):525-533.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Chobanian  AV, Bakris  GL, Black  HR,  et al; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee.  The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.  JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560-2572.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group.  Five-year findings of the hypertension detection and follow-up program, I: reduction in mortality of persons with high blood pressure, including mild hypertension.  JAMA. 1979;242(23):2562-2571.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group.  Five-year findings of the hypertension detection and follow-up program, III: reduction in stroke incidence among persons with high blood pressure.  JAMA. 1982;247(5):633-638.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hypertension-Stroke Cooperative Study Group.  Effect of antihypertensive treatment on stroke recurrence.  JAMA. 1974;229(4):409-418.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Medical Research Council Working Party.  MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results.  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985;291(6488):97-104.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Report by the Management Committee.  The Australian therapeutic trial in mild hypertension.  Lancet. 1980;1(8181):1261-1267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
 Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension, II: results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114 mm Hg.  JAMA. 1970;213(7):1143-1152.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hansson  L, Zanchetti  A, Carruthers  SG,  et al; HOT Study Group.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial.  Lancet. 1998;351(9118):1755-1762.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Ruggenenti  P, Perna  A, Loriga  G,  et al; REIN-2 Study Group.  Blood-pressure control for renoprotection in patients with non-diabetic chronic renal disease (REIN-2): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.  Lancet. 2005;365(9463):939-946.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Wright  JT  Jr, Bakris  G, Greene  T,  et al; African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension Study Group.  Effect of blood pressure lowering and antihypertensive drug class on progression of hypertensive kidney disease: results from the AASK trial.  JAMA. 2002;288(19):2421-2431.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Klahr  S, Levey  AS, Beck  GJ,  et al; Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.  The effects of dietary protein restriction and blood-pressure control on the progression of chronic renal disease.  N Engl J Med. 1994;330(13):877-884.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Curb  JD, Pressel  SL, Cutler  JA,  et al; Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program Cooperative Research Group.  Effect of diuretic-based antihypertensive treatment on cardiovascular disease risk in older diabetic patients with isolated systolic hypertension.  JAMA. 1996;276(23):1886-1892.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Tuomilehto  J, Rastenyte  D, Birkenhäger  WH,  et al; Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial Investigators.  Effects of calcium-channel blockade in older patients with diabetes and systolic hypertension.  N Engl J Med. 1999;340(9):677-684.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group.  Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38.  BMJ. 1998;317(7160):703-713.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Patel  A, MacMahon  S, Chalmers  J,  et al; ADVANCE Collaborative Group.  Effects of a fixed combination of perindopril and indapamide on macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the ADVANCE trial): a randomised controlled trial.  Lancet. 2007;370(9590):829-840.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
The IPPPSH Collaborative Group.  Cardiovascular risk and risk factors in a randomized trial of treatment based on the beta-blocker oxprenolol: the International Prospective Primary Prevention Study in Hypertension (IPPPSH).  J Hypertens. 1985;3(4):379-392.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Dahlöf  B, Devereux  RB, Kjeldsen  SE,  et al; LIFE Study Group.  Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol.  Lancet. 2002;359(9311):995-1003.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial Collaborative Research Group.  Diuretic versus alpha-blocker as first-step antihypertensive therapy: final results from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).  Hypertension. 2003;42(3):239-246.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Yusuf  S, Teo  KK, Pogue  J,  et al; ONTARGET Investigators.  Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events.  N Engl J Med. 2008;358(15):1547-1559.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group.  The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial: major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic.  JAMA. 2002;288(23):2981-2997.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Leenen  FH, Nwachuku  CE, Black  HR,  et al; Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial Collaborative Research Group.  Clinical events in high-risk hypertensive patients randomly assigned to calcium channel blocker versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial.  Hypertension. 2006;48(3):374-384.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Wright  JT  Jr, Harris-Haywood  S, Pressel  S,  et al.  Clinical outcomes by race in hypertensive patients with and without the metabolic syndrome: Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).  Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(2):207-217.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Lewis  EJ, Hunsicker  LG, Clarke  WR,  et al; Collaborative Study Group.  Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes.  N Engl J Med. 2001;345(12):851-860.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Brenner  BM, Cooper  ME, de Zeeuw  D,  et al; RENAAL Study Investigators.  Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.  N Engl J Med. 2001;345(12):861-869.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Lewis  EJ, Hunsicker  LG, Bain  RP, Rohde  RD; The Collaborative Study Group.  The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy.  N Engl J Med. 1993;329(20):1456-1462.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Mancia  G, Fagard  R, Narkiewicz  K,  et al.  2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).  Eur Heart J. 2013;34(28):2159-2219.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
 Hypertension without compelling indications: 2013 CHEP recommendations. Hypertension Canada website. http://www.hypertension.ca/hypertension-without-compelling-indications. Accessed October 30, 2013.
American Diabetes Association.  Standards of medical care in diabetes—2013.  Diabetes Care. 2013;36(suppl 1):S11-S66.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kidney Disease; Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Blood Pressure Work Group.  KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the management of blood pressure in chronic kidney disease.  Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2(5):337-414.Google ScholarCrossref
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.  Hypertension (CG127).http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg127. Accessed October 30, 2013.
Flack  JM, Sica  DA, Bakris  G,  et al; International Society on Hypertension in Blacks.  Management of high blood pressure in Blacks: an update of the International Society on Hypertension in Blacks consensus statement.  Hypertension. 2010;56(5):780-800.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Gibbons  GH, Harold  JG, Jessup  M, Robertson  RM, Oetgen  WJ.  The next steps in developing clinical practice guidelines for prevention.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(15):1399-1400.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Gibbons  GH, Shurin  SB, Mensah  GA, Lauer  MS.  Refocusing the agenda on cardiovascular guidelines: an announcement from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.  Circulation. 2013;128(15):1713-1715.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Eckel  RH, Jakicic  JM, Ard  JD,  et al.  AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines.  Circulation. 2013. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000437740.48606.d1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Special Communication
February 5, 2014

2014 Evidence-Based Guideline for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Report From the Panel Members Appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8)

Author Affiliations
  • 1University of Iowa, Iowa City
  • 2University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine
  • 3Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the University of Tennessee, Memphis
  • 4Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 5Kaiser Permanente, Anaheim, California
  • 6Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
  • 7University of Missouri, Columbia
  • 8Denver Health and Hospital Authority and the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver
  • 9New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
  • 10University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • 11Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  • 12Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
  • 13University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
  • 14Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
  • 15National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
  • 16at the time of the project,National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
  • 17currently with ProVation Medical, Wolters Kluwer Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota
JAMA. 2014;311(5):507-520. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.284427

Hypertension is the most common condition seen in primary care and leads to myocardial infarction, stroke, renal failure, and death if not detected early and treated appropriately. Patients want to be assured that blood pressure (BP) treatment will reduce their disease burden, while clinicians want guidance on hypertension management using the best scientific evidence. This report takes a rigorous, evidence-based approach to recommend treatment thresholds, goals, and medications in the management of hypertension in adults. Evidence was drawn from randomized controlled trials, which represent the gold standard for determining efficacy and effectiveness. Evidence quality and recommendations were graded based on their effect on important outcomes.

There is strong evidence to support treating hypertensive persons aged 60 years or older to a BP goal of less than 150/90 mm Hg and hypertensive persons 30 through 59 years of age to a diastolic goal of less than 90 mm Hg; however, there is insufficient evidence in hypertensive persons younger than 60 years for a systolic goal, or in those younger than 30 years for a diastolic goal, so the panel recommends a BP of less than 140/90 mm Hg for those groups based on expert opinion. The same thresholds and goals are recommended for hypertensive adults with diabetes or nondiabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD) as for the general hypertensive population younger than 60 years. There is moderate evidence to support initiating drug treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, calcium channel blocker, or thiazide-type diuretic in the nonblack hypertensive population, including those with diabetes. In the black hypertensive population, including those with diabetes, a calcium channel blocker or thiazide-type diuretic is recommended as initial therapy. There is moderate evidence to support initial or add-on antihypertensive therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker in persons with CKD to improve kidney outcomes.

Although this guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the management of high BP and should meet the clinical needs of most patients, these recommendations are not a substitute for clinical judgment, and decisions about care must carefully consider and incorporate the clinical characteristics and circumstances of each individual patient.