TSH indicates thyroid-stimulating hormone; LT4, levothyroxine.
TSH indicates thyroid-stimulating hormone; FT4, free thyroxine; T3, triiodothyronine. To convert FT4 to pmol/L, multiply by 12.871; and T3 to nmol/L, multiply by 0.0154. Thyroidectomy and levothyroxine (LT4) initiation occurred between time points 2 and 3. LT4 adjustment was made between time points 3 and 4. The top, bottom, and middle lines of the boxes correspond to the 75th percentile, 25th percentile, and 50th percentile (median), respectively. The whiskers extend from the 10th percentile to the 90th percentile. The filled squares indicate the arithmetic mean.
T3 indicates triiodothyronine. Mean prethyroidectomy T3 (mean of time points 1 and 2) and T3 at time point 4 (postthyroidectomy) measured by immunoassay are plotted on a single line. Each line is an individual patient. Filled circles and vertical lines indicate mean (SD), respectively. To convert T3 to nmol/L, multiply by 0.0154.
TSH indicates thyroid-stimulating hormone; T3, triiodothyronine.
To convert T3 to nmol/L, multiply by 0.0154. The top, bottom,
and middle lines of the boxes correspond to the 75th percentile, 25th percentile, and 50th percentile (median), respectively. The whiskers extend from the 10th percentile to the 90th percentile. The filled squares indicate the arithmetic mean. All individual postthyroidectomy values are displayed.aP = .01 vs other postthyroidectomy TSH groupings. bP < .001 vs other postthyroidectomy TSH groupings.
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Jonklaas J, Davidson B, Bhagat S, Soldin SJ. Triiodothyronine Levels in Athyreotic Individuals During Levothyroxine Therapy. JAMA. 2008;299(7):769–777. doi:10.1001/jama.299.7.769
Context Thyroidal production of triiodothyronine (T3) is absent in athyreotic patients, leading to the suggestion that T3 deficiency may be unavoidable during levothyroxine (LT4) therapy. However, trials evaluating therapy with combined LT4 and T3 have failed to demonstrate any consistent advantage of combination therapy.
Objective To determine whether T3 levels in patients treated with LT4 therapy were truly lower than in the same patients with native thyroid function.
Design, Setting, and Patients A prospective study conducted in the General Clinical Research Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, between January 30, 2004, and June 20, 2007, of 50 euthyroid study participants aged 18 to 65 years who were scheduled for total thyroidectomy for goiter, benign nodular disease, suspected thyroid cancer, or known thyroid cancer. Following thyroidectomy, patients were prescribed LT4. Patients with benign thyroid disease and thyroid cancer were treated to achieve a normal and suppressed serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level, respectively. The LT4 dose was adjusted as necessary postoperatively to achieve the desired TSH goal.
Main Outcome Measure Thyroxine (tetraiodothyronine [T4]), T3, and TSH levels were measured twice preoperatively and twice postoperatively.
Results By the end of the study, there were no significant decreases in T3 concentrations in patients receiving LT4 therapy compared with their prethyroidectomy T3 levels (mean, 127.2 ng/dL; 95% confidence interval [CI], 119.5-134.9 ng/dL vs 129.3 ng/dL; 95% CI, 121.9-136.7 ng/dL; P = .64). However, free T4 concentrations were significantly higher in patients treated with LT4 therapy (mean, 1.41 ng/dL; 95% CI, 1.33-1.49 ng/dL) compared with their native free T4 levels (1.05 ng/dL; 95% CI, 1.00-1.10 ng/dL; P < .001). Serum TSH values of 4.5
mIU/L or less were achieved in 94% of patients by the end of the study.
The T3 concentrations were lower in the subgroup of patients whose therapy had not resulted in a TSH level of 4.5 mIU/L or less (P < .001).
Conclusion In our study, normal T3 levels were achieved with traditional LT4 therapy alone in patients who had undergone near-total or total thyroidectomy, which suggests that T3 administration is not necessary to maintain serum T3 values at their endogenous prethyroidectomy levels.
The output of the human thyroid gland provides 15% to 20% of circulating triiodothyronine (T3). Nevertheless, thyroxine (T4) therapy, using synthetic levothyroxine (LT4), is the standard of care for thyroid hormone therapy in patients with hypothyroidism. The regulated peripheral conversion of LT4 to T3 in humans has previously been demonstrated.1-4 Such conversion thus makes it possible to achieve normal T3 levels in humans treated with LT4,5 albeit with the necessity for maintaining T4 levels at the higher end of the normal range.6-13 However, prior studies have not compared T3 levels on LT4 with levels previously observed in euthyroid patients serving as their own control, therefore not addressing the question of whether individuals have deficient T3 concentrations based on their own particular thyroid axis set point.
Despite documentation of LT4 to T3 conversion,
there has long been interest in combining T3 therapy with LT4, based on the premise that T3 levels may be lower or inappropriately balanced in patients treated with LT4. It has been suggested that this putative T3 deficiency may be associated with failure to fully reverse the symptoms of hypothyroidism.14,15 Residual symptoms associated with LT4 monotherapy have been hypothesized to include cognitive impairment, depression, and decreased psychomotor performance.14,16-18 A recent study did document decrements in psychological function,
working memory, and motor learning in euthyroid patients treated with LT4.12 However, these patients also had higher thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) values than the euthyroid control patients.
Many diverse human studies have been unable to demonstrate a consistent, objective benefit of T3 combination therapy,
despite initial studies suggesting improved mood and short-term memory with T3 supplementation.19,20 These studies have included randomized placebo-controlled studies,21-24 randomized parallel-design studies,25,26 crossover studies,19,20,27-32 studies focusing on patients with both hypothyroidism and depressive symptoms,22,23 a study of patients with thyroid cancer,32 and recent meta-analyses.15,33 Some of these studies have flaws, such as production of iatrogenic hyperthyroidism with therapy,19,25,27,28 small sample size,20,27,28,30 different TSH levels in treatment groups,29,30 failure to use athyreotic patients,22,25,27 and failure to replicate the normal molar ratio of T4:T3.19,21-23,25,29 Additional problems have included lack of placebo control20,25,27 and improvement in symptoms in the placebo group.21,24,28
The inability to confirm that combined LT4 and T3 therapy is beneficial could potentially be interpreted in many different ways. It is possible that the T3 doses used have been too high and too infrequently administered, or that sustained-release T3 is necessary to simulate normal physiology. It is also possible that assessment tools lack the necessary sensitivity to detect subtle improvements in mood, cognitive functioning, and performance.
Of interest, in 4 of these studies,20,25,27,30 the combination therapy was preferred by patients, despite the lack of a demonstrable benefit. In 3 other studies, there was either no preference29,32 or LT4 was the preferred therapy.31
This study was designed to compare the circulating levels of T4 and T3 produced by the normally functioning thyroid gland with those levels resulting from standard thyroid hormone therapy in the same patient. Thyroid hormone levels were measured before thyroidectomy when individuals were not receiving thyroid hormone,
and again after surgery when they were stabilized while receiving LT4 therapy. We sought to document whether LT4 therapy resulted in lower serum T3 concentrations within individual patients. The null hypothesis was that T3 levels in patients rendered euthyroid with LT4 replacement would not be deficient. The study contained 2 subgroups of participants.
Some patients were administered replacement LT4 therapy,
with their doses adjusted to keep their serum TSH level in the normal range; and others were administered suppression therapy because of a diagnosis of thyroid cancer, with their LT4 doses adjusted to achieve a TSH level below the normal range.
The study was approved by the Georgetown University Institutional Review Board and performed in the General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) of Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. At the first study visit, written informed consent was obtained and participants'
medications were then reviewed. Patient age, sex, and self-reported race and ethnicity were recorded according to GCRC protocol. A medical history was obtained and a physical examination was performed. Recorded parameters included weight, blood pressure, heart rate, thyroid examination,
and neurological examination. Participants had 2 separate thyroid profiles drawn before their thyroidectomy. Two further thyroid profiles were obtained after thyroidectomy and stabilization while receiving LT4 replacement therapy or suppression therapy. The medication history and physical examination were repeated at the end of the study.
The sequence of events for the study is depicted in Figure 1. Patients with thyroid cancer had a delayed progression through the study if they required radioactive iodine treatment. Patients participated in the study for approximately 13 to 25 weeks, depending on their diagnosis following thyroidectomy.
The study was conducted over a 42-month period. Enrollment was continuous during this period, with each study participant proceeding independently through the study.
Participants of both sexes aged 18 to 65 years were recruited from patients referred to the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC,
for total or near-total thyroidectomy for goiter, nodular thyroid disease, suspected thyroid cancer, or known thyroid cancer. Patients who had a current or previous diagnosis of hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism were excluded from the study. Patients who were expected to undergo thyroid lobectomy alone were not included in the study. Any patients who were expected to undergo total or near-total thyroidectomy but whose final surgery consisted of lobectomy were withdrawn from the study. Patients who had changes in their estrogen/progesterone therapy,
oral contraceptives, or other medications known to affect thyroid hormone protein binding in the 6 weeks before the study were also excluded. Pregnant or lactating patients were not eligible. Patients with chronic, serious diseases such as cardiac, pulmonary, and renal disease or who were currently taking corticosteroid therapy were not eligible for study participation. Patients whose preoperative (first or second) thyroid profiles were abnormal were excluded from the study.
Each thyroid profile consisted of a serum TSH level, free thyroxine (FT4), and total T3. Most presurgical profiles were obtained 1 week and 1 day before thyroidectomy. Postsurgical thyroid profiles were usually drawn 8 and 16 weeks after thyroidectomy.
These blood tests were drawn between 8:00 AM and 10:30 AM in a fasting state. The LT4 administration was delayed until after phlebotomy for the postthyroidectomy sampling to obtain trough levels of thyroid hormones. Two separate presurgical profiles were included for each patient to minimize the effect of day-to-day fluctuations in thyroid hormone concentrations, TSH levels,
and laboratory assays. Two postsurgical profiles were performed for the same reason, and also because of the likelihood that the initially selected dose of LT4 would not achieve the desired TSH level. All thyroid profiles were drawn in the GCRC and analyzed by Quest Diagnostics (Madison, New Jersey), LabCorp (Burlington, North Carolina), or Georgetown University Laboratories (Washington, DC).
All 4 thyroid profiles for each patient were analyzed by the same laboratory to minimize interassay variation. Samples were not analyzed in batches because of the long duration of the study, the need to adjust thyroid hormone dosages based on thyroid blood test results,
and the fact that each study participant was proceeding independently through the study. In addition, an aliquot of each blood sample was analyzed for T3 measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Thyroid-stimulating hormone levels were measured using a third-generation ultrasensitive immunochemiluminometric assay, with a sensitivity of 0.01 mIU/L (laboratory reference ranges, approximately 0.4-4.5 mIU/L).
The FT4 and T3 levels were measured by chemiluminescent immunoassays. During the study period, reference ranges were approximately 0.80 to 1.80 ng/dL for FT4 (to convert to pmol/L, multiply by 12.871) and 100 to 220 ng/dL for T3 (to convert to nmol/L,
multiply by 0.0154). Details of the liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay were previously described.34 Anthropometric measures included weight and height. Weight was measured using a DS 504 Ohaus scale (Ohaus Corporation, Pine Brook, New Jersey); height measurements used an Accustat Stadiometer (Genentech, San Francisco, California). Physiological measurements were performed by standard procedures. Blood pressure and pulse rate were recorded after the patient had been in a seated position for at least 5 minutes. Medication history, dietary history,
and medical history were obtained and recorded by using standardized case report forms.
Thyroidectomy was performed at Georgetown University Hospital,
Washington, DC, by a head and neck surgeon experienced in performing thyroid surgery. Any perioperative decisions regarding the extent of thyroid surgery were made by the patient's referring physician and surgeon, without regard for study involvement. Postoperative surgical care, treatment of hypocalcemia, and management of any other postoperative complications were uninfluenced by study participation.
Study participants were all prescribed a name brand of LT4. The particular brand was noted and adherence to the branded product was verified throughout the study. However, not all patients were taking the same brand name. Patients were asked to separate the time of ingestion of multivitamins or calcium supplements from the time of ingestion of their LT4 by at least 2 hours and to take their LT4 at least 60 minutes before breakfast.
Participants were not permitted to take any T3-containing products. Use of Armour Thyroid (a naturally derived thyroid replacement containing both T4 and T3), liotrix tablets (Thyrolar), or any other T3-containing thyroid hormone preparation was grounds for discontinuation from the study. The only exception was the group of patients with thyroid cancer who were temporarily taking T3 (liothyronine sodium [Cytomel]) as part of their preparation for radioiodine scanning and treatment. Patients with thyroid cancer who received liothyronine sodium therapy had not been taking liothyronine sodium for at least 6 weeks before their first postoperative thyroid profile. Postoperative LT4 dosage was determined by the patient's pathological diagnosis. Patients with benign disease were initially administered 1.7 μg/kg of LT4 daily with the goal of achieving a TSH level in the lower two-thirds of the normal range. Patients with thyroid cancer were administered 2.2 μg/kg of LT4 daily with the goal of achieving a subnormal or suppressed TSH level. Absolute body weight,
not ideal body weight, was used to calculate dosage. The LT4 dosage adjustments were made between the 2 postoperative (third and fourth) thyroid profiles to achieve these goals.
Our prospective study involved 2 cohorts of patients undergoing thyroidectomy. The 2 cohorts were patients with benign and malignant thyroid disease and therefore taking replacement or suppressive doses of LT4, respectively. Interventions were performed between time points 2 and 3 (thyroidectomy and LT4 initiation)
and between time points 3 and 4 (LT4 adjustment). Each patient served as his or her own control, thereby reducing the influence of intersubject variability in T3 and FT4 levels.
Statistical services were provided by the GCRC biostatistics core using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina). P<.05 was considered statistically significant.
Statistical analysis showed that a sample size of 40 patients would be sufficient to detect a difference of 6 ng/dL between preoperative and postoperative T3 levels for individual patients with 90% power and α = .05. Data for this calculation were generated from cross-sectional chart review examining the variation between T3 levels in individual patients. Ultimately, a sample size of 50 patients was used.
Statistical comparison was performed to determine differences in FT4 and T3 levels within individuals before and during thyroid hormone therapy. The null hypothesis was that LT4 therapy did not result in any alteration of T3 levels. The FT4 and T3 levels before and after thyroid hormone therapy were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test to determine whether patients had different thyroid hormone levels before and after their thyroidectomy. This nonparametric test was used for analysis because the data were not normally distributed.
A Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was used. Data were also analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance, including a random effect of the individual in the repeated measures model.
The post hoc covariates considered were sex (male, female), gonadal status (premenopausal, menopausal), age, race/ethnicity (black, white,
Asian, Hispanic), laboratory performing the immunoassay (LabCorp,
Quest Diagnostics, Georgetown University Laboratories), surgeon (B.D.
or other surgeon), initial LT4 dose, brand of LT4 (brand name 1 or brand name 2), and year of entry into the study (2004, 2005, 2006, 2007). Candidate covariate testing was performed by using analysis of variance to detect any signal of covariance,
although numbers were inadequate for many of these covariates.
Our study was conducted between January 30, 2004, and June 20,
2007. A total of 142 euthyroid patients were approached to recruit the 50 patients who completed the study. Reasons for declining study participation were time demands of the study, inconvenience of study visits, and lack of interest in research studies. Three patients were withdrawn from the study after initiation. One patient was scheduled for a total thyroidectomy for a substernal goiter, but the final surgery was a lobectomy due to concern about recurrent laryngeal nerve injury.
An additional patient scheduled for thyroidectomy for a large isthmus nodule instead underwent an isthmusectomy. A final patient with a multinodular goiter decided against pursuing thyroidectomy the day before surgery. Fifty patients completed the study and provided each of the 4 required blood samples. No patients were lost to follow-up.
Patients in the study were operated on by 1 of 5 surgeons. However,
78% of the thyroidectomies were performed by 1 surgeon (B.D.). There were no cases of permanent postoperative hypoparathyroidism. However,
1 patient had a unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve injury requiring speech therapy. There were no adverse events such as phlebotomy-related injuries, apparent allergies to LT4 excipients, or clinical signs of overt hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism associated with study participation.
The characteristics of the study patients are shown in Table 1. Thirty-seven patients (74%)
were female and the mean age of study participants was 49 years. A total of 34 participants (68%) were white. Seventeen patients (34%)
had a diagnosis of thyroid cancer. Thirty-four patients (68%) required an alteration in their LT4 dose based on the results of their first postoperative thyroid profile.
There were no differences in blood pressure, pulse rate, deep tendon reflex relaxation, or any other physical examination findings,
other than the absence of palpable thyroid tissue, in postoperative patients compared with their preoperative state. Table 2 shows the mean TSH, FT4, and T3 concentrations during the study. Time points 1 and 2 were prethyroidectomy (the mean of these 2 time points is displayed) and time points 3 and 4 were 2 successive postthyroidectomy assessments. All 4 time points are also displayed individually using box and whisker plots in Figure 2. Data are separated according to whether the patients had a diagnosis of benign thyroid disease or thyroid cancer.
Serum TSH levels were significantly higher than prethyroidectomy values at time point 3, but not at time point 4 (Table 2 and Figure 2). Serum FT4 levels increased significantly at postthyroidectomy time points 3 and 4 compared with the prethyroidectomy time points 1 and 2 (Table 2 and Figure 2). However, serum FT4 levels did not differ between time points 3 and 4.
Serum T3 levels were lower at time point 3 but were fully recovered by time point 4 (Table 2 and Figure 2). Hence, the adjustment of LT4 dosage performed after the third set of thyroid function tests to achieve goal serum TSH levels was associated with normalization of T3 levels. The increase in FT4 concentration associated with LT4 therapy was well illustrated by the significantly increased ratio of FT4 to T3 that was observed in patients after they had been transitioned to LT4 therapy (Table 2).
Serum T3 levels for each individual patient during the study period are shown in Figure 3 for patients with benign thyroid disease and thyroid cancer, respectively.
This plot displays the mean preoperative T3 value and the postoperative T3 value at time point 4 as a separate line for each patient. Time point 3 is not displayed in this plot, because this was primarily an adjustment or transition point. These plots also illustrate the intrasubject and intersubject variability in T3 levels. Preoperative T3 values within individuals can be observed to be both higher and lower than their postoperative T3 values.
After thyroid surgery, patients had different TSH levels, both because of the impact of the calculated LT4 dose on that particular patient and also because of the use of TSH suppression as a management tool for patients with thyroid cancer. A diagnosis of thyroid cancer was associated with lower TSH levels at time points 3 and 4 (P = .003 and P = .002, respectively), higher FT4 values at time points 3 and 4 (P = .006 and P = .01,
respectively), and a higher T3 concentration measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry at time point 4 (P = .04) than a diagnosis of hypothyroidism.
Our conclusions did not appear to be altered by any of the remaining covariates used in the analyses. However, these categories were developed post hoc and, in many cases, there were insufficient patients to examine the effect of the covariate separately. However, study conclusions were affected by the serum TSH level achieved with LT4 therapy.
Despite the use of a weight-based calculation to determine initial LT4 dose, widely differing serum TSH values were achieved postoperatively (Figure 2 and Figure 4). Postthyroidectomy time points were divided into 3 groupings: those with TSH values more than 4.5
mIU/L, those with serum TSH values between 0.35 and 4.5 mIU/L, and those with TSH values less than 0.35 mIU/L (Figure 4). The mean T3 concentration associated with each of these groups is shown for immunoassay and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry measurements, respectively. A significantly lower mean T3 was observed to be associated with the subset of postoperative TSH values more than 4.5 mIU/L, regardless of whether T3 was measured by immunoassay or liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. If postoperative TSH values were 0.35 to 4.5 mIU/L, the associated T3 levels were not lower than the entire group. The TSH values less than 0.35 mIU/L were not associated with higher postoperative T3 values.
Our study was unable to document any deficiency of T3 in athyreotic patients treated with LT4 replacement therapy.
After adequate adjustment of their LT4 doses, these patients had serum T3 levels after thyroidectomy that were not significantly different from their T3 levels before thyroidectomy. Serum T3 concentrations were lower in patients who were taking inadequate LT4 doses. This phenomenon was observed most clearly at the postthyroidectomy time point 3 (Figure 2 and Figure 4). Serum TSH concentrations of 4.5 mIU/L or more were associated with lower T3 levels than TSH concentrations of 0.35 to 4.5 mIU/L. There was a lower mean T3 value associated with TSH values of more than 4.5 mIU/L using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry measurements compared with immunoassay measurements.
Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry is generally known to be a more specific assay34 and,
at least in the case of FT4 measurement, agrees better with equilibrium dialysis than immunoassay.35 This is the first study to document T3 sufficiency using patients treated with LT4 as their own controls rather than using a nonidentical euthyroid control group. Although this information does not directly address the issue of whether patients might feel better taking combination therapy,
it does suggest that such therapy is not necessary to replicate normal serum T3 levels.
Clearly, our study simply documents circulating levels of thyroid hormones and does not measure thyroid gland hormone production or actual tissue levels. With respect to thyroid hormone tissue concentrations,
a 1996 study36 showed that tissue T3 levels were lower in rats treated with LT4 than in rats treated with combination therapy. We cannot exclude the possibility that cerebral T3 levels were lower in our participants during their LT4 therapy. However, there is no a priori reason to suspect this, given that serum T3 levels remained the same. It could, admittedly, be hypothesized that cerebral production of T3 by deiodinases could be down-regulated by the high-circulating FT4 levels associated with the LT4-treated state. In this prior animal study,
a dose of LT4 that normalized serum TSH was not studied.
However, an earlier study37 did demonstrate in rats that a higher dose of LT4 that produced both normal serum TSH and normal serum T3 concentrations could be used.
If a higher dose of LT4 had been unable to normalize serum TSH and serum T3 in rats, this would be in contrast with the results from our study. The possibility remains that interspecies differences, such as the greater magnitude of thyroidal T3 production in rats, would allow LT4 therapy to produce tissue euthyroidism in humans but not rodents.
The FT4 or T4 levels have been demonstrated to be higher in euthyroid patients treated with LT4 than in euthyroid controls in previous studies in humans.6-13 In our study, we found that within the same patient, FT4 levels were higher after thyroidectomy than before thyroidectomy.
Our data confirm that higher FT4 levels are a characteristic of LT4 monotherapy. Furthermore, we postulate based on our data that this is necessary to normalize TSH and serum T3 levels and thereby achieve euthyroidism. Whether there are adverse consequences of increased FT4 levels, even when they are not accompanied by decreased serum TSH concentrations, remains to be investigated in future studies.
A potential limitation of our study is that the patients with benign thyroid disease had varying amounts of remnant thyroid tissue.
However, it would seem unlikely that such thyroid remnants would function sufficiently to mask the ability to detect a decrement in T3 concentrations with LT4 replacement. Analysis included diagnosis as a covariate and patients with thyroid cancer, all of whom underwent remnant ablation with radioactive iodine, did not have lower postoperative T3 levels compared with patients with hypothyroidism. This suggests that residual thyroid tissue was not contributing significantly to maintenance of circulating T3 levels in patients with benign disease. This is in contrast with the findings from a previous study20 in which some benefits of T3 combination therapy were noted in the subgroup of patients with a diagnosis of thyroid cancer.
However, patients with thyroid cancer were compared with those with Hashimoto's hypothyroidism, whereas all our study participants had surgically induced hypothyroidism. Admittedly, another variable of a lower serum TSH level was also present in our patients with thyroid cancer. Subgroup analysis, however, showed that having a TSH level suppressed to less than 0.35 mIU/L did not raise postoperative T3 levels beyond those observed in the group with TSH levels of 0.35 to 4.5 mIU/L (Figure 4).
Another potential limitation of our study is that it had a long duration. It is possible that temporal changes in variables such as laboratory assays, surgeon procedures, LT4 formulation,
and other factors could increase the variation in the measured hormones and thereby decrease the ability to detect changes in T3 levels. However, including the year of entry into the study as a covariate did not alter study conclusions.
Our study did not examine satisfaction with LT4 therapy.
It was thought to be impossible to discern whether symptoms developing since LT4 initiation were due to recent major surgery,
thyroid cancer treatment, or the LT4 therapy itself. However,
we were unable to demonstrate different serum T3 levels in patients treated with LT4 therapy, when their therapy had been adjusted to achieve their target TSH levels, or when their TSH levels were less than 4.5 mIU/L. Based on this fact, there is no reason to hypothesize that patient dissatisfaction with LT4 treatment is due to inability to achieve the same serum T3 concentrations that are present in individuals with normal endogenous thyroid function. Certainly, declines in psychological and cognitive performance have been documented in euthyroid patients treated with LT4, even though as a group these patients had a mean TSH level of 2.6 mIU/L.12 Possibly, there is some characteristic of LT4 therapy that does not fully replicate an important but as yet unidentified aspect of normal thyroid physiology. For example, it is possible that there is some differential regulation of and thereby different fluctuation in T3 levels in endogenous function that is not replicated with LT4 replacement. There might, therefore, be some use in evaluating patient satisfaction, psychological functioning, and motor performance during therapy with a sustained-release T3 preparation, which might more closely replicate normal physiology.
Patients receiving LT4 therapy also clearly have higher FT4 / T3 ratios than the ratios that were characteristic of their period of endogenous thyroid function.
It is also possible that the high concentration of FT4 that is necessary for normalization of T3 levels during LT4 therapy is associated by some unappreciated mechanism with an adverse impact on patients.
Circulating T3 levels have been shown to be lower in individuals carrying certain deiodinase polymorphisms in some studies.38,39 A subgroup of patients who remain dissatisfied with their LT4 therapy may be individuals who carry a specific deiodinase polymorphism. It is possible that combination LT4-T3 therapy may be beneficial in these rare cases. We postulate that these deiodinase polymorphisms were probably not present in our small 50-patient sample, although some outlier T3 values were observed (Figure 3). Only the group of patients with TSH levels higher than 4.5 mIU/L had T3 levels lower than other groups of patients treated with LT4. It would be more logical to assume that the T3 deficiency in this group was caused by suboptimum LT4 therapy rather than the presence of a deiodinase polymorphism.
Based on our study results, it would appear reasonable to advise individual patients that physiological T3 levels can indeed be replicated with LT4 therapy. If it is assumed that maintenance of normal T3 concentrations correlates with satisfactory replacement therapy, our results could provide one possible explanation for the failure of multiple studies to demonstrate a benefit of T3 combination therapy. Our study, however, is limited by the fact that we did not document patients' symptoms. If adequate serum T3 levels were also correlated with patient satisfaction or well-being, this would support the commonly held belief that LT4 should remain the standard therapy for hypothyroidism and thyroid cancer.
Corresponding Author: Jacqueline Jonklaas, MD, PhD, Division of Endocrinology, Georgetown University Hospital, Ste 232, Bldg D, 4000 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007
Author Contributions: Dr Jonklaas had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: Jonklaas.
Acquisition of data: Jonklaas, Davidson,
Analysis and interpretation of data: Jonklaas, Soldin.
Drafting of the manuscript: Jonklaas,
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Jonklaas, Davidson, Bhagat, Soldin.
Statistical analysis: Jonklaas.
Obtained funding: Jonklaas, Soldin.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Jonklaas, Soldin.
Study supervision: Jonklaas, Davidson,
Financial Disclosures: None reported.
Funding/Support: This study was conducted through the General Clinical Research Center at Georgetown University and supported by grant M01-RR-023942-01 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This study was also supported by grant K23 RR16524
from the NCRR (Dr Jonklaas) and partially supported by grant M01-RR-020359
from the NIH (Dr Soldin), and by Applied Biosystems/Sciex.
Role of the Sponsor: The role of the NCRR and NIH was to approve the relevant grant and provide funding for the study. Applied Biosystems/Sciex had no role in the design and conduct of the study, in the collection, management, analysis,
and interpretation of the data, or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NCRR or NIH.
Previous Presentation: Presented in part as a “Short Call” abstract at the 78th Annual Meeting of the American Thyroid Association; October 5, 2007; New York, New York.
Additional Contributions: We gratefully acknowledge the dedication of the General Clinical Research Center nursing staff and the generosity of the study participants, without which this study could not have been completed.
Create a personal account or sign in to: