Context Bisphenol A (BPA) is widely used in epoxy resins lining food and beverage containers. Evidence of effects in animals has generated concern over low-level chronic exposures in humans.
Objective To examine associations between urinary BPA concentrations and adult health status.
Design, Setting, and Participants Cross-sectional analysis of BPA concentrations and health status in the general adult population of the United States, using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2004. Participants were 1455 adults aged 18 through 74 years with measured urinary BPA and urine creatinine concentrations. Regression models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, income, smoking, body mass index, waist circumference, and urinary creatinine concentration. The sample provided 80% power to detect unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) of 1.4 for diagnoses of 5% prevalence per 1-SD change in BPA concentration, or standardized regression coefficients of 0.075 for liver enzyme concentrations, at a significance level of P < .05.
Main Outcome Measures Chronic disease diagnoses plus blood markers of liver function, glucose homeostasis, inflammation, and lipid changes.
Results Higher urinary BPA concentrations were associated with cardiovascular diagnoses in age-, sex-, and fully adjusted models (OR per 1-SD increase in BPA concentration, 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.63; P = .001 with full adjustment). Higher BPA concentrations were also associated with diabetes (OR per 1-SD increase in BPA concentration, 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.60; P < .001) but not with other studied common diseases. In addition, higher BPA concentrations were associated with clinically abnormal concentrations of the liver enzymes γ-glutamyltransferase (OR per 1-SD increase in BPA concentration, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.14-1.46; P < .001) and alkaline phosphatase (OR per 1-SD increase in BPA concentration, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18-1.85; P = .002).
Conclusion Higher BPA exposure, reflected in higher urinary concentrations of BPA, may be associated with avoidable morbidity in the community-dwelling adult population.
Conclusion Published online September 16, 2008 (doi:10.1001/jama.300.11.1303).
Bisphenol A (BPA) is one of the world's highest production–volume chemicals, with more than 2 million metric tons produced worldwide in 2003 and annual increase in demand of 6% to 10% annually.1 Bisphenol A is used extensively in epoxy resins lining food and beverage containers and as a monomer in polycarbonate plastics in many consumer products. Widespread and continuous exposure to BPA, primarily through food but also through drinking water, dental sealants, dermal exposure, and inhalation of household dusts, is evident from the presence of detectable levels of BPA in more than 90% of the US population.2-4
Most studies of the health effects of BPA have focused on well-documented estrogenic activity,5 but reports have highlighted additional modes of action,6 including liver damage,7-11 disrupted pancreatic β-cell function,12 thyroid hormone disruption,13 and obesity-promoting effects.14 The potential for low-dose effects15 has added to the controversy about possible hazards and whether currently recommended exposure thresholds require revision.16-19
Debate about the health effects of BPA in humans has been hindered by the lack of epidemiologic data of sufficient statistical power to detect low-dose effects.4 The US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2004 recently released the only large-scale data on urinary BPA concentrations.20 Because orally administered BPA is rapidly and completely excreted, urine is considered the body fluid most appropriate for assessment of BPA exposure.21 The highly water-soluble major BPA metabolite, BPA-monoglucuronide, is formed in the gut wall and liver and is rapidly removed from the blood by the kidneys, with terminal half-lives of less than 6 hours after oral administration.21
Given the previous animal evidence, we hypothesized that higher urinary BPA concentrations would be associated with adverse health effects, especially in the liver and in relation to insulin, type 2 diabetes, and obesity in humans. Because of the paucity of direct human evidence, however, we undertook analyses of all 8 of the reported major diagnostic groupings available in the NHANES 2003-2004 data (including cardiovascular and respiratory conditions for which 3 questions each are available on subdiagnoses). We also examined a preselected list of 8 blood-based clinical measures reflecting liver function, glucose homeostasis, inflammation, and lipid changes.
Data were from NHANES 2003-2004.22 NHANES surveys assess the health and diet of the noninstitutionalized US population and are administered by the National Center for Health Statistics. NHANES was approved by the National Centers for Health Statistics institutional review board, and all participants provide written informed consent.
Assessment of BPA Concentrations
NHANES includes biomonitoring for exposure to a range of environmental toxins.23 A one-third random subset of NHANES 2003-2004 participants supplied urine samples that were then analyzed for BPA concentration. A spot urine sample was collected from each participant. Total (free and conjugated) urinary concentrations of BPA were measured at the Division of Environmental Health Laboratory Sciences (National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) using online solid-phase extraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography– isotope-dilution tandem mass spectrometry with peak focusing. A comprehensive quality control system, including reagent blanks, was used to ensure that samples were not contaminated during handling, storage, and analysis.24 For BPA concentrations below the level of detection (116/1455 [8%]), a value of 0.3 ng/mL was assigned by NHANES; we used this value in our analyses.
Participants aged 20 years and older were asked “Has a doctor or other health professional ever told you that you have . . . .” for angina, arthritis, asthma, cancer, chronic bronchitis, coronary heart disease, emphysema, heart attack, liver disease (any kind), stroke, or thyroid disease. Participants 18 years and older were asked about asthma and diabetes. Because of low numbers, emphysema (n = 20) was combined with chronic bronchitis. Similarly, we combined diagnosed and borderline diabetes and grouped the cardiovascular conditions (reported angina, coronary heart disease, and heart attack). We included all available common conditions (ie, those with ≥40 cases) in the analyses, covering 8 major disease categories after grouping.
We analyzed concentrations of the following 8 blood serum analytes: C-reactive protein, quantified using latex-enhanced nephelometry; γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT), using an enzymatic rate method; lactate dehydrogenase, using an enzymatic rate method; alkaline phosphatase, using a 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol buffer; triglycerides, measured enzymatically following hydrolysis; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), calculated from measured values of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; fasting glucose, using spectrophotometric measurement of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide concentration; and fasting insulin, using a 2-site immunoenzymometric assay. Details of analyte extraction and measurement are available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm.
Two derived glucose homeostasis indices were used: steady-state β-cell function, calculated from fasting levels of glucose and insulin using the computerized version of the updated homeostasis model assessment (HOMA2),25 and HOMA2 insulin resistance, the reciprocal of insulin sensitivity, also calculated using the HOMA2 model.
NHANES 2003-2004 used a complex cluster sample design, with some demographic groups (including Mexican Americans and groups in low socioeconomic positions) oversampled to ensure adequate representation. To account for this complex sampling, weighted estimates of population parameters were computed, following the NHANES Analytic and Reporting Guidelines (September 2006). For most analyses, population weights for the BPA measurement sample (subsample C of the medical examination) were used. Sampling errors were estimated by the Taylor series (linearization) method to account for stratification and clustering using the provided “masked variance pseudo-psu” and “pseudo-stratum” variables. This procedure produced the same geometric mean and variance estimates as those published by the National Center for Environmental Health3 (ie, geometric mean BPA concentrations for age group 20 to 59 years, 2.6 μg/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3 to 2.9). Data on levels of LDL-C, glucose, and insulin were available in a random subsample assigned to fast (n = 653); for these analyses, a specific fasting specimen weight was used as directed. Analyses were conducted by 3 authors (I.A.L., W.E.H., D.M.) using Stata SE version 9.2 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas); P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
Using the sample weights in a classical design-based analysis of survey data provides asymptotically unbiased estimates of population parameters but can lead to inefficiency (ie, inflation of standard errors).26 An overall inefficiency coefficient of 34% was calculated for our NHANES 2003-2004 BPA data set using equation 3.7 in Korn and Graubard.26 To assess the sensitivity of our findings to the weighting method, we repeated all analyses using a partial weighting approach in which the unweighted regression model was augmented with exogenous design variables.26 There were no substantive changes in the model inferences (eSupplement).
Because the diseases of interest are rare in children, we restricted our analyses to respondents aged 18 through 74 years (of those randomly selected by NHANES 2003-2004 for measurement of BPA concentration) to focus on health effects in adults. The upper age cutoff was chosen to minimize problems of comorbidity and nonrepresentation of seniors in institutions. We excluded 1 respondent because of a missing urinary creatinine concentration, resulting in an included sample of 1455 respondents.
We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of physician-diagnosed diseases (as the dependent variable) per 1-SD increase in BPA concentrations and used linear regression to estimate associations between logged levels of blood analytes and standardized BPA concentrations.
Regression models were adjusted for a broad range of potential confounders, including socioeconomic factors that Calafat et al3 have shown to be associated with BPA and urinary creatinine concentrations.27 Variables included were race/ethnicity (from self-description and categorized into Mexican American, other Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and other race [including multiracial]); education (categorized as <high school, high school diploma [including General Educational Development], and >high school); annual household income (in 3 approximately equal-sized categories [<$25 000, $25 000-$55 000, and >$55 000], plus a fourth category for missing values [n = 92]); smoking (from self-reported status and categorized as never smoked, former smoker, smoking some days, and smoking every day, plus unknown, because the questions were asked of those aged ≥20 years [n = 177]); body mass index (BMI) (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared and categorized as underweight [<18.5], recommended weight [18.5-24.9], overweight [25.0-29.9], obese I [30.0-34.9], or obese II [≥35.0], with a final category for participants with missing values [n = 25]); waist circumference (in quintiles, with n = 60 in a group with missing values); and urinary creatinine concentration in mg/dL.
We carried out 5 sets of sensitivity analyses, which were identified post hoc to test the robustness of our findings. First, to assess whether increased levels of liver enzymes reflect normal induction of enzymes or a clinically relevant abnormality, we used NHANES reference ranges, established from wellness participants with an age mix similar to that of NHANES participants. Ranges were 36 to 113 U/L for alkaline phosphatase, 93 to 198 U/L for lactate dehydrogenase, and 10 to 65 U/L for GGT in men and 8 to 36 U/L in women (to convert values for all 3 analytes to μkat/L, multiply by 0.0167).28 Second, to investigate whether the presence of the diseases found to be associated with BPA concentrations might have been associated with altered BPA exposure (perhaps through greater consumption of sugar-free foods or drinks from plastic containers by individuals trying to manage their obesity or diabetes), we examined associations of BPA with increased levels of liver enzymes in respondents in 2 subgroups: those reporting neither cardiovascular disease nor diabetes, and those with BMI less than 25. Third, because alcohol intake might confound associations of BPA concentration with increased levels of liver enzymes, we conducted our analyses again including data on self-reported daily alcohol consumption. Fourth, we tested whether the association between BPA concentrations and cardiovascular disease was robust to adjustment for the effects of lipid levels (LDL-C and triglycerides). Fifth, to explore the possibility that our findings were due to higher exposure to a wider set of xenoestrogenic compounds and not specific to BPA concentrations, we repeated our models including other known xenoestrogenic compounds.
We also have explored a range of alternative approaches to accounting for the sampling design, the skewed distribution of BPA concentrations, and the correction of urinary creatinine concentrations (eSupplement).
Power calculations for presence of diagnoses were conducted using the approach proposed by Hsieh et al29 for simple logistic regression models. For continuous outcomes, the power calculations were performed using the PS power and sample size program.30,31 The sample provided 80% power to detect unadjusted ORs of 1.4 for diagnoses of 5% prevalence per 1-SD change in BPA concentration (or, for 10% prevalence, unadjusted ORs of 1.3). For liver enzymes and insulin, the detectable effect sizes for 80% power are given by standardized regression coefficients of 0.075 and 0.11, respectively.
The study sample included 694 men and 761 women (Table 1). Weighted but unadjusted mean urinary BPA concentrations were similar by sex, but for some variables ranges were wider. For example, mean BPA concentrations in participants at recommended weight (BMI 18.5-24.9) were 3.91 ng/mL (95% CI, 3.34 to 4.48), compared with 6.93 ng/mL (95% CI, 4.39 to 9.47) in those in the obese II category (BMI ≥35).
Weighted mean BPA concentrations adjusted for age and sex (Figure) appeared higher in those who reported diagnoses of cardiovascular diseases (including coronary heart disease, heart attack, and angina) and diabetes. To explore this further, we estimated the ORs of reporting a diagnosis of these conditions by z scores of BPA concentration, using adjusted logistic regression models including age, sex, and urinary creatinine concentrations and fully adjusted models including these covariates plus race/ethnicity, education, income, smoking, BMI, and waist circumference (Table 2). Overall, patterns of linear association in all models were similar to those in the Figure. A 1-SD increase in BPA concentration was associated with increased ORs of reporting cardiovascular disease (angina, coronary heart disease, or heart attack combined) (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.63; P = .001 with full adjustment) and diabetes (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.60; P < .001). Associations with the individual cardiovascular diagnoses were all significant. No associations with the other diagnoses were observed.
When using an alternative exposure metric of dividing BPA concentrations into quartiles in the fully adjusted models, participants in the highest BPA concentration quartile had an OR of 2.89 (95% CI, 1.07 to 7.78; P = .04) for cardiovascular disease compared with those in the lowest quartile. Similarly, those in the highest BPA concentration quartile had an OR of 2.43 (95% CI, 1.35 to 4.38; P = .006) for diabetes compared with those in the lowest quartile.
Table 3 presents results of adjusted regression models of logged levels of blood analytes by z scores of BPA concentration. In fully adjusted models, associations were observed between BPA concentrations and logged levels of alkaline phosphatase (P = .01), lactate dehydrogenase (P = .04), and GGT (P = .001). Initial associations (adjusted for age, sex, and urinary creatinine level) with levels of C-reactive protein disappeared on further adjustment. Levels of fasting glucose and insulin were associated with BPA concentration in models adjusted for age, sex, and urinary creatinine concentration but not in models with full adjustment. No associations with levels of LDL-C or triglycerides were observed.
We first reran our models to assess the ORs for having clinically above-normal concentrations of each of the liver enzymes. In adjusted models, we found that a 1-SD increase in BPA concentration was associated with clinically above-normal concentrations of GGT (n = 129 above normal; weighted 8.8% prevalence; OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.46; P < .001), alkaline phosphatase (n = 58 above normal; weighted 2.6% prevalence; OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.85; P = .002), and lactate dehydrogenase (n = 20 above normal; 1% prevalence; OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.72; P = .08).
In participants reporting neither cardiovascular disease nor diabetes (excluding n = 190), BPA concentration remained associated with clinically abnormal concentrations of lactate dehydrogenase (OR per 1-SD increase in BPA concentration, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.62; P = .01) and GGT (OR per 1-SD increase in BPA concentration, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.45; P = .03). In those with BMI less than 25 (n = 501), BPA concentration was associated with increased concentrations of GGT (β = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.18; P = .03).
Models including measures of alcohol consumption included a smaller number of participants (n = 1029) because of item nonresponse and because those younger than 20 years were not questioned. In models including self-reported daily alcohol consumption, BPA concentration remained associated with increased concentrations of GGT (β = .06; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.10; P = .007).
In models adjusted for triglyceride levels, a 1-SD change in BPA concentration was associated with increased odds of reporting cardiovascular disease (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.65; P < .001) and diabetes (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.58; P < .001). Models adjusted for levels of triglycerides plus LDL-C had a reduced number of participants (data for the fasting subsample only), but overall trends were similar: a 1-SD increase in BPA concentration was associated with increased odds of reporting diabetes (n = 635; OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.93; P = .04). However, the association with cardiovascular disease became nonsignificant, although the trend was similar (n = 546; OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.88; P = .33).
Finally, we found that including measured concentrations of other phenols (4-tert-octyl phenol, benzophenone, and triclosan) did not affect the relationship between BPA concentration and disease or levels of blood analytes, and these compounds were not themselves associated with these outcomes. For example, in adjusted models the OR of reporting cardiovascular disease associated with a 1-SD score change in 4-tert-octyl phenol concentrations was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.79 to 1.54; P = .55) and of reporting diabetes was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.36; P = .71). A 1-SD score change in 4-tert-octyl phenol concentrations was not associated with changes in concentrations of the 3 liver enzymes; eg, for GGT, the β coefficient for 4-tert-octyl phenol per 1-SD change was 0.00 (95% CI, −0.03 to 0.04; P = .78). In fully adjusted BPA models with the addition of standardized 4-tert-octyl phenol and triclosan concentrations, the OR for reporting cardiovascular disease with a 1-SD score change in BPA concentration was 1.38 (95% CI, 1.18 to 1.61; P < .001) and for diabetes was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.22 to 1.60). BPA concentration remained associated with logged levels of GGT (β = .06; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.10; P = .002).
In this study we aimed to assess whether increased urinary BPA concentrations were associated with adverse health effects in the general US adult population. This analysis made use of the first large-scale and high-quality population-representative data set to become available. After adjusting for potential confounders, we found that higher BPA concentrations were associated with diagnoses of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. We also found associations between higher BPA concentrations and clinically abnormal concentrations of the 3 liver enzymes examined, namely GGT, alkaline phosphatase, and lactate dehydrogenase. Importantly, we observed no associations with the other common conditions examined, suggesting specificity of the associations. A series of sensitivity analyses provided further support for the specificity of the associations found.
Controversy has surrounded the risk that BPA poses to humans, because estimates extrapolated from animal studies32 have demonstrated significant species-specific differences in both metabolism and toxicity32 and also because of the multiple potential routes of human exposure. Ingestion of oral doses of BPA in rats and humans leads to first-pass metabolism in the intestine and liver to yield the major metabolite, BPA-monoglucuronide.33 Transdermal exposure and inhalation of airborne dust will largely avoid first-pass metabolism, which is also limited in neonates.34 While BPA-monoglucuronide is eliminated in the bile in rodents, in humans it is eliminated principally in the urine, and both gastrointestinal tract glucuronidation and enterohepatic recirculation differ between rats and humans. Modeling the pharmacokinetics of BPA is further complicated by a lack of human exposure studies, which are restricted for ethical reasons and by the difficulties in finding individuals completely unexposed to BPA from the environment. The human experimental exposures that do exist have mostly been to single high doses.4 Calculations to predict actual human exposure levels based on animal exposure studies have reported mean circulating concentrations of both unconjugated and conjugated BPA.4
These models suggest that exposure among the general US population is likely to exceed the 50-μg/kg per day reference dose currently recommended by the US Environmental Protection Agency and that exposure is most likely through continuous, multiroute exposure, principally diet, but also through transdermal exposure and inhalation of airborne dust. These results confirm estimates made from early-morning urine samples collected from 48 women, which were used to estimate an intake of 0.6 to 71.4 μg/d.35 A study of Japanese university students between 1992 and 1999 compared urinary BPA concentrations with dietary intake to suggest that canned beverages constitute a major dietary source.36
Because human health effects are most likely associated with long-term, low-dose exposure, the relevance of single measurements of urinary BPA concentrations has been questioned. From the few pharmacokinetic studies of human BPA metabolism, near-complete urinary excretion has been shown to occur within 24 hours of a single high dose.37 Mahalingaiah et al38 examined temporal variability in urinary concentrations and found that although a second sample could improve the sensitivity of predicting an individual's longer-term exposure status, a single urinary measurement showed moderate sensitivity for predicting the individual's tertile categorization. This temporal variability in urinary BPA concentrations is likely to have resulted in underestimation of the true strengths of association with the outcomes in our analyses.
BPA has long been thought to act via relatively loose binding to the estrogen receptor, and this mode of action has been incorporated in pharmacokinetic models; however, recent evidence suggests that BPA also binds strongly to the estrogen-related receptor γ, the function of which is unknown.6 Although the major metabolite BPA-monoglucuronide lacks estrogenic activity, the generation of estrogenically active metabolites following oxidative cleavage of BPA has been reported in vitro in rat liver microsomal fractions,39 although the in vivo significance of this pathway is not yet clear. Bindhumol et al7 found BPA-induced oxidative stress in rat hepatocytes with oral intake over a 30-day period, and hepatocyte damage has been reported in a number of other experimental contexts.8-11 Lipid accumulation has been shown in adipocyte and hepatoma cell lines exposed to BPA.40 A variety of other effects of BPA have been noted, including disrupted pancreatic β-cell function, which produces insulin resistance in mice exposed to oral BPA doses well below the lowest observed adverse effect level currently considered by the Environmental Protection Agency.12 Four days of low-dose BPA injections also produced insulin resistance in mice.41
Other studies have identified associations between environmental toxins, body weight, and diabetes,42,43 and it has been proposed that exposure to some environmental pollutants may initiate or exacerbate the development of obesity14 and associated health problems.44 We found an apparently wide range of BPA concentrations across BMI categories, with weighted but unadjusted mean BPA concentrations of 3.91 ng/mL (95% CI, 3.34 to 4.48) in participants with BMI of 18.5 to 24.9 compared with 6.93 ng/mL (95% CI 4.39 to 9.47) in those with BMI of 35 or more (Table 1). However, formal testing of logged BPA concentrations adjusted for age, sex, and urinary creatinine concentrations showed no significant differences between the categories (data available from the authors on request). Although a possible explanation for our findings is that the increased dietary intakes associated with obesity also result in higher intakes of BPA and consequent morbidity, the observed disease and liver enzyme changes were present after adjusting for both BMI and waist circumference. Crucially, the association with GGT was present after excluding overweight and obese participants. An association of BPA concentration with GGT concentration also was present in those without cardiovascular disease or diabetes, suggesting that “reverse causation” (in which the presence of these diseases might have led to greater exposure or to some form of altered BPA excretion) is also unlikely.
Exposure to BPA also might be an indicator of exposure to multiple xenobiotics, including other endocrine disruptors—but, as presented, adjustment for other environmental phenols and known xenoestrogens including 4-tert-octyl phenol and triclosan made no difference to the observed outcomes, suggesting a specific effect mediated by BPA. We also have explored a range of alternative approaches to accounting for the sampling design, the distribution of BPA concentrations, and the correction of urinary creatinine concentrations (eSupplement), all of which point to our results being robust.
The main limitation of our analyses is their cross-sectional nature: longitudinal data demonstrating that high BPA concentrations predict later onsets of biochemical change or diagnoses would strengthen the evidence. A further limitation is that we have examined a broad hypothesis of associations between higher BPA concentrations and adverse effects on health status, including tests of association with 8 major diagnostic groupings (with 3 questions each about cardiovascular and respiratory conditions) and 8 blood-based assays. Our approach, justified by this being the first large-scale study, may have resulted in false-positive associations. Although false-positive inverse associations between BPA concentrations and outcomes were theoretically as likely, none were found.
Independent replication is now needed to confirm the associations reported. Because our analyses are based on urinary concentrations of BPA, which reflect recent exposure, studies based on repeat measurements over weeks, months, or even years would improve the assessment of longer-term exposure. Given the many routes of exposure to BPA, direct measures of dermal contact or of contact with contaminated foods, beverages, and dusts would be very difficult to undertake. A further issue is that although the previous animal-model literature provides evidence of the mechanisms underlying effects on liver cells (and therefore liver enzymes) and insulin signaling (and therefore diabetes, as previously discussed), the mechanisms underlying the effect on prevalence of cardiovascular disease are not obvious. If the associations reported here are confirmed in independent studies, more work will be needed to identify the mechanisms of action linking long-term, low-dose BPA exposure to adverse outcomes in humans. Given the substantial negative effects on adult health that may be associated with increased BPA concentrations and also given the potential for reducing human exposure, our findings deserve scientific follow-up.
Using data representative of the adult US population, we found that higher urinary concentrations of BPA were associated with an increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and liver-enzyme abnormalities. These findings add to the evidence suggesting adverse effects of low-dose BPA in animals. Independent replication and follow-up studies are needed to confirm these findings and to provide evidence on whether the associations are causal.
Corresponding Author: David Melzer, MB, PhD, Epidemiology and Public Health Group, Peninsula Medical School, Barrack Rd, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Published Online: September 16, 2008 (doi:10.1001/jama.300.11.1303).
Author Contributions: Drs Lang and Melzer had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: Lang, Galloway, Depledge, Wallace, Melzer.
Analysis and interpretation of data: Lang, Galloway, Scarlett, Henley, Wallace, Melzer.
Drafting of the manuscript: Lang, Galloway, Melzer.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Lang, Galloway, Scarlett, Henley, Depledge, Wallace, Melzer.
Statistical analysis: Lang, Henley, Melzer.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Galloway, Scarlett, Wallace.
Study supervision: Depledge.
Financial Disclosures: Dr Galloway reported having served as a paid independent expert for the United Kingdom Bisphenol A Ecotoxicology Review Panel. Dr Depledge reported that he is a member of the United Kingdom Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution and serves as a board member of Natural England. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: Resources for this analysis were provided by the Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry. Dr Lang is an Academic Specialty Trainee in Public Health supported by the United Kingdom National Health Service South West Region Public Health Training Scheme.
Role of the Sponsor: The funding organization had no role in the design and conduct of the study; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
Additional Contributions: We thank the many persons who have contributed to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data we have examined, including all of the anonymous participants in the study. We are particularly grateful to those who carried out the laboratory assays of bisphenol A concentrations at the Division of Environmental Health Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Burridge E. Bisphenol A: product profile. Eur Chem News
. 2003;78(2048):17Google Scholar
Calafat AM, Kuklenyik Z, Reidy JA, Caudill SP, Ekong J, Needham LL. Urinary concentrations of bisphenol A and 4-nonylphenol in a human reference population. Environ Health Perspect
. 2005;113(4):391-39515811827PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Calafat AM, Ye X, Wong LY, Reidy JA, Needham LL. Exposure of the U.S. population to bisphenol A and 4-tertiary-octylphenol: 2003-2004. Environ Health Perspect
. 2008;116(1):39-4418197297PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Vandenberg LN, Hauser R, Marcus M, Olea N, Welshons WV. Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA). Reprod Toxicol
. 2007;24(2):139-17717825522PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Takeuchi T, Tsutsumi O, Ikezuki Y, Takai Y, Taketani Y. Positive relationship between androgen and the endocrine disruptor, bisphenol A, in normal women and women with ovarian dysfunction. Endocr J
. 2004;51(2):165-16915118266PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Okada H, Tokunaga T, Liu X, Takayanagi S, Matsushima A, Shimohigashi Y. Direct evidence revealing structural elements essential for the high binding ability of bisphenol A to human estrogen-related receptor-gamma. Environ Health Perspect
. 2008;116(1):32-3818197296PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Bindhumol V, Chitra KC, Mathur PP. Bisphenol A induces reactive oxygen species generation in the liver of male rats. Toxicology
. 2003;188(2-3):117-12412767684PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Elsby R, Maggs JL, Ashby J, Park BK. Comparison of the modulatory effects of human and rat liver microsomal metabolism on the estrogenicity of bisphenol A: implications for extrapolation to humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther
. 2001;297(1):103-11311259533PubMedGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa Y, Tayama S. Metabolism and cytotoxicity of bisphenol A and other bisphenols in isolated rat hepatocytes. Arch Toxicol
. 2000;74(2):99-10510839477PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Roy D, Palangat M, Chen CW,
et al. Biochemical and molecular changes at the cellular level in response to exposure to environmental estrogen-like chemicals. J Toxicol Environ Health
. 1997;50(1):1-299015129PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Tyl RW, Myers CB, Marr MC,
et al. Three-generation reproductive toxicity study of dietary bisphenol A in CD Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicol Sci
. 2002;68(1):121-14612075117PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Ropero AB, Alonso-Magdalena P, Garcia-Garcia E, Ripoll C, Fuentes E, Nadal A. Bisphenol-A disruption of the endocrine pancreas and blood glucose homeostasis. Int J Androl
. 2008;31(2):194-20017971160PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Moriyama K, Tagami T, Akamizu T,
et al. Thyroid hormone action is disrupted by bisphenol A as an antagonist. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
. 2002;87(11):5185-519012414890PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Newbold RR, Padilla-Banks E, Jefferson WN, Heindel JJ. Effects of endocrine disruptors on obesity. Int J Androl
. 2008;31(2):201-20818315718PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Welshons WV, Nagel SC, vom Saal FS. Large effects from small exposures, III: endocrine mechanisms mediating effects of bisphenol A at levels of human exposure. Endocrinology
European Union. European Union Risk Assessment Report: 4,4′-isopropylidenediphenol (bisphenol-A). Luxembourg, Belgium: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2003. CAS No. 80-05-7; EINECS No. 201-245-8
vom Saal FS, Hughes C. An extensive new literature concerning low-dose effects of bisphenol A shows the need for a new risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect
. 2005;113(8):926-93316079060PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
vom Saal FS, Akingbemi BT, Belcher SM,
et al. Chapel Hill bisphenol A expert panel consensus statement: integration of mechanisms, effects in animals and potential to impact human health at current levels of exposure. Reprod Toxicol
. 2007;24(2):131-13817768031PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Goodman JE, McConnell EE, Sipes IG,
et al. An updated weight of the evidence evaluation of reproductive and developmental effects of low doses of bisphenol A. Crit Rev Toxicol
. 2006;36(5):387-45716954066PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Dekant W, Volkel W. Human exposure to bisphenol A by biomonitoring: methods, results and assessment of environmental exposures. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol
. 2008;228(1):114-13418207480PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data 2003-04. Hyattsville, MD: US Dept of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2004
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Third National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. Altanta, GA: CDC; 2005
Korn E, Graubard B. Analysis of large health surveys: accounting for the sampling design. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc
. 1995;158:263-295Google ScholarCrossref
Barr DB, Wilder LC, Caudill SP, Gonzalez AJ, Needham LL, Pirkle JL. Urinary creatinine concentrations in the U.S. population: implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements. Environ Health Perspect
. 2005;113(2):192-20015687057PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hsieh FY, Bloch DA, Larsen MD. A simple method of sample size calculation for linear and logistic regression. Stat Med
. 1998;17(14):1623-16349699234PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Dupont WD, Plummer WD Jr. Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression. Control Clin Trials
. 1998;19(6):589-6019875838PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Oehlmann J, Schulte-Oehlmann U, Bachmann J,
et al. Bisphenol A induces superfeminization in the ramshorn snail Marisa cornuarietis (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia) at environmentally relevant concentrations. Environ Health Perspect
. 2006;114:(suppl 1)
Teeguarden JG, Waechter JM Jr, Clewell HJ III, Covington TR, Barton HA. Evaluation of oral and intravenous route pharmacokinetics, plasma protein binding, and uterine tissue dose metrics of bisphenol A: a physiologically based pharmacokinetic approach. Toxicol Sci
. 2005;85(2):823-83815746009PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Matsumoto J, Yokota H, Yuasa A. Developmental increases in rat hepatic microsomal UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activities toward xenoestrogens and decreases during pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect
. 2002;110(2):193-19611836149PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Ouchi K, Watanabe S. Measurement of bisphenol A in human urine using liquid chromatography with multi-channel coulometric electrochemical detection. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci
. 2002;780(2):365-37012401363PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Matsumoto A, Kunugita N, Kitagawa K,
et al. Bisphenol A levels in human urine. Environ Health Perspect
. 2003;111(1):101-10412515686PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Völkel W, Colnot T, Csanady GA, Filser JG, Dekant W. Metabolism and kinetics of bisphenol A in humans at low doses following oral administration. Chem Res Toxicol
. 2002;15(10):1281-128712387626PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Mahalingaiah S, Meeker JD, Pearson KR,
et al. Temporal variability and predictors of urinary bisphenol A concentrations in men and women. Environ Health Perspect
. 2008;116(2):173-17818288314PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Yoshihara S, Mizutare T, Makishima M,
et al. Potent estrogenic metabolites of bisphenol A and bisphenol B formed by rat liver S9 fraction: their structures and estrogenic potency. Toxicol Sci
. 2004;78(1):50-5914691209PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Wada K, Sakamoto H, Nishikawa K,
et al. Life style-related diseases of the digestive system: endocrine disruptors stimulate lipid accumulation in target cells related to metabolic syndrome. J Pharmacol Sci
. 2007;105(2):133-13717928741PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Alonso-Magdalena P, Morimoto S, Ripoll C, Fuentes E, Nadal A. The estrogenic effect of bisphenol A disrupts pancreatic beta-cell function in vivo and induces insulin resistance. Environ Health Perspect
. 2006;114(1):106-11216393666PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Lee DH, Lee IK, Song K,
et al. A strong dose-response relation between serum concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and diabetes: results from the National Health and Examination Survey 1999-2002. Diabetes Care
. 2006;29(7):1638-164416801591PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Vasiliu O, Cameron L, Gardiner J, Deguire P, Karmaus W. Polybrominated biphenyls, polychlorinated biphenyls, body weight, and incidence of adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Epidemiology
. 2006;17(4):352-35916755267PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Grün F, Blumberg B. Perturbed nuclear receptor signaling by environmental obesogens as emerging factors in the obesity crisis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord
. 2007;8(2):161-17117657605PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref