Association of Physician Certification and Outcomes Among Patients Receiving an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator | Cardiology | JAMA | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.175.212.130. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ,  et al; Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Investigators.  Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction.  N Engl J Med. 2002;346(12):877-88311907286PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators.  A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias.  N Engl J Med. 1997;337(22):1576-15839411221PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Kuck KH, Cappato R, Siebels J, Rüppel R. Randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest: the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg (CASH).  Circulation. 2000;102(7):748-75410942742PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB,  et al; Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) Investigators.  Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure.  N Engl J Med. 2005;352(3):225-23715659722PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J,  et al; Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Investigators.  Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure.  N Engl J Med. 2004;350(21):2140-215015152059PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Buxton AE, Lee KL, Fisher JD, Josephson ME, Prystowsky EN, Hafley G.Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators.  A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease.  N Engl J Med. 1999;341(25):1882-189010601507PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS,  et al; Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators.  Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia.  N Engl J Med. 1996;335(26):1933-19408960472PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Day JD, Curtis AB, Epstein AE,  et al; American College of Cardiology Foundation.  Addendum to the clinical competency statement: training pathways for implantation of cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization devices.  Heart Rhythm. 2005;2(10):1161-116316188603PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, Hammill SC,  et al.  Clinical competency statement: training pathways for implantation of cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization devices.  Heart Rhythm. 2004;1(3):371-37515851187PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Meier B. Growing debate as doctors train on new devices. NY Times. August 1, 2006:A1, C6
11.
Hammill SC, Cain ME. Alternate training track for ICD and CRT implantation for non-electrophysiologists: are the guidelines too strict to be practical or too simple to protect patient care?  Heart Rhythm. 2004;1(3):376-37715851188PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Curtis AB. Experience counts better patient outcomes with higher device volumes.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(8):1541-154216226181PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Hammill SC, Kremers MS, Stevenson LW,  et al.  Review of the Registry's second year, data collected, and plans to add lead and pediatric ICD procedures.  Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(9):1359-136318774117PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Al-Khatib SM, Lucas FL, Jollis JG, Malenka DJ, Wennberg DE. The relation between patients' outcomes and the volume of cardioverter-defibrillator implantation procedures performed by physicians treating Medicare beneficiaries.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(8):1536-154016226180PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
ICD Registry.  Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Registry v1.08 data dictionary—definitions only. http://www.ncdr.com/WebNCDR/NCDRDocuments/ICDDataDictionaryDefinitionsOnlyv1.0.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2009
16.
Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH,  et al; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; American College of Chest Physicians; International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation; Heart Rhythm Society.  ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society.  Circulation. 2005;112(12):e154-e23516160202PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA,  et al; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices); American Association for Thoracic Surgery; Society of Thoracic Surgeons.  ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(21):e1-e6218498951PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Austin PC, Tu JV, Alter DA. Comparing hierarchical modeling with traditional logistic regression analysis among patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: should we be analyzing cardiovascular outcomes data differently?  Am Heart J. 2003;145(1):27-3512514651PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Zhang J, Yu KF. What's the relative risk? a method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.  JAMA. 1998;280(19):1690-16919832001PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Al-Khatib SM, Greiner MA, Peterson ED, Hernandez AF, Schulman KA, Curtis LH. Patient and implanting physician factors associated with mortality and complications following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, 2002-2005.  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008;1(4):240-24919169382PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Reynolds MR, Cohen DJ, Kugelmass AD,  et al.  The frequency and incremental cost of major complications among Medicare beneficiaries receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(12):2493-249716781379PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Goodney PP, Lucas FL, Stukel TA, Birkmeyer JD. Surgeon specialty and operative mortality with lung resection.  Ann Surg. 2005;241(1):179-18415622006PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Earle CC, Schrag D, Neville BA,  et al.  Effect of surgeon specialty on processes of care and outcomes for ovarian cancer patients.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(3):172-18016449677PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Chen J, Rathore SS, Wang Y, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. Physician board certification and the care and outcomes of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.  J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(3):238-24416637823PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Feasby TE, Quan H, Ghali WA. Hospital and surgeon determinants of carotid endarterectomy outcomes.  Arch Neurol. 2002;59(12):1877-188112470174PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Gorcsan J III, Abraham T, Agler DA,  et al; American Society of Echocardiography Dyssynchrony Writing Group; Heart Rhythm Society.  Echocardiography for cardiac resynchronization therapy: recommendations for performance and reporting—a report from the American Society of Echocardiography Dyssynchrony Writing Group endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society.  J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21(3):191-21318314047PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Upadhyay GA, Choudhry NK, Auricchio A, Ruskin J, Singh JP. Cardiac resynchronization in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(15):1239-124618926327PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Olshansky B, Kowey PR, Naccarelli GV. Fast-track training of nonelectrophysiologists to implant defibrillators: is it needed?  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006;29(6):627-63116784429PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Contribution
April 22 2009

Association of Physician Certification and Outcomes Among Patients Receiving an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program (Dr Krumholz), Section of Cardiovascular Medicine (Drs Curtis, Chen, Lampert, and Krumholz and Mr Wang), Department of Internal Medicine (Mr Rathore), Section of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health (Dr Krumholz), Yale University School of Medicine, and Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital (Dr Krumholz), New Haven, Connecticut; Section of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr Luebbert); VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (Dr Heidenreich); and Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Dr Hammill).

JAMA. 2009;301(16):1661-1670. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.547
Abstract

Context Allowing nonelectrophysiologists to perform implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) procedures is controversial. However, it is not known whether outcomes of ICD implantation vary by physician specialty.

Objective To determine the association of implanting physician certification with outcomes following ICD implantation.

Design, Setting, and Patients Retrospective cohort study using cases submitted to the ICD Registry performed between January 2006 and June 2007. Patients were grouped by the certification status of the implanting physician into mutually exclusive categories: electrophysiologists, nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, thoracic surgeons, and other specialists. Hierarchical logistic regression models were developed to determine the independent association of physician certification with outcomes.

Main Outcome Measures In-hospital procedural complication rates and the proportion of patients meeting criteria for a defibrillator with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) who received that device.

Results Of 111 293 ICD implantations included in the analysis, 78 857 (70.9%) were performed by electrophysiologists, 24 399 (21.9%) by nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, 1862 (1.7%) by thoracic surgeons, and 6175 (5.5%) by other specialists. Compared with patients whose ICD was implanted by electrophysiologists, patients whose ICD was implanted by either nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists or thoracic surgeons were at increased risk of complications in both unadjusted (electrophysiologists, 3.5% [2743/78 857]; nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, 4.0% [970/24 399]; thoracic surgeons, 5.8% [108/1862]; P < .001) and adjusted analyses (relative risk [RR] for nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, 1.11 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.01-1.21]; RR for thoracic surgeons, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.15-1.79]). Among 35 841 patients who met criteria for CRT-D, those whose ICD was implanted by physicians other than electrophysiologists were significantly less likely to receive a CRT-D device compared with patients whose ICD was implanted by an electrophysiologist in both unadjusted (electrophysiologists, 83.1% [21 303/25 635]; nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, 75.8% [5950/7849]; thoracic surgeons, 57.8% [269/465]; other specialists, 74.8% [1416/1892]; P < .001) and adjusted analyses (RR for nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.91-0.95]; RR for thoracic surgeons, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.74-0.88]; RR for other specialists, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.94-0.99]).

Conclusions In this registry, nonelectrophysiologists implanted 29% of ICDs. Overall, implantations by a nonelectrophysiologist were associated with a higher risk of procedural complications and lower likelihood of receiving a CRT-D device when indicated compared with patients whose ICD was implanted by an electrophysiologist.

×