Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Colonography for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia in Individuals at Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer | Radiology | JAMA | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.175.212.130. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M, Boyle P. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006.  Ann Oncol. 2007;18(3):581-59217287242PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Cho KR, Vogelstein B. Genetic alterations in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence.  Cancer. 1992;70(6):(suppl)  1727-17311516027PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN,  et al.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopy polypectomy: the National Polyp Study Work Group.  N Engl J Med. 1993;329(27):1977-19818247072PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Winawer SJ, Zauber AG. The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2002;12(1):1-9, v11916153PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Frazier AL, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, Kuntz KM. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.  JAMA. 2000;284(15):1954-196111035892PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B,  et al; SCORE3 Working Group-Italy.  Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening.  Gastroenterology. 2007;132(7):2304-231217570205PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I,  et al.  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.  N Engl J Med. 2003;349(23):2191-220014657426PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AJ,  et al.  Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers.  N Engl J Med. 2008;359(12):1207-121718799557PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Pickhardt PJ. Incidence of colonic perforation at CT colonography: review of existing data and implications for screening of asymptomatic adults.  Radiology. 2006;239(2):313-31616641348PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP, Bassett P, Vance M, Bartram CI. Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(4):913-92114500202PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B,  et al; American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.  Gastroenterology. 2008;134(5):1570-159518384785PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Bujanda L, Sarasqueta C, Zubiaurre L,  et al; EPICOLON Group.  Low adherence to colonoscopy in the screening of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer.  Gut. 2007;56(12):1714-171817400596PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Rapuri S, Spencer J, Eckels D. Importance of postpolypectomy surveillance and postpolypectomy compliance to follow-up screening: review of literature.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23(5):453-45918193238PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Nadel MR, Shapiro JA, Klabunde CN,  et al.  A national survey of primary care physicians' methods for screening for fecal occult blood.  Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(2):86-9415657156PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D,  et al; Gastrointestinal Consortium Panel.  Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale: update based on new evidence.  Gastroenterology. 2003;124(2):544-56012557158PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Vasen HF, Watson P, Mecklin JP, Lynch HT. New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative group on HNPCC.  Gastroenterology. 1999;116(6):1453-145610348829PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P, Halligan S, Stoker J. European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography.  Eur Radiol. 2007;17(2):575-57916967260PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Zalis ME, Perumpillichira JJ, Magee C, Kohlberg G, Hahn PF. Tagging-based, electronically cleansed CT colonography: evaluation of patient comfort and image readability.  Radiology. 2006;239(1):149-15916567485PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Edwards JT, Mendelson RM, Fritschi L,  et al.  Colorectal neoplasia screening with CT colonography in average-risk asymptomatic subjects: community-based study.  Radiology. 2004;230(2):459-46414688402PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy.  Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(5):352-35915353426PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Gluecker TM, Fletcher JG, Welch TJ,  et al.  Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(4):881-88915039159PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Hamilton SR, Vogelstein B, Kudo S,  et al.  Carcinoma of the colon and rectum. In: Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA, eds. Pathology and Genetics: Tumours of the Digestive System: WHO Classification of Tumours. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2000
23.
Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC,  et al.  Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia.  JAMA. 2004;291(14):1713-171915082698PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D,  et al.  Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison.  Lancet. 2005;365(9456):305-31115664225PubMedGoogle Scholar
25.
Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C,  et al.  Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.  Radiology. 2003;229(3):775-78114657315PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Cottet V, Pariente A, Nalet B,  et al; ANGH Group.  Colonoscopic screening of first-degree relatives of patients with large adenomas: increased risk of colorectal tumors.  Gastroenterology. 2007;133(4):1086-109217919484PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS,  et al.  Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences.  Radiology. 2003;227(2):378-38412732696PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Lieberman DA, De Garmo PL, Fleischer DE, Eisen GM, Helfand M. Patterns of endoscopy use in the United States.  Gastroenterology. 2000;118(3):619-62410702214PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Laiyemo AO, Murphy G, Albert PS,  et al.  Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: predictive accuracy for advanced adenoma at 4 years.  Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(6):419-42618347350PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
van Rossum LG, van Rijn AF, Laheij RJ,  et al.  Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population.  Gastroenterology. 2008;135(1):82-9018482589PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Contribution
June 17, 2009

Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Colonography for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia in Individuals at Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Radiology Unit (Drs Regge, Della Monica, and Gallo) and Gastroenterology Unit (Drs Laudi and Galatola), Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, Candiolo, Turin, Italy; Epidemiology Unit (Drs Bonelli, Boni, and Bruzzi) and Radiology Unit (Dr Grasso), National Institute for Cancer Research, Genoa, Italy; Radiology Department, University of Bari, Policlinico Hospital, Bari, Italy (Dr Angelelli); Radiology Unit, Salvatore Maugeri IRCCS Foundation, Veruno, Novara, Italy (Dr Asnaghi); Radiology Department, University Cattolica, Policlinico Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy (Dr Barbaro); Radiology Department, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy (Drs Bartolozzi and Neri); Radiology Department, University of Leuven, UZ Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (Dr Bielen); Radiology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy (Dr Borghi); Radiology Department, University of Turin, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Turin (Drs Cassinis, Martina, and Gandini); Radiology Department, University of Palermo, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy (Dr Galia); Gastroenterology Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome (Dr Hassan); Radiology Department, University La Sapienza, Polo Didattico Pontino ICOT, Rome (Dr Laghi); CPO Piemonte, ASO San Giovanni Battista, Turin (Dr Senore); Radiology Department, Tor Vergata University, Rome (Dr Simonetti); and Radiology Unit, National Cancer Institute, Aviano, Pordenone, Italy (Dr Venturini).

JAMA. 2009;301(23):2453-2461. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.832
Abstract

Context Computed tomographic (CT) colonography has been recognized as an alternative for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in average-risk individuals, but less information is available on its performance in individuals at increased risk of CRC.

Objective To assess the accuracy of CT colonography in detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic individuals at increased risk of CRC using unblinded colonoscopy as the reference standard.

Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study. Individuals at increased risk of CRC due to either family history of advanced neoplasia in first-degree relatives, personal history of colorectal adenomas, or positive results from fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) were recruited in 11 Italian centers and 1 Belgian center between December 2004 and May 2007. Each participant underwent CT colonography followed by colonoscopy on the same day.

Main Outcome Measures Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography in detecting individuals with advanced neoplasia (ie, advanced adenoma or CRC) 6 mm or larger.

Results Of 1103 participants, 937 were included in the final analysis: 373 cases in the family-history group, 343 in the group with personal history of adenomas, and 221 in the FOBT-positive group. Overall, CT colonography identified 151 of 177 participants with advanced neoplasia 6 mm or larger (sensitivity, 85.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 79.0%-90.0%) and correctly classified results as negative for 667 of 760 participants without such lesions (specificity, 87.8%; 95% CI, 85.2%-90.0%). The positive and negative predictive values were 61.9% (95% CI, 55.4%-68.0%) and 96.3% (95% CI, 94.6%-97.5%), respectively; after group stratification, a significantly lower negative predictive value was found for the FOBT-positive group (84.9%; 95% CI, 76.2%-91.3%; P < .001).

Conclusions In a group of persons at increased risk for CRC, CT colonography compared with colonoscopy resulted in a negative predictive value of 96.3% overall. When limited to FOBT-positive persons, the negative predictive value was 84.9%.

×