Context.— Dog bites that result in injuries occur frequently, but how frequently
dog bite injuries necessitate medical attention at a hospital or hospital
admission is unknown.
Objective.— To describe the incidence and characteristics of dog bite injuries treated
in US emergency departments (EDs).
Design.— Emergency department survey from the National Center for Health Statistics
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for 1992 to 1994.
Patients.— National probability sample of patients visiting EDs.
Main Outcome Measure.— Incidence of dog bites treated in EDs, defined as a cause of injury
recorded as the E-code E906.0.
Results.— The 3-year annualized, adjusted, and weighted estimate of new dog bite–related
injury visits to US EDs was 333687, a rate of 12.9 per 10000 persons (95%
confidence interval [CI], 10.5-15.4). This represents approximately 914 new
dog bite injuries requiring ED visits per day. The median age of patients
bitten was 15 years, with children, especially boys aged 5 to 9 years, having
the highest incidence rate (60.7 per 10000 persons for boys aged 5 to 9 years).
Children seen in EDs were more likely than older persons to be bitten on the
face, neck, and head (73% vs 30%). We estimated that for each US dog bite
fatality there are about 670 hospitalizations and 16000 ED visits.
Conclusions.— Dog bite injuries are an important source of injury in the US population,
especially among children. Improved surveillance and prevention of dog bite–related
injuries, particularly among children, are needed.
THE CLOSE ASSOCIATION between humans and domesticated dogs began at
least 12000 years ago.1 Since then, people
have been intimately involved in domesticating the wild dog into hunter, guard,
and companion. However, the domesticated dog retains many of its wild instincts,
including behaviors that all too often lead to human attacks. This risk has
always been present. Only now, however, are we beginning to gain a full understanding
of the impact of dog bites on populations.2
Estimates of dog bite injuries have been reported from data derived
from household surveys, hospital-based studies, school-based surveys, local
animal shelter monitoring, police reports, and newspaper articles.2-8
Because of lack of a national reporting system and variation of local reporting
procedures, accurate national incidence rates for dog bite–related emergency
department (ED) visits and hospitalizations have not been well quantified.
The reported incidence of ED-treated dog bite injuries in the United States
ranges from 0.3% to 1.1% of all ED visits.3,9,10
With regard to overall morbidity, the annual number of total bites that
occur in the US population has been estimated to range from 500000 to 4.5
million.11,12 It has been estimated
that almost half of all children have been bitten by a dog at some point in
their lives.5 Among children, more than 50%
of documented bites have been to the head, face, or neck.4,13,14
Unfortunately, most of the studies that provided this descriptive information
were limited because of small sample size and lack of consistent definitions,
or they were not representative of the general population.
Recent work by Sacks et al2 has improved
the precision of national estimates for dog bite–related mortality and
for dog bites receiving any medical attention. For the 10-year period, 1979
through 1988, an annual average of about 15 fatal dog attacks was documented
in the United States, with extrapolated estimates suggesting that as many
as 20 per year may have actually occurred.11
Based on a random household survey, the Injury Control and Risk Survey conducted
by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, it was estimated that about
800000 bites occur annually that require medical attention.2
However, this estimate was not able to break down the proportion of patients
seen in hospitals owing to the small size of the sample. The only nationwide
study from any country that examined both major morbidity and mortality from
dog bite injuries was conducted in New Zealand.15
This study predicted an incidence of hospitalization due to dog bites in the
year 2000 of 9.6 per 100000 persons, twice the incidence for 1979.15
The purpose of the present study is to estimate the incidence and characteristics
of dog bite injuries treated in US EDs using a 3-year population-based stratified
random sample of US ED visits. This study also fills the gaps in our understanding
of the patterns of medical care for dog bite victims. With such an understanding,
the broad medical and public health impact of dog bite–related injuries
can be better appreciated and targeted for preventive efforts.
Data were obtained from the ED component of the 1992-1994 National Hospital
Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), a population-based stratified sample
of US ED visits. This survey, conducted annually since 1992, is directed by
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health
Statistics. The combined 1992-1994 data set represented estimates applying
to approximately 274 million ED visits16-18
(about 91 million visits per year). The NHAMCS is a national probability sample
of noninstitutional general and short-stay hospitals (excludes federal, Veterans
Affairs, and military hospitals). It uses a 4-stage probability sample that
covers geographic primary sampling units, hospitals within primary sampling
units, EDs within hospitals, and patients within EDs. Data collection takes
place during a randomly assigned 4-week data period for each of the sampled
hospitals. The US Bureau of the Census regional staff oversees the data collection
process, while actual data collection is the responsibility of hospital staff.
A separate data collection form is filled out at or close to the time of visit
for each sampled patient. A full report of the methods used in this survey
is available from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).16
After the forms are completed, they are sent to NCHS where International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) coding takes place by experienced
nosologists. A maximum of 3 E-codes are assigned to each case. The nosologists
work from the data collection form, not the.sgminal medical record. For 1992-1994,
a total of 91935 patient forms were collected.
Definition and Case Selection
A dog bite injury was defined as any ED visit with an ICD-9-CM E-code of E906.0 ("dog bite") in the primary, secondary, or
tertiary E-code field. More than 99% of the cases were identified from the
primary E-code field. To obtain incidence estimates (ie, new cases) records
from the 1992 data set were excluded if they were not marked as "Injury, first
visit" in the data set to prevent counting follow-up visits. This excluded
17.9% of the dog bite–related injuries from the 1992 data. The 1993
and 1994 data collection instruments did not contain information on whether
the visit was a first visit for injury or follow-up visit. Therefore, the
sample weights from each of these latter 2 years were reduced by 17.9% based
on the percentage of follow-up visits found in 1992. All 3 years were then
combined and averaged to produce mean annual national estimates. The NCHS
suggests the minimum reliable estimate for this combined data set is 30000
visits (Catherine W. Burt, EdD, Ambulatory Care Statistics Branch, NCHS, oral
communication, August 30, 1996). Place of injury (home, work, school, street,
etc) was only collected in 1993 and 1994. An addition was made to the NHAMCS
data set by imputing an Injury Severity Score from the primary and secondary
diagnosis fields. The Injury Severity Score ranks injury severity mainly in
terms of threat to life. In this study the Injury Severity Score was derived
by automated translation of the ICD-9-CM diagnoses
using Tricode software (Tri-Analytics Inc, Bel Air, Md).
Data were obtained from NCHS on floppy diskettes in ASCII format and
combined for analysis on a desktop computer using SPSS software (SPSS Inc,
Chicago, Ill). Rates were computed by dividing incidence estimates by the
appropriate population estimate. The 1993 total US population estimates were
used as enumerated by the NCHS. The results are presented using weighted values
to produce annual national estimates. Approximate relative standard errors
in percentages used for calculating 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for reported
aggregate estimates and rates are based on a model suggested by NCHS (Catherine
W. Burt, EdD, Ambulatory Care Statistics Branch, NCHS, oral communication,
August 30, 1996).
The annualized weighted estimate of the incidence of new dog bite–related
injuries seen in US EDs was 333687 (95% CI, 269950-397424) for a rate of 12.9
(95% CI, 10.5-15.4) per 10000 persons. These injuries comprised about 0.4%
of all ED visits during the study period. (Numbers and rates for race, sex,
age, age and sex, geographic region, season, and day of month are available
from the authors on request).
Ages of victims of dog bite–related injuries ranged from younger
than 1 year to 91 years (median age, 15 years). Incidence rates were significantly
higher among children aged 0 to 9 years, especially among boys. The 5- to
9-year-old male age group had the highest rate, 60.7 ED visits per 10000 persons
(95% CI, 34.8-86.6). The estimated 57580 dog bite–related visits for
boys aged 5 to 9 years represent 3.6% of all injury-related ED visits in this
age and sex group.
Among the cases in which body part area could be determined (about two
thirds of the cases), the face, neck, and head (combined) were the leading
body part sites affected (29%), followed by the upper limbs and lower limbs.
Among children aged 0 to 9 years, 73% of the injuries with attributed injury
site were to the face, head, and neck, while all other ages had only 30% of
the injuries occur to the face, head, and neck. There was a nonsignificant
trend toward a seasonal distribution of the incidence of dog bite injuries,
with the highest rates being observed during the summer months. Although the
highest number of cases was seen in the southern region of the United States
(Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina,
Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia), the population-adjusted rates
were similar by geographic region and not significantly different from one
another.
Over half the dog bite injuries (58.0%) were reported to have occurred
at a home. Dog bite–related ED visits were more likely to occur on the
weekends. Dog bite injuries were triaged in the ED as urgent-emergent in 46.1%
of the visits and nonurgent for the remainder. Ninety-six percent of patients
making dog bite–related ED visits were treated and released from the
ED; the remainder were admitted to the hospital or transferred to another
facility. Among the 94% of the cases assigned a calculated ISS score, 99%
were of low severity (Injury Severity Score, 1).
This study extends previous work in dog bite epidemiology by adding
more precise quantitative information about ED visits and incidence. It fills
the remaining gap in our understanding of where people go for medical treatment
of dog bites, thereby more clearly defining their burden on the medical care
system. Using the (rounded) NCHS survey data reported here of 334000 dog bite–related
ED visits with a 4% hospitalization rate, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention household survey estimates of 757000 medically treated and 3.73
million nonmedically treated dog bites,2 and
averaged mortality data reporting about 20 deaths per year,11,19
it appears that, for each US dog bite fatality, there are about 670 hospitalizations,
16000 ED visits, 21000 other medical visits (office and clinic), and 187000
nonmedically treated bites. Consistent with the results of other reports,
males were more likely than females to be bitten by dogs, children had the
highest rate of ED visits for dog bite injuries, and young children were more
likely than adults to be bitten in the head, neck, and face area.
Table 1 presents some interesting
comparisons between the incidence of the dog bite–related ED visits
and ED visits for selected injury types reported by the US Consumer Product
Safety Commission (CPSC).20 The CPSC does not
currently collect or report dog bite–related injuries.
We also applied a limited but useful payment model to the data. This
model was based on averaging a non–NCHS/NHAMCS sample of actual ED visit
reimbursements for each of several broad body part–based diagnosis code
groupings (details available from authors on request). This conservative model
excluded indirect costs (such as pain and suffering or lost work, either by
parents or the victim), charges for ED follow-up visits and inpatient visits,
and non–ED-related charges. Also, given the risk of infection,22 the ragged nature of many bite-related lacerations,
and the large number of dog bites treated by at least an initial course of
rabies prophylaxis, the average payment for a dog bite–related injury
might be much higher than the diagnostic group average used in the model.
Nevertheless, using this model we estimate the average dog bite results in
a payment to the hospital of $274 and a national annual total payment for
ED services for new dog bite–related injuries of $102.4 million. Children
and adolescents younger than 20 years accounted for over half these payments
($58.7 million), and Medicaid, Medicare, and other government sources were
mentioned as payers in 26% of the visits.
Regarding study limitations, some undercounting was possible since the
NHAMCS data set had no cause of injury text-string field available to search
for dog bite–related visits that were not E-coded. Therefore, some bites
may not have been identified on account of missing or incorrect coding. However,
a single, unambiguous E-code for dog bites limits the false positives likely
in the ICD-9-CM coding scheme used in this data set.
The NHAMCS provides the ongoing ability to quantify nationally the magnitude
of the incidence of hospital-treated dog bite injuries. This data set is a
representative sample of the US population from which trends can eventually
be followed for the nation as a whole and to set realistic goals for local
programs. However, sample size issues result in large 95% CIs for many subgroup
distributions, limiting the data set's usefulness. Most animal control programs
are administered locally and require local and more specific data, such as
breed type and more specificity about the incident, for which the NHAMCS national
ED survey is not suited.
Analysis of the NHAMCS data set has shown that each year US EDs treat
about 334000 new cases of dog bites with associated ED treatment payments
of over $100 million. With more than one third of American households owning
a dog, the number of dogs in the United States is over 50 million.23 Clearly, the popularity of the dog as both friend
and protector will not soon disappear. Considering the risk to large parts
of the population, especially to children, it is necessary that effective
preventive strategies be developed and applied to reduce the painful and costly
burden of dog bites. We know little about which strategies work or do not
work, however.11 More knowledge is needed through
a combination of enhanced and coordinated dog bite reporting systems, expanded
population-based surveys, and implementation and evaluation of preventive
trials. Particularly for the more severe episodes, information needs to be
obtained regarding high-risk situations, high-risk dogs, and what leads to
successful preventive interventions.
1.Davis SJM, Valla FR. Evidence for domestication of the dog 12,000 years ago in the Natufian
of Israel.
Nature.1978;276:608-610.Google Scholar 2.Sacks JJ, Kresnow M, Houston B. Dog bites: how big a problem?
Inj Prev.1996;2:52-54.Google Scholar 3.Aghababian RV, Conte JE. Mammalian bite wounds.
Ann Emerg Med.1980;9:79-83.Google Scholar 4.Brogan TV, Bratton SL, Dowd D, Hegenbarth MA. Severe dog bites in children.
Pediatrics.1995;96:947-950.Google Scholar 5.Beck AM, Jones BA. Unreported dog bites in children.
Public Health Rep.1985;100:315-321.Google Scholar 6.Gershman KA, Sacks JJ, Wright JC. Which dogs bite: a case-control study of risk factors.
Pediatrics.1994;93:913-917.Google Scholar 7.Beck AM, Loring H, Lockwood R. The ecology of dog bite injury in St. Louis, Missouri.
Public Health Rep.1975 May-Jun;90(3):262-267.Google Scholar 8.Pickney LE, Kennedy LA. Traumatic deaths from dog attacks in the United States.
Pediatrics.1982;69:193-196.Google Scholar 9.Avner JR, Baker MD. Dog bites in urban children.
Pediatrics.1991;88:55-57.Google Scholar 10.Sokol AB, Houser RG. Dog bites: prevention and treatment. Comments from the surgeon's viewpoint.
Clin Pediatr (Phila).1971;10:336-338.Google Scholar 11.Sacks JJ, Lockwood R, Hornreich J, Sattin RW. Fatal dog attacks, 1989-1994.
Pediatrics.1996;97(6, pt 1):891-895.Google Scholar 12.Scarcella J. Management of bites: early definitive repair of bite wounds.
Ohio State Med J.1969;65:25-31.Google Scholar 13.Chin Y, Berkelhamer JE, Herold TE. Dog bites in children less than 4 years old.
Pediatrics.1982;69:119-120.Google Scholar 14.Kizer KW, Town M. Epidemiologic and clinical aspects of animal bite injuries.
JACEP.1979;8:134-141.Google Scholar 15.Langley J. The incidence of dog bites in New Zealand.
N Z Med J.1992;105:33-35.Google Scholar 16.McCaig LF. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1992 Emergency
Department Summary . Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 1994. Advance
Data From Vital and Health Statistics, No. 245.
17.Burt CW. Injury-Related Visits to Hospital Emergency Departments: United
States, 1992 . Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 1995. Advance
Data From Vital and Health Statistics, No. 261.
18.Stussman BJ. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1993 Emergency
Department Summary . Hyattsville, Md: National Center for Health Statistics; 1996. Advance
Data From Vital and Health Statistics, No. 271.
19.Sacks JJ, Sattin RW, Bonzo SE. Dog bite–related fatalities from 1979 through 1988.
JAMA.1989;262:1489-1492.Google Scholar 20.US Consumer Product Safety Commission. Injuries associated with selected sports and recreation equipment treated
in hospital emergency departments, calendar year 1994.
Consumer Product Safety Review.Summer 1996;1:5.Google Scholar 21.US Consumer Product Safety Commission. Stair Steps and Baby Walkers Don't Mix . Washington, DC: US Consumer Product Safety Commission; 1992. Consumer
Product Safety Alert No. 009207.
22.Peel MM. Dog-associated bacterial infections in humans.
Pathology.1993;25:379-384.Google Scholar 23.Wise JK, Yang JJ. Dog and cat ownership, 1991-1998.
J Am Vet Med Assoc.1994;204:1166-1167.Google Scholar