Prognostic Significance of the Initial Electrocardiogram in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction | Acute Coronary Syndromes | JAMA | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Granger C, Moffie I.The GUSTO Investigators.  Underuse of thrombolytic therapy in North America has been exaggerated: results of the GUSTO MI registry.  Circulation.1994;90(suppl I):I324. Abstract.Google Scholar
2.
Lee KL, Woodlief LH, Topol EJ.  et al.  Predictors of 30-day mortality in the era of reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction: results from an international trial of 41021 patients.  Circulation.1995;91:1659-1668.Google Scholar
3.
The GUSTO Investigators.  An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction.  N Engl J Med.1993;329:673-682.Google Scholar
4.
Califf RM, Topol EJ, Stack RS.  et al.  Evaluation of combination thrombolytic therapy and timing of cardiac catheterization in acute myocardial infarction: results of Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction, phase 5 randomized trial.  Circulation.1991;83:1543-1556.Google Scholar
5.
Hindman NB, Schocken DD, Widmann M.  et al.  Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size, V: specificity and method of application of the complete system.  Am J Cardiol.1985;55:1485-1490.Google Scholar
6.
Sevilla DC, Wagner NB, Anderson WD.  et al.  Sensitivity of a set of myocardial infarction screening criteria in patients with anatomically documented single and multiple infarcts.  Am J Cardiol.1990;66:792-795.Google Scholar
7.
Devlin TF, Weeks BJ. Spline functions for logistic regression modeling. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference . Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1986:646-651.
8.
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and the use of the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve.  Radiology.1982;143:29-36.Google Scholar
9.
Efron B, Tibshirani R. An Introduction to the Bootstrap.  New York, NY: Chapman & Hall; 1993.
10.
Crimm A, Severance Jr HW, Coffey K. Prognostic significance of isolated sinus tachycardia during first three days of acute myocardial infarction.  Am J Med.1984;76:983-988.Google Scholar
11.
DeSanctis RW, Block P, Hutter AM. Tachyarrhythmias in myocardial infarction.  Circulation.1972;45:681-702.Google Scholar
12.
Bates ER, Califf RM, Stack RS.  et al.  Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI-1) trial: influence of infarct location on arterial patency, left ventricular function and mortality.  J Am Coll Cardiol.1989;13:12-18.Google Scholar
13.
Fletcher WO, Gibbons RJ, Clements IP. The relationship of inferior ST depression, lateral ST elevation, and left precordial ST elevation to myocardium at risk in acute anterior myocardial infarction.  Am Heart J.1993;126:526-535.Google Scholar
14.
Aldrich HR, Wagner NB, Boswick J.  et al.  Use of initial ST-segment deviation for prediction of final electrocardiographic size of acute myocardial infarcts.  Am J Cardiol.1988;61:749-753.Google Scholar
15.
Mauri F, Gasparini M, Barbonaglia L.  et al.  Prognostic significance of the extent of myocardial injury in acute myocardial infarction treated by streptokinase (the GISSI trial).  Am J Cardiol.1989;63:1291-1295.Google Scholar
16.
Edmunds JJ, Gibbons RJ, Bresnahan JF, Clements IP. Significance of anterior ST depression in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction.  Am J Cardiol.1994;73:143-148.Google Scholar
17.
Hlatky MA, Califf RM, Lee KL, Pryor DB, Wagner GS, Rosati RA. Prognostic significance of precordial ST-segment depression during inferior acute myocardial infarction.  Am J Cardiol.1985;55:325-329.Google Scholar
18.
Mirvis DM. Physiologic bases for anterior ST segment depression in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction.  Am Heart J.1988;116:1308-1322.Google Scholar
19.
Peterson ED, Hathaway WR, Zabel KM.  et al.  Prognostic significance of precordial ST depression during inferior myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era: results in 16521 patients.  J Am Coll Cardiol.1996;28:305-312.Google Scholar
20.
Capone RJ, Pawitan Y, el-Sherif N.  et al.  Events in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial: baseline predictors of mortality in placebo-treated patients.  J Am Coll Cardiol.1991;18:1434-1438.Google Scholar
Clinical Cardiology
February 4, 1998

Prognostic Significance of the Initial Electrocardiogram in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Author Affiliations

From the Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

 

Clinical Cardiology section editors: Bruce Brundage, MD, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine; Margaret A. Winker, MD, Senior Editor, JAMA .

JAMA. 1998;279(5):387-391. doi:10.1001/jama.279.5.387
Abstract

Context.— Early risk stratification of patients with myocardial infarction is critical to determine optimum treatment strategies and enhance outcomes, but knowledge of the prognostic importance of the initial electrocardiogram (ECG) is limited.

Objective.— To assess the independent value of the initial ECG for short-term risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction.

Design.— Retrospective analysis of the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA (alteplase) for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) clinical trial database.

Setting.— A total of 1081 hospitals in 15 countries.

Patients.— From the 41021 patients enrolled in the overall study, we selected those who presented within 6 hours of chest pain onset with ST-segment elevation and no confounding factors (paced rhythms, ventricular rhythms, or left bundle-branch block) on the ECG performed before thrombolysis was administered (n=34166).

Main Outcome Measure.— Ability of initial ECG to predict all-cause mortality at 30 days.

Results.— Most ECG variables were associated with 30-day mortality in a univariable analysis. In a multivariable analysis combining the initial ECG variables and clinical predictors of mortality, the sum of the absolute ST-segment deviation (both ST elevation and ST depression: odds ratio [OR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-1.69), ECG, heart rate (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.41-1.59), QRS duration (for anterior infarct: OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.43-1.68), and ECG evidence of prior infarction (for new inferior infarct: OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 2.02-3.00) were the strongest ECG predictors of mortality. A nomogram based on the multivariable model produced excellent discrimination of 30-day mortality (C-index, 0.830).

Conclusions.— In patients presenting with myocardial infarction accompanied by ST-segment elevation, components of the initial ECG help predict 30-day mortality. This information should be valuable in early risk stratification, when the opportunity to reduce mortality is greatest, and may help in assessing outcomes adjusted for patient risk.

×