Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Physicians in the United States, Canada, and Mexico
Physicians with current and valid licenses in the United States, Canada,
or Mexico who read any 3 of the selected continuing medical education (CME)
articles in this issue of JAMA, complete the CME Evaluation Form, and fax
it to the number or mail it to the address at the bottom of the CME Evaluation
Form are eligible for category 1 CME credit. There is no charge.
The American Medical Association (AMA) is accredited by the Accreditation
Council for Continuing Medical Education to sponsor CME for physicians. The
AMA designates this educational activity for up to 1 hour of category 1 CME
credit per JAMA issue toward the AMA Physician's Recognition Award (PRA).
Each physician should claim only those hours of credit that were actually
spent in this educational activity.
Physicians in Other Countries
Physicians with current and valid licenses in the United States, Mexico,
or Canada are eligible for CME credit even if they live or practice in other
countries. Physicians licensed in other countries are also welcome to participate
in this CME activity. However, the PRA is available only to physicians licensed
in the United States, Canada, or Mexico.
Earning Credit and the CME Evaluation Form
To earn credit, read 3 of the articles listed below that are designated
for CME credit carefully and complete the CME Evaluation Form. The CME Evaluation
Form must be submitted within 1 month of the issue date. A certificate awarding
1 hour of category 1 CME credit will be faxed or mailed to you; it is then
your responsibility to maintain a record of credit received.
One of our goals is to assess continually the educational needs of our
readers so we may enhance the educational effectiveness of JAMA. To achieve
this goal, we need your help. You must complete the CME Evaluation Form to
Statement of Educational Purpose
JAMA is a general medical journal. Its mission and educational purpose
is to promote the science and art of medicine and the betterment of the public
health. A flexible curriculum of article topics is developed annually by THE
JOURNAL's editorial board and is then supplemented throughout the year with
information gained from readers, authors, reviewers, and editors. To accommodate
the diversity of practice types within JAMA's readership, the Reader's Choice
CME activity allows readers, as adult learners, to determine their own educational
needs and to assist the editors in addressing their needs in future issues.
Readers of JAMA should be able to attain the following educational
objectives: (1) select and read at least 3 articles in 1 issue to gain new
medical information on topics of particular interest to them as physicians,
(2) assess the articles' value to them as practicing physicians, and (3) think
carefully about how this new information may influence their own practices.
The educational objective for each CME article is given after the article
CME Articles in This Issue of JAMA
The following articles in this issue may be read for CME credit:
Authorship: The Coin of the Realm, The Source of ComplaintsArticle
Educational objective: To learn that authorship
disputes are increasingly frequent.
Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost
Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical JournalsArticle
Educational objective: To learn how often medical
journal articles have honorary or ghost authors.
Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?
A Randomized Controlled TrialArticle
Educational objective: To learn whether masking
author identity improves peer review quality.
Adherence to Published Standards of Reporting: A Comparison
of Placebo-Controlled Trials Published in English or GermanArticle
Educational objective: To learn about reporting
deficiencies in published randomized controlled trials.
Publication Bias and Research on Passive Smoking:
Comparison of Published and Unpublished StudiesArticle
Educational objective: To learn that publication
may be delayed if a study's results are not statistically significant.
Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the
Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific MeetingArticle
Educational objective: To learn that studies
with positive results are more likely to be accepted for presentation at scientific
meetings and published.
A Comparison of the Opinions of Experts and Readers
as to What Topics a General Medical Journal (JAMA) Should AddressArticle
Educational objective: To learn how often editors
and editorial board members agree with readers about topics to emphasize for
After reading 3 of these articles, complete the CME Evaluation Form.
July 15, 1998July 15, 1998. JAMA. 1998;280(3):303–304. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.303
Create a personal account or sign in to: