Context Minor electrocardiographic (ECG) ST-T abnormalities
are common, but their prognostic importance has not been fully
determined.
Objective To examine associations of single (1 time only) and
multiple (2 times only and ≥3 times) nonspecific minor ST-T
abnormalities in 5 years with long-term mortality due to myocardial
infarction (MI), coronary heart disease (CHD), cardiovascular disease
(CVD), and all causes in middle-aged men.
Design Prospective cohort study (29-year follow-up after 5 annual
examinations).
Setting and Participants A total of 1673 men employed at the
Western Electric Company in Chicago, Ill, aged 40 to 55 years at entry,
with no evidence of CHD and no major ECG abnormalities throughout the
first 5-year period.
Main Outcome Measures Minor ST-T abnormalities identified from
annual resting ECGs and mortality ascertained from death certificates.
Results Of the 1673 men, 173 had evidence of isolated nonspecific
minor ST-T segment abnormalities. During the follow-up period, there
were 234 deaths due to MI, 352 deaths due to CHD, 463 deaths due to
CVD, and 889 deaths due to all causes. For men with 3 or more annual
recordings of minor ST-T abnormalities, risk of death due to MI, CHD,
CVD, and all causes was significantly greater than for those with
normal ECG findings. For men with 3 or more ECGs with minor ST-T
abnormalities, relative risks (and 95% confidence intervals) adjusted
for cardiovascular and other risk factors were 2.28 (1.16-4.49), 2.39
(1.39-4.12), 2.30 (1.44-3.68), and 1.60 (1.06-2.42), respectively, with
a graded relationship between frequency of occurrence of ST-T
abnormalities and mortality risk (linear trend, P≤.007).
Conclusions Persistent, minor, nonspecific ST-T abnormalities are
associated with increased long-term risk of mortality due to MI, CHD,
CVD, and all causes; the higher the frequency of occurrence of minor
ST-T abnormalities, the greater the risk. These data underscore the
potential value of including nonspecific ECG findings in the overall
assessment of cardiovascular risk.
Electrocardiograms
(ECGs) may be obtained at intervals from adults with a variety of
cardiac or noncardiac diseases and from persons who undergo periodic
health examinations. Nonspecific abnormalities are frequently observed
in tracings of persons without clinical signs of heart disease. The
most common nonspecific findings, ST segment or T-wave abnormalities or
both (ST-T abnormalities), can be disquieting hints of latent
abnormality that the physician may not be able to confirm or completely
dismiss. Association of ST-T abnormalities, particularly major
abnormalities, with increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD)
incidence and mortality has been reported.1-16 However, the
prognostic significance of minor ST-T abnormalities is less
conclusive,2,4,10,11,13,17-20 especially since most studies
have not investigated minor ST-T abnormalities in the absence of other
ECG findings.2,4,10,11,17,18 Furthermore, ST-T
abnormalities are often transient.12,18,20-23 To our
knowledge, no systematic study has been done to determine the relative
prognostic importance of single ST-T abnormalities observed once only
vs on 2 or more occasions, occurring months or years apart.
With the use of long-term data from the Chicago Western Electric Study,
this study examines whether there is an independent
relationship of isolated, nonspecific minor ST-T abnormalities to
long-term risk of mortality due to myocardial infarction (MI), CHD,
cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), and all causes, and evaluates whether
frequency of occurrence of these abnormalities, as well as their
severity and extent, in annual examinations for 5 years is
associated with risk.
Data are from the Chicago Western Electric Study initiated in the fall
of 1957 as a long-term prospective investigation of CHD. Details of the
selection of participants and their demographic characteristics have
been reported.24 Briefly, a group of 2107 middle-aged men
employed by the Hawthorne Works of the Western Electric Company,
Chicago, Ill, underwent an extensive baseline examination, including a
12-lead ECG at rest. For available survivors of this cohort,
examinations including ECG were repeated annually for 11 subsequent
years. This study used data from the first 5 examinations (ie, baseline
and first 4 annual reexaminations). The decision to limit the baseline
period to the first 5 annual examinations was made because (1) complete
data on CVD risk factors were available for substantially more men for
this period, and (2) this approach yielded a longer subsequent
follow-up period.
Exclusions and Inclusions
Participants included in these analyses were men aged 40 to 55 years at
baseline. Five men who were not in this age range, 43 men who had a
history of CHD at entry, and 105 men who were diagnosed as having CHD
during the 4 subsequent annual examinations were excluded. In addition,
because the focus of these analyses was on isolated, minor ST-T
abnormalities, 127 other men were excluded because they had 1 or more
of the following major ECG abnormalities at baseline
(n=40) or at 1 or more of the 4 annual reexaminations
(n=87). These abnormalities may cause secondary ST-T
change and affect prognosis: Q-QS wave abnormalities (Minnesota Code
[MC], 1-1 to 1-2-8); left ventricular hypertrophy (MC, 3-1 and 4-1-1
to 4-3 or 5-1 to 5-3); complete atrioventricular block (MC, 6-1);
Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (MC, 6-4-1 or 6-4-2); complete bundle
branch block or intraventricular block (MC, 7-1-1, 7-2-1, 7-4, or 7-8);
atrial fibrillation or flutter (MC, 8-3); and other major ST-T segment
abnormalities (MC, 4-1 to 4-2 or 5-1 to 5-2).25
Furthermore, 29 men who died prior to the fourth annual reexamination
and 125 men who did not complete the 5 consecutive annual examinations
were also excluded. The remaining 1673 men constitute the cohort of
this study.
All ECGs were read according to the MC25 at the University
of Minnesota ECG reading center. Serial ECGs for the same person were
coded and compared during the same coding period to ensure
comparability of coding for serial tracings recorded in different
years. All ECGs were coded without knowledge of clinical or demographic
data.
Criteria for minor ST-segment depression were either of the following:
(1) no ST-J depression as much as 0.5 mm but ST segment downward
sloping and segment or T-wave nadir at least 0.5 mm below P-R baseline,
in any of leads I, II, aVL, or V2 to V6 (MC,
4-3); or (2) ST-J depression of 1.0 mm or greater and ST segment upward
sloping or U-shaped, in any of leads I, II, aVL, or V1 to V6 (MC, 4-4). Criteria for minor T-wave abnormality were
either of the following: (1) T-wave amplitude zero (flat), negative, or
diphasic (negative-positive type only) with less than 1.0 mm negative
phase in lead I, II, V3 to V6, or in lead aVL
when R-wave amplitude is 5.0 mm or greater (MC, 5-3); or (2) T-wave
amplitude positive and T- to R-wave amplitude ratio of less than 1:20
in any of leads I, II, aVL, or V3 to V6 when
R-wave amplitude in the corresponding leads was 10.0 mm or greater (MC,
5-4). These definitions parallel those used in clinical practice.
Over the past 25 years, the reproducibility of ECG coding has been
checked regularly in the Minneapolis ECG reading center (approximately
every 3 months) on existing and surrogate ECG dossiers. The intercoder
and intracoder reliability and κ values for ST-wave patterns
consistently are between 96% to 97% agreement (κ, 0.82-0.86; SE,
0.03-0.06) and for T-wave patterns are 96% to 98% (κ, 0.90-0.92;
SE, 0.04-0.05). In the present study, ST-segment depression and
T-wave abnormality were combined into 1 group of primary ST-T
abnormalities. These minor ST-T abnormalities were then categorized
according to frequency of appearance (recurrence) during 5 consecutive
annual examinations into 4 groups: no abnormalities, 1 time only, 2
times only, and 3 or more times. In addition, the MCs were grouped
according to severity of abnormality. The MC 4-4 and 5-4 were
classified as less severe forms of abnormality, and MC 4-3 and 5-3 were
considered more severe. Furthermore, extent of abnormality was assessed
by counting the number of lead groups, ie, anterior (leads
V1-V5), anterolateral (I, aVL, V6), and posterior (inferior) (II, III, aVF) in which the ST-T
abnormality occurred.
Clinical Data and Follow-up
Other annual data collected and used in this study were age
at baseline examination and average values from the first 5
examinations for body mass index (BMI) (weight in kilograms divided by
height in meters squared), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP),
serum total cholesterol, and cigarette smoking. Men continuing in the
study were reexamined annually up to 1969. Vital status was
subsequently determined by mailed questionnaires or telephone
interviews through 25 years; data were available for all 2107 men. For
year 33, data on vital status were obtained from the National Death
Index, the Health Care Financing Administration, and surviving
participants' responses to questionnaires; data were available for
2084 participants (98.9%). For analyses herein, follow-up began after
the fifth examination and continued through the thirty-third
anniversary of the initial examination.
Causes of death were classified by reviewing death
certificates and were coded according to the International
Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revision (ICD-8).26
Coding was done independently in duplicate without knowledge of other
information about participants. While the primary focus of this report
is on associations of isolated nonspecific minor ST-T abnormalities
with death due to MI (ICD-8 codes 410.0-410.9) and CHD
(ICD-8 codes 410.0-414.9), results also are presented for CVDs
(ICD-8 codes 400.0-445.9) and all causes of death.
Average values of characteristics at the first 5 annual examinations
were calculated for groups of men defined based on frequency of minor
ECG ST-T abnormalities: none, 1 time only, 2 times only, and 3 or more
times, and compared using the Bonferroni method. Age-adjusted rates for
mortality due to MI, all deaths due to CHD, all deaths due to CVDs, and
deaths due to all causes were calculated per 10,000 person-years
of follow-up for each group of men. Cox proportional hazards regression
model27 was used to estimate the relative risks (RRs) of
death and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each group of men
(compared with men without ST-T abnormalities) with adjustment for age,
education, family history of heart disease, systolic BP, serum
cholesterol level, cigarettes per day, BMI, and BMI squared, and to
test for linear trend (for the 4 groups of minor ST-T abnormalities,
classified as 0, 1, 2, and 3).
To evaluate the prognostic significance of severity and extent of
these abnormalities, scores were computed by assigning 1 point to ST-T
abnormalities coded as MC 4-4 or 5-4 (ie, less severe) and 2 points to
those abnormalities coded as MC 4-3 or 5-3 (ie, more severe).
Cumulative severity score (range, 0-10) for a man was computed by
summing the scores across the 5 annual examinations. Cumulative extent
score (range, 0-15) was calculated by summing the number of lead groups
with any of these minor abnormalities in the 5 examinations.
Single and Recurrent Minor ST-T Abnormalities
Table 1 shows the frequency and
percentage distribution of men with single (1 time only) or repeated
minor ST-T abnormalities during 5 consecutive annual examinations. Of
the 1673 men, 173 showed evidence of isolated nonspecific minor ST-T
abnormalities, which were detected only once in 105 of these men; only
2 times in 36 men; and 3 or more times in the remaining 32 men.
Descriptive Characteristics
Table 2 presents data on age
and risk factors for CHD in the 4 ST-T groups and
for all men. On average, the study cohort was
overweight (BMI ≥25 kg/m2),28 had
higher than desirable levels of BP (ie, >120/80 mm Hg29),
and was hypercholesterolemic. More than half were current smokers
(54.8%), with a mean of 18 cigarettes smoked per day. On average, they
had slightly less than a high school education and 19% had a family
history of CVD. Age, BMI, serum total cholesterol levels, cigarette
smoking, education, and family history of CVD did not differ
significantly among the 4 groups. Systolic and diastolic BP were higher
for those with minor ST-T abnormalities. Men with more frequent
occurrence of ST-T abnormalities had higher percentage of a more severe
form (ie, MC 4-3 or 5-3) and of abnormalities involving multiple lead
groups.
Mortality and Minor ST-T Abnormalities
During 29 years of follow-up, there were 234 deaths due to MI,
352 deaths due to all CHD, 463 due to all CVDs, and 889 due to all
causes (Table 3).
Higher age-adjusted rates of MI, CHD, CVDs, and mortality due to all
causes were observed in men with 1 only, 2 only, and 3 or more minor
ST-T abnormalities than men with none (Table 3). There was a graded
increase in 29-year mortality from those with normal ECG findings to
those with ST-T abnormalities 1 time only, to those with abnormalities
on multiple occasions (linear trend, P<.001). Men with 3 or
more occurrences of ST-T abnormalities had 212 times the death
rate due to MI, CHD, and all CVDs than men with normal ECG findings;
they also had higher death rates due to all causes. Age-adjusted
mortality rates for the 173 men with any recording of minor ST-T
abnormalities (ie, ≥1 in 5 annual examinations) were higher for all
end points compared with those with normal ECG findings throughout.
Two proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate RRs
of mortality for the 4 groups of men with adjustment for: (1) age only,
and (2) age, systolic BP, serum cholesterol level, cigarettes
per day, education, family history of CVD, BMI, and BMI squared (Table 4). With control for age only
or for multiple confounders, there was a significant direct graded
relationship between minor ST-T abnormalities and mortality due to MI,
all CHD, all CVDs,
and all causes. Men with ST-T abnormalities on
only 1 occasion had a greater risk of death (all end points) than did
those without abnormalities (multivariate RRs, 1.13-1.40). Risk was
higher for men with abnormalities on repeat annual examinations
(multivariate RRs, 1.27-2.39; linear trend, P<.001 to
P=.007).
Model 1 and 2 Cox analyses were repeated for men with any
occurrence of minor ST-T abnormalities in 5 years of examinations, ie,
men with 1 or more recordings of minor ST-T abnormalities. A
significant relationship was found for any recording of minor ST-T
abnormalities and death due to MI, CHD, CVDs, and all causes (Table 5). Multivariate RRs for these
end points ranged from 1.28 to 1.67 with 95% CIs that did not include
values of 1.00 or lower. When diastolic BP was substituted for systolic
BP in multivariate Cox analyses, results were consistent with those
reported for systolic BP (results not shown).
Similar Cox analyses for the prognostic significance of severity or
extent scores of minor ST-T abnormalities were performed. Multivariate
adjusted RRs (95% CIs) for MI, CHD, CVD, and all cause mortality
associated with a 1-point increase in cumulative severity score were
1.18 (1.07-1.30), 1.20 (1.11-1.29), 1.16 (1.08-1.25), and 1.11
(1.04-1.17), respectively. Corresponding risks for extent of ST-T
abnormalities score were 1.18 (1.07-1.31), 1.19 (1.10-1.29), 1.18
(1.09-1.27), and 1.12 (1.05-1.12), respectively.
This prospective study demonstrates that in employed
middle-aged men isolated, nonspecific minor ST-segment and/or T-wave
abnormalities on repeat annual examinations were independently
associated with increased risk of death due to MI, CHD, CVDs, and all
causes. Risks were greater for men with only 2 and 3 or more
occurrences of ST-T abnormalities than for men with abnormalities on
only 1 occasion. Of clinical relevance for screening, compared with men
with no abnormalities, men with 1 or more recordings of minor ST-T
abnormalities in 5 years of annual examinations had an increased risk
of 38% to 67% for cardiovascular, coronary, and MI death.
Our analysis focused on minor ST-T findings, which constitute a class
of abnormalities generally considered less severe than the combined
(minor and major) ST-T wave changes reported in most other
studies.2,4,11,15 Ten percent of these middle-aged men, who
were otherwise free of evidence of CHD, had minor ST-T abnormalities at
least once in annual resting ECG examinations during 5 years. Other
studies report similar rates of occurrence. Minor T-wave abnormality
(MC, 5-3) was found in 12% of men aged 40 to 59 years in the community
population in Tecumseh, Mich,30 and in 9% of men of
similar age in a religious sect living in the northwestern United
States and southwestern Canada.31 Kannel et
al12 reported that in Framingham Study examinations 8 to 12
(ie, over 4 years), 14.1% of men aged 44 to 74 years had nonspecific
ECG abnormalities (ST-segment depression ≥1 mm and/or T-wave
flattening or inversion). Thus, nonspecific ST-T abnormalities are
common in apparently healthy people.
Consistent with the longstanding but unconfirmed impression of
clinicians and epidemiologists,12,18,21-23 the Western
Electric data demonstrate that there was considerable intraindividual
variation in frequency of occurrence of minor ST-T abnormalities over
time. The ST-T abnormalities have been described in a number of
situations besides the presence of organic heart disease, including
with change in posture,32 hyperventilation,32
ingestion of food,33 the hyperkinetic heart
syndrome,34 imbalance of the sympathetic nervous
system,34 or anxiety.35 These factors,
difficult to delineate and control, contribute to this variability.
Hence, some authors believe that these abnormalities are the result of
physiological influences and are not prognostically
relevant.23 It is also true that persons with confirmed CHD
may manifest only transient asymptomatic ST-T changes.36
One limitation of our study is that data on exercise were not available
for inclusion in these analyses. Furthermore, information on use of
medication and serum electrolytes were not collected. However, the
likelihood is that the majority of participants were not taking
medication that would affect ST-T waves (eg, digitalis) and that
abnormal serum electrolyte levels were uncommon, given that the study
cohort was a healthy working population and that participants with CHD
or MI were excluded from these analyses.
Other possible noncardiac causes of variation are errors or differences
in ECG recording technique and differences in interpretation across
examinations.37 The MC used in this study has been widely
recommended for classification of ECGs for epidemiological
purposes.25 The principal advantage of this system is that
all classifications are based on the semiquantitative magnitude of
specific items, which should improve comparability between ECG readings
taken on different occasions. In this study, all ECGs were coded at the
same time in a serial,
standardized quality-controlled laboratory, which
minimized intraobserver and interobserver variation. Therefore, it is
likely that the large observed intraindividual variation in occurrence
of minor ST-T abnormalities is not an artifact but a real feature of
such abnormalities.
The predictive value of major ECG abnormalities for cardiovascular
mortality has been well established.4-7,9,14,38,39 These
ECG abnormalities include Q wave,4-7,9 left ventricular
hypertrophy,9,14,38 and others (eg, atrial flutter and/or
fibrillation, frequent ectopic ventricular beats, ventricular
conduction defect, and complete left bundle branch
block).5,7,9 In the Western Electric cohort, the
multivariate-adjusted RRs of death due to CHD in 29 years for men with
major abnormalities on their baseline ECG were: abnormal Q wave, 2.35
(95% CI, 1.41-3.90); left ventricular hypertrophy, 2.02 (95% CI,
1.01-4.26), and other major ECG abnormalities combined, 1.89 (95% CI,
1.03-3.47). The magnitudes of these risks were greater compared with
that of any minor ST-T abnormalities described in this study (RR, 1.67;
95% CI, 1.25-2.25), indicating the relative importance of these
abnormalities. However, for men with minor ST-T abnormalities on 3 or
more of the ECGs during the first 5 years (RR, 2.39; 95% CI,
1.39-4.12), risk was similar to those for men with major abnormalities
on the single baseline ECG.
The existing literature consistently shows an association of total or
major prevalent ST-T abnormalities with a higher risk of
death.1-16 Minor abnormalities, eg, ST-segment depression
less than 0.5 mm (MC, 4-3), or junctional ST depression with
upward-sloping (MC, 4-4), or decreased T-wave amplitude without
inversion of 1.0 mm or more (MC, 5-3, 5-4), also have been examined in
some studies, with inconsistent results, eg, reported as being of
prognostic importance,2,4,11,18,20 of some
importance,10,17 and no prognostic
significance.19 Of particular concern, most
investigations2,4,10,11,17,18 did not isolate minor ST-T
abnormalities from coexisting major ECG abnormalities, did not examine
whether the relationship of these abnormalities to outcome was
independent of other established coronary risk factors, and did not
determine the meaning of occurrence of these abnormalities only 1 time
vs more than once, in repeat examinations. Based on data from the
Honolulu Heart Program, Knutsen et al14 noted that
individual ECG abnormalities frequently were correlated and that
subsequent CHD rates were lower for each ECG category examined as an
isolated abnormality, and some major ischemic ECG findings such as ST
depression did not seem to indicate substantially increased risk when
it was an isolated ECG finding in clinically disease-free men.
In light of these concerns, our present analyses excluded persons
with CHD or major ECG abnormalities, including major ST-segment (MC,
4-1 and 4-2), T-wave (MC, 5-1 and 5-2) abnormality, or both, in the
first 5 years. This ensured that the prognostic evaluation involved
only isolated minor nonspecific ST-T abnormalities. No previous study
has examined the predictive value of more than 1 occurrence of minor
ST-T abnormalities on repeat annual examinations. Our data show that
there was a significant trend of graded increase in RR from absence of
abnormalities to serially recurring abnormalities. In addition, men
with more frequent recurring abnormalities were also more likely to
have the more severe codes (ie, MC, 4-3 and 5-3) and to have ST-T
abnormalities in multiple lead groups. Both severity and extent
apparently contribute to the higher mortality observed in persons with
more frequent occurrence of minor ST-T abnormalities. Colinearity among
these variables makes assessment of their separate impact on risks
virtually impossible.
A great deal is now known about the frequency and prognosis of ECG
abnormalities in patients with clinically overt heart disease. However,
the practicing physician is often confronted with an ECG abnormality,
such as minor ST-T change, as an incidental finding during a routine
evaluation of an asymptomatic individual without a clinically apparent
cardiac disorder. Our study implies that attention should be given to
such an ECG finding as possibly clinically significant, worthy of
diagnostic evaluation, and warranting interval ECG reexamination. Data
from a careful history taking, physical examination, and laboratory
assessment must be correlated with the ECG. It is also important to
consider other major cardiovascular risk factors such as the patient's
sex, age, population of origin, major modifiable-preventable traits
(elevated BP, dyslipidemia, adverse dietary pattern, and cigarette
smoking), and other lifestyle habits, because these may give meaning to
the ECG finding.4,8,13,16
Although data from the Western Electric Study provide no direct
evidence of the value of ECG screening for reducing cardiovascular
risk, these data do provide evidence that minor isolated nonspecific
ECG findings are prognostically important. Our findings suggest that
recurrent nonspecific minor ST-T abnormalities on repeat examinations
in middle-aged men indicate increased mortality risk and warrant
especially vigorous preventive management against the occurrence of
clinical CHD.
1.Ostrander LD. The relation of "silent"
T-wave inversion to cardiovascular disease in an epidemiologic study.
Am J Cardiol.1970;25:325-328.Google Scholar 2.Bartel A, Heyden S, Tyroler HA, Tabesh E, Cassel JC, Hames CG. Electrocardiographic predictors of coronary heart
disease.
Arch Intern Med.1971;128:929-937.Google Scholar 3.The Coronary Drug Project Research Group. The prognostic
importance of the electrocardiogram after myocardial infarction:
experience in the Coronary Drug Project.
Ann Intern Med.1972;77:677-689.Google Scholar 4.Rose G, Baxter PJ, Reid DD, McCartney P. Prevalence and
prognosis of electrocardiographic findings in middle-aged men.
Br
Heart J.1978;40:636-643.Google Scholar 5.Reunanen A, Pyorala K, Punsar S, Aromaa A. Predictive
value of ECG findings with respect to coronary heart disease mortality.
Adv Cardiol.1978;21:310-312.Google Scholar 6.Greig M, Pemberton J, Hay I, MacKenzie G. A prospective
study of the development of coronary heart disease in a group of 1202
middle-aged men.
J Epidemiol Community Health.1980;34:23-30.Google Scholar 7.Ostor E, Schnohr P, Jensen G, Nyboe J, Hansen AT. Electrocardiographic findings and their association with mortality in
the Copenhagen City Heart Study.
Eur Heart J.1981;2:317-328.Google Scholar 8.Atterhog JH. A 5-year follow-up of young men with
primary T-wave aberrations in their electrocardiograms.
Acta Med
Scand.1981;209:75-82.Google Scholar 9.Rabkin SW, Mathewson FL, Tate RB. The electrocardiogram
in apparently healthy men and the risk of sudden death.
Br Heart
J.1982;47:546-552.Google Scholar 10.Singer RB, Siber FJ, Brown AE, Pitkin FI. Mortality in
4100 insured applicants with ECG and chest X-ray: relation to
cardiovascular and other risk factors, including relative heart
diameter.
Trans Assoc Life Insur Med Dir Am.1982;65:180-193.Google Scholar 11.Cullen K, Stenhouse NS, Wearne KL, Cumpston GN. Electrocardiograms and 13 year cardiovascular mortality in Busselton
Study.
Br Heart J.1982;47:209-212.Google Scholar 12.Kannel WB, Anderson K, McGee DL, Degatano LS, Stampfer MJ. Nonspecific electrocardiographic abnormality as a predictor of
coronary heart disease: the Framingham Study.
Am Heart J.1987;113:370-376.Google Scholar 13.Liao Y, Liu K, Dyer A.
et al. Sex differential in the
relationship of electrocardiographic ST-T abnormalities to risk of
coronary death: 11.5 year follow-up findings of the Chicago Heart
Association Detection Project in industry.
Circulation.1987;75:347-352.Google Scholar 14.Knutsen R, Knutsen SF, Curb JD, Reed DM, Kautz JA, Yano K. The predictive value of resting electrocardiograms for 12-year
incidence of coronary heart disease in the Honolulu Heart Program.
J Clin Epidemiol.1988;41:293-302.Google Scholar 15.De Bacquer D, Martins Pereira LS, De Backer G, De Henauw S, Kornitzer M. The predictive value of electrocardiographic
abnormalities for total and cardiovascular disease mortality in men and
women.
Eur Heart J.1994;15:1604-1610.Google Scholar 16.Sigurdsson E, Sigfusson N, Sigvaldason H, Thorgeirsson G. Silent ST-T changes in an epidemiologic cohort study: a marker of
hypertension or coronary heart disease, or both: the Reykjavik Study.
J Am Coll Cardiol.1996;27:1140-1147.Google Scholar 17.Ungerleider HE. The prognostic implications of the
electrocardiogram.
Am J Cardiol.1960;6:35-44.Google Scholar 18.Kiessling CE, Schaaf RS, Lyle AM. A study of T-wave
changes in the electrocardiograms of normal individuals.
Am J
Cardiol.1964;13:598-602.Google Scholar 19.Higgins ITT, Kannel WB, Dawber TR. The
electrocardiogram in epidemiological studies: reproducibility,
validity, and international comparison.
Br J Prev Soc Med.1965;19:53-68.Google Scholar 20.Blackburn H, Taylor HL, Keys A. Coronary heart disease
in seven countries, XVI: the electrocardiogram in prediction of
five-year coronary heart disease incidence among men aged forty through
fifty-nine.
Circulation.1970;41(suppl IV):154-161.Google Scholar 21.Mathewson FAL, Varnam GS. Abnormal electrocardiograms
in apparently healthy people: long-term follow-up study.
Circulation.1960;21:196-203.Google Scholar 22.Ostrander LD. Serial electrocardiographic findings in a
prospective epidemiological study.
Circulation.1966;34:1069-1080.Google Scholar 23.Harlan WR, Graybiel A, Mitchell RE, Oberman A, Osborne RK. Serial electrocardiograms: their reliability and prognostic
validity during a 24-yr period.
J Chronic Dis.1967;20:853-867.Google Scholar 24.Paul O, Lepper MH, Phelan WH.
et al. A longitudinal
study of coronary heart disease.
Circulation.1963;28:20-31.Google Scholar 25.Prineas RJ, Crow RS, Blackburn H. The Minnesota
Code Manual of Electrocardiographic Findings: Standards and Procedures
for Measurement and Classification. Littleton, Mass: John
Wright-PSG Inc; 1982.
26. International Classification of Diseases, Eighth
Revision (ICD-8). Washington, DC: National Center for Health
Statistics; 1967:49-522.
27.Cox DR. Regression models and life tables.
JR Stat
Soc B.1972;34:187-220.Google Scholar 28.Garrison RJ, Kannel WB. A new approach for estimating
healthy body weights.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord.1993;17:417-423.Google Scholar 29.Stamler J. Blood pressure and high blood pressure:
aspects of risk.
Hypertension.1991;18:I95-I107.Google Scholar 30.Ostrander LD, Brandt RL, Kjelsberg MO, Epstein FH. Electrocardiographic findings among the adult population of a total
natural community, Tecumseh, Michigan.
Circulation.1965;31:888-898.Google Scholar 31.Goldbarg AN, Kurczynski TW, Hellerstein HK, Steinberg AG. Electrocardiographic findings among the total adult population of a
large religious isolate.
Circulation.1970;41:257-269.Google Scholar 32.Kemp GL, Ellestad MH. The significance of
hyperventilative and orthostatic T-wave changes on the
electrocardiogram.
Arch Intern Med.1968;121:518-523.Google Scholar 33.Guazzi M, Fiorentini C, Polese A, Magrini F, Olivari MT. Stress-induced and sympathetically-mediated electrocardiographic
and circulatory variations in the primary hyperkinetic heart syndrome.
Cardiovasc Res.1975;9:342-354.Google Scholar 34.Furberg C. Adrenergic beta-blockade and
electrocardiographical ST-T changes.
Acta Med Scand.1967;181:21-32.Google Scholar 35.Taggart P, Carruthers M, Somerville W. Emotions,
catecholamines and the electrocardiogram. In: Yu PN, Goodwin JF, eds.
Progress in Cardiology. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger;
1978:103.
36.Schang Jr SJ, Pepine CJ. Transient asymptomatic S-T
segment depression during daily activity.
Am J Cardiol.1977;39:396-402.Google Scholar 37.Surawicz B. Assessing abnormal ECG patterns in the
absence of heart disease.
Cardiovasc Med.1977;2:629-645.Google Scholar 38.Kannel WB, Gordon T, Offutt D. Left ventricular
hypertrophy by electrocardiogram: prevalence, incidence, and mortality
in the Framingham Study.
Ann Intern Med.1969;71:89-105.Google Scholar 39.The Pooling Project Research Group. Relationship of
blood pressure, serum cholesterol, smoking habit, relative weight, and
ECG abnormalities to incidence of major coronary events: final report
of the Pooling Project.
J Chronic Dis.1978;31:201-306.Google Scholar