Context
In men who develop an elevated serum prostate-specific
antigen level (PSA) after having undergone a radical prostatectomy, the
natural history of progression to distant metastases and death due to
prostate cancer is unknown.
Objective
To characterize the time course of disease progression
in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Design
A retrospective review of a large surgical series with
median (SD) follow-up of 5.3 (3.7) years (range, 0.5-15 years) between
April 1982 and April 1997.
Setting An urban academic tertiary referral institution.
Patients
A total of 1997 men undergoing radical
prostatectomy, by a single surgeon, for clinically localized prostate
cancer. None received neoadjuvant therapy, and none had received
adjuvant hormonal therapy prior to documented distant metastases.
Main Outcome Measures
After surgery, men were followed up with PSA
assays and digital rectal examinations every 3 months for the first
year, semiannually for the second year, and annually thereafter. A
detectable serum PSA level of at least 0.2 ng/mL was evidence of
biochemical recurrence. Distant metastases were diagnosed by
radionuclide bone scan, chest radiograph, or other body imaging, which
was performed at the time of biochemical recurrence and annually
thereafter.
Results
The actuarial metastasis-free survival for all 1997 men
was 82% (95% confidence interval, 76%-88%) at 15 years after
surgery. Of the 1997 men, 315 (15%) developed biochemical PSA level
elevation. Eleven of these underwent early hormone therapy after the
recurrence and are not included in the study. Of the remaining 304 men,
103 (34%) developed metastatic disease within the study period. The
median actuarial time to metastases was 8 years from the time of PSA
level elevation. In survival analysis, time to biochemical progression
(P<.001), Gleason score (P<.001), and PSA
doubling time (P<.001) were predictive of the probability
and time to the development of metastatic disease. An algorithm
combining these parameters was constructed to stratify men into risk
groups. Once men developed metastatic disease, the median actuarial
time to death was 5 years. The time interval from surgery to the
appearance of metastatic disease was predictive of time until death
(P<.02).
Conclusions
Several clinical parameters help predict the outcomes
of men with PSA elevation after radical prostatectomy. These data may
be useful in the design of clinical trials, the identification of men
for enrollment into experimental protocols, and counseling men
regarding the timing of administration of adjuvant
therapies.
Radical
prostatectomy provides excellent cancer control in most men with
clinically localized disease. However, approximately 35% of men
will experience a detectable serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA)
elevation within 10 years following surgery.1-5 At this
early sign of biochemical recurrence, patients want to know what this
means, whether they will survive, and if not, how long they will have
to live. Cancer-specific and metastasis-free survival rates following
radical prostatectomy have been reported.2,6-10 However,
until now, the time course of progression to distant metastases or
death due to prostate cancer in men with biochemical failure following
radical prostatectomy has not been documented. This report
characterizes the natural history of the disease in these men. This
analysis provides information to men and their physicians considering
systemic therapy, even in the setting of minimal elevation of PSA
levels. It provides additional background data that are lacking in the
proper design of some clinical trials.
A total of 1997 men had undergone radical prostatectomy for clinically
localized prostate cancer by a single surgeon at The Johns Hopkins
Hospital, Baltimore, Md, between April 1982 and April 1997. The
Hybritech-Tandem R and E, San Diego, Calif, and the TOSOH PSA
assays, (Hybritech/Beckman, San Francisco, Calif) were used at The
Johns Hopkins Hospital. These assays have been demonstrated to be
comparable in
intralaboratory testing. Other comparable PSA
assays may have been used at referring institutions. Pathologic
diagnosis of prostate cancer was based on examination of prostate
tissue. Histologic grading was performed using the Gleason system for
the prostatectomy specimen. No man received neoadjuvant radiation or
hormonal therapy. The method of pathologic analysis at our institution
has been described.11 Tumors were determined to be
organ-confined, to penetrate the prostatic capsule without extension to
the seminal vesicles, to involve the seminal vesicles without nodal
disease, or to involve the pelvic lymph nodes.
After the operation, men were followed up, either at our institution or
by referring physicians, with serum PSA levels and digital rectal
examinations performed every 3 months for the first year, semiannually
for the second year, and yearly thereafter. Isolated biochemical PSA
elevation was defined as a serum PSA level of at least 0.2 ng/mL, which
represents a measurable value above the level of detection for this
assay. Radionuclide bone scans were performed either at our institution
or by the referring physicians at the time of biochemical recurrence
and on a yearly basis thereafter unless performed earlier for symptoms
suggestive of distant metastasis. A positive bone scan result or other
radiographic or histologic (lymph node biopsy) evidence of distant
failure was used for the diagnosis of distant metastases.
Thirteen men who had received immediate adjuvant radiation
therapy based on pathologic features and 11 men who had received
adjuvant hormonal therapy prior to the development of metastatic
disease were not included in the analysis of progression after PSA
elevation. Therefore, adjuvant hormonal therapy had no impact on either
the time to biochemical progression or the time to distant metastasis
in this analysis. Men with a PSA elevation following surgery who
received postoperative radiation to the prostatic bed and demonstrated
a biochemical response for longer than 24 months were considered to
have local recurrences only and cured by the combination of surgery and
radiation, and thus were not included in this analysis. Conversely, 83
(27%) of 304 men who had a PSA level elevation and had received
adjuvant radiation without a sustained biochemical response (not cured
by adjuvant radiation) were considered to harbor distant metastatic
disease and were included in this analysis.
Some men with documented metastatic disease had received a
variety of experimental therapies for androgen-insensitive disease. No
form of systemic therapy substantially prolonged survival in men with
hormone-resistant prostate cancer. These therapies were not considered
to have had a significant effect on the length of survival after the
development of metastatic disease.12
Serum PSA level increases above 0.2 ng/mL demonstrated an exponential
growth curve similar to that originally reported by Patel et
al.13 By this manner, a correlation between the log of PSA
levels and time was linear. Prostate-specific antigen doubling time
(PSADT) was calculated by natural log of 2 (0.693) divided by the slope
of the relationship between the log of PSA and time of PSA measurement
for each patient. To determine the optimal PSADT cutoff for predicting
metastatic disease progression for this cohort, several doubling-time
calculation models were analyzed. Models that used all postoperative
PSA values, only the first 2 values regardless of level,13
only the first 2 values after a level of 0.2 ng/mL was reached, and all
PSA values within a 2-, 3-, and 5-year period following a documented
PSA elevation were analyzed by recursive partitioning to determine the
optimal PSADT cutoff level. The method of recursive partitioning
involved calculating PSADT based on the PSA values in all of the above
models and using sequential values of PSADT provided by each model as a
trial cutoff level to determine the optimal separation of men based on
their risk of developing metastatic disease. The PSADT values that were
less than 0 (stable, nonincreasing, or decreasing PSA levels) were
assigned a value equal to 0. The PSADT values that were exceptionally
long (eg, >100 months)
were assigned a value of 100 months for ease of
calculations.
Patients who died were placed into 1 of 3 categories: dead with
no evidence of disease (no previous history of a detectable PSA), dead
with cancer (history of a detectable PSA, and elevated PSA with
documented death due to another cause), and death due to cancer. Death
due to prostate cancer was defined as death in any man with metastatic
disease that showed any progression following treatment with hormonal
therapy. No patient with metastatic disease died due to any cause other
than prostate cancer and thus cancer-specific survival was the same as
overall survival in men with metastatic disease for this series.
Statistical analyses were performed using the STATA 5.0 software
package (Stata Corporation, College Station, Tex). Cox proportional
hazards regression analysis was used to compare the models for
calculating the PSADT. The PSADT method used was optimized to provide
the best χ2P value with the most number of men
with PSA data. Analyses of actuarial survival were performed as
described by Kaplan and Meier.14 Statistical significance
of Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival curves was calculated using the
Wilcoxon-Gehan statistic.
The clinical TNM stages, the range of preoperative PSA levels,
prostatectomy Gleason scores, and the pathologic stages of all 1997 men
are detailed in Table 1. These men
have been followed up for a mean (SD) of 5.3 (3.7) years (range, 0.5-15
years). Seventeen percent (344/1997) have been followed up for 10 or
more years. Figure 1 depicts the
actuarial metastasis-free likelihood following surgery for all 1997 men
with a 15-year metastasis-free likelihood of 82% (95% confidence
interval [CI], 76%-88%). Actuarial cancer-specific survival at 10
and 15 years following surgery was 94% (95% CI, 92%-96%) and 91%
(95% CI, 87%-94%), respectively.
Three hundred fifteen men (15%) have demonstrated biochemical
recurrence. No man has experienced a distant or local recurrence with
an undetectable serum PSA level. Eleven of these 315 men with
biochemical recurrence underwent early hormonal therapy after PSA
elevation and are not included in the analysis of progression to
metastatic disease. Table 2 depicts
the pathologic stage, Gleason score, follow-up, and year of PSA
recurrence for the remaining 304 men.
Various models for determining PSADT were compared using a Cox
proportional hazards regression model (Table 3). Use of all PSA values within 2 years of
initial documented PSA level elevation provided the optimal combination
of statistical significance and number of evaluable men for this group.
The median PSADT for this group of men (n=131) was 10
months. When used as a cutoff level for further comparison, a PSADT of
greater than or less than 10 months provided the most statistically
significant prediction (P<.001) of time to distant disease
progression after PSA elevation.
The time from PSA elevation to the development of clinically
evident metastasis is depicted by actuarial analysis in Figure 2. The significance of Gleason score on the
risk of developing metastatic disease after PSA elevation is
illustrated in Figure 3, A (P<.001). At the time of this report, of the 304 men with
biochemical recurrence, 103 (34%) have developed distant metastases.
The median actuarial time to development of metastases following PSA
elevation was 8 years, and the 5-year metastasis-free rate was 63%.
Figure 3, B demonstrates that the time to development of distant
metastases was dependent on the time of the PSA elevation (≤2 or >2
years following surgery; P<.001). Figure 3, C demonstrates
that a PSADT cutoff of 10 months predicted the likelihood of subsequent
development of metastatic disease as well (P<.001). In men
with Gleason score 6 or 7 tumors, substratification according to the
presence of organ-confined disease or surgical margin status did not
identify a subset of men with a significantly different time course to
metastatic disease. When all 304 men were
considered, pathologic stage stratified as organ-confined disease,
capsular penetration with negative seminal vesicles and lymph nodes, or
involvement of the seminal vesicles and/or pelvic lymph nodes was
statistically significant in predicting time to metastatic disease
(data not shown, P=.01).
We constructed an algorithm (Figure 4) to predict a man's likelihood of
developing metastatic disease within various periods following initial
biochemical recurrence. Unfortunately, when pathologic stage was used
to further subcategorize the algorithm in Figure 4, the number of men
within each category was not sufficient to obtain reasonable 95% CIs,
and pathologic stage was not included in the algorithm for this reason.
Using the prostatectomy Gleason score, the time of initial biochemical
recurrence (≤2 vs >2 years), and PSADT (<10 vs ≥10 months) for
men with Gleason score of less than 8, we estimated a man's likelihood
of remaining free of clinically evident metastatic disease over various
times (3, 5, and 7 years) without additional therapeutic intervention.
The PSADT was not a statistically significant predictor for men with a
Gleason score of greater than 7 when time to PSA elevation was known.
This may be due to small numbers of men within each subset and requires
further investigation. The periods indicate years from biochemical
recurrence as opposed to years from surgery.
Forty-four (43%) of the 103 men with metastatic disease died
due to prostate cancer. Again, no man with metastatic disease died due
to any cause other than prostate cancer. The actuarial median time to
death after development of metastatic disease was slightly less than 5
years (Figure 5). The only
variable that reliably separated men based on time to death was the
length of time from surgery until diagnosis of metastatic disease.
Figure 6 demonstrates a significant
difference in the time to death after development of distant disease
between those men who developed metastatic disease within 1 to 3, 4 to
7, and 8 to 15 years following surgery
(P=.02). Median survival for men developing
metastases within the first 3 years after surgery was approximately 4
years from the diagnosis of metastatic disease. For men developing
metastases between 4 and 7 years following surgery, median survival was
approximately 5 years, and the median survival has not been reached in
men developing metastases at 8 or more years following surgery. Gleason
score, time to biochemical recurrence, PSADT, and serum PSA levels at
diagnosis of metastases did not significantly influence time until
death.
We are able to estimate a patient's probability of long-term cure
after radical prostatectomy using pathologic stage as
a surrogate end point. Both clinical and
pathologic factors play a role in determining a patient's likelihood
of having an undetectable serum PSA level at 10 to 15 years following
surgery.1-5 The most predictive of these factors include
pretreatment PSA level, pathologic stage, and Gleason score; however,
other microscopic features and biomarkers have also been suggested to
identify patients at risk for failure following
surgery.1-5,15-17
Between 27% and 53% of men undergoing radical
prostatectomy will have a detectable serum PSA elevation within 10
years following surgery.1-5 Until now, there have been no
reliable data concerning the timing and natural history of disease
progression for men with an isolated PSA level elevation after radical
prostatectomy. These findings should allow physicians and patients to
make educated decisions about the progression of disease and need for
treatment and to facilitate the design of clinical trials.
Twenty-three percent of the men who demonstrated biochemical
recurrence in our series had an undetectable serum PSA level for at
least 5 years, and a small percentage (4%) had an undetectable level
for 10 years prior to biochemical recurrence (Table 2). In other
series, PSA progression has been rare in men with an undetectable PSA
level for 5 to 6 years after surgery.18 Our series
demonstrates that with a larger number of patients and with yearly
extended follow-up, men do continue to experience recurrence even 10
years and longer after surgery.
This analysis demonstrates that some men remain free of metastasis for
an extended length of time after
biochemical recurrence. The median actuarial time from
biochemical recurrence until progression to metastases was 5 years
(mean, 8 years). The metastasis-free rate of 63% for all men at 5
years after biochemical progression is similar to the 60% to 75%
progression-free rates at 5 years after surgery in men with lymph
node–positive disease treated solely by radical
prostatectomy.19-21
The risk of developing metastatic disease after biochemical
recurrence was shown to correlate with pathologic Gleason scores. Men
with tumors of Gleason scores less than 8 had a 73% chance of
remaining free of progression at 5 years after biochemical recurrence
compared with a 40% probability in men with higher grade tumors
(Gleason score, 8-10). A similar correlation between risk of
progression and tumor grade was also seen in men with lymph
node–positive disease treated solely with radical
prostatectomy.20
The length of time after surgery prior to biochemical recurrence
was important in determining the risk of eventual distant failure for
men with lower (5, 6, and 7) and men with high (8, 9, and 10) Gleason
scores (Figure 4). A similar observation was made previously by Partin
et al22 in a report demonstrating that a high Gleason score
and advanced pathologic stage were important in determining the
likelihood of local or distant failure. Using a cutoff of 10 months,
PSADT provided further substratification for men with a Gleason score
of less than 8. Men with rapid PSA level elevation (<2 years), a
Gleason score of 5 to 7, and a PSADT (>10 months)
demonstrated a 76% probability of remaining free
of metastatic disease for 5 years following initial PSA level elevation
compared with men with a shorter PSADT (<10 months) who had only 35%
chance of remaining free of metastatic disease for 5 years after
biochemical recurrence. Although not as strong as Gleason score, time
of biochemical recurrence, and PSADT, the pathologic stage did
contribute to the likelihood of distant metastasis
(P=.01). The PSADT has been suggested by Patel
et al13 as a useful predictor of the type of eventual
recurrence after radical prostatectomy. They measured the PSADT for a
group of 77 men with biochemical recurrence following radical
retropubic prostatectomy and found that shorter PSADTs (<6 months)
were more indicative of distant disease when compared with local
recurrence.
The overall 10- and 15-year metastasis-free survival rates in the
present report were 87% and 82%, respectively. Zincke et
al2 previously reported 10- and 15-year metastasis-free
rates of 82% and 76% in more than 3000 men undergoing radical
prostatectomy. In a multi-institutional study, Gerber et
al6 reported 10-year metastasis-free rates that varied
directly with tumor grade (low, 87%; intermediate, 68%; and high,
52%). When patients in our series were divided into these same
categories, the metastasis-free rates at 10 years were better than
those reported for those who had the low-grade tumors (100%) and
intermediate-grade tumors (91%) but were somewhat lower in the
higher-grade tumors (43%). This lower rate for the high-grade tumors
may be due to the lack of early hormonal therapy in our patients with
high-grade disease. Although this issue was not specifically addressed
by Gerber et al,6 more than one quarter of the men in the
report from the Mayo Clinic received either early hormonal or radiation
therapy.2
After the development of metastatic disease, the actuarial
median time until death due to prostate cancer was slightly less than 5
years and dependent on the timing of progression to distant disease.
Men who progressed to distant disease within 1 to 3 years following
surgery died due to cancer at a higher rate than those men who
developed metastases at 4 to 7 years or more than 8 years after
surgery. Seventy-eight percent of the men who developed distant disease
8 years or more after surgery survived an additional 5 years. Time to
original biochemical recurrence, serum PSA level at the time of
diagnosis of metastatic disease, and Gleason score did not prove useful
in stratifying risk of cancer-specific death. Data relating to the
extent of disease on radionuclide bone scan, serum testosterone level,
and performance status was not available in these men. These factors
have also been shown to be important in determining overall survival in
men with metastatic disease.23,24
The 10- and 15-year cancer-specific survival rates of 94% and
91% for all 1997 men were similar to those reported in 2 recent
analyses.7-10 As was the case for metastasis-free survival,
our rates of cancer-specific survival are higher than those reported by
Gerber et al6 and Zincke et al2; this may due
to patient selection.
None of the men in our study with metastatic disease died due to causes
other than prostate cancer. This means that our cancer-specific death
rate in men with metastatic disease is the same as the overall survival
rate. The overall survival rate of 43% at 5 years was almost identical
to that reported in men with minimal metastatic disease and good
performance status in the National Cancer Institute Intergroup Study
Number 0036 and other studies.24-32
For men who experience an isolated biochemical recurrence, the
algorithm in Figure 4 should provide a reasonable estimate of their
probability of developing metastatic disease over the next 3, 5, or 7
years. This information should
allow physicians and patients to make educated
treatment decisions based on their risk of recurrence.25-32
We anticipate that this algorithm should provide valuable information
for the stratification of patients into different risk groups when
designing and enrolling patients in investigational protocols. This
analysis demonstrates that the duration of survival in these men is
quite long and must be taken into account when determining the
feasibility of proposed clinical trials.
This report characterizes the natural history of disease progression to
distant metastasis and death due to prostate cancer in men with a PSA
elevation following radical prostatectomy. Radical prostatectomy was
shown to provide excellent long-term cure rates with 82%
metastasis-free survival at 15 years following surgery for all men in
this study group. Of the men who did develop a PSA elevation, many
remained free of metastatic disease for an extended period after
initial biochemical recurrence without other forms of therapy. This has
important implications in the selection of systemic therapies that are
not curative and have no demonstrated impact on eventual outcome. The
extended interval between biochemical recurrence and clinical
metastatic disease emphasizes the need to design clinical trials to
examine new treatment modalities in these men.
Factors that predicted the time course to the development of metastatic
disease included the timing of initial PSA elevation, Gleason score,
and PSADT. These factors were used to construct an algorithm that
should be useful to the clinician in counseling patients about the time
course and likelihood of eventual development of metastatic disease
after initial biochemical recurrence.
1.Pound CR, Partin AW, Epstein JI, Walsh PC.
Prostate-specific antigen after anatomic radical retropubic
prostatectomy: patterns of recurrence and cancer control.
Urol
Clin North Am.
1997;24:395-406.Google Scholar 2.Zincke H, Oesterling JE, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Barrett DM.
Long-term (15 years) results after radical
prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate
cancer.
J Urol.1994;152:1850-1857.Google Scholar 3.Trapasso JG, DeKernion JB, Smith RB, Dorey F.
The
incidence and significance of detectable levels of serum prostate
specific antigen after radical prostatectomy.
J Urol.1994;152:1821-1825.Google Scholar 4.Catalona WJ, Smith DS.
5-Year tumor recurrence rates
after anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
J Urol.1994;152:1837-1842.Google Scholar 5.Ohori M, Goad JR, Wheeler TM.
et al.
Can radical
prostatectomy alter the progression of poorly differentiated prostate
cancer?
J Urol.1994;152:1843-1849.Google Scholar 6.Gerber GS, Thisted RA, Scardino PT.
et al.
Results of
radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer:
multi-institutional pooled analysis.
JAMA.1996;276:615-619.Google Scholar 7.Krongrad A, Lai HL, Lai S.
Survival after radical
prostatectomy.
JAMA.1997;278:44-46.Google Scholar 8.Adolfsson J, Steineck G, Whitmore Jr WF.
Recent results
of management of palpable clinically localized prostate cancer.
Cancer.1993;72:310-322.Google Scholar 9.Lepor H, Kimball AW, Walsh PC.
Cause-specific actuarial
survival analysis: a useful method for reporting survival data in men
with clinically localized carcinoma of the prostate.
J Urol.1989;141:82-84.Google Scholar 10.Gibbons RP, Correa RJ, Brannen GE, Weissman RM.
Total
prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: long-term
results.
J Urol.1989;141:564-566.Google Scholar 11.Partin AW, Pound CR, Clemens JQ, Epstein JI, Walsh PC.
Serum PSA after anatomic radical prostatectomy: The Johns Hopkins
experience after 10 years.
Urol Clin North Am.1993;20:713-725.Google Scholar 12.Scher HI, Curley T, Yeh S, Iverson JM, O'Dell M, Larson SM.
Therapeutic alternatives for hormone-refractory
prostatic cancer.
Semin Urol.1992;10:55-64.Google Scholar 13.Patel A, Dorey F, Franklin J, DeKernion JB.
Recurrence
patterns after radical retropubic prostatectomy: clinical usefulness of
prostate specific antigen doubling times and log slope prostate
specific antigen.
J Urol.1997;158:1441-1445.Google Scholar 14.Kaplan EL, Meier P.
Nonparametric estimation from
incomplete observations.
J Am Stat Assoc.1958;53:457.Google Scholar 15.Bauer JJ, Connelly RR, Sesterhenn IA.
et al.
Biostatistical modeling using traditional variables and genetic
biomarkers for predicting the risk of prostate carcinoma recurrence
after radical prostatectomy.
Cancer.1997;79:952-962.Google Scholar 16.Veltri RW, O'Dowd GJ, Orozco R, Miller MC.
The role of
biopsy pathology, quantitative nuclear morphometry, and biomarkers in
the pre-operative prediction of prostate cancer staging and prognosis.
Semin Urol Oncol.1998;16:106-117.Google Scholar 17.Partin AW, Piantadosi S, Sanda MG.
et al.
Selection of
men at high risk for disease recurrence for experimental adjuvant
therapy following radical prostatectomy.
Urology.1995;45:831-838.Google Scholar 18.Dillioglugil O, Leibman BD, Kattan MW.
et al.
Hazard
rates for progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically
localized prostate cancer.
Urology.1997;50:93-99.Google Scholar 19.Zincke H, Bergstralh EJ, Larson-Keller JJ.
et al.
Stage
D1 prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy and adjuvant
hormonal treatment.
Cancer.1992;70(suppl 1):311-323.Google Scholar 20.Sgrignoli AR, Walsh PC, Steinberg GD, Steiner MS, Epstein JI.
Prognostic factors in men with stage D1 prostate cancer:
identification of patients less likely to have prolonged survival after
radical prostatectomy.
J Urol.1994;152:1077-1081.Google Scholar 21.Golimbu M, Provet J, Al-Askari S.
Radical prostatectomy
for stage D1 prostate cancer.
Urology.1987;30:427-435.Google Scholar 22.Partin AW, Pearson JD, Landis PK.
et al.
Evaluation of serum prostate-specific antigen velocity after radical
prostatectomy to distinguish local recurrence from distant metastases.
Urology.1994;43:649-659.Google Scholar 23.Soloway MS.
The importance of prognostic factors in
advanced prostate cancer.
Cancer.1990;66(suppl 5):1017-1021.Google Scholar 24.Eisenberger MA, Blumenstein BB, Crawford ED.
et al.
Bilateral orchiectomy with or without flutamide for metastatic prostate
cancer.
N Engl J Med.1998;339:1036-1042.Google Scholar 25.Byar DP.
The Veterans Administration Cooperative
Urological Research Group's studies of cancer of the prostate.
Cancer.1973;32:1126-1130.Google Scholar 26.Kramalowsky EV.
The value of testosterone deprivation
in stage D1 carcinoma of the prostate.
J Urol.1988;139:1242-1244.Google Scholar 27.Steckel J, DeKernion JB.
Therapeutic options for stage
D1 prostate cancer.
Am Urol Assoc Update Series.1994;13:166.Google Scholar 28.Byar DP, Corle DK.
Hormonal therapy for prostate
cancer: results of the Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological
Research Group Studies.
Natl Cancer Inst Monogr.1988;7:165-170.Google Scholar 29.Walsh PC.
Benign and malignant neoplasms of the
prostate.
J Urol.1989;141:1032-1033.Google Scholar 30.Schroder FH. Endocrine treatment of prostate cancer.
In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ, eds.
Campbell's
Urology.
Vol 3. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co;
1998:2627-2644.
31.Sharifi R, Soloway M.for the Leuprolide Study Group.
Clinical study of leuprolide depot formulation in the treatment of
advanced prostate cancer.
J Urol.1990;143:68-71.Google Scholar 32.Crawford ED, Eisenberger MA, McLeod DG.
et al.
A
controlled trial of leuprolide with and without flutamide in prostatic
carcinoma.
N Engl J Med.1989;321:419-424.Google Scholar