Context Dietary sodium is positively associated with blood pressure, and ecological
and animal studies both have suggested that high dietary sodium intake increases
stroke mortality.
Objective To examine the risk of cardiovascular disease associated with dietary
sodium intake in overweight and nonoverweight persons.
Design Prospective cohort study.
Setting The first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic
Follow-up Study, conducted in 1982-1984, 1986, 1987, and 1992.
Participants Of those aged 25 to 74 years when the survey was conducted in 1971-1975
(14,407 participants), a total of 2688 overweight and 6797 nonoverweight persons
were included in the analysis.
Main Outcome Measures Dietary sodium and energy intake were estimated at baseline using a
single 24-hour dietary recall method. Incidence and mortality data for cardiovascular
disease were obtained from medical records and death certificates.
Results For overweight and nonoverweight persons, over an average of 19 years
of follow-up, the total number of documented cases were as follows: 680 stroke
events (210 fatal), 1727 coronary heart disease events (614 fatal), 895 cardiovascular
disease deaths, and 2486 deaths from all causes. Among overweight persons
with an average energy intake of 7452 kJ, a 100 mmol higher sodium intake
was associated with a 32% increase (relative risk [RR], 1.32; 95% confidence
interval [CI], 1.07-1.64; P = .01) in stroke incidence,
89% increase (RR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.31-2.74; P<.001)
in stroke mortality, 44% increase (RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.14-1.81; P = .002) in coronary heart disease mortality, 61% increase (RR, 1.61;
95% CI, 1.32-1.96; P<.001) in cardiovascular disease
mortality, and 39% increase (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.23-1.58; P<.001) in mortality from all causes. Dietary sodium intake was
not significantly associated with cardiovascular disease risk in nonoverweight
persons.
Conclusions Our analysis indicates that high sodium intake is strongly and independently
associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause
mortality in overweight persons.
Observational epidemiologic studies have repeatedly identified an independent,
positive relationship between dietary intake of sodium and blood pressure
across populations as well as within populations.1-4
Randomized controlled trials have also demonstrated that reduced sodium intake
leads to a reduction in blood pressure in both hypertensive and normotensive
persons.1,5-7
Given that blood pressure level is a strong risk factor for coronary heart
disease and stroke, a high dietary sodium intake could be predicted to increase
the risk of cardiovascular disease. Indeed, several ecological studies have
found a positive relationship between average population dietary sodium intake
and mortality due to stroke.8-11
Animal studies have also indicated that a high-sodium diet increases stroke
mortality in Dahl rats and stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats.12,13 However, several prospective cohort
studies have failed to identify a significant association between dietary
sodium intake and risk of stroke.14,15
This may have been due to difficulties in measuring an individual's usual
sodium intake or to use of relatively small sample sizes.14,15
In westernized populations, intraindividual variations in sodium intake
are even greater than interindividual variations.16
This measurement error diminishes the statistical power to detect significant
associations between dietary sodium intake and cardiovascular outcomes in
epidemiologic studies. Another difficulty in studying the relationship between
sodium intake and cardiovascular disease is the heterogeneity of risk that
exists at any given level of sodium intake because of the multifactorial nature
of environmental and genetic influences on risk. For example, results of some
epidemiologic and clinical studies suggest that obese persons are more sensitive
to the effect of sodium on blood pressure than are their nonobese counterparts.17-19 This enhanced sodium
sensitivity may be due to increased renal tubular reabsorption of sodium in
obese persons.20 We made use of the large sample
size and prolonged follow-up experiences of participants in the first National
Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I) Epidemiologic Follow-up
Study to examine the risk of cardiovascular disease associated with dietary
sodium intake in overweight persons.
In NHANES I, a multistage, stratified, probability-sampling design was
used to select a representative sample of the US civilian noninstitutionalized
population aged 1 to 74 years.21,22
Certain population subgroups, including those with low incomes, women of childbearing
age (25-44 years), and elderly persons (65 years or older) were oversampled.
The NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study is a prospective cohort study of
NHANES I participants who were 25 to 74 years of age when the survey was conducted
in 1971 to 1975.12-17
Of the 14,407 persons in this age range at baseline, we excluded 3059 who
lacked 24-hour dietary recall information; 2 who lacked sodium intake information;
1133 who had a self-reported history of heart attack, heart failure, or stroke
at baseline or had used medication for heart disease during the preceding
6 months; and 337 who were consuming a low-salt diet at baseline. Among remaining
participants, 391 (4.0%) were lost to follow-up, leaving a total of 9485 participants,
of whom 931 men and 1757 women were overweight (Table 1). Overweight was defined as a body mass index of 27.8 kg/m2 or higher for men and 27.3 kg/m2 or higher for women; nonoverweight
was defined as a body mass index of less than 27.8 kg/m2 for men
and less than 27.3 kg/m2 for women.23
Baseline data collection included medical history, standardized medical
examination, dietary history, laboratory tests, and anthropometric measurements.21,22 A single 24-hour dietary recall was
conducted by trained NHANES I personnel using a standardized protocol and
3-dimensional food-portion models. Frequency but not amount of salt added
during food preparation or consumption was collected in the NHANES I. The
dietary recall questionnaires were later coded by interviewers using nutrient
information from the US Department of Agriculture Handbook No. 824
or other resources. Dietary sodium and energy intake were calculated for each
participant by the National Center for Health Statistics. Frozen serum samples
were sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for measurement
of serum total cholesterol levels. Blood pressure, body weight, and height
were obtained using standard protocols. The baseline questionnaire on medical
history included questions about selected health conditions and medications
used for those conditions during the preceding 6 months. Data on education,
physical activity, and alcohol consumption were obtained by interviewer-administered
questionnaires. Baseline information on smoking status was obtained in a random
subsample of 936 overweight and 2313 nonoverweight participants who underwent
more detailed baseline examination.21,22
For the remaining study participants, information on smoking status at baseline
was derived from responses to questions on lifetime smoking history at follow-up
interviews in 1982 through 1984 or later.25,26
Validity of information obtained using this approach has been documented.25,26
Follow-up data were collected between 1982 and 1984, and in 1986, 1987,
and 1992.27-30
Each follow-up examination included tracking a participant or his or her proxy
to a current address; performing in-depth interviews with the participant
or proxy; obtaining hospital and nursing home records, including pathology
reports and electrocardiograms; and, for decedents, acquiring a death certificate.
Incident cardiovascular disease was based on documentation of an event that
met prespecified study criteria and occurred during the period between the
participant's baseline examination and last follow-up interview. Mortality
due to cardiovascular disease was based on death certificate reports. Validity
of study outcome data from both sources has been documented.31
Incident stroke was based on death certificate reports in which the
underlying cause of death was recorded using an International
Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code of 430-434.9, 436, or 437.0-437.1, or 1 or more hospital and/or
nursing home stays in which the participant had a discharge diagnosis with
one of these codes. Incident coronary heart disease was based on a death certificate
report in which the underlying cause of death was coded as ICD-9 410-414, or by 1 or more hospital and/or nursing home stays in
which the participant had a discharge diagnosis with an ICD-9 code of 410-414. Cause-specific mortality was identified by underlying
cause of death using the following ICD-9 codes: 430-434.9,
436, or 437.0-437.1 (stroke); 410-414 (coronary heart disease); and 410-414,
430-434.9, 436, 437.0-437.1, 402-404, or 428 (cardiovascular disease). The
date of record for incident events was identified by the date of first hospital
admission with an established study event or date of death from a study event
in the absence of hospital or nursing home documentation of such an event.
Sodium intake and total energy intake were highly correlated in the
study population (r = 0.65, P<.001).
Therefore, both absolute sodium intake (mmol/d) and sodium-to-energy ratio
(mmol/kJ) were used to examine the relationship between sodium intake and
cardiovascular disease risk. Relative risk estimates were similar for both
indexes. Sodium-to-energy ratio was expressed as 1 mmol of sodium per 7452
kJ, the average energy intake in the study population.
Because a statistically significant interaction on cardiovascular disease
outcomes was detected between dietary sodium intake and overweight, all analyses
were stratified by overweight. The quartile of sodium-to-energy ratio was
calculated using the total sample (nonoverweight and overweight). For each
baseline characteristic, mean value or corresponding percentage of study participants
was calculated by quartile of sodium-to-energy ratio. The statistical significance
of differences was examined by analysis of variance (continuous variables)
and by the χ2 test (categorical variables). The cumulative
incidence of cardiovascular disease and mortality due to cardiovascular disease
by quartile of sodium intake was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method32 and differences in cumulative rates were examined
using the log-rank test for trend.33 Cox proportional
hazard models were used to explore the relationship between dietary sodium
intake and cardiovascular disease risk.34 Age
was used as the time scale for all time-to-event analyses.35
With the exception of stroke mortality models, for which there were few events
in younger cohorts, all Cox proportional hazard models were stratified by
birth cohort using 10-year intervals to control for calendar period and cohort
effects.35 Sodium intake was assessed both
as a categorical (quartile) and continuous variable. Methods to estimate variances
that take into account sample clustering and stratification of the NHANES
I sample were used in Cox proportional hazard models.35
Data from the small number of participants who had reached 85 years of age
were censored. Sex differences in the relationships between sodium-to-energy
ratio and cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality were tested using
interaction terms in Cox proportional hazard models. Because there were no
significant differences, men and women were pooled in the main analysis. However,
a subgroup analysis by sex was also conducted.
Compared with the study participants with a lower sodium intake, nonoverweight
participants with a higher sodium intake were older; were more likely to be
white and male; had higher mean systolic blood pressures; had higher prevalences
of hypertension, diabetes, and low education; but had lower prevalences of
current cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption (Table 1). In contrast, the means or percentages of most baseline
variables were similar among the 4 sodium intake groups in the overweight
participants except for the percentages of whites and regular alcohol drinkers.
During 113,467 person-years of follow-up from 1971 through 1992, 430
stroke events (123 fatal), 1080 coronary heart disease events (400 fatal),
566 cardiovascular disease deaths, and 1676 deaths from all causes were documented
in the nonoverweight participants. Dietary sodium intake was not significantly
associated with risk of cardiovascular disease in the nonoverweight persons
(Table 2).
In age-, race-, and sex-adjusted analyses, stroke incidence and mortality,
coronary heart disease mortality, and mortality due to cardiovascular disease
and all causes were all positively and significantly associated with the corresponding
trend in sodium-to-energy ratio. After additional adjustment for the factors
listed in the first footnote to Table 2, all of the previously mentioned associations remained significant
(Table 2). Similar results were
obtained when quartile of sodium intake was used as the independent variable
and when history of hypertension instead of systolic blood pressure was used
as an adjustment variable.
During a total of 43,788 person-years of follow-up in the overweight
participants, 250 stroke events (87 fatal), 647 coronary heart disease events
(214 fatal), 329 cardiovascular disease deaths, and 810 deaths from all causes
were documented. The cumulative mortality of stroke at age 85 years was 9.0%,
8.9%, 14.4% and 15.8% among patients within the first, second, third, and
fourth quartiles of sodium-to-energy ratio, respectively (P = .004 for trend) (Figure 1).
The corresponding cumulative estimates by quartile of sodium-to-energy ratio
were 24.9%, 22.3%, 26.0%, and 30.9% for coronary heart disease mortality (P = .17 for trend); 34.3%, 32.4%, 39.0%, and 44.9% for
cardiovascular disease mortality (P = .008 for trend);
and 65.8%, 63.7%, 70.2%, and 74.7% for mortality from all causes (P = .003 for trend), respectively. The cumulative incidence of stroke
at age 85 years was 23.7%, 30.4%, 41.4%, and 33.9% among patients within the
first, second, third, and fourth quartiles of sodium-to-energy ratio, respectively
(P = .005 for trend). The cumulative incidence of
coronary heart disease was not significantly associated with the corresponding
sodium-to-energy ratio.
There were statistically significant interactions on major outcomes
between sodium intake and overweight (Table
3). Dietary sodium intake was significantly associated with increased
stroke incidence and mortality from stroke, coronary heart disease, cardiovascular
disease, and all causes in overweight but not in nonoverweight persons. Furthermore,
the RRs were similar when either sodium-to-energy ratio or absolute sodium
intake was used as the independent variable.
The association between sodium intake and risk of cardiovascular disease
was similar in men and women (P value for interaction
varied from .19 to .98). For example, a 100-mmol per 7452 kJ higher intake
of sodium was associated with a 67% increase (RR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.27-2.18)
in cardiovascular mortality in men and a 53% increase (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.13-2.08)
in women (P = .69 for interaction). A 100-mmol per
7452 kJ higher intake of sodium was associated with a 44% increase (RR, 1.44;
95% CI, 1.14-1.81) in all-cause mortality in men and a 35% increase (RR, 1.35;
95% CI, 1.13-1.62) in women (P = .71 for interaction).
Our study is the first to document the presence of a positive and independent
relationship between dietary sodium intake and cardiovascular disease risk
in adults. In 1995, an estimated 960,592 US residents died of cardiovascular
disease, representing 41.5% of all deaths.36
In many economically developing countries, cardiovascular disease mortality
has increased rapidly and has become the leading cause of death.37
Dietary sodium reduction has been recommended as a means to prevent both hypertension
and cardiovascular disease mortality and morbidity.38,39
Our findings suggest that reduced sodium intake may be especially efficacious
in overweight persons.
Obesity activates the sympathetic nervous and renin-angiotensin systems,
causes insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, and alters intrarenal vascular
resistance. These changes have been related to enhanced renal tubular sodium
reabsorption and sodium retention.20,40
In a study of 60 obese and 18 nonobese adolescents, Rocchini et al18 found that blood pressure was more readily affected
by dietary sodium intake in obese than nonobese adolescents, and this increased
sodium sensitivity was reduced after weight loss. Increased sodium sensitivity
in overweight persons may explain why we identified a strong, independent
relationship between dietary sodium intake and cardiovascular disease risk,
whereas other investigators who have studied predominantly nonoverweight populations
have not found such an association.14,15
Overweight is a common and important cardiovascular disease risk factor. According
to data from NHANES III, conducted from 1988 to 1991, 33.4% of US adults aged
20 years or older were overweight as defined by a body mass index of 27.8
kg/m2 or higher for men and 27.3 kg/m2 or higher for
women.41 That the prevalence of obesity has
increased progressively during recent decades in males and females of all
racial groups in the United States is particularly troubling.41
To reduce the cardiovascular disease risk in overweight patients, both weight
loss and sodium reduction should be recommended. For persons with difficulty
losing weight, greater attention to reductions in sodium intake may be appropriate.
Animal studies have identified a significant increase in stroke mortality
in Dahl salt-resistant rats that were placed on high-salt diets compared with
those that were maintained on lower-salt diets, despite similar levels of
blood pressure in the 2 groups.42 Findings
from ecological analyses indicating that the association between sodium intake
and stroke risk was stronger than the corresponding relationship between sodium
intake and blood pressure level may also imply a direct effect of sodium intake
on stroke risk.9,11 In our study,
dietary sodium intake was related to cardiovascular disease risk and total
mortality, independent of baseline levels of systolic blood pressure. Moreover,
estimated RRs of cardiovascular disease associated with a 100-mmol greater
sodium intake were much larger than would be expected based on the corresponding
influence on blood pressure. In clinical trials, a 100-mmol reduction in dietary
sodium intake was associated with an average reduction in diastolic blood
pressure of 1.4 to 2.5 mm Hg.5 This could potentially
result in a 15% decrease in stroke risk.43
Our study estimated that a 100-mmol difference in dietary sodium intake was
associated with a 32% increase in stroke risk. The apparent excess of observed
RR of cardiovascular disease associated with sodium intake compared with that
expected on the basis of anticipated blood pressure increase suggests the
possibility of an independent direct effect of sodium intake on cardiovascular
disease.
Alderman and colleagues44 used data from
the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study to examine the relationship between
dietary sodium intake and mortality from cardiovascular disease and all causes.
In contrast with our findings, they identified an inverse relationship between
sodium intake and mortality from cardiovascular disease (P = .09) and all causes (P<.007) and a
positive relationship between sodium-to-energy ratio and mortality from cardiovascular
disease (P = .006) and all causes (P<.001). However, several methodological concerns make it difficult
to interpret their findings. For instance, they did not exclude from their
main analysis participants with baseline histories of cardiovascular disease,
albeit such participants might have been expected to have changed their dietary
intake of sodium. In addition, they did not exclude participants who were
consuming low-sodium diets at baseline. Acute rheumatic fever, chronic rheumatic
heart disease, and diseases of the pulmonary circulation were included as
cardiovascular mortality outcomes, although there is no obvious biological
basis for a relationship between sodium intake and these diseases. Perhaps
of greatest concern is the fact that they included sodium intake, energy intake,
and sodium-to-energy ratio as continuous variables in the same multivariate
model. Given that an interaction term was included in their analysis model,
it is not possible to interpret the main effect of sodium intake alone on
the outcomes of interest. The inconsistency of the association between the
2 sodium intake indicators (sodium alone and sodium-to-energy ratio) and outcomes
of interest in the study by Alderman et al might reflect the heterogeneity
of this relationship in a study population with different body weights. In
our analyses, we found a consistent relationship between both sodium intake
and sodium-to-energy ratio with risk of cardiovascular disease and total mortality
in overweight persons but not in nonoverweight persons.
In an earlier study, Alderman and colleagues45
reported a significant inverse association between urinary sodium excretion
and incidence of myocardial infarction in a prospective study of 2937 patients
treated for hypertension. Unmeasured variables and imprecision of the potentially
confounding variables that were measured might have contributed to the occurrence
of this unexpected finding.46,47
In addition, urinary sodium excretion was measured after 5 days of dietary
sodium restriction, which most likely would not have provided a valid assessment
of habitual intake of dietary sodium. Finally, the study was conducted in
hypertensive patients who were enrolled in a work-site treatment program.
As such, the findings may not have general applicability. In our study, dietary
sodium intake was not associated with coronary heart disease incidence but
with increased coronary heart disease mortality. Similarly, analyses from
the Multiple Risk Factors Intervention Trial cohort did not find an inverse
association between sodium intake and incidence of myocardial infarction.48
A limitation of our study is the estimation of sodium intake by a single
24-hour dietary recall. This may result in misclassification of usual sodium
intake at the individual level. In addition, the dietary recall method used
in NHANES I may have underestimated sodium intake because it did not include
quantitative data on discretionary use of salt in the cooking or seasoning
of food at the table, settings that account for about 15% to 30% of the sodium
intake in Western societies.49,50
Likewise, NHANES I study participants may have underreported their dietary
energy intake.51,52 These measurement
errors would tend to bias our RR estimates toward 1 (effect to 0) in univariate
models. Aside from a possible lowering of sensitivity to sodium intake in
nonoverweight compared with overweight persons, these measurement errors in
sodium intake might have contributed to our finding of a null association
in nonoverweight persons. Another limitation is that participants were passively
followed up for clinical outcomes. However, any resultant misclassification
bias is likely to have been confined to characterization of incident cases
and should have had no effect on estimation of mortality experience.
Our study has several important strengths. First, the findings can be
generalized to overweight persons in the US general population because the
NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study cohort is a random sample of this population.
In addition, temporal relationships can be established with confidence because
dietary sodium intake was measured at baseline, and subsequent cardiovascular
disease and total mortality were assessed over an average of 19 years. The
fact that follow-up experience was available for more than 96% of study participants
further enhances the validity of our findings.
Our study indicates that a high sodium intake is strongly and independently
associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in overweight
persons. While we await additional studies on this important public health
issue, our findings support existing recommendations for moderate reduction
in sodium intake aimed at reducing blood pressure and cardiovascular disease
risk in the overweight adult population.
1.He J, Whelton PK. Role of sodium reduction in the treatment and prevention of hypertension.
Curr Opin Cardiol.1997;12:202-207.Google Scholar 2.Law MR, Frost CD, Wald NJ. By how much does dietary salt reduction lower blood pressure? I: analysis
of observational data among populations.
BMJ.1991;302:811-815.Google Scholar 3.Frost CD, Law MR, Wald NJ. By how much does dietary salt reduction lower blood pressure? II: analysis
of observational data within populations.
BMJ.1991;302:815-818.Google Scholar 4.Elliott P, Stamler J, Nichols R.
et al. for the Intersalt Cooperative Research Group. Intersalt revisited: further analyses of 24 hour sodium excretion and
blood pressure within and across populations.
BMJ.1996;312:1249-1253. [published correction appears in BMJ. 1997;315:458].Google Scholar 5.Cutler JA, Follmann D, Allender PS. Randomized trials of sodium reduction: an overview.
Am J Clin Nutr.1997;65(2 suppl):643S-651S.Google Scholar 6.The Trials of Hypertension Prevention Collaborative Research Group. The effects of nonpharmacologic interventions on blood pressure of
persons with high normal levels: results of the Trials of Hypertension Prevention,
Phase I.
JAMA.1992;267:1213-1220. [published correction appears in JAMA. 1992;267:2330].Google Scholar 7.Whelton PK, Appel LJ, Espeland MA.
et al. for the TONE Collaborative Research Group. Sodium reduction and weight loss in the treatment of hypertension in
older persons: a randomized controlled trial of nonpharmacologic interventions
in the elderly (TONE).
JAMA.1998;279:839-846. [published correction appears in JAMA. 1998;279:1954].Google Scholar 8.Ikeda M, Kasahara M, Koizumi A, Watanabe T. Correlation of cerebrovascular disease standardized mortality ratios
with dietary sodium and the sodium/potassium ratio among the Japanese population.
Prev Med.1986;15:46-59.Google Scholar 9.Sasaki S, Zhang XH, Kesteloot H. Dietary sodium, potassium, saturated fat, alcohol, and stroke mortality.
Stroke.1995;26:783-789.Google Scholar 10.Yang J, Zhang H, Zhou L, Wu Y, Zhang X. Protein, salt and stroke mortality [abstract].
Can J Cardiol.1997;13:44B.Google Scholar 11.Perry IJ, Beevers DG. Salt intake and stroke: a possible direct effect.
J Hum Hypertens.1992;6:23-25.Google Scholar 12.Coyle P. High NaCl predisposes Dahl rats to cerebral infarction after middle
cerebral artery occlusion.
Hypertension.1988;12:96-101.Google Scholar 13.Chen J, Delaney KH, Kwiecien JM, Lee RM. The effects of dietary sodium on hypertension and stroke development
in female stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Exp Mol Pathol.1997;64:173-183.Google Scholar 14.Kagan A, Popper JS, Rhoads GG, Yano K. Dietary and other risk factors for stroke in Hawaiian Japanese men.
Stroke.1985;16:390-396.Google Scholar 15.Khaw KT, Barrett-Connor E. Dietary potassium and stroke-associated mortality: a 12-year prospective
population study.
N Engl J Med.1987;316:235-240.Google Scholar 16.Liu K, Cooper R, McKeever J.
et al. Assessment of the association between habitual salt intake and high
blood pressure: methodological problems.
Am J Epidemiol.1979;110:219-226.Google Scholar 17.Altschul AM, Ayers WR, Grommet JK, Slotkoff L. Salt sensitivity in experimental animals and man.
Int J Obes.1981;5(suppl 1):27-38.Google Scholar 18.Rocchini AP, Key J, Bondie D.
et al. The effect of weight loss on the sensitivity of blood pressure to sodium
in obese adolescents.
N Engl J Med.1989;321:580-585.Google Scholar 19.He J, Klag MJ, Coresh J, Whelton PK. Age, body mass, and dietary intake of protein and fiber modify the
salt-blood pressure relationship [abstract].
Circulation.1994;90:I-503.Google Scholar 20.Hall JE. Mechanisms of abnormal renal sodium handling in obesity hypertension.
Am J Hypertens.1997;10(5 pt 2):49S-55S.Google Scholar 21.Miller HW. Plan and operation of the Health and Nutrition Examination Survey,
United States, 1971-1973: part A, development, plan, and operation.
Vital Health Stat 1.1973;10a:1-46.Google Scholar 22.Engel A, Murphy RS, Maurer K, Collins E. Plan and operation of the HANES I augmentation survey of adults 25-74
years, United States, 1974-1975.
Vital Health Stat 1.1978;14:1-110.Google Scholar 23.Najjar MF, Rowland M. Anthropometric reference data and prevalence of overweight, United
States, 1976-80.
Vital Health Stat 11.1987;238:1-73.Google Scholar 24.Watt BK, Merrill AL. Composition of Foods: Agriculture Handbook No. 8. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture; 1963.
25.McLaughlin JK, Dietz MS, Mehl ES, Blot WJ. Reliability of surrogate information on cigarette smoking by type of
informant.
Am J Epidemiol.1987;126:144-146.Google Scholar 26.Machlin SR, Kleinman JC, Madans JH. Validity of mortality analysis based on retrospective smoking information.
Stat Med.1989;8:997-1009.Google Scholar 27.Cohen BB, Barbano HE, Cox CS.
et al. Plan and operation of the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study: 1982-84.
Vital Health Stat 1.1987;22:1-142.Google Scholar 28.Finucane FF, Freid VM, Madans JH.
et al. Plan and operation of the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study, 1986.
Vital Health Stat 1.1990;25:1-154.Google Scholar 29.Cox CS, Rothwell ST, Madans JH.
et al. Plan and operation of the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study, 1987.
Vital Health Stat 1.1992;27:1-190.Google Scholar 30.Cox CS, Mussolino ME, Rothwell ST.
et al. Plan and operation of the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study, 1992.
Vital Health Stat 1.1997;35:1-231.Google Scholar 31.Madans JH, Reuben CA, Rothwell ST, Eberhardt MS. Differences in morbidity measures and risk factor identification using
multiple data sources: the case of coronary heart disease.
Stat Med.1995;14:643-653.Google Scholar 32.Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations.
J Am Stat Assoc.1958;53:457-481.Google Scholar 33.Tarone RE. Tests for trend in life table analysis.
Biometrika.1975;62:679-682.Google Scholar 34.Cox RD. Regression models and life tables (with discussion).
J R Stat Soc.1972;34:187-220.Google Scholar 35.Korn EL, Graubard BI, Midthune D. Time-to-event analysis of longitudinal follow-up of a survey: choice
of the time-scale.
Am J Epidemiol.1997;145:72-80.Google Scholar 36.American Heart Association. 1998 Heart and Stroke Statistical Update. Dallas, Tex: American Heart Association; 1998.
37.World Health Organization. World Health Statistics Annual 1995. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1996.
38.Krauss RM, Deckelbaum RJ, Ernst N.
et al. Dietary guidelines for healthy American adults: a statement for health
professionals from the Nutrition Committee, American Heart Association.
Circulation.1996;94:1795-1800.Google Scholar 39.The Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation,
and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection,
Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.
Arch Intern Med.1997;157:2413-2446. [published correction appears in Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:573].Google Scholar 40.Luft FC, Weinberger MH. Heterogeneous responses to changes in dietary salt intake: the salt-sensitivity
paradigm.
Am J Clin Nutr.1997;65(suppl 2):612S-617S.Google Scholar 41.Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM, Campbell SM, Johnson CL. Increasing prevalence of overweight among US adults: the National Health
and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1960 to 1991.
JAMA.1994;272:205-211.Google Scholar 42.Tobian L, Hanlon S. High sodium chloride diets injure arteries and raise mortality without
changing blood pressure.
Hypertension.1990;15(6 pt 2):900-903.Google Scholar 43.Cook NR, Cohen J, Hebert P, Taylor JO, Hennekens CH. Implications of small reductions in diastolic blood pressure for primary
prevention.
Arch Intern Med.1995;155:701-709.Google Scholar 44.Alderman MH, Cohen H, Madhaven S. Dietary sodium intake and mortality: the National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey.
Lancet.1998;351:781-785.Google Scholar 45.Alderman MH, Madhavan S, Cohen H, Sealey JE, Laragh JH. Low urinary sodium is associated with greater risk of myocardial infarction
among treated hypertensive men.
Hypertension.1995;25:1144-1152.Google Scholar 46.Cook NR, Cutler JA, Hennekens CH. An unexpected result from sodium—causal or casual [comment]?
Hypertension.1995;25:1153-1154.Google Scholar 47.MacGregor GA. Low urinary sodium and myocardial infarction [comment].
Hypertension.1996;27:156.Google Scholar 48.Stamler J, Cohen J, Cutler JA.
et al. Sodium intake and mortality from myocardial infarction: Multiple Risk
Factors Intervention Trial.
Can J Cardiol.1997;13(suppl B):272B.Google Scholar 49.Jmes WP, Ralph A, Sanchez-Castillo CP. The dominance of salt in manufactured food in the sodium intake of
affluent societies.
Lancet.1987;1:426-429.Google Scholar 50.Fregly MJ. Estimates of sodium and potassium intake.
Ann Intern Med.1983;98(5 pt 2):792-799.Google Scholar 51.Klesges RC, Eck LH, Ray JW. Who underreports dietary intake in a dietary recall? evidence from
the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
J Consult Clin Psychol.1995;63:438-444.Google Scholar 52.Briefel RR, Sempos CT, McDowell MA, Chien S, Alaimo K. Dietary methods research in the third National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey: underreporting of energy intake.
Am J Clin Nutr.1997;65(4 suppl):1203S-1209S.Google Scholar