Context Persuasive evidence has demonstrated that increased physical activity
is associated with substantial reduction in risk of coronary heart disease.
However, the role of physical activity in the prevention of stroke is less
well established.
Objective To examine the association between physical activity and risk of total
stroke and stroke subtypes in women.
Design and Setting The Nurses' Health Study, a prospective cohort study of subjects residing
in 11 US states.
Subjects A total of 72,488 female nurses aged 40 to 65 years who did not have
diagnosed cardiovascular disease or cancer at baseline in 1986 and who completed
detailed physical activity questionnaires in 1986, 1988, and 1992.
Main Outcome Measure Incident stroke occurring between baseline and June 1, 1994, compared
among quintiles of physical activity level as measured by metabolic equivalent
tasks (METs) in hours per week.
Results During 8 years (560,087 person-years) of follow-up, we documented 407
incident cases of stroke (258 ischemic strokes, 67 subarachnoid hemorrhages,
42 intracerebral hemorrhages, and 40 strokes of unknown type). In multivariate
analyses controlling for age, body mass index, history of hypertension, and
other covariates, increasing physical activity was strongly inversely associated
with risk of total stroke. Relative risks (RRs) in the lowest to highest MET
quintiles were 1.00, 0.98, 0.82, 0.74, and 0.66 (P
for trend=.005). The inverse gradient was seen primarily for ischemic stroke
(RRs across increasing MET quintiles, 1.00, 0.87, 0.83, 0.76, and 0.52; P for trend=.003). Physical activity was not significantly
associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage or intracerebral hemorrhage. After
multivariate adjustment, walking was associated with reduced risk of total
stroke (RRs across increasing walking MET quintiles, 1.00, 0.76, 0.78, 0.70,
and 0.66; P for trend=.01) and ischemic stroke (RRs
across increasing walking MET quintiles, 1.00, 0.77, 0.75, 0.69, and 0.60; P for trend=.02). Brisk or striding walking pace was associated
with lower risk of total and ischemic stroke compared with average or casual
pace.
Conclusion These data indicate that physical activity, including moderate-intensity
exercise such as walking, is associated with substantial reduction in risk
of total and ischemic stroke in a dose-response manner.
Persuasive evidence has demonstrated that increased physical activity
is associated with substantial reduction in risk of coronary heart disease.1 However, the role of physical activity in the prevention
of stroke is less well studied, and results from epidemiological studies have
been inconsistent. A significant inverse association between increasing physical
activity and risk of stroke has been observed in some studies1-6
but not in others.7-10
Also, the dose-response relationship between physical activity and stroke
has not been well characterized. Some studies have demonstrated a monotonic
decreasing risk with increasing physical activity,2-4
while others have indicated a U-shaped relationship.6,11
In addition, few studies have examined the effects of physical activity on
subtypes of stroke.1,2,6
Furthermore, most previous studies have focused on men2,3,5-8,11;
data on women are sparse.1,12
In the Framingham Heart Study,12 high levels
of physical activity were protective against total stroke risk in men but
not in women.
Current guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention13 and the National Institutes of Health14
recommend that Americans should accumulate at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity
physical activity on most, preferably all, days of the week. However, the
role of low- and moderate-intensity activities such as walking, compared with
vigorous exercise, in the prevention of cardiovascular disease remains controversial.
If walking is confirmed to provide the same benefits as more vigorous forms
of physical activity, it will have important public health implications because
walking is the most popular form of physical activity, especially among middle-aged
and older women.15
In this study, we examined in detail the relationship between physical
activity and risk of stroke in a large prospective cohort of women. We specifically
assessed the role of walking compared with vigorous activities in the prevention
of stroke. We also examined the influence of change in activity level on subsequent
risk of stroke.
The Nurses' Health Study cohort was established in 1976, when 121,700
female registered nurses aged 30 to 55 years and residing in 1 of 11 US states
responded to mailed questionnaires regarding their medical history and health
practices.16 In 1986, 82,409 women responded
to a physical activity questionnaire. Of these women, 90% repeated the same
physical activity questionnaire in 1988, and 89% in 1992. After exclusion
of women who were diagnosed as having myocardial infarction, stroke, angina,
or other cardiovascular disease or coronary bypass surgery (n=4470) or cancer
(n=5451) through 1986, the analysis included 72,488 women aged 40 to 65 years.
Assessment of Physical Activity
In 1986, 1988, and 1992, participants were asked the average amount
of time they spent per week doing each of the following physical activities:
walking, jogging, running, bicycling, calisthenics/aerobics/aerobic dance/rowing
machine, lap swimming, squash/racquetball, and tennis. They were also asked
about their usual walking pace, specified as easy (<2.0 mph), moderate
(2.0-2.9 mph), brisk (3.0-3.9 mph), or very brisk (≥4 mph). From this information,
energy expenditure in metabolic equivalent tasks (METs), measured in hours
per week, was calculated.17 Because only 2%
of the subjects reported very brisk pace, we combined the brisk and very brisk
categories in the analyses of walking pace and stroke risk. We defined any
physical activity requiring 6 METs or more (≥6-fold increase from resting
metabolic rate) as vigorous. These activities included jogging, running, bicycling,
calisthenics/aerobic/aerobic dance/rowing machine, lap swimming, squash/racquetball,
and tennis. In contrast, walking requires an energy expenditure of only 2.0
to 4.5 METs, depending on pace; we therefore considered it to be a moderate-intensity
activity.
On the 1980 questionnaire, women were asked to report the average number
of hours they spent each week during the past year on moderate and vigorous
recreational activities, such as heavy gardening, vigorous sports, jogging,
brisk/very brisk walking, bicycling, and heavy housework. On the 1982 questionnaire,
women were asked a slightly different question: "For how many hours per week,
on average, do you engage in activity strenuous enough to build up a sweat?"
To use this information, we created a variable representing average hours
per week spent doing moderate or vigorous recreational activities (all activities
described heretofore except for hours spent walking at an easy or normal pace)
across 1980, 1982, 1986, 1988, and 1992. To examine the effects of change
in physical activity levels on subsequent risk of stroke, we calculated the
differences in average hours per week of moderate or vigorous activities between
1980 and 1986 for women who reported on these activities in both periods (n=62,983).
Validation of the Questionnaire
The detailed physical activity questionnaire that was used in this study
has been validated in a number of settings. In a representative sample (n=147)
of participants in the Nurses' Health Study II cohort, this questionnaire
was completed on 2 occasions 2 years apart, in conjunction with past-week
activity recall and 7-day activity diaries completed 4 times during a 1-year
period.18 The 2-year test-retest correlation
for activity was 0.59. The correlation between physical activity reported
on 1-week recalls and that reported on the questionnaire was 0.79. The correlation
between activity reported in diaries and that reported on the questionnaire
was 0.62. In a separate study on a population aged 20 to 59 years recruited
from a university community (n=103), the correlation between physical activity
score on a very similar questionnaire and maximum oxygen consumption was 0.54.19 These data indicate relatively good validity and
reproducibility for the questionnaire.
The end point was incident stroke occurring between return of the baseline
questionnaires in 1986 and June 1, 1994. Women who reported stroke on follow-up
questionnaires were asked for permission to review medical records; these
were reviewed by a physician without knowledge of the participant's exposure
status. Cerebrovascular pathology due to infection, trauma, or malignancy
was excluded. Incident strokes were confirmed by medical record review according
to National Survey of Stroke criteria,20 requiring
a constellation of neurologic deficits, sudden or rapid in onset and lasting
at least 24 hours or until death.
Strokes were classified as subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage,
ischemic stroke (embolic infarction or thrombotic infarction), or stroke of
undetermined type, according to Perth Community Stroke Study criteria and
based on computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or autopsy
findings.21 Subarachnoid hemorrhage was defined
as hemorrhage in the subarachnoid space, usually caused by rupture of a saccular
aneurysm of the cerebral arteries or, less commonly, by arteriovenous malformations
or other causes. Intracerebral hemorrhage was defined as hemorrhage in intracerebral
regions of the brain not due to an aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation.
Hospital records were available for approximately 88% of nonfatal cases;
among these subjects, the percentage of cases with CT or MRI documentation
increased over time, reaching 82% for CT, 28% for MRI, and 93% for CT and/or
MRI findings in 1988-1994. Overall, CT/MRI findings were present for 88% of
women for whom hospital records were obtained. If no records could be obtained,
strokes were considered probable if they were corroborated by additional information
provided by letter or interview and the subject required hospitalization.
Analyses that excluded probable cases yielded similar results.
Deaths were reported by next of kin, coworkers, postal authorities,
or the National Death Index. Using all sources combined, we estimated that
follow-up for deaths was more than 98% complete.22
Fatal stroke was confirmed using medical records or autopsy reports (74%)
or considered probable if these records were not obtainable but stroke was
listed as the underlying cause on the death certificate.
Our primary analyses used 1986 as baseline. Person-time for each participant
was calculated from the date of return of the 1986 questionnaire to the date
of confirmed stroke, death from any cause, or June 1, 1994, whichever came
first. Relative risks (RRs) were computed as the incidence rate in a specific
MET quintile divided by that in the lowest quintile, with adjustment for 5-year
age categories. Tests of linear trend across increasing MET quintiles were
conducted by treating the quintiles as a continuous variable and assigning
the median score for each quintile as its value. To best represent long-term
physical activity levels of individual subjects and reduce measurement error,
we created measures of cumulative average METs from all available questionnaires
up to the start of each 2-year follow-up interval. A similar method for analyzing
repeated dietary measurements has been described in detail elsewhere.23 We also used restricted cubic spline transformations
with 4 knots to flexibly model the relation between physical activity level
and stroke risk, avoiding the need for prior specification of the risk function
or the location of a threshold exposure value.24
In a secondary analysis, we used 1980 as baseline. We used the continuous
values of hours per week to compute cumulative averages of physical activity
at each period and categorized the hours per week into 5 levels (<1.0,
1.0-1.9, 2.0-3.9, 4.0-6.9, and ≥7.0 h/wk) after averaging. To examine the
effects of change in physical activity on risk of stroke, we related the difference
in hours spent on moderate and/or vigorous activities between 1980 and 1986
to incident cases of stroke occurring between 1986 and 1994.
We used pooled logistic regression across the five 2-year intervals,25 which is asymptotically equivalent to Cox regression,
to adjust simultaneously for potential confounding variables such as age (5-year
categories); smoking status (never, past, or current smoking of 1-14, 15-24,
or ≥25 cigarettes/d); alcohol consumption (0, 1-4, 5-14, or ≥15 g/d);
body mass index (quintiles); menopausal status (premenopausal, postmenopausal
without hormone replacement therapy, postmenopausal with past hormone replacement
therapy, or postmenopausal with current hormone replacement therapy); aspirin
use (<1 time/wk, 1-6 times/wk, or ≥7 times/wk); parental history of
myocardial infarction before age 60 years; and history of diabetes, hypercholesterolemia,
or hypertension at baseline. Because fruit and vegetable intake was inversely
associated with risk of stroke in our cohort,26
we adjusted for fruit and vegetable intake (both in quintiles) in a secondary
analysis.
During 8 years (560,087 person-years) of follow-up, we documented 407
incident cases of stroke (258 ischemic strokes, 67 subarachnoid hemorrhages,
42 intracerebral hemorrhages, and 40 strokes of unknown type). As described
elsewhere,27 women who were more physically
active tended to be leaner and were less likely to be current smokers. Increasing
total physical activity level was strongly associated with progressively lower
risk of total stroke (Table 1).
Age-adjusted RRs of total stroke across increasing MET quintiles for total
physical activity were 1.00, 0.87, 0.68, 0.57, and 0.49 (P for trend <.001). Further adjustment for smoking, body mass index,
and other covariates only somewhat attenuated the association for total stroke
(RRs across increasing MET quintiles, 1.0, 0.98, 0.82, 0.74, and 0.66; P for trend=.005). Additional adjustment for intake of
fruits and vegetables did not materially alter the results (corresponding
RRs, 1.0, 0.97, 0.80, 0.71, and 0.63; P for trend=.003).
Further adjustment for antihypertensive, cholesterol-lowering, or hypoglycemic
medications did not change the results. The inverse association was primarily
observed for ischemic stroke (multivariate RRs across increasing MET quintiles,
1.0, 0.87, 0.83, 0.76, and 0.52; P for trend=.003).
Significant trends indicate an overall linear relationship between physical
activity level and risk of total and ischemic stroke. Spline regression analysis
demonstrated a dose-response relationship between physical activity level
and incidence of ischemic stroke (Figure 1). Physical activity level had no significant relationship with
either subarachnoid hemorrhage (RR for lowest vs highest MET quintile, 0.77;
95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-1.66; P for trend=.64)
or intracerebral hemorrhage (RR for lowest vs highest MET quintile, 1.20;
95% CI, 0.45-3.19; P for trend=.34). The wide CIs
of these estimates are in part due to the small number of cases. Thus, we
combined intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage in subsequent
analyses (Table 1).
In secondary analyses, the inverse association between physical activity
and risk of total stroke persisted in subgroup analyses according to body
mass index, current smoking status, and parental history of myocardial infarction.
Multivariate RRs of total stroke comparing the extreme MET quintiles were
0.61 for current smokers and 0.68 for nonsmokers; 0.64 for women with a body
mass index of 29 kg/m2 or less and 0.61 for women with a body mass
index of more than 29 kg/m2; and 0.64 for women without parental
history of myocardial infarction and 0.57 for women with parental history
of myocardial infarction. To avoid potential bias due to preclinical conditions,
we eliminated stroke cases that occurred in the first 2 years of follow-up,
and the results did not appreciably change (390 incident cases were included
in the analyses; multivariate RRs across MET quintiles, 1.0, 0.92, 0.84, 0.76,
and 0.59; P for trend=.004).
To evaluate the long-term effects of physical activity, we examined
the cumulative averages of physical activity level from 1980, 1982, 1986,
1988, and 1992 in relation to incident stroke from 1980 to 1994 (695 stroke
cases with 1,168,015 person-years of follow-up). Multivariate RRs across categories
of average hours per week spent on moderate/vigorous physical activity (<1
hour, 1-1.9 hours, 2-3.9 hours, 4-6.9 hours, and ≥7 hours) were 1.0, 0.83,
0.90, 0.79, and 0.60, respectively (P for trend=.01).
This inverse association was primarily observed for ischemic stroke.
After adjusting for age, walking was associated with a graded reduction
in risk of total stroke (RRs across increasing MET quintiles, 1.0, 0.71, 0.66,
0.54, and 0.49; P for trend <.001) (Table 2). This association was somewhat attenuated after adjustment
for other risk factors and vigorous physical activity (multivariate RRs across
increasing MET quintiles, 1.0, 0.76, 0.78, 0.70, and 0.66; P for trend=.01). To minimize residual confounding by vigorous physical
activity, we conducted an additional analysis excluding women who performed
vigorous physical activity and obtained similar results (RRs across increasing
MET quintiles, 1.0, 0.71, 0.78, 0.74, and 0.64; P
for trend=.10). As with total physical activity level, the inverse association
for walking was primarily observed for ischemic stroke (Table 2).
Independent of the number of hours spent walking, walking pace was strongly
associated with risk of stroke. Compared with women whose usual walking pace
was easy, multivariate RRs of total stroke were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.63-1.03) for
women with moderate pace and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.36-0.68) for women with brisk/very
brisk pace (Table 3). This inverse
association appeared to be particularly strong for ischemic stroke. The reduction
in risk of hemorrhagic stroke associated with brisk/very brisk walking pace
was not statistically significant.
To assess whether more vigorous activity had an increased benefit beyond
that of walking, we examined risk of stroke according to the joint distribution
of METs from walking and nonwalking vigorous physical activity. Equivalent
energy expenditure from walking and vigorous physical activity resulted in
comparable risk reductions. Women in the highest categories (≥7 METs) of
both vigorous physical activity and walking had an RR of 0.30 (95% CI, 0.16-0.57)
for ischemic stroke compared with the most sedentary women (0 METs from vigorous
physical activity and <0.7 METs from walking). When METs for both walking
and vigorous activity were entered into the model as continuous variables
simultaneously, RRs of ischemic stroke associated with 10-MET increases in
energy expenditure were 0.82 (95% CI, 0.69-0.97) for vigorous activity and
0.83 (95% CI, 0.69-0.99) for walking.
We examined changes in physical activity between 1980 and 1986 in relation
to incidence of stroke from 1986 to 1994 (Table 4). After adjustment for baseline physical activity level
and other covariates, each 3.5-h/wk increase in moderate/vigorous physical
activity from baseline was associated with a 19% reduction in total stroke
and a 29% reduction in ischemic stroke. Increasing physical activity levels
were not significantly associated with risk of hemorrhagic stroke. Compared
with women who were consistently sedentary (<1 h/wk of moderate/vigorous
physical activity in both 1980 and 1986), those who were consistently active
(≥4 h/wk of physical activity in both 1980 and 1986) had the lowest risk
of ischemic stroke (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.96).
In this large prospective cohort study of women, greater leisure-time
physical activity was associated with reduced risk of stroke in a dose-response
manner. Independent of vigorous physical activity, walking was associated
with a substantial reduction in stroke risk, and brisk/very brisk usual walking
pace was independently associated with decreased risk compared with normal
or easy pace. We observed comparable magnitudes of risk reduction with equivalent
energy expenditures from walking and vigorous physical activity.
Findings from previous prospective cohort studies on regular physical
activity and risk of stroke have been inconsistent. A significant inverse
association between increasing physical activity and stroke has been observed
in some studies1-6
but not in others.7-10
Also, the dose-response relationship between physical activity and stroke
has not been well characterized. Some studies have demonstrated a monotonic
decreasing risk with increasing physical activity,2-4
while others have indicated a U-shaped relationship.6,11
Small sample sizes and inadequate physical activity assessment may partially
account for these discrepancies. The NIH Consensus Development Panel on Physical
Activity and Cardiovascular Health14 concluded
that "data are inadequate to determine whether stroke incidence is affected
by physical activity or exercise training." Similarly, the surgeon general's
report on physical activity and health28 concluded
that "it is unclear whether physical activity plays a protective role against
stroke." With large sample size and detailed and repeated measures of physical
activity, our study provides strong evidence for a graded inverse relationship
between physical activity levels and risk of stroke.
Few previous studies have examined the effects of physical activity
on ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke separately. Sacco and colleagues4 observed a strong dose-response relationship between
leisure-time physical activity and risk of ischemic stroke, but the study
did not examine the association with hemorrhagic stroke. Gillum and colleagues1 found a significant positive association between lower
levels of nonrecreational activity and increased risk of total and nonhemorrhagic
stroke. In contrast, 2 other studies5,12
suggest a stronger inverse association with hemorrhagic stroke than ischemic
stroke. However, neither study obtained detailed or repeated measurements
of physical activity. Our data support the role of physical activity, including
walking, in the prevention of ischemic stroke rather than hemorrhagic stroke.
The risk reduction in ischemic stroke observed in our study was similar to
that for coronary heart disease, reflecting shared risk factors and atherothrombotic
origin of these 2 diseases. Although hypertension is also a risk factor for
both intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage, the pathophysiology of these
events is not predominantly atherogenic in nature. However, our power for
detecting an association with hemorrhagic stroke is limited due to a smaller
number of cases.
Our data suggest that similar energy expenditure from walking and vigorous
physical activity confer similar reductions in stroke risk and that substantial
reduction in stroke risk appears achievable through a moderate amount of walking.
This finding is reassuring, since walking is a physical activity that is highly
accessible, readily adopted, inexpensive, and rarely associated with exercise-related
injury. In our previous studies, METs for walking and brisk walking pace were
independently associated with lower risk of type 2 diabetes29
and coronary heart disease.27 In the Honolulu
Heart Study, walking distance was inversely associated with risk of coronary
heart disease30 and total mortality.31 These findings have important public health implications
because walking is the most popular form of physical activity, especially
among middle-aged and older women.15
Another important finding of our study is that sedentary women who became
active in middle and later adulthood had lower stroke risk than their counterparts
who remained sedentary. This implies a relatively prompt effect of physical
activity—older adults can enjoy the benefit of exercise even if they
were sedentary for a long time.
The protective effect of physical activity may be partly mediated through
its effects on various risk factors for stroke.32
Physical activity lowers blood pressure and increases high-density lipoprotein
cholesterol concentration. It has been associated with reductions in plasma
fibrinogen level and platelet aggregation and elevations in plasma tissue
plasminogen activator activity.32 Physical
activity facilitates weight loss and weight maintenance.33
It can increase insulin sensitivity because of increased number and activity
of glucose transporters, both in muscle and adipose tissue.34,35
Convincing epidemiological data demonstrate the beneficial effects of physical
activity on risk of type 2 diabetes,36 an important
risk factor for stroke.
Our physical activity questionnaire has been validated against a physical
activity diary,18 and similar questionnaires
have correlated well with measured oxygen consumption.37
Although some error in self-report is inevitable, because of the prospective
design of this study, misclassification would be nondifferential with respect
to the outcome and would bias the results toward the null. The present study
is the largest cohort for whom data on physical activity and health outcomes
were collected prospectively, and it is the only large study examining the
association between physical activity and stroke in a female population. The
present study is also the only one in which physical activity exposures were
updated after the initial assessment, with detailed examination of moderate
vs vigorous activity.
In conclusion, increasing physical activity levels are associated with
substantial reductions in risk of total and ischemic stroke in women. We observed
comparable magnitudes of risk reduction with similar energy expenditure from
walking and vigorous physical activity. Our findings lend further support
to current guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention13 and the National Institutes of Health14
that promote regular moderate-intensity physical activity for prevention of
chronic diseases.
1.Gillum RF, Mussolino ME, Ingram DD. Physical activity and stroke incidence in women and men: the NHANES
I Epidemiological Follow-up Study.
Am J Epidemiol.1996;143:860-869.Google Scholar 2.Abbott RD, Rodriguez BL, Burchfiel CM, Curb JD. Physical activity in older middle-aged men and reduced risk of stroke:
the Honolulu Heart Program.
Am J Epidemiol.1994;139:881-893.Google Scholar 3.Bijnen FCH, Caspersen CJ, Feskens EJM, Saris WH, Mosterd WL, Kromhout D. Physical activity and 10-year mortality from cardiovascular diseases
and all causes.
Arch Intern Med.1998;158:1499-1505.Google Scholar 4.Sacco RL, Gan R, Boden-Albala B.
et al. Leisure-time physical activity and ischemic stroke risk: the Northern
Manhattan Stroke Study.
Stroke.1998;29:380-387.Google Scholar 5.Lee I-M, Hennekens CH, Berger K, Buring JE, Manson JE. Exercise and risk of stroke in male physicians.
Stroke.1999;30:1-6.Google Scholar 6.Lee I-M, Paffenbarger Jr RS. Physical activity and stroke incidence: the Harvard Alumni Health Study.
Stroke.1998;29:2049-2054.Google Scholar 7.Paffenbarger Jr RS. Factors predisposing to fatal stroke in longshoremen.
Prev Med.1972;1:522-527.Google Scholar 8.Menotti A, Keys A, Blackburn H.
et al. Twenty-year stroke mortality and prediction in twelve cohorts of the
Seven Countries Study.
Int J Epidemiol.1990;19:295-301.Google Scholar 9.Lindsted KD, Tonstad S, Kuzma JW. Self-report of physical activity and patterns of mortality in Seventh-Day
Adventist men.
J Clin Epidemiol.1991;44:355-364.Google Scholar 10.Ellekjaer EF, Wyller TB, Sverre JM, Holmen J. Lifestyle factors and risk of cerebral infarction.
Stroke.1992;23:829-834.Google Scholar 11.Wannamethee G, Shaper AG. Physical activity and stroke in British middle aged men.
BMJ.1992;304:597-601.Google Scholar 12.Kiely DK, Wolf PA, Cupples LA, Beiser AS, Kannel WB. Physical activity and stroke risk: the Framingham Study.
Am J Epidemiol.1994;140:608-620.Google Scholar 13.Pate R, Pratt M, Blair S.
et al. Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine.
JAMA.1995;273:402-407.Google Scholar 14.NIH Consensus Development Panel on Physical Activity and Cardiovascular
Health. Physical activity and cardiovascular health.
JAMA.1996;276:241-246.Google Scholar 15.Ziegel PZ, Brackbill RM, Heath GW. The epidemiology of walking for exercise: implications for promoting
activity among sedentary groups.
Am J Public Health.1995;85:706-710.Google Scholar 16.Colditz GA, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ.
et al. Weight as a risk factor for clinical diabetes in women.
Am J Epidemiol.1990;132:501-513.Google Scholar 17.Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS.
et al. Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of
human physical activities.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.1993;25:71-80.Google Scholar 18.Wolf AM, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA.
et al. Reproducibility and validity of a self-administered physical activity
questionnaire.
Int J Epidemiol.1994;23:991-999.Google Scholar 19.Jacobs Jr DR, Ainsworth BE, Hartman TJ, Leon AS. A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.1993;25:81-91.Google Scholar 20.Walker AE, Robins M, Weinfeld FD. The National Survey of Stroke: clinical findings.
Stroke.1981;12(suppl I):I13-I44.Google Scholar 21.Anderson CS, Jamrozik KD, Burvill PW, Chakera TMH, Johnson GA, Stewart-Waynne EG. Determining the incidence of different subtypes of stroke: results
from the Perth Community Stroke Study, 1989-1990.
Med J Aust.1993;158:85-89.Google Scholar 22.Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Speizer FE.
et al. Test of the National Death Index.
Am J Epidemiol.1984;119:837-839.Google Scholar 23.Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE.
et al. Dietary fat intake and risk of coronary heart disease in women.
N Engl J Med.1997;337:1491-1499.Google Scholar 24.Greenland S. Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: alternatives to categorical
analysis.
Epidemiology.1995;6:356-365.Google Scholar 25.D'Agostino RB, Lee M-L, Belanger AJ, Cupples LA, Anderson K, Kannel WB. Relation of pooled logistic regression to time-dependent Cox regression
analysis: the Framingham Heart Study.
Stat Med.1990;9:1501-1515.Google Scholar 26.Joshipura KJ, Ascherio A, Manson JE.
et al. Fruit and vegetable intake in relation to risk of ischemic stroke.
JAMA.1999;282:1233-1239.Google Scholar 27.Manson JE, Hu FB, Rich-Edwards JW.
et al. A prospective study of walking compared with vigorous exercise in the
prevention of coronary heart disease in women.
N Engl J Med.1999;341:650-658.Google Scholar 28.US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon
General. Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1996:1-8, 85-172,
175-207.
29.Hu FB, Sigal RJ, Rich-Edwards JW.
et al. Walking compared with vigorous physical activity and risk of type 2
diabetes in women: a prospective study.
JAMA.1999;282:1433-1439.Google Scholar 30.Hakim AA, Curb JD, Petrovitch H.
et al. Effects of walking on coronary heart disease in elderly men: the Honolulu
Heart Program.
Circulation.1999;100:9-13.Google Scholar 31.Hakim AA, Petrovitch H, Burchfiel CM.
et al. Effects of walking on mortality among nonsmoking retired men.
N Engl J Med.1998;338:94-99.Google Scholar 32.Gorelick PB, Sacco RL, Smith DB.
et al. Prevention of a first stroke: a review of guidelines and a multidisciplinary
consensus statement from the National Stroke Association.
JAMA.1999;281:1112-1120.Google Scholar 33.Blair SN. Evidence for success of exercise in weight loss and control.
Ann Intern Med.1993;119(7 pt 2):702-706.Google Scholar 34.Devlin JT. Effects of exercise on insulin sensitivity in humans.
Diabetes Care.1992;15:1690-1693.Google Scholar 35.Henriksson J. Influence of exercise on insulin sensitivity.
J Cardiovasc Risk.1995;2:303-309.Google Scholar 36.Manson JE, Spelsberg A. Primary prevention of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Am J Prev Med.1994;10:172-184.Google Scholar 37.Ainsworth BE, Leon AS, Richardson MT, Jacobs DR, Paffenbarger Jr RS. Accuracy of the College Alumnus Physical Activity Questionnaire.
J Clin Epidemiol.1993;46:1403-1411.Google Scholar