Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
JAMA 100 Years Ago Section Editor: Jennifer
Reiling, Editorial Assistant.
ITS VALUE TO THE GENERAL PRACTITIONER.M. H. FUSSELL, M.D.PHILADELPHIA.
I believe that the vast majority of the practitioners of medicine never
make an examination of the blood of their patients unless such an examination
is suggested and carried out by a consultant. The reasons for this may be
many, but the following I believe to be the most important: 1. Blood examinations
as practical diagnostic measures are of comparatively recent origin; consequently,
men who graduated fifteen or more years ago were not taught the value of such
examinations, or how to make them. Unless such members of our profession have
had the subject forced upon them by teaching, or by continued intercourse
with men trained in such work, they are quite unlikely to take it upon themselves.
2. Blood examinations, like all other valuable diagnostic measures
take time. The general practitioner is hurried; in the town competition is
great; and those who depend upon the practice of medicine for a livelihood
are apt to become careless about the use of these finer diagnostic measures,
and depend upon less certain means of diagnosis. To once slur these valuable
agents is to learn to gradually discard them, to the great detriment of ourselves
and our patients. It is certain that in many cases examination of the blood
is quite as important as, indeed more important than, examination of the urine.
It is now an accepted fact that no case is thoroughly studied without a urine
examination. I believe it will soon be accepted by the general practitioner—as
it is now recognized by the specialist—that a blood examination is equally
as important for a thorough study of our cases.
That such examinations are possible and practical for one who practices
medicine for a livelihood and not as a pastime, I am personally certain, for
I am a practitioner and by no means a hematologist; I have been slow in learning,
but now make almost daily use of this most valuable help. Without the aid
of an assistant, I have made the examinations of blood in a practical way
just as I have the urine, and I feel that it helps me as
much in my daily work. I have as yet been unable to examine the blood
of every patient, but I trust that the time is not far off when I can do that
in my work. I do, however, use blood examinations in every obscure case, with
the greatest possible benefit. I was led to the general use of examination
of the blood by the recognition of my own mistakes and by the mistakes of
others where no such examinations were made. . . .
For years malaria has been made the scapegoat for all conditions of
the character of which we may be uncertain. Every patient with an intermittent
fever associated with malaise of uncertain origin—especially if such
a patient resided in a malarial district—was said to be suffering from
malaria. Malaria is to-day one of the few diseases that can be positively
diagnosed. I believe that no case should be diagnosed as malaria unless the
plasmodium malariæ has been found in the blood. Examinations for this
organism need a microscope and the knowledge how to use it. Unfortunately
the blood is not frequently submitted to this test. If this were done, beginning
cases of tuberculosis and intermittent fevers in pneumonia would be much less
frequently called malaria. . . .
It will be seen that I have not referred to the staining of the blood
and the invaluable and often absolutely necessary steps toward the full study
of the case. I have avoided this because such steps need a special training
and familiarity with methods not always practicable in everyday practice.
But if the preliminary and frequently entirely satisfactory steps be taken,
then almost invariably some one can be found who will complete the examinations.
The apparatus to be used in this means of diagnosis which I advocate are a
microscope, slides, coverslips, hemoglobinometer and hemocytometer.
By the use of a microscope and a slide of fresh blood, one may observe,
1, whether the leucocytes are largely increased in number; 2, whether the
red cells form properly in rouleaux, and whether they are of odd shapes; 3,
the presence or absence of malarial organism. The first two observations may
be made with an ordinary 1/6 objective. The last requires a higher power,
preferably an oil-immersion. . . . It takes but a few minutes—fifteen—at
a patient's home to get the blood properly. The counting and examination can
be done at leisure at home. Then, too, there is no undue display of instruments
in the presence of the patients. The fresh blood may be preserved for several
hours by using oil of cedar run under the edge of the slide. The diluted blood
in the tubes can be easily preserved by putting an ordinary gum band lengthwise
In conclusion, let me insist that this most valuable diagnostic measure
is practicable for the ordinary, every-day physician. It will enable him to
avoid many errors in diagnosis. It will help him to take a deeper, more scientific
interest in his cases.
BLOOD EXAMINATION. JAMA. 2000;284(4):411. doi:10.1001/jama.284.4.411
Create a personal account or sign in to: