Using Internet Technology to Deliver a Behavioral Weight Loss Program | Lifestyle Behaviors | JAMA | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.239.150.57. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kuczmarski RJ, Johnson CL. Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends.  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord.1998;22:3947.Google Scholar
2.
Sherwood NE, Morton N, Jeffery RW, French SA, Neumark-Sztainer D, Falkner NH. Consumer preferences in format and type of community-based weight control programs.  Am J Health Promot.1998;13:12-18.Google Scholar
3.
Jeffery RW, Hellerstedt WL, Schmid TL. Correspondence programs for smoking cessation and weight control: a comparison of two strategies in the Minnesota Heart Health Program.  Health Psychol.1990;9:585-598.Google Scholar
4.
O'Loughlin J, Paradis G, Meshefedjian G, Kishchuk N. Evaluation of an 8-week mailed health-weight intervention.  Prev Med.1998;27:288-295.Google Scholar
5.
Cameron R, MacDonald MA, Schlegel RP.  et al.  Toward the development of self-help health behaviour change programs: weight loss by correspondence.  Can J Public Health.1990;81:275-279.Google Scholar
6.
Hellerstedt W, Jeffery R. The effects of a telephone-based intervention on weight loss.  Am J Health Promot.1997;11:177-182.Google Scholar
7.
Meyers A, Graves T, Whelan J, Barclay D. An evaulation of a television-delivered behavioral weight loss program: are the ratings acceptable?  J Consult Clin Psychol.1996;64:172-178.Google Scholar
8.
Harvey-Berino J. Changing health behavior via telecommunications technology: using interactive television to treat obesity.  Behav Ther.1998;29:505-519.Google Scholar
9.
Winett RA, Moore JF, Wagner JL.  et al.  Altering shoppers' supermarket purchases to fit nutritional guidelines: an interactive information system.  J Appl Behav Anal.1991;24:95-105.Google Scholar
10.
Winett RA, Anderson ES, Bickley PG.  et al.  Nutrition for a Lifetime System(c): a multimedia system for altering food supermarket shoppers' purchases to meet nutritional guidelines.  Comput Human Behav.1997;13:371-392.Google Scholar
11.
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Velicer WF, Rossi JS. Standardized, individualized, interactive, and personalized self-help programs for smoking cessation.  Health Psychol.1993;12:399-405.Google Scholar
12.
Marcus BH, Bock BC, Pinto BM, Forsyth LH, Roberts MB, Traficante RM. Efficacy of an individualized motivationally-tailored physical activity intervention.  Ann Behav Med.1998;20:174-180.Google Scholar
13.
Taylor CB, Agras WS, Losch M, Plante TG, Burnett K. Improving the effectiveness of computer-assisted weight loss.  Behav Ther.1991;22:229-236.Google Scholar
14.
Burnett KF, Taylor CB, Agras WS. Ambulatory computer-assisted therapy for obesity: a new frontier for behavior therapy.  J Consult Clin Psychol.1985;53:698-703.Google Scholar
15.
Taylor H. Harris Poll. Online population growth surges to 56% of all. December 22, 1999. Poll No. 76. Available at: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=9. Accessibility verified February 3, 2001.
16.
Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard RJ. Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q).  Can J Sport Sci.1992;17:338-345.Google Scholar
17.
Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric Standardization Reference ManualChampaign, Ill: Human Kinetics Books; 1988.
18.
Paffenbarger RS, Wing AL, Hyde RT. Physical activity as an index of heart attack risk in college alumni.  Am J Epidemiol.1978;108:161-175.Google Scholar
19.
Block G, Hartman AM, Dresser CM, Carroll MD, Gannon J, Gardner L. A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing.  Am J Epidemiol.1986;124:453-469.Google Scholar
20.
Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population.  Appl Psychologic Measurement.1977;1:385-401.Google Scholar
21.
Wing RR, Jeffery RW. Sample size in clinical outcome research: the case of behavioral weight control.  Behav Ther.1984;15:550-556.Google Scholar
22.
Thomas R. Weighing the Options: Criteria for Evaluating Weight Management ProgramsWashington, DC: National Academy Press; 1995.
23.
Blackburn GL. Effects of weight loss on weight-related risk factors. In: Brownell KD, Fairburn CG, eds. Eating Disorders and Obesity: A Comprehensive Handbook. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1995:406-410.
24.
Goldstein DJ. Beneficial health effects of modest weight loss.  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord.1992;16:397-416.Google Scholar
25.
Miller WC, Eggert KE, Wallace JP, Lindeman AK, Jastremski C. Successful weight loss in a self-taught, self-administered program.  Int J Sports Med.1993;14:401-405.Google Scholar
26.
Klem ML, Klesges RC. Competition in a minimal-contact weight-loss program.  J Consult Clin Psychol.1988;56:142-144.Google Scholar
27.
Abrams DB, Follick MJ. Behavioral weight loss intervention at the work site: feasibility and maintenance.  J Consult Clin Psychol.1983;51:226-233.Google Scholar
28.
Stunkard AJ, Brownell K. Work-site treatment for obesity.  Am J Psychiatry.1980;137:252-253.Google Scholar
29.
Jeffery RW, Danaher BG, Killen J, Farquhar JW, Kinnier R. Self-administered programs for health behavior change: smoking cessation and weight reduction by mail.  Addict Behav.1982;7:57-63.Google Scholar
30.
Jeffery RW, Gerber WM. Group and correspondence treatments for weight reduction used in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.  Behav Ther.1982;13:24-30.Google Scholar
31.
Heshka S, Greenway F, Anderson JW.  et al.  Self-help weight loss vs a structured commercial program after 26 weeks: a randomized controlled trial.  Am J Med.2000;109:282-287.Google Scholar
32.
Leermakers EA, Anglin K, Wing RR. Reducing postpartum weight retention through a correspondence intervention.  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord.1998;22:1103-1109.Google Scholar
33.
Jeffery RW, Wing RR, Thorson C, Burton LC. Use of personal trainers and financial incentives to increase exercise in a behavioral weight-loss program.  J Consult Clin Psychol.1998;66:777-783.Google Scholar
34.
Lichtman SW, Pisarska K, Berman ER.  et al.  Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects.  N Engl J Med.1992;327:1893-1898.Google Scholar
Original Contribution
March 7, 2001

Using Internet Technology to Deliver a Behavioral Weight Loss Program

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Brown Medical School/Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI (Drs Tate and Wing) and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va (Dr Winett).

JAMA. 2001;285(9):1172-1177. doi:10.1001/jama.285.9.1172
Abstract

Context Rapid increases in access to the Internet have made it a viable mode for public health intervention. No controlled studies have evaluated this resource for weight loss.

Objective To determine whether a structured Internet behavioral weight loss program produces greater initial weight loss and changes in waist circumference than a weight loss education Web site.

Design Randomized, controlled trial conducted from April to December 1999.

Setting and Participants Ninety-one healthy, overweight adult hospital employees aged 18 to 60 years with a body mass index of 25 to 36 kg/m2. Analyses were performed for the 65 who had complete follow-up data.

Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to a 6-month weight loss program of either Internet education (education; n = 32 with complete data) or Internet behavior therapy (behavior therapy; n = 33 with complete data). All participants were given 1 face-to-face group weight loss session and access to a Web site with organized links to Internet weight loss resources. Participants in the behavior therapy group received additional behavioral procedures, including a sequence of 24 weekly behavioral lessons via e-mail, weekly online submission of self-monitoring diaries with individualized therapist feedback via e-mail, and an online bulletin board.

Main Outcome Measures Body weight and waist circumference, measured at 0, 3, and 6 months, compared the 2 intervention groups.

Results Repeated-measures analyses showed that the behavior therapy group lost more weight than the education group (P = .005). The behavior therapy group lost a mean (SD) of 4.0 (2.8) kg by 3 months and 4.1 (4.5) kg by 6 months. Weight loss in the education group was 1.7 (2.7) kg at 3 months and 1.6 (3.3) kg by 6 months. More participants in the behavior therapy than education group achieved the 5% weight loss goal (45% vs 22%; P = .05) by 6 months. Changes in waist circumference were also greater in the behavior therapy group than in the education group at both 3 months (P = .001) and 6 months (P = .005).

Conclusions Participants who were given a structured behavioral treatment program with weekly contact and individualized feedback had better weight loss compared with those given links to educational Web sites. Thus, the Internet and e-mail appear to be viable methods for delivery of structured behavioral weight loss programs.

×