Factors Influencing Families' Consent for Donation of Solid Organs for Transplantation | Surgery | JAMA | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.175.212.130. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
United Network for Organ Sharing.  Waiting ListAvailable at: http://www.unos.org/frame_Default.asp?Category=Newsdata. Accessibility verified June 5, 2001.
2.
Institute of Medicine.  Non–Heart-Beating Donors: Medical and Ethical Issues in ProcurementWashington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press; 1997.
3.
Ehrle RN, Shafer TJ, Nelson KR. Referral, request, and consent for organ donation: best practice—a blueprint for success.  Crit Care Nurse.1999;19:21-30, 32-33.Google Scholar
4.
Evans RW, Orians CE, Ascher NL. The potential supply of organ donors.  JAMA.1992;267:239-246.Google Scholar
5.
United Network for Organ Sharing.  1999 SR & OPTN Annual ReportRichmond, Va: United Network for Organ Sharing; 2000.
6.
Siminoff LA, Arnold RM, Caplan AL, Virnig BA, Seltzer DL. Public policy governing organ and tissue procurement in the United States.  Ann Intern Med.1995;123:10-17.Google Scholar
7.
Gortmaker SL, Beasley CL, Sheehy E.  et al.  Improving the request process to increase family consent for organ donation.  J Transpl Coord.1998;8:210-217.Google Scholar
8.
Beasley CL, Capossela CL, Brigham LE, Gunderson S, Weber P, Gortmaker SL. The impact of a comprehensive, hospital-focused intervention to increase organ donation.  J Transpl Coord.1997;7:6-13.Google Scholar
9.
The Gallup Organization.  The American Public's Attitudes Toward Organ Donation and TransplantationBoston, Mass: The Partnership for Organ Donation Inc; 1993.
10.
Franz HG, DeJong W, Wolfe SM.  et al.  Explaining brain death.  J Transpl Coord.1997;7:14-21.Google Scholar
11.
DeJong W, Franz HG, Wolfe SM.  et al.  Requesting organ donation.  Am J Crit Care.1998;7:13-23.Google Scholar
12.
Bartucci M. Organ donation: a study of the donor family perspective.  J Neurosci Nurs.1987;19:305-309.Google Scholar
13.
Siminoff LA, Arnold RM, Caplan AL. Health care professionals' attitudes toward donation: effect on practice and procurement.  J Trauma.1995;39:553-559.Google Scholar
14.
Siminoff LA, Mercer MB. Public policy, public opinion and consent for organ donation.  Camb Q Healthc Ethics.In press.Google Scholar
15.
Pelletier M. The needs of family members of organ and tissue donors.  Heart Lung.1993;22:151-157.Google Scholar
16.
Robbins RA, Nye-Dameshek J, McLaughlin NR. Knowledge and beliefs about donation, II.  J Transplant Coord.1993;3:14-17.Google Scholar
17.
Cutler JA, David SD, Kress CJ.  et al.  Increasing the availability of cadaveric organs for transplantation.  Transplantation.1993;56:225-228.Google Scholar
18.
Sophie LR, Salloway JC, Sorock G, Volek P, Merkel FK. Intensive care nurses' perceptions of cadaver organ procurement.  Heart Lung.1983;12:261-267.Google Scholar
19.
Perkins KA. The shortage of cadaver organ donors for transplantation: can psychology help?  Am Psychol.1987;42:921-930.Google Scholar
20.
Garrison RN, Bentley FR, Raque GH. There is an answer to the shortage of organ donors.  Surg Gynecol Obstet.1991;173:391-396.Google Scholar
21.
Pelletier M. The organ donor family members' perception of stressful situations during the organ donation experience.  J Adv Nurs.1992;17:90-97.Google Scholar
22.
Morris JA, Slaton J, Gibbs D. Vascular organ procurement in the trauma population.  J Trauma.1989;29:782-788.Google Scholar
23.
Kopfman JE, Smith SW. Understanding the audiences of a health communication campaign.  J Appl Commun Res.1996;24:33-49.Google Scholar
24.
Kopfman JE, Smith SW, Ah Yun JK, Hodges A. Affective and cognitive reactions to narrative versus statistical evidence organ donation messages.  J Appl Commun Res.1998;26:279-300.Google Scholar
25.
Smith SW, Morrison K, Kopfman JE. The influence of prior thought and intent on the memorability and persuasiveness of organ donation message strategies.  Health Commun.1994;6:1-20.Google Scholar
26.
Winkel FW. Public communication on donor cards.  Soc Sci Med.1984;19:957-963.Google Scholar
27.
Bosch X. Spain leads world in organ donation and transplantation.  JAMA.1999;282:17-18.Google Scholar
Original Contribution
July 4, 2001

Factors Influencing Families' Consent for Donation of Solid Organs for Transplantation

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Departments of Medicine (Drs Siminoff and Hewlett) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Gordon), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (Dr Arnold).

JAMA. 2001;286(1):71-77. doi:10.1001/jama.286.1.71
Abstract

Context Transplantation has become the therapy of choice for patients with organ failure. However, the low rate of consent by families of donor-eligible patients is a major limiting factor in the success of organ transplantation.

Objective To explore factors associated with the decision to donate among families of potential solid organ donors.

Design and Setting Data collection via chart reviews, telephone interviews with health care practitioners (HCPs) or organ procurement organization (OPO) staff, and face-to-face interviews with family for all donor-eligible deaths at 9 trauma hospitals in southwestern Pennsylvania and northeastern Ohio from 1994 to 1999.

Participants Family members, HCPs, and OPO staff involved in the donation decision for 420 donor-eligible patients.

Main Outcome Measure Factors associated with family decision to donate or not donate organs for transplantation.

Results A total of 238 of the 420 cases led to organ donation; 182 did not. Univariate analysis revealed numerous factors associated with the donation decision. Multivariable analysis of associated variables revealed that family and patient sociodemographics (ethnicity, patient's age and cause of death) and prior knowledge of the patients' wishes were significantly associated with willingness to donate (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 7.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.55-9.01). Families who discussed more topics and had more conversations about organ donation were more likely to donate (adjusted OR, 5.22; 95% CI, 4.32-6.30), as were families with more contact with OPO staff (adjusted OR, 3.08; 95% CI, 2.63-3.60) and those who experienced an optimal request pattern (adjusted OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 2.58-3.40). Socioemotional and communication variables acted as intervening variables.

Conclusions Public education is needed to modify attitudes about organ donation prior to a donation opportunity. Specific steps can be taken by HCPs and OPO staff to maximize the opportunity to persuade families to donate their relatives' organs.

×