Complications of Femoral and Subclavian Venous Catheterization in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial | Critical Care Medicine | JAMA | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Williams JF, Seneff MG, Friedman BC.  et al.  Use of femoral venous catheters in critically ill adults: prospective study.  Crit Care Med.1991;19:550-553.Google Scholar
2.
Getzen LC, Pollack EW. Short-term femoral vein catheterization: a safe alternative venous access?  Am J Surg.1979;138:875-878.Google Scholar
3.
Mansfield PF, Hohn DC, Fornage BD, Gregurich MA, Ota DM. Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization.  N Engl J Med.1994;331:1735-1738.Google Scholar
4.
Sitzmann JV, Townsend TR, Siler MC, Bartlett JG. Septic and technical complications of central venous catheterization: a prospective study of 200 consecutive patients.  Ann Surg.1985;202:766-770.Google Scholar
5.
Durbec O, Viviand X, Potie F, Vialet R, Martin C. Lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in comatose or sedated patients undergoing femoral vein catheterization.  Crit Care Med.1997;25:1982-1985.Google Scholar
6.
Joynt GM, Kew J, Gomersall CD, Leung VY, Liu EK. Deep venous thrombosis caused by femoral venous catheters in critically ill adult patients.  Chest.2000;117:178-183.Google Scholar
7.
Trottier SJ, Veremakis C, O'Brien J, Auer AI. Femoral deep vein thrombosis associated with central venous catheterization: results from a prospective, randomized trial.  Crit Care Med.1995;23:52-59.Google Scholar
8.
Timsit JF, Farkas JC, Boyer JM.  et al.  Central vein catheter-related thrombosis in intensive care patients: incidence, risks factors, and relationship with catheter-related sepsis.  Chest.1998;114:207-213.Google Scholar
9.
Haire WD, Lynch TG, Lieberman RP.  et al.  Utility of duplex ultrasound in the diagnosis of asymptomatic catheter-induced subclavian vein thrombosis.  J Ultrasound Med.1991;10:493-496.Google Scholar
10.
Goetz AM, Wagener MM, Miller JM, Muder RR. Risk of infection due to central venous catheters: effect of site of placement and catheter type.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.1998;19:842-845.Google Scholar
11.
Collignon P, Soni N, Pearson I, Sorrell T, Woods P. Sepsis associated with central vein catheters in critically ill patients.  Intensive Care Med.1988;14:227-231.Google Scholar
12.
Mermel LA. Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.  Ann Intern Med.2000;132:391-402.Google Scholar
13.
Pearson ML. Guideline for prevention of intravascular device-related infections.  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.1996;17:438-473.Google Scholar
14.
Timsit JF, Bruneel F, Cheval C.  et al.  Use of tunneled femoral catheters to prevent catheter-related infection: a randomized, controlled trial.  Ann Intern Med.1999;130:729-735.Google Scholar
15.
Durbec O, Viviand X, Potie F, Vialet R, Albanese J, Martin C. A prospective evaluation of the use of femoral venous catheters in critically ill adults.  Crit Care Med.1997;25:1986-1989.Google Scholar
16.
Brun-Buisson C, Abrouk F, Legrand P, Huet Y, Larabi S, Rapin M. Diagnosis of central venous catheter-related sepsis: critical level of quantitative tip cultures.  Arch Intern Med.1987;147:873-877.Google Scholar
17.
Ryan Jr JA, Abel RM, Abbott WM.  et al.  Catheter complications in total parenteral nutrition: a prospective study of 200 consecutive patients.  N Engl J Med.1974;290:757-761.Google Scholar
18.
Gil RT, Kruse JA, Thill-Baharozian MC, Carlson RW. Triple vs single-lumen central venous catheters: a prospective study in a critically ill population.  Arch Intern Med.1989;149:1139-1143.Google Scholar
19.
Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study.  JAMA.1993;270:2957-2963.Google Scholar
20.
Fagon JY, Chastre J, Novara A, Medioni P, Gibert C. Characterization of intensive care unit patients using a model based on the presence or absence of organ dysfunctions and/or infection: the ODIN model.  Intensive Care Med.1993;19:137-144.Google Scholar
21.
Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Pribble CG. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature.  Crit Care Med.1996;24:2053-2058.Google Scholar
22.
Raad I, Darouiche R, Dupuis J.  et al.  Central venous catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin for the prevention of catheter-related colonization and bloodstream infections: a randomized, double-blind trial.  Ann Intern Med.1997;127:267-274.Google Scholar
23.
Hirsh J, Hoak J. Management of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a statement for healthcare professionals.  Circulation.1996;93:2212-2245.Google Scholar
24.
Brismar B, Hardstedt C, Jacobson S. Diagnosis of thrombosis by catheter phlebography after prolonged central venous catheterization.  Ann Surg.1981;194:779-783.Google Scholar
25.
Prandoni P, Polistena P, Bernardi E.  et al.  Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis: risk factors, diagnosis, and complications.  Arch Intern Med.1997;157:57-62.Google Scholar
26.
Becker DM, Philbrick JT, Walker FB. Axillary and subclavian venous thrombosis: prognosis and treatment.  Arch Intern Med.1991;151:1934-1943.Google Scholar
27.
Monreal M, Lafoz E, Ruiz J, Valls R, Alastrue A. Upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a prospective study.  Chest.1991;99:280-283.Google Scholar
28.
Horattas MC, Wright DJ, Fenton AH.  et al.  Changing concepts of deep venous thrombosis of the upper extremity: report of a series and review of the literature.  Surgery.1988;104:561-567.Google Scholar
29.
Plate G, Ohlin P, Eklof B. Pulmonary embolism in acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis.  Br J Surg.1985;72:912-915.Google Scholar
30.
Huisman MV, Buller HR, ten Cate JW.  et al.  Unexpected high prevalence of silent pulmonary embolism in patients with deep venous thrombosis.  Chest.1989;95:498-502.Google Scholar
31.
Timsit JF, Sebille V, Farkas JC.  et al.  Effect of subcutaneous tunneling on internal jugular catheter-related sepsis in critically ill patients: a prospective randomized multicenter study.  JAMA.1996;276:1416-1420.Google Scholar
32.
Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Brun-Buisson C. Tunneling short-term central venous catheters to prevent catheter-related infection: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.  Crit Care Med.1998;26:1452-1457.Google Scholar
Caring for the Critically Ill Patient
August 8, 2001

Complications of Femoral and Subclavian Venous Catheterization in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Service de Réanimation Médicale (Drs Merrer, De Jonghe, and Outin) and Service de Réanimation Chirurgicale (Dr Raffy), Centre Hospitalier de Poissy/St Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France; Centre de Coordination et de Lutte Contre les Infections Nosocomiales de Paris-Nord (Mr Golliot) and Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Hôpital Saint Joseph (Dr Misset), Paris, France; Département d'Urgence Réanimation, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Nîmes, Nîmes, France (Dr Lefrant); Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Mantes-la-Jolie, Mantes-la-Jolie, France (Dr Barre); Service de Réanimation Médicale, Centre Hospitalier de Dieppe, Dieppe, France (Dr Rigaud); Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France (Dr Casciani); Service de Réanimation Médicale, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France (Dr Bosquet); Service de Réanimation Médicale, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Henri Mondor, Creteil, France (Dr Brun-Buisson); and Service de Réanimation Medico-Chirurgicale, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France (Dr Nitenberg).

 

Caring for the Critically Ill Patient Section Editor: Deborah J. Cook, MD, Consulting Editor, JAMA.

JAMA. 2001;286(6):700-707. doi:10.1001/jama.286.6.700
Abstract

Context Whether venous catheterization at the femoral site is associated with an increased risk of complications compared with that at the subclavian site is debated.

Objective To compare mechanical, infectious, and thrombotic complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization.

Design and Setting Concealed, randomized controlled clinical trial conducted between December 1997 and July 2000 at 8 intensive care units (ICUs) in France.

Patients Two hundred eighty-nine adult patients receiving a first central venous catheter.

Interventions Patients were randomly assigned to undergo central venous catheterization at the femoral site (n = 145) or subclavian site (n = 144).

Main Outcome Measures Rate and severity of mechanical, infectious, and thrombotic complications, compared by catheterization site in 289, 270, and 223 patients, respectively.

Results Femoral catheterization was associated with a higher incidence rate of overall infectious complications (19.8% vs 4.5%; P<.001; incidence density of 20 vs 3.7 per 1000 catheter-days) and of major infectious complications (clinical sepsis with or without bloodstream infection, 4.4% vs 1.5%; P = .07; incidence density of 4.5 vs 1.2 per 1000 catheter-days), as well as of overall thrombotic complications (21.5% vs 1.9%; P<.001) and complete thrombosis of the vessel (6% vs 0%; P = .01); rates of overall and major mechanical complications were similar between the 2 groups (17.3% vs 18.8 %; P = .74 and 1.4% vs 2.8%; P = .44, respectively). Risk factors for mechanical complications were duration of insertion (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.08 per additional minute; P<.001); insertion in 2 of the centers (OR, 4.52; 95% CI, 1.81-11.23; P = .001); and insertion during the night (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.04-4.08; P = .03). The only factor associated with infectious complications was femoral catheterization (hazard ratio [HR], 4.83; 95% CI, 1.96-11.93; P<.001); antibiotic administration via the catheter decreased risk of infectious complications (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.18-0.93; P = .03). Femoral catheterization was the only risk factor for thrombotic complications (OR, 14.42; 95% CI, 3.33-62.57; P<.001).

Conclusion Femoral venous catheterization is associated with a greater risk of infectious and thrombotic complications than subclavian catheterization in ICU patients.

×