The use of anthrax as a weapon of biological terrorism has moved from
theory to reality in recent weeks. Following processing of a letter containing
anthrax spores that had been mailed to a US senator, 5 cases of inhalational
anthrax have occurred among postal workers employed at a major postal facility
in Washington, DC. This report details the clinical presentation, diagnostic
workup, and initial therapy of 2 of these patients. The clinical course is
in some ways different from what has been described as the classic pattern
for inhalational anthrax. One patient developed low-grade fever, chills, cough,
and malaise 3 days prior to admission, and then progressive dyspnea and cough
productive of blood-tinged sputum on the day of admission. The other patient
developed progressively worsening headache of 3 days' duration, along with
nausea, chills, and night sweats, but no respiratory symptoms, on the day
of admission. Both patients had abnormal findings on chest radiographs. Non–contrast-enhanced
computed tomography of the chest showing mediastinal adenopathy led to a presumptive
diagnosis of inhalational anthrax in both cases. The diagnoses were confirmed
by blood cultures and polymerase chain reaction testing. Treatment with antibiotics,
including intravenous ciprofloxacin, rifampin, and clindamycin, and supportive
therapy appears to have slowed the progression of inhalational anthrax and
has resulted to date in survival.
The use of anthrax as a weapon of biological terrorism has moved from
theory to reality in recent weeks. This report describes the clinical presentation,
diagnostic workup, and initial therapy of 2 patients with inhalational anthrax.
The clinical course is in some ways different from what has been described
as the classic pattern for inhalational anthrax. A high degree of clinical
suspicion, coupled with abnormal findings on chest radiographs and non–contrast-enhanced
computed tomography (CT) imaging of the chest led to a presumptive diagnosis
of inhalational anthrax in both cases, later confirmed by blood cultures and
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. Timely intervention with antibiotic
therapy, including ciprofloxacin, rifampin and clindamycin, and supportive
therapy appears to have slowed the progression of inhalational anthrax and
has resulted to date in improved clinical outcome.
Until recently, inhalational anthrax was a rare disease, with the last
case in the United States reported in 1978. The potential use of anthrax as
a bioterrorism agent has been described for more than 75 years, and nearly
20 countries are known to have investigated its use as a biological weapon.1,2 Current understanding of the clinical
course and presentation of inhalational anthrax has been largely shaped by
3 sources: the unintentional anthrax exposure in Sverdlovsk in the former
Soviet Union in 19793; scattered outbreaks
of the disease, usually among wool sorters or laboratory workers4,5;
and experimental animal models.6,7
We recently diagnosed and treated documented inhalational anthrax in
2 patients, whose clinical symptoms, diagnostic workup and clinical course
suggest that some redefinition of the natural history of inhalational anthrax
in its initial presentation is warranted, at least in the setting of a bioterrorism
event.
On October 15, 2001, a staff member of a US senator's office opened
a tightly sealed envelope and noticed a "small burst of dust."8
The following day, the letter was shown to contain Bacillus
anthracis by PCR testing. While criminal and epidemiologic research
indicated a discrete area of exposure at the US Capitol, postal workers outside
this area were not known to be at risk.
On October 19, 2001, a 56-year-old male postal worker from the Brentwood
facility in Washington, DC, presented to the emergency department. He had
been well until 3 days prior to admission, when he developed low-grade fever,
chills, cough, dyspnea on exertion, and generalized malaise. The cough was
initially productive of clear sputum until the night of admission, when it
became blood tinged. The dyspnea was progressive and accompanied on the day
of admission by a feeling of midsternal, nonradiating, pleuritic chest tightness.
On review of systems, the patient noted myalgias, arthralgias, anorexia,
and a sore throat. There was no congestion or other nasal symptoms. The patient
had a childhood history of asthma but had been asymptomatic since adolescence.
He denied any history of smoking tobacco. His primary duties at work involved
distribution of express mail letters from the Brentwood and Baltimore–Washington–International
Airport postal centers to government agencies, including the Senate office
building.
The patient's initial vital signs were temperature of 37.5°C, pulse
of 110/min, respirations of 18/min, blood pressure of 157/75 mm Hg, and oxygen
saturation of 98% in room air. The physical examination revealed a thin but
otherwise healthy patient in no apparent distress. The only abnormality on
physical examination was a decrease in breath sounds in the left lower lung
base, without dullness, percussion, or egophony. The white blood cell count
was 7500/µL (segmentd neutrophils, 76; bands, 8; lymphocytes, 7; monocytes,
7). Serum chemistry results were normal, with the exception of creatine kinase,
which was 207 U/L, with a creatine kinase–MB fraction of 1 U/L. Arterial
blood gas analysis showed pH of 7.45, PaCO2 of 27 mm Hg, PaO2 of 80.3 mm Hg, and oxygen saturation of 97% on room air.
A posterior-anterior and lateral chest radiograph depicted a minimally
widened mediastinum (most notable in the right paratracheal region), bilateral
hilar masses, a moderate right pleural effusion, a suggestion of a left subpulmonic
effusion, and a slight right lower lobe air-space opacity (Figure 1A). A contrast spiral CT of the chest showed profuse and
slightly hyperattenuating paratracheal, anterior-posterior window, subcarinal,
hilar, and azygoesophageal recess adenopathy (Figure 1B). The largest lymph node was in the subcarinal region
and measured 4.2 cm in maximal transverse diameter (upper limit of normal,
1.0-1.5 cm). In addition, there was evidence of diffuse infiltrating mediastinal
edema, bilateral moderate-sized pleural effusions, bibasilar air-space disease,
and thickened peribronchial tissue.
Blood cultures obtained at the time of admission showed prominent gram-positive
rods on Gram stain at 11 hours, consistent with B anthracis (Figure 2). The patient
was given parenteral ciprofloxicin, 400 mg every 8 hours; rifampin, 300 mg
every 12 hours; and clindamycin, 900 mg every 8 hours. He was admitted to
the hospital for further therapy, where he was in serious but stable condition
on the 20th hospital day. Bacillus anthracis was
confirmed as the etiologic organism at the Virginia State Health Laboratory
and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) by PCR on October
21.
On October 20, 2001, a 56-year-old man who worked at the Brentwood post
office in the mail sorting center presented to the emergency department with
a progressively worsening headache of 3 days' duration, described as gradual
in onset, global, and constant. He also complained of nausea, chills, and
night sweats, but denied fevers, vomiting, photophobia, visual complaints,
nuchal rigidity, slurred speech, or weakness. He had no respiratory complaints
other than a mild sore throat, and the remainder of his review of systems
was negative.
The patient's vital signs were temperature 37.6°C, pulse of 127/min,
respirations of 20/min, blood pressure of 133/87 mm Hg, and oxygen saturation
of 94% in room air. Physical examination revealed a well-developed man in
no acute distress whose neurologic examination result was completely normal.
The remainder of physical examination was notable only for diffuse rhonchi
and decreased breath sounds in both lung bases.
His white blood cell count was 9700/µL with a normal differential,
and the remainder of his laboratory studies yielded normal results. A noncontrast
head CT image was normal. He underwent a lumbar puncture, which showed 20
red blood cells per high-power field, 4 white blood cells per high-power field,
cerebrospinal fluid glucose level of 92 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L), and no organisms
on Gram stain. Culture and Gram stain of the cerebrospinal fluid were negative.
Serum electrolytes were normal.
Anterior-posterior chest radiograph showed a widened mediastinum and
low long volumes, along with bilateral hilar masses, a right pleural effusion,
and bilateral perihilar air-space disease (Figure 3A). A noncontrast spiral chest CT showed profuse and slightly
hyperattenuating paratracheal, AP window, subcarinal, hilar, and azygoesophageal
recess adenopathy, although to a lesser extent than in patient 1 (Figure 3B). Diffuse mediastinal edema, bilateral
pleural effusions, bibasilar air-space disease, and thickened peribronchial
tissue were noted.
Because of the markedly abnormal chest radiograph and CT scans, a presumptive
diagnosis of inhalational anthrax was made and the patient was given parenteral
ciprofloxacin, 400 mg every 8 hours; rifampin, 300 mg every 12 hours; and
clindamycin, 900 mg every 8 hours. Bacillus anthracis
grew from the blood at 15 hours and was confirmed by PCR by the Virginia Department
of Health and the CDC. The patient remained stable on the 21st hospital day.
Current literature on inhalational anthrax has stressed the rarity of
this disease but has also emphasized several important features.9-14
First, it has been emphasized that early diagnosis of inhalational anthrax
is exceedingly difficult, particularly if there is not a clearly defined exposure
known to the clinicians treating a patient. It has been suggested that syndromic
surveillance could be an important component in raising clinical suspicion
of the disease, since it has been presumed that identification of an increase
in flulike syndromes leading to clinical deterioration and death would be
a harbinger in identifying the disease.10-13
Second, the illness has been characterized as having a 2-stage clinical
course, with early nonspecific respiratory symptoms followed in 24 to 72 hours
by the abrupt onset of fever, dyspnea, profound respiratory distress, and
shock, with death occurring in 80% to 90% of patients.11-15
Third, radiographic findings of a widened or abnormal mediastinum in previously
healthy patients with flulike symptoms have been considered pathognomonic
of inhalational anthrax.9,11-15
However, these radiographic signs have been described as a relatively late
finding associated with a poor prognosis.9,11,12
A recent consensus statement indicated that "treatment at this stage would
be unlikely to alter the outcome of the illness."9
These features of the disease are derived not only from previous cases
of inhalational anthrax but also because of what is known of the pathophysiology
of the disease. Inhalational anthrax occurs following deposition of a sufficient
number of spores into the alveolar space. These 1- to 5-µm spores are
then ingested by macrophages, which are transported by the lymphatic system
to the mediastinal lymph nodes. Germination of the spore into the B anthracis organism typically occurs within 1 to 3 days, but may occur
as long as 60 days following transport to the lymph nodes.3,14
Once the bacteria replicate, anthrax toxin is released, comprising 3 proteins:
protective antigen, lethal factor, and edema factor. Lethal factor and protective
antigen bind to form lethal toxin, which is the predominant virulence factor
of the disease. Once production of lethal toxin has occurred, apoptosis and
hemorrhagic necrosis of the mediastinal lymph nodes occur rapidly, producing
a clinical cascade of hemorrhagic mediastinitis and edema. When hemorrhagic
necrosis extends to the pleura, bloody pleural effusions occur. Hematogenous
spread of the bacteria and the toxin results in systemic disease, with profound
shock, dyspnea, respiratory distress, and, in the majority of cases, death.11-15
The 2 cases we report add to what is known about the natural history
of inhalational anthrax and the initial presentation of the disease. Neither
of the cases were known at the time of clinical presentation to have been
exposed to anthrax or to be at high risk of the disease. In both cases, the
treating physicians had a high clinical index of suspicion regarding the disease,
based partly on the known B anthracis exposures in
the Senate office building although the association of the disease with postal
workers was not clearly known at the time the first patient presented to the
emergency department. Both patients had an increased pulse rate, elevated
out of proportion to either symptoms or fever, and an abnormal chest radiograph
with bilateral pleural effusions and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. The second
patient presented with a different clinical picture, with severe headache,
low-grade fever, night sweats, and nausea. The chest radiograph showed a right
pleural effusion and a widened mediastinum; these findings were considered
highly suggestive of inhalational anthrax and led to obtaining the chest CT
image, which further confirmed the clinical suspicion of the disease.
Both patients were treated with ciprofloxacin, rifampin, and clindamycin
and did not develop the classic findings of high-grade fever, dyspnea, profound
respiratory distress, and shock. Ciprofloxacin was chosen because of its presumed
effect on patients with inhalational anthrax, as evidenced by the fact that
it is recommended as first-line therapy for treatment of inhalational anthrax.8 Rifampin was used to provide additional gram-positive
coverage and because of its primarily intracellular mechanism of action.16 Clindamycin was added because of its ability to prevent
expression of toxin in patients with streptococcal disease.17
This activity was believed to be of theoretical advantage in anthrax, in which
toxin production is a major cause of morbidity and mortality.
These reports suggest that early diagnosis and treatment may improve
the prognosis of inhalational anthrax. Both patients had substantial mediastinal
pathologic findings at the time of their clinical presentation, yet aggressive
therapy resulted in a good clinical outcome at this stage of their illness.
Other possibilities are that these patients were exposed to a lower, sublethal
dose of spores or that the strain of B anthracis
was of a lower virulence than previously reported. However, the presence of
substantial mediastinal lymphadenopathy and pleural effusions indicate a substantial
degree of disease at the time of initial presentation. This suggests that
early diagnosis and intervention interrupted what has primarily been described
as a 2-stage cycle of the disease, in which mediastinal necrosis and hemorrhage
progress to widespread toxin release and death, with reported mortality rates
of 80% to 90%.9-14
Reports of the radiographic findings of inhalational anthrax are limited
to descriptions of chest radiographs in a small number of cases.12,18,19
As the cases presented here illustrate, prior publications have reported widened
mediastinum, adenopathy, pleural effusions, and parenchymal infiltrates. While
these findings may make a dramatic presentation, there is nothing specific
about this constellation of radiographic findings that would, by itself, lead
to a diagnosis of inhalational anthrax. Nonetheless, the presence of pleural
effusions in the presence of a clinical history of potential exposure should
raise suspicion of inhalational anthrax.
We found chest CT studies to be substantially useful. There are no published
reports of the CT findings of inhalational anthrax, and there are no cases
of inhalational anthrax with correlative CT imaging accessioned at the Armed
Forces Institute of Pathology in Washington, DC (Jeffrey R. Galvin, MD, Armed
Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington DC, written communication, October
23, 2001). Both of the cases reported herein had an unusual combination of
findings that may prove to be helpful in diagnosing inhalational anthrax,
namely, the presence of hyperdense enlarged mediastinal adenopathy and diffuse
mediastinal edema. Although pathological correlation was not obtained in these
cases, the hyperdensity in the lymph nodes is likely due to the presence of
localized hemorrhage, which is known to be present based on prior reports.20,21 To optimally depict the presence
of hyperdense adenopathy, noncontrast CT images may be more useful than contrast-enhanced
images. Each patient presented with abnormal findings on chest radiographs,
but CT of the chest showed much more dramatic evidence of mediastinal lymph
node enlargement, suggesting that the chest radiograph substantially understates
the degree of disease compared with chest CT.
At our institution, symptomatic patients with known or suspected exposure
to anthrax spores receive a chest radiograph. If pleural effusion, mediastinal
lymphadenopathy, or mediastinal widening is found, a non–contrast-enhanced
CT study of the chest is obtained. For patients with normal chest radiographs
but who have a substantial clinical suspicion of inhalational anthrax, chest
CT also is obtained because this study may reveal important clinical information
in such cases.
Our experience with 2 patients with inhalational anthrax resulting from
a bioterrorism event suggests that a high degree of clinical suspicion, diagnostic
workup including chest CT, and early intervention with appropriate antibiotics
may reduce the previously reported mortality of 80% to 90% in inhalational
anthrax.9,11-15
Although it is unfortunate that inhalational anthrax has reemerged as a distinct
clinical entity rather than a theoretical bioterrorism agent, it is extremely
important that clinicians be aware of this clinical presentation and be prepared
to evaluate and appropriately treat such patients. Unfortunately, only further
experience with this devastating disease can clarify its precise natural history
and optimal treatment.
1.Christopher GW, Cieslak TJ, Pavlin JA, Eitzen EM. Biological warfare: a historical perspective.
JAMA.1997;278:412-417.Google Scholar 2.Brownlee S. Clear and present danger.
Washington Post Magazine.October 28, 2001.Google Scholar 3.Meselson M, Guillemin J, Hugh-Jones M.
et al. The Sverdlovsk anthrax outbreak of 1979.
Science.1994;266:1202-1208.Google Scholar 4.Brachman PS. Inhalational anthrax.
Ann N Y Acad Sci.1980;353:83-93.Google Scholar 5.Brachman PS, Kaufman AF, Dalldorf FG. Industrial inhalational anthrax.
Bacteriol Rev.1966;30:646-659.Google Scholar 6.Fritz DL, Jaax NK, Lawrence WB.
et al. Pathology of experimental inhalation anthrax in the rhesus monkey.
Lab Invest.1995;73:691-702.Google Scholar 7.Gleiser CA, Berdjis CC, Hartman HA, Gochenour WS. Pathology of experimental respiratory anthrax in macaca mulatta.
Br J Exp Pathol.1963;44:416-426.Google Scholar 8.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax and interim guidelines
for exposure management and antimicrobial therapy.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.2001;50:909-919.Google Scholar 9.Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG.
et al. for the Working Group on Civilian Biodefense. Anthrax as a biological weapon: medical and public health management.
JAMA.1999;281:1735-1745.Google Scholar 10.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Bioterrorism alleging use of anthrax and interim guidelines for management.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.1999;48:69-74.Google Scholar 11.Pile JC, Malone JD, Eitzen EM, Friedlander AM. Anthrax as a potential biological warfare agent.
Arch Intern Med.1998;158:429-434.Google Scholar 12.Shafazand S, Doyle R, Ruoss S.
et al. Inhalational anthrax: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management.
Chest.1999;116:1369-1376.Google Scholar 13.Dixon TC, Meselson M, Guillemin J, Hanna PC. Anthrax.
N Engl J Med.1999;341:815-826.Google Scholar 14.Lew DP. Bacillus anthracis (anthrax). In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Principles
and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Churchill
Livingstone; 2000:2215-2220.
15.Franz DR, Jahrling PB, Friedlander A.
et al. Clinical recognition and management of patients exposed to biological
warfare agents.
JAMA.1997;278:399-411.Google Scholar 16.Farr BM. Rifamycins. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Principles
and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Churchill
Livingstone; 2000:348-356.
17.Jriskandan S, McKee A, Hall L.
et al. Comparative effects of clindamycin and ampicillin on superantigenic
activity of
Streptococcus pyogenes.
J Antimicrob Chemother.1997;40:275-277.Google Scholar 18.Abramova FA, Grinberg LM, Yampolskaya OV, Walker DH. Pathology of inhalational anthrax in 42 cases from the Sverdlovsk outbreak
of 1979.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.1993;90:2291-2294.Google Scholar 19.Vessal K, Yeganehdoust J, Dutz W, Kohout E. Radiological changes in inhalation anthrax. a report of radiological
and pathological correlation in two cases.
Clin Radiol.1975;26:471-474.Google Scholar 20.Fritz DL, Jaax NK, Lawrence WB.
et al. Pathology of experimental inhalation anthrax in the rhesus monkey.
Lab Invest.1995;73:691-702.Google Scholar 21.Grinberg LM, Abramova FA, Yampolskaya OV, Walker DH, Smith JH. Quantitative pathology of inhalational anthrax, I: quantitative microscopic
findings.
Mod Pathol.2001;14:482-495.Google Scholar