Cognitive Functioning of Long-term Heavy Cannabis Users Seeking Treatment | Adolescent Medicine | JAMA | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Watson SJ, Benson JA, Joy JE. Marijuana and medicine: assessing the science base: a summary of the 1999 Institute of Medicine report.  Arch Gen Psychiatry.2000;57:547-552.Google Scholar
2.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).  National Household Survey on Drug Abuse Series: H-6: Preliminary Results from the 1997 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Rockville, Md: Office on Applied Studies; 1998. DHHS publication SMA 98-3251.
3.
Hall W, Babor TF. Cannabis use and public health: assessing the burden.  Addiction.2000;95:485-490.Google Scholar
4.
Voelker R. "Decent research and closure" needed on medical marijuana, says head of NIH panel.  JAMA.1997;278:802.Google Scholar
5.
Pope HG, Gruber AJ, Yurgelun-Todd D. The residual neuropsychological effects of cannabis: the current status of research.  Drug Alcohol Depend.1995;38:25-34.Google Scholar
6.
Solowij N. Cannabis and Cognitive Functioning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
7.
Fried PA, Watkinson B, Gray R. Differential effects on cognitive functioning in 9- to 12-year olds prenatally exposed to cigarettes and marihuana.  Neurotoxicol Teratol.1998;20:293-306.Google Scholar
8.
Solowij N, Michie PT, Fox AM. Effects of long term cannabis use on selective attention: an event-related potential study.  Pharmacol Biochem Behav.1991;40:683-688.Google Scholar
9.
Solowij N, Michie PT, Fox AM. Differential impairments of selective attention due to frequency and duration of cannabis use.  Biol Psychiatry.1995;37:731-739.Google Scholar
10.
Solowij N. Do cognitive impairments recover following cessation of cannabis use?  Life Sci.1995;56:2119-2126.Google Scholar
11.
Pope HG, Yurgelun-Todd D. The residual cognitive effects of heavy marijuana use in college students.  JAMA.1996;275:521-527.Google Scholar
12.
Pope HG, Jacobs A, Mialet JP, Yurgelun-Todd D, Gruber S. Evidence for a sex-specific residual effect of cannabis on visuospatial memory.  Psychother Psychosom.1997;66:179-184.Google Scholar
13.
Fletcher JM, Page JB, Francis DJ.  et al.  Cognitive correlates of long-term cannabis use in Costa Rican men.  Arch Gen Psychiatry.1996;53:1051-1057.Google Scholar
14.
Elwan O, Hassan AAH, Naseer MA.  et al.  Brain aging in a sample of normal Egyptians: cognition, education, addiction and smoking.  J Neurol Sci.1997;148:79-86.Google Scholar
15.
Solowij N, Grenyer BFS, Peters R, Chesher G. Long term cannabis use impairs memory processes and frontal lobe function. In: 1997 Symposium on the Cannabinoids. Burlington, Vt: International Cannabinoid Research Society; 1997:84.
16.
Loeber RT, Yurgelun-Todd DA. Human neuroimaging of acute and chronic marijuana use: implications for frontocerebellar dysfunction.  Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp.1999;14:291-301.Google Scholar
17.
Block RI, O'Leary DS, Hichwa RD.  et al.  Cerebellar hypoactivity in frequent marijuana users.  Neuroreport.2000;11:749-753.Google Scholar
18.
Block RI, O'Leary DS, Hichwa RD.  et al.  Effects of frequent marijuana use on memory-related regional cerebral blood flow.  Pharmacol Biochem Behav.In press.Google Scholar
19.
Block RI, O'Leary DS, Augustinack JC.  et al.  Effects of frequent marijuana use on attention-related regional cerebral blood flow.  Abstr Soc Neurosci.2000;26:2080.Google Scholar
20.
Lyketsos CG, Garrett E, Liang K-Y, Anthony JC. Cannabis use and cognitive decline in persons under 65 years of age.  Am J Epidemiol.1999;149:794-800.Google Scholar
21.
Hampson RE, Deadwyler SA. Cannabinoids, hippocampal function and memory.  Life Sci.1999;65:715-723.Google Scholar
22.
Hampson RE, Deadwyler SA. Cannabinoids reveal the necessity of hippocampal neural encoding for short-term memory in rats.  J Neurosci.2000;20:8932-8942.Google Scholar
23.
Reibaud M, Obinu MC, Ledent C.  et al.  Enhancement of memory in cannabinoid CB1 receptor knock-out mice.  Eur J Pharmacol.1999;379:R1-R2.Google Scholar
24.
Bohme GA, Laville M, Ledent C, Parmentier M, Imperato A. Enhanced long-term potentiation in mice lacking cannabinoid CB1 receptors.  Neuroscience.2000;95:5-7.Google Scholar
25.
Marijuana Treatment Project Research Group.  Treating marijuana dependence: findings from a multi-site study.  Arch Gen Psychiatry.In press.Google Scholar
26.
McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D.  et al.  The Fifth Edition of the Addiction Severity Index.  J Subst Abuse Treat.1992;9:199-213.Google Scholar
27.
Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline follow-back: a technique for assessing self reported alcohol consumption. In: Litten RZ, Allen JP, eds. Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psychological and Biochemical Methods. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1992.
28.
Miller WR. Form 90: A Structured Assessment Interview for Drinking and Related Behaviors: Test Manual: Project MATCH Monograph Series, Vol. 5. Bethesda, Md: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 1996. NIH Publication 96-4004.
29.
First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. User's Guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders—Research Version. New York, NY: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute; 1996.
30.
Jastak S, Wilkinson G. The Wide Range Achievement Test: Manual of Instructions. Wilmington, Del: Jastak Associates; 1984.
31.
Kareken DA, Gur RC, Saykin AJ. Reading on the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised and parental education as predictors of IQ: comparison with the Barona formula.  Arch Clin Neuropsychol.1995;10:147-157.Google Scholar
32.
Blair JR, Spreen O. Predicting premorbid IQ: a revision of the National Adult Reading Test.  Clin Neuropsychol.1989;3:129-136.Google Scholar
33.
Barona A, Reynolds CR, Chastain R. A demographically based index of pre-morbid intelligence for the WAIS-R.  J Consult Clin Psychol.1984;52:885-887.Google Scholar
34.
Bell R, Taylor EH, Ackerman B, Pappas AA. Interpretation of urine quantitative 11-nor-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid to determine abstinence from marijuana smoking.  J Toxicol Clin Toxicol.1989;27:109-115.Google Scholar
35.
Dackis CA, Pottash ALC, Annitto W, Gold MS. Persistence of urinary marijuana levels after supervised abstinence.  Am J Psychiatry.1982;139:1196-1198.Google Scholar
36.
Ellis GM, Mann MA, Judson BA, Schramm NT, Tashchian A. Excretion patterns of cannabinoid metabolites after last use in a group of chronic users.  Clin Pharmacol Ther.1985;38:572-578.Google Scholar
37.
Fraser AD, Worth D. Urinary excretion profiles of 11-nor-9-carboxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol: a delta-9-THCCOOH to creatinine ratio study.  J Anal Toxicol.1999;23:531-534.Google Scholar
38.
Baddeley A, Emslie H, Nimmo Smith I. The Speed and Capacity of Language-Processing Test Manual. Bury St Edmonds, England: Thames Valley Test Co; 1992.
39.
Lezak MD. Neuropsychological Assessment. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995.
40.
Rey A. L'examen clinique en psychologie. Paris, France: Presse Universitaire de France; 1964.
41.
Spreen O, Strauss E. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms and Commentary. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
42.
Golden CJ. Stroop Color and Word Test: A Manual for Clinical and Experimental Uses. Wood Dale, Ill: Stoelting; 1978.
43.
Bohnen N, Jolles J, Twijnstra A. Modification of the Stroop Color Word Test improves differentiation between patients with mild head injury and matched controls.  Clin Neuropsychol.1992;6:178-184.Google Scholar
44.
 The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Computer Version.  Alpharetta, Ga: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc, CyberMetrics Testing Software Services; 1989.
45.
Stuss DT, Stethem LL, Poirier CA. Comparison of three tests of attention and rapid information processing across six age groups.  Clin Neuropsychol.1987;1:139-152.Google Scholar
46.
Levin HS, Mattis S, Ruff RM.  et al.  Neurobehavioral outcome following minor head injury: a three-center study.  J Neurosurg.1987;66:234-243.Google Scholar
47.
Geffen G, Moar KJ, O'Hanlon AP, Clark CR, Geffen LB. Performance measures of 16- to 86-year old males and females on the Auditory Verbal Learning Test.  Clin Neuropsychol.1990;4:45-63.Google Scholar
48.
Stuss DT, Stetham L, Pelchat G. Three tests of attention and rapid information processing: an extension.  Clin Neuropsychol.1988;2:246-250.Google Scholar
49.
Roman DD, Edwall GE, Buchanan RJ, Patton JH. Extended norms for the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task.  Clin Neuropsychol.1991;5:33-40.Google Scholar
50.
Brittain JL, La Marche JA, Reeder KP, Roth DL, Boll TJ. Effects of age and IQ on Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) performance.  Clin Neuropsychol.1991;5:163-175.Google Scholar
51.
Levy R, Goldman-Rakic PS. Segregation of working memory functions within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.  Exp Brain Res.2000;133:23-32.Google Scholar
52.
Herman BP, Seidenberg M, Wyler A.  et al.  The effects of human hippocampal resection on the serial position curve.  Cortex.1996;32:323-334.Google Scholar
53.
Middleton FA, Strick PL. Anatomical evidence for cerebellar and basal ganglia involvement in higher cognitive function.  Science.1994;266:458-461.Google Scholar
54.
Schacter DL. Memory and awareness.  Science.1998;280:59-60.Google Scholar
55.
Schmahmann JD. The Cerebellum and Cognition. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press; 1997.
56.
Herkenham M, Lynn AB, Little MD.  et al.  Cannabinoid receptor localization in brain.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.1990;87:1932-1936.Google Scholar
Original Contribution
March 6, 2002

Cognitive Functioning of Long-term Heavy Cannabis Users Seeking Treatment

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, and Department of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong (Dr Solowij), New South Wales, Australia; Department of Psychology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va (Dr Stephens); Innovative Programs Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle (Dr Roffman); Department of Community Medicine (Dr Babor and Mss McRee and Vendetti) and Department of Psychiatry (Dr Kadden), University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington; and The Village South Inc, Miami, Fla (Drs Miller and Christiansen).

JAMA. 2002;287(9):1123-1131. doi:10.1001/jama.287.9.1123
Abstract

Context Cognitive impairments are associated with long-term cannabis use, but the parameters of use that contribute to impairments and the nature and endurance of cognitive dysfunction remain uncertain.

Objective To examine the effects of duration of cannabis use on specific areas of cognitive functioning among users seeking treatment for cannabis dependence.

Design, Setting, and Participants Multisite retrospective cross-sectional neuropsychological study conducted in the United States (Seattle, Wash; Farmington, Conn; and Miami, Fla) between 1997 and 2000 among 102 near-daily cannabis users (51 long-term users: mean, 23.9 years of use; 51 shorter-term users: mean, 10.2 years of use) compared with 33 nonuser controls.

Main Outcome Measures Measures from 9 standard neuropsychological tests that assessed attention, memory, and executive functioning, and were administered prior to entry to a treatment program and following a median 17-hour abstinence.

Results Long-term cannabis users performed significantly less well than shorter-term users and controls on tests of memory and attention. On the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, long-term users recalled significantly fewer words than either shorter-term users (P = .001) or controls (P = .005); there was no difference between shorter-term users and controls. Long-term users showed impaired learning (P = .007), retention (P = .003), and retrieval (P = .002) compared with controls. Both user groups performed poorly on a time estimation task (P<.001 vs controls). Performance measures often correlated significantly with the duration of cannabis use, being worse with increasing years of use, but were unrelated to withdrawal symptoms and persisted after controlling for recent cannabis use and other drug use.

Conclusions These results confirm that long-term heavy cannabis users show impairments in memory and attention that endure beyond the period of intoxication and worsen with increasing years of regular cannabis use.

×