Changes in Career Satisfaction Among Primary Care and Specialist Physicians, 1997-2001 | Health Care Economics, Insurance, Payment | JAMA | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.153.100.128. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Schuster  MA, McGlynn  EA, Brook  RH.  How good is the quality of health care in the United States?  Milbank Q. 1998;76:517-563. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Brook  RH, McGlynn  EA, Cleary  PD.  Quality of health care, II: measuring quality of care.  N Engl J Med. 1996;335:966-970. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Fennell  ML, Alexander  JA.  Perspectives on organizational change in the US medical care sector.  Annu Rev Sociol. 1993;19:89-112.Google ScholarCrossref
4.
Scott  WR.  The organization of medical care services: toward an integrated theoretical model.  Med Care Rev. 1993;50:271-303. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Landon  BE, Wilson  IB, Cleary  PD.  A conceptual model of the effects of health care organizations on the quality of medical care.  JAMA. 1998;279:1377-1382. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Landon  BE, Aseltine Jr  R, Shaul  JA, Miller  Y, Auerbach  BA, Cleary  PD.  Evolving dissatisfaction among primary care physicians.  Am J Manag Care. 2002;8:890-901. PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Linn  LS, Yager  J, Cope  D, Leake  B.  Health status, job satisfaction, job stress, and life satisfaction among academic and clinical faculty.  JAMA. 1985;254:2775-2782. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Haas  JS, Cook  EF, Puopolo  AL, Burstin  HR, Cleary  PD, Brennan  TA.  Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction?  J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:122-128. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Hirshman  A.  Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1970.
10.
Barnard  A, Tong  K.  The doctor is out—more and more physicians, frustrated with managed care, are trying new professions and finding life less stressful.  Boston Globe. July9 , 2000:A1.Google Scholar
11.
Barnard  A.  Her job now is to help others do what she did—quit the medical field.  Boston Globe. July9 , 2000:A18.Google Scholar
12.
Buchbinder  SB, Wilson  M, Melick  CF, Powe  NR.  Estimates of costs of primary care physician turnover.  Am J Manag Care. 1999;5:1431-1438. PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Stoddard  JJ, Hargraves  JL, Reed  M, Vratil  A.  Managed care, professional autonomy, and income: effects on physician career satisfaction.  J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:675-684. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Reschovsky  JD, Edson  D, Sewall  A,  et al.  Community Tracking Study: Physician Survey Public Use File: User's Guide (Round One, Release 1). Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 1998. Technical Publication No. 10.
15.
Metcalf  CE, Kemper  P, Kohn  LT, Pickreign  JD.  Site Definition and Sample Design for the Community Tracking Study. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 1996. Technical Publication No. 1.
16.
Keil  L, Chattopadhyay  M, Potter  F, Reed  MC.  Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round 1 Survey Methodology Report. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 1998. Technical Publication No. 1.
17.
Reschovsky  JD, Reed  M, Blumenthal  D, Landon  BE.  Physicians' assessments of their ability to provide high quality care in a changing health care system.  Med Care. 2001;39:254-269. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Konrad  TR, Williams  ES, Linzer  M,  et al; for the SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group, Society of General Internal Medicine.  Measuring physician job satisfaction in a changing workplace and a challenging environment.  Med Care. 1999;37:1174-1182. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Williams  ES, Konrad  TR, Linzer  M,  et al; for the SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group, Society of General Internal Medicine.  Refining the measurement of physician job satisfaction: results from the Physician Worklife Survey.  Med Care. 1999;37:1140-1154. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
St Peter  RF, Reed  MC, Kemper  P, Blumenthal  D.  Changes in the scope of care provided by primary care physicians.  N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1980-1985. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Not Available.  The InterStudy Competitive Edge 9.2. St Paul, Minn: InterStudy Publications; 2000.
22.
Not Available.  Bureau of Health Professions, Office of Research and Planning Health Resources and Services Administration, Area Resource File. Fairfax, Va: Quality Resource Systems Inc; 1998.
23.
Stoddard  JJ, Reschovsky  JD, Hargraves  JL.  Managed care in the doctor's office: has the revolution stalled?  Am J Manag Care. 2001;7:1061-1067. PubMedGoogle Scholar
24.
Hadley  J, Mitchell  JM.  Effects of HMO market penetration on physicians' work effort and satisfaction.  Health Aff (Millwood). 1997;16:99-111. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Linzer  M, Konrad  TR, Douglas  J,  et al.  Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the Physician Worklife Study.  J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:441-450. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Baker  LC.  Association of managed care market share and health expenditures for fee-for-service Medicare patients.  JAMA. 1999;281:432-437. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Kerr  EA, Mittman  SB, Hays  RD, Siu  AL, Leake  B, Brook  RH.  Managed care and capitation in California: how do physicians at financial risk control their own utilization?  Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:500-504. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Murray  A, Montgomery  JE, Chang  H, Rogers  WH, Inui  T, Safran  DG.  Doctor discontent: a comparison of physician satisfaction in different delivery system settings, 1986 and 1997.  J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:452-459. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Grossman  JM.  Health plan competition in local markets.  Health Serv Res. 2000;35(1 pt 1):7-16. PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Rosenthal  M, Landon  BE, Huskamp  H.  Managed care and market power: physician organizations in four markets.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20:187-193. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Landon  BE, Reschovsky  J, Reed  M, Blumenthal  D.  Personal, organizational, and market level influences on physicians' practice patterns: results of a national survey of primary care physicians.  Med Care. 2001;39:889-905. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Katz  A, Hurley  RE, Jackson  LA, Lake  TK, Short  AC, Reschovsky  JD.  Insurers Consolidate, Hospitals Struggle Fianancially. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; Winter2001. Community Report No. 05. Available at: http://www.hschange.com/CONTENT/298. Accessibility verified December 26, 2002.
33.
Draper  DA, Brewster  LR, Brown  LD,  et al.  Financial Pressures Continue to Plague Hospitals. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; Summer2001. Community Report No. 12. Available at: http://www.hschange.org/CONTENT/359. Accessibility verified December 26, 2002.
34.
Brewster  LR, Jackson  L, Lesser  CS.  Insolvency and Challenges of Regulating Providers that Bear Risk. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; February2000. Issue Brief No. 26.
Original Contribution
January 22, 2003

Changes in Career Satisfaction Among Primary Care and Specialist Physicians, 1997-2001

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School (Drs Landon and Blumenthal); Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Dr Landon); Institute for Health Care Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital/Partners HealthCare System (Dr Blumental), Boston, Mass; and Center for Studying Health System Change, Washington, DC (Dr Reschovsky).

JAMA. 2003;289(4):442-449. doi:10.1001/jama.289.4.442
Abstract

Context  A number of forces have changed the practice of medicine in the past decade. Evidence suggests that physicians are becoming less satisfied in this environment.

Objectives  To describe changes in career satisfaction in a large, nationally representative sample of physicians and to examine market and practice factors associated with changes in physician satisfaction.

Design and Setting  Data were collected from the first 3 rounds of the Community Tracking Study (CTS) Physician Survey, a series of nationally representative telephone surveys of physicians in 60 US sites conducted in 1996-1997 (round 1: 12 385 respondents; 65% response rate), 1998-1999 (round 2: 12 280 respondents; 61% response rate), and 2000-2001 (round 3: 12 389 respondents; 59% response rate) for the Center for Studying Health System Change. The second and third rounds of the survey included physicians sampled in the previous round, as well as new physicians.

Participants  Primary care and specialist physicians who spent at least 20 hours per week in direct patient care activities.

Main Outcome Measures  Changes in physicians' overall satisfaction with their career and the proportion of dissatisfied physicians in particular sites.

Results  Physician satisfaction levels declined marginally between 1997 and 2001, with most of the decline occurring between 1997 and 1999. Among primary care physicians, 42.4% were very satisfied in 1997, as were 43.3% of specialists, compared with 38.5% and 41.4%, respectively, in 2001. There were nearly equal increases in those who reported that they were somewhat satisfied. Overall means mask significant differences across the 60 sites. Among 12 sites randomly selected for more intensive study, the proportion of respondents who were somewhat or very dissatisfied ranged from 8.8% of physicians in Lansing, Mich (1999), to 34.2% in Miami, Fla (1997). Between 1997 and 1999, 25.6% of primary care physicians reported decreased satisfaction and 18.1% reported improved satisfaction, while approximately equal percentages reported increased (19.8%) and decreased (20.4%) satisfaction between 1999-2001. Findings were similar for specialist physicians. In multivariable models, the strongest and most consistent predictors of change in satisfaction were changes in measures of clinical autonomy, including increases in hours worked and physicians' ability to obtain services for their patients. Changes in exposure to managed care were weakly related to changes in satisfaction.

Conclusions  Our findings demonstrate that overall physician satisfaction levels over this time period did not change dramatically. In addition, satisfaction and changes in satisfaction vary greatly among sites. Rather than declining income, threats to physicians' autonomy, to their ability to manage their day-to-day patient interactions and their time, and to their ability to provide high-quality care are most strongly associated with changes in satisfaction.

×