Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Spratt KF, Peterson KK, Spoonamore MJ, Ponseti IV. Health and Function of Patients With Untreated Idiopathic ScoliosisA 50-Year Natural History Study. JAMA. 2003;289(5):559–567. doi:10.1001/jama.289.5.559
Context Previous long-term studies of idiopathic scoliosis have included patients
with other etiologies, leading to the erroneous conclusion that all types
of idiopathic scoliosis inevitably end in disability. Late-onset idiopathic
scoliosis (LIS) is a distinct entity with a unique natural history.
Objective To present the outcomes related to health and function in untreated
patients with LIS.
Design, Setting, and Patients Prospective natural history study performed at a midwestern university
with outpatient evaluation of patients who presented between 1932 and 1948.
At 50-year follow-up, which began in 1992, 117 untreated patients were compared
with 62 age- and sex-matched volunteers. The patients' mean age was 66 years
(range, 54-80 years).
Main Outcome Measures Mortality, back pain, pulmonary symptoms, general function, depression,
and body image.
Results The estimated probability of survival was approximately 0.55 (95% confidence
interval [CI], 0.47-0.63) compared with 0.57 expected for the general population.
There was no significant difference in the demographic characteristics of
the 2 groups. Twenty-two (22%) of 98 patients complained of shortness of breath
during everyday activities compared with 8 (15%) of 53 controls. An increased
risk of shortness of breath was also associated with the combination of a
Cobb angle greater than 80° and a thoracic apex (adjusted odds ratio,
9.75; 95% CI, 1.15-82.98). Sixty-six (61%) of 109 patients reported chronic
back pain compared with 22 (35%) of 62 controls (P =
.003). However, of those with pain, 48 (68%) of 71 patients and 12 (71%) of
17 controls reported only little or moderate back pain.
Conclusions Untreated adults with LIS are productive and functional at a high level
at 50-year follow-up. Untreated LIS causes little physical impairment other
than back pain and cosmetic concerns.
Late-onset idiopathic scoliosis (LIS) is a structural lateral curvature
of the spine arising in otherwise normal children usually during puberty.
The diagnosis is made when other causes of scoliosis, such as neuromuscular
disorder, vertebral malformation, trauma, or tumor, have been ruled out. Epidemiological
and natural history studies estimate that 1% to 3% of the at-risk population
will have some degree of curvature, with the vast majority of curves requiring
no intervention.1-7 Applying
these estimates to current population figures, LIS affects more than 60 000
adolescents in the United States.8 In 1995,
there were an estimated 602 884 visits to private physician offices associated
with the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth
Revision (ICD-9)9 code 737.30 for idiopathic
scoliosis.10 Of these visits, 37% were to physicians
other than orthopedic surgeons, making the clinical course of idiopathic scoliosis
of importance to multiple disciplines.
Previous long-term studies of idiopathic scoliosis1,11-23 presented
a grim prognosis, perpetuating the common misperception that all types of
idiopathic scoliosis inevitably lead to disability from back pain and cardiopulmonary
compromise. The shortcomings of these earlier studies have been previously
described23; of particular concern is the inclusion
of patients with congenital, neuromuscular, or early-onset idiopathic scoliosis,
and the failure to evaluate outcome in terms of the location of the curvature.
However, according to Dickson,24 the presence
of a significant thoracic deformity prior to age 5 years indicates a real
risk of cardiopulmonary compromise, whereas LIS is most commonly a matter
of deformity without any serious organic health problems. For these reasons,
inferences about the natural history of LIS from uncontrolled studies of heterogeneous
groups are questionable.
Treatment of any condition is an attempt to alter its natural history;
therefore, long-term studies are necessary to provide benchmarks for clinicians
and policymakers. The most common treatment of LIS involves early, conservative
treatment to prevent curve progression. This forms the basis of school screening
programs and the use of bracing in skeletally immature patients. Curves that
progress to between 40° and 50° in skeletally immature patients have
been shown to continue progression throughout adulthood, most often at the
rate of approximately 1° per year.22 Consequently,
a Cobb angle25 of between 40° and 50°
has become the threshold indicating need for instrumentation and arthrodesis
to correct the curvature, and to additionally prevent the sequelae of deformity,
pain, and disability associated with this condition. Since the goal of both
conservative and operative treatment of LIS is preventative, all decision
makers must be aware of exactly what it is they are trying to prevent. To
this aim, we present outcomes related to health and function in a long-term
cohort of untreated patients at 50-year follow-up.
Between 1932 and 1948, 444 patients diagnosed as having LIS were seen
at our facility. This group was first described by Ponseti and Friedman26 in 1950 and subsequently at 30-year27 and
40-year follow-up.22,23Table 1 summarizes the history of the cohort,
noting the number of fusions, exclusions due to misdiagnosis, deaths, missing
patients, and refusals to participate.
The current target population consisted of 314 eligible patients from
the original cohort who had not been fused, excluded for other reasons, or
had died. Human subjects' review board approval was obtained prior to beginning
searching for the patients. Informed consent was obtained as patients were
enrolled. We were unable to determine the disposition of 127 patients (88
had not been located since the 1950 report26)
despite a search of the National Death Index28 and
letters and telephone calls to the last known address and to relatives. Of
the remaining patients, 36 were dead, 3 had undergone fusion for scoliosis,
2 had been misclassified, and 2 were excluded due to decreased mental functioning.
Thus, 144 were located and eligible. All were asked to return for evaluation
and radiographs, or if unable to return to have these procedures performed
locally. Twenty-seven patients refused to participate, often citing the length
of the questionnaires as the reason for not participating. Hence, 117 patients
are included in this study.
Sixty-two individuals participated in the study as control subjects.
These volunteers were sought at various local sites (hospital clinics, senior
citizen centers, retirement homes). Volunteers were examined by the Adams
forward bend test for the presence of spinal curvature and/or were questioned
concerning any history of spinal curvature. None were noted to have any evidence
of non–age-related spinal deformity. The control group was age-matched
(<65 years, ≥65 years) and sex-matched at a 100% target rate for men
(n = 13) and 50% target rate for women (n = 49).
Mortality, back pain, pulmonary symptoms, general function, depression,
and body image are the outcomes presented here. Details of the radiographic
history of this cohort will be reported in a separate article. Outcomes used
in the 30-year27 and 40-year23 follow-up
studies were included for longitudinal comparisons.
All radiographs were taken in the standing position using a posterior-anterior
projection. Evaluation included the Cobb angle25 of
the primary and compensatory curves along with other standard measures of
spinal balance and rotation. Evidence of thoracic and/or lumbar osteoarthritis
and other radiographic changes was noted. All dependent variables were examined
for a relationship with curve type, and when appropriate, the magnitude of
the curve. For certain analyses, the magnitude of the primary angle was used
to classify patients as either having small or large curves relative to other
patients with the same curve type. For patients with double major curves,
the thoracic measurement was used except in cases where the lumbar curve was
more than 10° larger than the thoracic curve.
The physical examination included vital signs, height, weight, spinal
range of motion, chest expansion, reflexes, evaluation of motor-sensory function,
and tests for nonorganic physical signs.29 Pulmonary
function testing was not repeated as this was reported on extensively in the
The number of usable responses for each variable varies due to missing
or ambiguous data. For the longitudinal analyses, only responses from those
who participated in all 3 studies are included. No attempt was made to interpolate
or otherwise replace missing data.
The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival probabilities.
Fisher exact tests, odds ratios, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and logistic regression
were used for nominal or ordinal variables. For interval or ratio variables,
Pearson correlations, t tests, and analysis of variance
with corresponding post-hoc tests were conducted. All analyses were performed
using SAS statistical software (Version 8; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Tests
were conducted as 2-tailed and the significance level was set at P = .05. All dependent variables were tested for differences due to
curve type or size and for differences between the scoliosis and control groups.
Unless otherwise noted, no statistically significant differences were found.
Of the 117 patients, 104 (89%) were women (compared with 84% of those
included in the 1950 article26). This ratio
is comparable with the expected 10:1 ratio based on prevalence literature.1-3,7,30-40 The
mean age was 66 years (range, 54-80 years) and the mean follow-up since diagnosis
was 51 years (range, 44-61 years). Forty-eight patients (41%) had thoracic
curves, 14 (12%) thoracolumbar, 32 (27%) lumbar, and 23 (20%) had double major
curves. Curve characteristics of 79 patients with current radiographs are
summarized in Table 2. The Cobb
angles ranged between 23° and 156° degrees in thoracic curves (mean,
85°); between 50° and 155° in thoracolumbar curves (mean, 90°);
and between 15° and 90° in lumbar curves (mean, 49°). The thoracic
components of the double major curves ranged between 30° and 104°
(mean, 79°). The lumbar component ranged between 32° and 110°
(mean, 76°). Measurements at skeletal maturity are provided in the table
to demonstrate average progression of the curves. Using the current median
as the threshold, those curves with a thoracic apex and a Cobb angle of 80°
or higher and lumbar curves of 50° or higher were classified as large.
Representativeness of the sample was evaluated by comparing the age,
sex, and curve type and size at maturity of the sample with that of the patients
who refused to participate (n = 27) or those who participated in the 1981
study23 but were not located for the current
study (n = 17). Radiographs taken at skeletal maturity were available for
35 of these 44 nonparticipants. There were no significant differences in the
mean Cobb angle at maturity between the groups, except in the case of the
double major curves, in which the nonparticipating group had a mean Cobb angle
of 66° compared with 44° in the sample (P =
.04). There was no difference in the distribution of curve types between the
2 groups, or in the mean age or sex. If differences in the dependent variables
are indeed related to age, sex, type of curve, or curve magnitude at maturity,
the above comparisons provide little evidence for bias in the results due
to these characteristics in the participating sample.
All patients completed questionnaires. Fifty-four patients returned
for a physical examination and radiographs; 3 patients had radiographs taken
locally in conjunction with an orthopedic examination; and 23 patients had
radiographs taken locally but did not have physical examinations.
The scoliosis patient and control groups were demographically similar
(Table 3). Seventy-one (61%) of
117 patients were older than 65 years and 97% were white. Fifty-five (47%)
had a high school education or less, and 25 (21%) were college graduates.
Ninety-six patients (90%) had been married at least once, while 11 (10%) had
never been married. The median number of children was 3. The cesarean rate
in scoliotic women was 3% compared with 10% in the control group.
Deaths since 1981 are summarized in Table 4. Information on other deaths has been previously published,23,27 and the mean age at death for these
36 patients was 65 years. Despite the National Death Index search and contacts
with relatives, the cause of death was not confirmed in 13 cases. To our knowledge,
scoliosis potentially contributed to the death of 3 patients (case-patient
6, 11, and 31). There was no difference between the age at death and the mean
age of the living sample, nor was there a difference between the 2 groups
in curve type or size from the last available radiograph.
Survival probability estimates for this cohort were 0.44 (95% confidence
interval [CI], 0.36-0.52) if all patients not located are dead; 0.70 (95%
CI, 0.63-0.78) if all patients not located are alive; and 0.55 (95% CI, 0.47-0.63)
if half of the patients not located are alive. Table 5 includes the number of known dead, the number not located,
and the estimated survival probability under these 3 assumptions. According
to the 1994 US life tables,41 women born between
1929 and 1931 have a 0.57 probability of surviving until age 65 years, a rate
not dissimilar to ours under the third assumption.
The results of the physical examination are shown in Table 6. Except for diminished chest expansion (<2.5-cm increase
in chest circumference on inspiration) in some patients with thoracic-level
curves, physical examination results were within normal limits.
Forty-five (79%) were able to forward bend to at least ankle level,
and 52 (91%) had no pain with this motion. There were no lower extremity motor
deficits and sensory examination was likewise unremarkable. Test results for
nonorganic signs were all negative. The straight leg raise in both the seated
and supine positions was negative in all examinations.
Of the 79 patients with current radiographs, 72 (91%) had evidence of
arthritis or other radiographic changes. Two patients (1 thoracic and 1 thoracolumbar
curve) had thoracic endplate abnormalities; 13 had evidence of thoracic osteoarthritis
(4 with thoracic, 2 with thoracolumbar, 2 with lumbar, and 5 with double major
curve); 7 had osteopenia (6 with lumbar and 1 thoracolumbar curve); and 1
had lumbar endplate abnormalities (lumbar curve). Sixty-nine (87%) of 79 patients
had evidence of lumbar osteoarthritis (28 thoracic, 10 thoracolumbar, 20 lumbar,
and 11 double major curves).
Pulmonary Function. Scoliosis was not associated with an increased risk of self-reported
history of smoking, asthma, bronchitis, or pneumonia. All 4 patients with
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease had large curvatures involving the thoracic
spine (one 82° double major curve and 3 thoracic curves averaging 101°).
Twenty-two (22%) of 98 patients reported shortness of breath during
everyday activities compared with 8 (15%) of 53 controls. Thirty-five (39%)
of 89 patients and 15 (31%) of 48 controls had shortness of breath while walking
1 city block. Smoking status was not related to shortness of breath in either
the patient or control group.
Although there were no significant differences in reported shortness
of breath with activities between groups, there was a relationship between
shortness of breath and the size and location of the curve (unadjusted odds
ratio [OR], 2.13; 95% CI, 0.72-6.28). For patients with relatively small curves
(<80° with thoracic involvement or <50° lumbar), those with
a thoracic apex were at no greater risk for shortness of breath with activities
than those with a single lumbar curve (adjusted OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.08-2.44).
However, patients with the combination of a large (>80°) curve and a thoracic
apex had significantly greater odds of shortness of breath than did those
with large (>50°) lumbar curves (adjusted OR, 9.75; 95% CI, 1.15-82.98).
A similar pattern of ORs was noted for shortness of breath while walking 1
The effect of apical rotation was also examined. Using logistic regression,
we found that curve apex and Cobb angle were not significant predictors of
shortness of breath when rotation was simultaneously evaluated. Larger degrees
of rotation were significantly associated with shortness of breath (adjusted
OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.04-1.30; P = .008).
Of the 79 patients who participated in 1968, 1981, and 1992, 15 (19%)
reported daily shortness of breath in 1968, as did 22 (28%) in 1978, and 19
(24%) in 1992. A Cobb angle of greater than 50° at skeletal maturity was
associated with significantly increased odds of developing shortness of breath
(1968: OR, 14.58 [95% CI, 2.28-93.46]; 1978: OR, 5.01 [95% CI, 1.23-20.99];
1992: OR, 3.67 [95% CI, 1.11-12.12]). A thoracic curve apex was not an independent
predictor of shortness of breath in these analyses.
Back Pain. Both chronic and acute back pain were more prevalent in patients relative
to controls. However, for those subjects with pain, there was no significant
difference in intensity or duration between the patients and controls (Table 7).
Specifically, 66 (61%) of 109 patients reported chronic back pain at
any level of the spine compared with 22 (35%) of 62 controls (P = .003). Current pain was measured by intensity (none = 0; unbearable
pain = 5),42 and duration (<1 month = 1;
≥2 years = 6). Currently, 71 (77%) of 92 patients report back pain compared
with 17 (35%) of 48 controls (P = .001). Of those
with pain, the intensity was similar: 48 (68%) of 71 patients and 12 (71%)
of 17 controls had little or moderate pain (P>.99).
Duration of pain was also similar between the 2 groups: 61 (91%) of 67 patients
and 13 (76%) of 17 controls have had back pain for at least 2 years (P = .12). We additionally summed the intensity and duration
scores to create a more complete pain composite. The median score was 7 in
the scoliosis group compared with 6 in the control group (P = .08).
Of 78 patients responding to the question in all 3 studies, 22% had
never or rarely had pain, 38% have had occasional pain, 21% have had frequent
pain, and 19% have had daily pain. The median response was occasional pain
in all 3 studies. Of 25 patients without back pain in 1968, 11 still are without
pain, 11 have occasional pain, 2 have frequent pain, and 1 has daily pain.
Both acute back pain scores and current radiographic data were available
for 60 patients. Of these, 9 (15%) had evidence of thoracic osteoarthritis
and 53 (88%) had lumbar osteoarthritis. Neither thoracic (P = .89) nor lumbar osteoarthritis (P = .12)
was significantly related to the pain composite scores.
The majority of both the patient (61%) and control (54%) groups rarely
use pain medication of any type. No one with scoliosis reported using strong
narcotics more than rarely, while 2 (7%) of 30 controls used 1 to 2 doses
of strong narcotics per day. When the patient group was asked specifically
about pain medicine use for their backs, 48 (49%) of 97 patients stated they
took no medications, 35% took aspirin or acetaminophen only, 6% took nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatories, and 10% took varying combinations of the above. Only
1 scoliosis patient reported taking narcotic medication for back pain.
Activities of Daily Living. Respondents were asked to indicate their capacity (no = 0 and yes =
1) to perform each of 15 different activities of daily living, such as riding
in a car, sitting for long periods, walking up or down stairs, making a bed,
or cooking a meal. These responses were then summed to create an overall capacity
score. The median capacity score was 14 for patients and 15 for controls.
Additionally, the frequency with which individuals performed these activities
was examined. Frequency was measured on a 0 (never) to 5 (daily) scale and
scores were then summed to create a 0- to 75-point activity scale. The median
performance score for the scoliosis group was 48 compared with 50 in the control
group (P = .03). Therefore, there was no difference
in the capacity to perform these activities, but the control group performed
them slightly more frequently.
The acute back pain index was significantly related to the performance
scores, but after controlling for back pain, there was no significant difference
in performance scores between the groups. Shortness of breath during everyday
activities was also related to performance (P = .01).
Cause and Effect of Disability on Work Hours and Activity Level. Thirty-seven (39%) of 94 patients felt they had a disability compared
with 16 (30%) of 53 controls. Thirty-one (80%) of these 37 patients and 15
(94%) of these 16 controls said their disability was back-related. Of these,
25 patients and 15 controls were still working. Thirteen (52%) of these 25
patients reduced their work hours due to back pain, as did 6 (40%) of controls.
Twenty-three (74%) of 31 patients and 8 (53%) of 15 controls reduced their
activity level due to back pain.
Depression Index. The presence of clinical depression was evaluated using a modification
of the Self-Rating Depression Scale.43 The
reliability and validity of this scale has been well documented for use as
both a screening tool and in outcomes assessment.43-45 The
items describe symptoms related to the presence of depression and respondents
rate the frequency with which they experience each symptom. Possible scores
range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating less frequent depressive
symptoms. The mean (SD) score for the scoliosis group was 47.53 (9.74) with
a range of 24.21 to 69.00 compared with 48.17 (10.02) and a range of 29.63
to 66.00 in the control group (P = .60).
Body Satisfaction. Body satisfaction was measured using an adaptation of the Body Satisfaction
Scale.46 Subjects rated their satisfaction
with 16 body parts (the original scale), as well as appearance from the front,
side, and rear, and appearance in clothes and a swimsuit (added for this study)
using a 6-point scale. The 21 ratings were then averaged to create 2 subscale
scores and a total score. The first subscale included items concerning the
axial skeleton (shoulders, upper back, lower back, and hips). The mean (SD)
score for the scoliosis group was 3.02 (1.23) with a range of 1.30 to 6.00
compared with 4.47 (1.11) and a range of 1.75 to 6.00 in the control group
(P = .001). The second subscale included the remaining
items to determine if the effect of scoliosis on body satisfaction was localized
to the back and hips, or if it affected perception of the rest of the body.
The patient mean (SD) score was 3.74 (0.83) with a range of 1.38 to 6.00 compared
with 4.15 (1.03) and a range of 1.73 to 6.00 in the control group (P = .01). The mean (SD) total score in the scoliosis group was 3.60
(0.84) with a range of 1.30 to 6.00 compared with 4.21 (1.00) and a range
of 2.00 to 5.95 in the control group (P = .001).
Therefore, on all scales, patients were slightly dissatisfied to slightly
satisfied, and the controls were slightly satisfied to moderately satisfied.
Neither the current Cobb angle nor the degree of apical rotation was
highly correlated with the body image subscales or total scores (Pearson correlation r = −0.08 to −0.32).
Perception of Limitation Due to Scoliosis. Patients responded to the open-ended prompt "Do you feel your back has
limited your life, or in any way affected you, other than as discussed above?"
[treatment, pain, medications, pulmonary complaints, apparent deformity].
Responses varied, but the majority dealt with such issues as difficulty in
purchasing clothes, decreased physical capacity, and self-consciousness. In
1968, 33% of 73 respondents felt limited compared with 25% in 1978, and 32%
Patients with LIS and their families are often upset by misinformation
about the condition and its ultimate effect on their lives. Although it is
quite clear today that the natural history of scoliosis varies according to
the etiology and the pattern of vertebral involvement, the results of studies
following cases of mixed origin have been used to develop screening and treatment
policy. For example, a state screening program has been supported because
untreated scoliosis has been reported to result in changes in cardiopulmonary
function and life expectancy, and that "delay in obtaining specialized care
may lead to serious crippling."47
The current study completes the natural history study of untreated LIS
patients first seen at the University of Iowa between 1932 and 1948. We did
not find evidence to link untreated LIS with increased rates of mortality
in general, or from cardiac or pulmonary conditions potentially related to
the curvature. In LIS, only patients with thoracic apices and curves of more
than 100° are at increased risk of death from cor pulmonale and right
ventricular failure.23 The cumulative death
rate was approximately 54%, but not higher than that expected in the general
population. Of the 36 deaths in the last 10 years, only 3 are possibly attributable
to scoliosis. This points out the deficiency of previous research reporting
a higher than expected mortality rate without properly controlling for the
age at onset.19 Furthermore, no patient with
LIS in that study died of respiratory failure. Likewise, Branthwaite48 found dyspnea solely due to the curvature to be extremely
rare in patients with LIS. Therefore, respiratory failure and premature death
may develop in idiopathic scoliosis, but there is no indication from any study
that severe pulmonary compromise is common in those with LIS.
With respect to back pain, recent data from the National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey49 estimate the
annual prevalence of back pain in the population of persons aged 65 years
or older to be 29%, while 75% to 85% of all people will experience some form
of back pain during their lifetime.50 Although
the prevalence of back pain in untreated scoliosis likely exceeds that in
the general population, it does not appear to cause excessive disability.
For example, Dahlberg51 found similar rates
of surgery specifically for backache in both scoliotic and nonscoliotic patients.
Horal52 showed that patients with scoliosis
did not represent a disproportionate number of disability pensions. Furthermore,
the 3 Swedish long-term follow-up studies of idiopathic scoliosis, all with
follow-up periods longer than 30 years and all with more than 90% of the patients
traced, also demonstrated that low back pain was not a significant problem
in these patients.17,19,20
On average, patients have been experiencing occasional back pain during
the past 30 years, and the frequency of back pain has not significantly increased
in this cohort since 1968. Although scoliosis patients report more chronic
back pain, those with pain have similar profiles in terms of duration and
intensity as their peers, and their ability to work and perform everyday activities
is similar to their peers. Additionally, back pain had no larger impact on
work and activities for scoliosis patients than it did for controls.
Late-onset scoliosis, and possible sequelae such as back pain and pulmonary
limitations, must be viewed in light of its effect on function and self-esteem.
The authors of the Ste-Justine series14,18,53,54 conclude
that patients with idiopathic scoliosis perceive themselves to be less healthy
than their peers and experience limitations in certain activities such as
lifting, walking long distances, standing and sitting for periods, and the
traveling and socializing outside the home. The present study did not find
the patients to be significantly different from controls in terms of ability
to perform similar activities to those reported in the Ste-Justine studies.
Our findings also conflict with those of Dickson et al55 who
found untreated patients to have decreased physical, functional, self-care,
and positional abilities when compared with controls. Likewise, we found that
back pain and shortness of breath had similar effects on the function and
activity levels of both the control and patient groups.
A recent long-term study from Sweden corroborates our interpretations
concerning back pain and function. Danielsson and Nachemson, in comparing
previously braced patients56 and patients who
had undergone surgery57 with the same set of
age-matched controls, found little evidence that either patient group was
significantly impaired relative to their peers when using the 36-item Short
Form Health Survey (SF-36)58 and the Oswestry
Disability59 questionnaire. The mean curve
size in both groups was greater than 30°. Another recently reported follow-up
of more than 20 years found no difference in quality of life, including back
pain and function, between adolescent idiopathic patients who had undergone
surgery and those who remained untreated, as inferred from multiple instruments
including the Oswestry Disability, Roland-Morris, and the EuroQol-5D.60 These studies do not confirm the necessity of intervening
in LIS to prevent back pain and disability in late adulthood.
This series of Iowa studies22,23,26,27 does
not demonstrate a grim prognosis. In 1968, at the mean age of 42 years, 98%
of the sample (n = 195) were either homemakers or gainfully employed.27 Sixteen percent restricted their activities due to
their backs. The mortality rate of 7% was only slightly higher than that expected
in the general population (5.4%). Sixty-nine percent only had occasional back
pain compared with 72% in the control group. Ten years later,23 a
similar sample of 161 patients from the same cohort was reviewed at the mean
age of 53 years. All but 4 were reported as normally active and 12% restricted
activities due to their back, but none were receiving disability due to scoliosis.
Sixty-three percent (101/161) of patients reported occasional back pain compared
with 75% (75/100) of the controls. We have not been able to demonstrate a
significant correlation between curve severity or curve location and back
symptoms. At skeletal maturity, 2% of patients showed evidence of osteoarthritis
of the spine. Currently, this rate is 75%. There was no evidence, however,
for a relationship between the degree of back pain and osteoarthritis, or
for a corresponding increase in back pain over the study period. Curve characteristics
are, however, highly predictive of pulmonary symptoms. The current study found
that having a Cobb angle of greater than 50° at skeletal maturity is a
significant predictor of decreased pulmonary function. The fact that large
curves with a thoracic apex have been associated with decreased vital capacity
and more frequent shortness of breath was demonstrated in the 1981 follow-up.23 Using suggested score criteria,44,45 the
depression indices for both the scoliosis and control groups compare closely
with those for nondepressed patients. On average, patients were slightly dissatisfied
to slightly satisfied with their bodies.
By closely studying this group of patients for more than 50 years, we
have learned that patients with untreated LIS can function well as young adults,
become employed, get married, have children, and grow to become active older
adults. Unfortunately, patients with untreated LIS can develop significant
deformity, and the cosmetic aspect of this condition cannot be disregarded.
The physical outcomes demonstrated in this cohort born many decades ago can
be used to predict the likely experience of a similar set of untreated patients
born later in the century, although what is less sure is if a contemporary
cohort (and their peers) would be as accepting of deformity as these patients
It is essential that community physicians and the public recognize the
difference in clinical course between early-onset scoliosis and LIS, and recognize
that the latter is likely to cause little physical impairment other than back
pain and cosmetic concerns. Curves less than 30° at skeletal maturity
rarely get worse. However, back pain may arise in any patient regardless of
curve size or location. School screening programs, if conducted at all, should
aim for low false-positive rates, because the high error rates have led to
undue concern for adolescents and their parents, as well as contributing to
expensive, unnecessary radiographs and specialty consultations.61,62
Community physicians should be concerned with noticeable body asymmetries
as noted on the forward bend test in the thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar
area, shoulder height discrepancies, and trunk shift, especially in skeletally
immature patients. The recommendation of bracing and surgery must be made
on an individual basis with the patient and family well-informed of the natural
history of the disease.
Create a personal account or sign in to: