Context Infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has been associated with an
increased risk of multiple sclerosis (MS), but the temporal relationship remains
unclear.
Objective To determine whether antibodies to EBV are elevated before the onset
of MS.
Design, Setting, and Population Nested case-control study conducted among more than 3 million US military
personnel with blood samples collected between 1988 and 2000 and stored in
the Department of Defense Serum Repository. Cases were identified as individuals
granted temporary or permanent disability because of MS. For each case (n
= 83), 2 controls matched by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and dates of blood
sample collection were selected.
Main Outcome Measures Antibodies including IgA against EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA) and
IgG against VCA, nuclear antigens (EBNA complex, EBNA-1, and EBNA-2), diffuse
and restricted early antigens, and cytomegalovirus.
Results The average time between blood collection and MS onset was 4 years.
The strongest predictors of MS were serum levels of IgG antibodies to VCA
or EBNA complex. The risk of MS increased monotonically with these antibody
titers; relative risk (RR) in persons in the highest category of VCA (≥2560)
compared with those in the lowest (≤160) was 19.7 (95% confidence interval
[CI], 2.2-174; P for trend = .004). For EBNA complex
titers, the RR for those in the highest category (≥1280) was 33.9 (95%
CI, 4.1-283; P for trend <.001) vs those in the
lowest category (≤40). Similarly strong positive associations between EBV
antibodies and risk of MS were already present in samples collected 5 or more
years before MS onset. No association was found between cytomegalovirus antibodies
and MS.
Conclusion These results suggest a relationship between EBV infection and development
of MS.
Elevations in anti–Epstein Barr virus (EBV) serum antibody titers
occurring several years before diagnosis have been characteristically found
in diseases probably caused by EBV, such as Burkitt lymphoma1 and
nasopharyngeal carcinoma,2 and in Hodgkin disease.3 Anti-EBV antibodies are elevated in individuals with
multiple sclerosis (MS),4,5 and
we recently reported a premorbid increase in a small study,6 but
it remains uncertain whether these elevations predate disease onset. We therefore
conducted a larger prospective investigation using serial blood samples collected
several years before onset of MS.
The source population for the present study is more than 3 million US
military personnel whose blood samples are stored at − 30°C in the
Department of Defense Serum Repository.7 This
repository contains more than 30 million serum specimens from active-duty
and reserve personnel of the US military collected at entry and, on average,
every 2 years thereafter since 1988. The research protocol was approved by
the relevant institutional review board, which waived the need for consent
to use blood products in a study.
Case Ascertainment and Selection of Controls
Cases were identified by searching the computerized database of the
US Army Physical Disability Agency for active-duty personnel granted temporary
or permanent disability because of MS and by reviewing medical records. We
classified cases as definite MS if there was a history of 2 or more attacks,
a diagnosis of MS made by a neurologist, and a positive magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) result or if the final diagnosis in the record was specified
as definite MS, clinical definite MS, or laboratory-supported definite MS.8 Cases were classified as probable MS if they did not
meet the criteria for definite MS but had at least 2 of the following: history
of 2 or more attacks, positive MRI result, and diagnosis of MS made by a neurologist.
These criteria (definite or probable MS) were met by 118 cases, 83 of whom
had at least 1 serum sample collected before onset of MS symptoms (defined
as the earliest neurological symptom ever reported) and were included in the
study. For each of these 83 cases, we identified the earliest available serum
sample (baseline sample) plus up to 2 additional samples collected before
onset of MS and the first sample collected after onset of MS. For each of
the 83 cases, we randomly selected 2 controls matched by age (±1 year),
sex, race/ethnicity (white, black, Hispanic, or other), and dates of blood
collection (±30 days). For serial samples, each blood sampling date
was matched to within 30 days.
Serum samples from MS cases and controls were sent to the laboratory
in triplets containing the case and the 2 matched controls in random order
without identification of case-control status. Immunoglobulin G and IgA antibodies
to EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA) and anti–early antigen complex (diffuse
[EA-D] and restricted [EA-R]) were determined by indirect immunofluorescence9,10; IgG antibodies against the EBV nuclear
antigen (EBNA) complex and 2 of its individual members, EBNA-1 and EBNA-2,
were determined by anticomplement immunofluorescence.11 Immunoglobulin
G antibody titers against cytomegalovirus (CMV) were also determined to assess
the specificity of any association that may be found between MS and EBV serology.12
Geometric mean antibody titers (reciprocal of the dilution) were compared
between cases and controls using generalized linear models.13 We
used conditional logistic regression to estimate the relative risk (RR) of
MS associated with serum levels of specific antibody titers. The main regression
analyses were conducted using the antibody titers as categorical variables;
further analyses were conducted using the base 2 logarithm of the reciprocal
of the dilution as a continuous variable (on this scale, a 1-unit increase
corresponds to a 2-fold change in titers). Antibody titers were categorized
by the highest dilution that tested positive, and each doubling (eg, 20, 40,
80) formed a category. The lowest and highest categories were collapsed because
of small numbers or lack of cases in these categories. The differences in
antibody titers between samples collected before or after MS onset were tested
by paired t test. All P values
are 2-tailed and significant at P<.05. We used
SAS version 6.12 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) for all analyses.
Baseline characteristics of cases and controls are shown in Table 1. All cases and 96% of the controls
had evidence of EBV infection (VCA IgG ≥20) at baseline (P = .08). For cases, the mean (SD) age at MS onset was 27 (5.5) years
(range, 18-41 years). Certainty of diagnosis was definite in 53 (64%) and
probable in 30 (36%). Mean (SD) time between baseline blood collection and
MS onset was 4.0 (2.4) years (range, <1-11 years). The baseline geometric
mean serum antibody titers to EBV were consistently higher among individuals
who later developed MS than among their matched controls, whereas there was
no difference in antibodies to CMV (Table
2). Similar results were observed in analyses restricted to cases
with blood samples collected at least 5 years before the onset of MS (Table 2). The risk of MS increased monotonically
with increasing serum levels of antibodies to VCA and EBNA complex. Compared
with individuals with the lowest antibody titers, the RR was 19.7 (95% confidence
interval [CI], 2.2-174; P for trend = .004) for individuals
in the highest category of VCA IgG and was 33.9 (95% CI, 4.1-283; P for trend <.001) for individuals in the highest category of EBNA
complex (Figure 1). A strong positive
association was also found with EBNA-1 (RRs for titers from ≤40 to ≥1280:
reference, 6.1, 8.1, 6.3, 11.9, and 16.7), whereas weaker associations were
found for VCA IgA (RRs for titers ≤2.5, 10-20, and ≥40: reference, 0.0,
and 3.6), EBNA-2 (RRs for titers from ≤2.5 to ≥160: reference, 1.4,
1.7, 3.1, 1.7, 3.1, and 2.5), EA-D (RRs for titers ≤2.5, 5-20, 40-80, and
≥160: reference, 0.7, 1.5, and 2.4), and EA-R (RRs for titers ≤2.5,
5-20, 40-80, and ≥160: reference, 2.3, 1.5, and 10.2). There was no association
between antibodies to CMV and risk of MS (RRs for titers ≤5, 10-20, 40-80,
and ≥160: reference, 2.3, 0.91, and 0.95).
In analyses using the log-transformed antibody titers as continuous
variables, strong associations were found with IgG antibodies to VCA, EBNA
complex, and EBNA-1 (Table 3);
these associations did not vary significantly by sex, age, or race/ethnicity.
When the serum titers of different anti-EBV antibodies were included simultaneously
in a regression model, only the EBNA complex and EBNA-1 titers retained statistical
significance (these titers were not included at the same time because EBNA
immunofluorescence is mostly accounted for by EBNA-1 antibodies11 so
that these titers are highly correlated). The EBNA-1/EBNA-2 ratio was not
significantly associated with risk of MS. Results of analyses restricted to
cases of definite MS were not materially different.
Finally, we used the repeated serological determinations to examine
whether specific antibody titers varied among cases and whether there was
evidence of EBV reactivation before onset of MS symptoms. For all antibodies,
titers were similar in the earliest available sample (mean, 3.6 years before
MS onset) and the sample collected after MS onset (mean, 1.0 years after MS
onset). The geometric mean titers in the pre-onset and post-onset samples,
respectively, were as follows: for VCA IgG, 905 and 896 (P = .88 by paired t test); for VCA IgA, 3
and 3 (P = .32); for EBNA, 561 and 561 (P>.99); for EBNA-1, 400 and 405 (P = .92);
for EBNA-2, 26 and 27 (P = .72); for EA-D, 4 and
4 (P = .76); for EA-R, 4 and 3 (P = .33); and for CMV, 18 and 17 (P = .68).
Positive IgA titers to VCA and IgG titers to EA-D reflect repeated infection
or reactivation. Overall, the proportion of cases and controls with at least
1 positive titer (≥5) before MS onset (index date in controls) was not
significantly different in cases (6% for VCA IgA and 31% for EA-D) and controls
(4% and 21%, respectively). However, cases were more likely than controls
to have at least 1 sample with a titer of at least 80 (for VCA IgA, RR, 8.0;
95% CI, 1.3-50.4; P = .03; for EA-D, RR, 4.2; 95%
CI, 1.6-11.4; P = .005).
These results confirm those obtained in a smaller study of women with
MS.6 Although the date of onset of MS is difficult
to establish accurately, and many patients at the time of clinical onset have
multiple silent MRI lesions,14 the lack of
variation in our study in anti-EBV antibody titers between samples collected
6 to 11 years before the estimated MS onset and later samples suggests that
the increased antibody response to EBV occurs early in relation to the pathological
process that leads to demyelination and clinical disease. Furthermore, all
cases were already seropositive at the time of collection of the first blood
sample (mean, 4 years before MS onset) and appeared to have stable antibody
titers, suggesting that there is a long lag time between infection with EBV
and occurrence of MS.
The pattern of antibody response that we observed among individuals
who developed MS is different from the pattern observed in immunocompromised
hosts or in chronic infectious mononucleosis, where there are elevated anti–EBNA-2
and reduced anti–EBNA-1 titers,11 and
from that observed in Burkitt lymphoma, where there are prediagnostic elevations
of anti-VCA but not anti-EBNA antibodies.1 Rather,
the simultaneous elevation of titers to VCA and EBNA-1 suggests a more severe
or more recent primary infection or reactivation of infection accompanied
by a vigorous cellular immune response.15-17 A
similar pattern of anti-VCA and anti-EBNA IgG elevation in prediagnostic sera
has been associated with risk of Hodgkin disease3 and
nasopharyngeal carcinoma,18 but in the latter
the strongest predictors of risk are IgA antibodies to VCA.19 As
previously discussed, these results support a role for EBV in the etiology
of MS.6
1.de-The G, Geser A, Day NE.
et al. Epidemiological evidence for causal relationship between Epstein-Barr
virus and Burkitt's lymphoma from Ugandan prospective study.
Nature.1978;274:756-761.Google Scholar 2.Rickinson AB, Kieff E. Epstein-Barr virus. In: Fields BN, Knipe DM, Howley PM, eds. Fields
Virology. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1996:2397-2446.
3.Mueller N, Evans A, Harris NL.
et al. Hodgkin's disease and Epstein-Barr virus: altered antibody pattern
before diagnosis.
N Engl J Med.1989;320:689-695.Google Scholar 4.Larsen PD, Bloomer LC, Bray PF. Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen and viral capsid antigen antibody titers
in multiple sclerosis.
Neurology.1985;35:435-438.Google Scholar 5.Shirodaria PV, Haire M, Fleming E.
et al. Viral antibody titers: comparison in patients with multiple sclerosis
and rheumatoid arthritis.
Arch Neurol.1987;44:1237-1241.Google Scholar 6.Ascherio A, Munger KL, Lennette ET.
et al. Epstein-Barr virus antibodies and risk of multiple sclerosis: a prospective
study.
JAMA.2001;286:3083-3088.Google Scholar 7.Rubertone MV, Brundage JF. The defense medical surveillance system and the Department of Defense
Serum Repository: glimpses of the future of comprehensive public health surveillance.
Am J Public Health.2002;92:1900-1904.Google Scholar 8.Poser C, Paty D, Scheinberg L.
et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis.
Ann Neurol.1983;13:227-231.Google Scholar 9.Henle W, Henle G, Andersson J.
et al. Antibody responses to Epstein-Barr virus-determined nuclear antigen
(EBNA)-1 and EBNA-2 in acute and chronic Epstein-Barr virus infection.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.1987;84:570-574.Google Scholar 10.Lennette ET. Epstein-Barr virus. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH, eds. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 7th ed. Washington, DC:
ASM Press; 1999:912-918.
11.Lennette ET, Rymo L, Yadav M, Masucci G, Merk K, Timar L, Klein G. Disease-related differences in antibody patterns against EBV-encoded nuclear
antigens EBNA 1, EBNA 2 and EBNA 6.
Eur J Cancer.1993;29A:1584-1589.Google Scholar 12.Lennette E, Lennette D. Immune adherence hemagglutination. In: Specter S, Hodinka R, Young S, eds. Clinical
Virology Manual. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2000:140-145.
13.Diggle P, Liang K, Zeger S. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press; 1994:253.
14.Brex PA, O'Riodan JI, Miszkiel KA.
et al. Multisequence MRI in clinically isolated syndromes and the early development
of MS.
Neurology.1999;53:1184-1190.Google Scholar 15.Henle W, Henle G, Niederman JC, Klemola E, Haltia K. Antibodies to early antigens induced by Epstein-Barr virus in infectious
mononucleosis.
J Infect Dis.1971;124:58-67.Google Scholar 16.Kusunoki Y, Huang H, Fukuda Y.
et al. A positive correlation between the precursor frequency of cytotoxic
lymphocytes to autologous Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B cells and antibody
titer level against Epstein-Barr virus-associated nuclear antigen in healthy
seropositive individuals.
Microbiol Immunol.1993;37:461-469.Google Scholar 17.Horwitz CA, Henle W, Henle G.
et al. Long-term serological follow-up of patients for Epstein-Barr virus
after recovery from infectious mononucleosis.
J Infect Dis.1985;151:1150-1153.Google Scholar 18.de-The G. Epidemiology of Epstein-Barr virus and associated diseases in man. In: Roizman B, ed. The Herpesviruses. Vol
1. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1982:25-103.
19.Chien YC, Chen JY, Liu MY.
et al. Serologic markers of Epstein-Barr virus infection and nasopharyngeal
carcinoma in Taiwanese men.
N Engl J Med.2001;345:1877-1882.Google Scholar