Context Formation of nitric oxide–derived oxidants may serve as a mechanism
linking inflammation to development of atherosclerosis. Nitrotyrosine, a specific
marker for protein modification by nitric oxide–derived oxidants, is
enriched in human atherosclerotic lesions and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)
recovered from human atheroma.
Objectives To determine whether systemic levels of nitrotyrosine are associated
with the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and are modulated by
hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme-A reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy.
Design, Setting, and Patients A case-control and interventional study at 2 urban tertiary-care referral
centers; recruitment for each was from June 1, 2001, until January 1, 2002.
For the case-control study, 100 case-patients with established CAD and 108
patients with no clinically evident CAD were recruited consecutively. In the
interventional study, participants aged 21 years or older with hypercholesterolemia
(LDL cholesterol ≥130 mg/dL [≥3.5 mmol/L]) underwent nutrition and exercise
counseling. Those whose levels did not decrease with 6 to 8 weeks were enrolled
in the study (n = 35). For 12 weeks, they received 10 mg/d of oral atorvastatin
therapy.
Main Outcome Measures In the case-control study, the association between systemic levels of
protein-bound nitrotyrosine, CAD risk, and presence of CAD. In the interventional
study, the change in nitrotyrosine, lipoprotein, and C-reactive protein (CRP)
levels.
Results Nitrotyrosine levels were significantly higher among patients with CAD
(median 9.1 µmol/mol [interquartile range, 4.8-13.8 µmol/mol]
tyrosine vs 5.2 µmol/mol [interquartile range, 2.2-8.4 µmol/mol]; P<.001). Patients in the upper quartile of nitrotyrosine
(29%; P<.001) had a higher odds of CAD compared
with those in the lowest quartile (unadjusted odds ratio, 6.1; 95% confidence
interval, 2.6-14.0; P<.001). In multivariate models
adjusting for Framingham Global Risk Score and CRP, upper quartiles of nitrotyrosine
remained associated with CAD (odds ratio, 4.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-10.6; P<.001). Statin therapy reduced nitrotyrosine levels
significantly (25%; P<.02) with a magnitude similar
to reductions in total cholesterol levels (25%; P<.001)
and LDL particle number (29%; P<.001) yet were
independent of alterations in lipoproteins and inflammatory markers like CRP.
Conclusions The findings from this preliminary study indicate that nitrotyrosine
levels are associated with the presence of CAD and appear to be modulated
by statin therapy. These results suggest a potential role for nitric oxide–derived
oxidants as inflammatory mediators in CAD and may have implications for atherosclerosis
risk assessment and monitoring of anti-inflammatory actions of statins.
Nitric oxide is a vasodilator and inhibitor of platelet aggregation,
leukocyte adhesion, and smooth muscle cell proliferation.1-3 However,
under pathological conditions, nitric oxide may be converted into potent nitrating
oxidants that promote oxidative damage, cell injury, and conversion of low-density
lipoprotein (LDL) into an atherogenic form.1-5 One
pathway for generating nitric oxide–derived oxidants involves interaction
with superoxide anion, leading to formation of peroxynitrite. Peroxynitrite
is a potent oxidant that promotes nitration of protein tyrosine residues producing
a distinctive "molecular fingerprint" for nitric oxide–derived oxidants,
nitrotyrosine.6,7 An alternative
mechanism for generating nitric oxide–derived oxidants involves myeloperoxidase,7-11 a
leukocyte-derived enzyme enriched in atherosclerotic lesions that serves as
an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk.10 Although
pathways that form nitrotyrosine have been mechanistically linked to atherosclerosis
development, and nitrotyrosine levels are enriched in human atheroma,12,13 a role for plasma or serum levels
of nitrotyrosine as a predictor of human coronary artery disease (CAD) has
not yet been examined.
The pleiotropic effects of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme-A reductase
inhibitors (statins) are an area of intense interest.14,15 The
pathways leading to generation of nitric oxide–derived oxidants and
nitrotyrosine formation all require the formation of superoxide or its dismutation
product, hydrogen peroxide.5-7,11 The
major enzymatic sources for superoxide anion formation within vascular tissues
involve leukocyte and vascular cell NAD(P)H oxidase complexes.5 Statins
have been shown to inhibit superoxide anion formation within vascular cells
by inhibiting isoprenylation of key NAD(P)H oxidase components,15,16 suggesting
that statins may cause significant reductions in nitrotyrosine formation.
Alternatively, statin-induced inhibition in isoprenylation of the small G-protein
Rho leads to increased levels of endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase and
enhanced nitric oxide production.15,17 The
net effect of statin therapy on formation of nitric oxide–derived oxidants
in vivo is unclear. This study was performed to determine whether CAD is associated
with increased systemic levels of nitrotyrosine and whether statin therapy
would reduce these levels.
We enrolled 208 individuals from 2 venues in Boston, Mass, from June
2001 until January 2002. Consecutive patients presenting to the cardiology
section of the Boston Medical Center were enrolled. Simultaneously (and to
increase recruitment of controls), consecutive area residents responding to
advertisements in a community newspaper were recruited. The 100 case patients
had a history of CAD, defined as documented myocardial infarction, coronary
artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention, or a stenosis
of 50% or greater in 1 or more major coronary vessels on angiography. Some
of the patients with CAD also had peripheral arterial disease (PAD), defined
as an ankle-brachial index less than 0.9, intermittent claudication, and/or
documented stenoses of peripheral or carotid arteries by angiography, magnetic
resonance imaging, or ultrasound. Controls had no clinical history or symptoms
suggestive of CAD or PAD. All participants gave written informed consent,
and the institutional review board of Boston Medical Center approved the study
protocol.
Prospective Intervention Study
We enrolled 35 consecutive patients from the Preventive Cardiology Clinic
at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation from June 2001 until January 2002. Patients
who were at least 21 years old, had no clinical evidence of CAD, PAD, or diabetes
mellitus, were naive to statin therapy, and had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
(LDL-C) levels that were 130 mg/dL or higher (≥3.3 mmol/L) received counseling
on nutritional and exercise interventions. If after 6 to 8 weeks LDL-C remained
at 130 mg/dL or higher (≥3.3 mmol/L), patients were eligible for enrollment
in the study. Fasting morning plasma samples were collected prior to initiation
of therapy (baseline) and following 12 weeks of atorvastatin therapy (10 mg/d).
All patients enrolled completed the study. Exclusion criteria included liver
disease, renal insufficiency, or changes in medical therapy during the treatment
period. All patients gave written informed consent, and the institutional
review board at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation approved the study protocol.
General. Blood samples were collected into
serum separator tubes (case-control study) or EDTA tubes (interventional study)
from patients who had fasted overnight. Samples were centrifuged at 3500 rpm
for 10 minutes, plasma/serum were recovered, and aliquots were stored at −80°C
until analysis. Personnel blinded to clinical data performed all laboratory
measurements. Lipoprotein/lipid profiles and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein
(CRP) measurements were performed as previously described.18,19
Nitrotyrosine. Protein-bound nitrotyrosine
levels were determined by stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography–electrospray
ionization tandem mass spectrometry-based methods using an ion trap mass spectrometer
(LCQ Deca, ThermoFinigann, San Jose, Calif), as previously described.11 Synthetic 3-nitro-[13C6]tyrosine
(2 pmol) and [13C915N1]tyrosine
(2 nmol) were added to protein pellets both as internal standards and to simultaneously
monitor nitrotyrosine, tyrosine, and potential artifactual formation of nitrotyrosine
during analyses.11 Nitrotyrosine content in
samples is expressed as the molar ratio between nitrotyrosine and the precursor
amino acid tyrosine. Protein-bound nitrotyrosine levels in plasma reproducibly
were greater than that observed in serum, suggesting clotting factors represent
preferential targets for nitration. Control studies demonstrated protein-bound
nitrotyrosine levels within plasma of healthy subjects are stable over time,
with coefficients of variance less than 15% for multiple independent repeated
measures on different days or for comparisons made during more than 3 months
apart.
Case-Control Study. Nitrotyrosine levels were
not normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test). Consequently, quartile-based
methods were used for analyses, and summary measures were presented as median
and interquartile range. Comparisons between cases and controls were made
with χ2 tests for categorical measures and Wilcoxon rank-sum
tests for continuous measures. Trends were assessed with Cochran-Armitage
tests.
Logistic regression models (SAS System, SAS Institute, Cary, NC) were
used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) associated with the second, third, and
highest quartile of nitrotyrosine compared with the lowest quartile for the
indicated outcomes. Single adjustments were made for individual traditional
CAD risk factors (age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, smoking [ever or current]),
family history, total cholesterol, LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
[HDL-C], triglycerides, CRP), and a modified Framingham Global Risk Score,10 alone and with CRP. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit
tests were used to evaluate appropriate model fit. Associations among continuous
variables were assessed with use of Spearman rank-correlation coefficient.
Associations among categorical variables were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum
tests.
The study was planned to have at least 100 patients per group, based
on a logistic regression power calculation demonstrating that 198 patients
would provide 80% power (α = .05) to detect an OR of 2.0 for elevated
nitrotyrosine (upper quartile).
Interventional Study. Wilcoxon rank-sum test
was used to analyze the differences between measurements at baseline and 12
weeks. Spearman rank-correlation coefficients were used to assess associations
between both baseline and atorvastatin-induced changes in nitrotyrosine levels,
lipoprotein profile measures, and CRP levels. Approximate 95% confidence intervals
(CIs) were found using Fisher r-to-z transform. Multiple regression analyses were performed to determine
factors associated with changes in nitrotyrosine levels.
Patient Demographics. Baseline characteristics
of study participants are shown in Table
1. As expected, patients with CAD were older, more likely to be
men, and more likely to have hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or family history
of CAD. Patients with CAD also had increased triglyceride levels and CRP levels,
and they were more likely to use lipid-lowering drugs and other cardiovascular
medications.
Nitrotyrosine Levels and CAD. Nitrotyrosine
levels were higher in patients with CAD compared with controls (median values,
9.1 µmol/mol tyrosine vs 5.2 µmol/mol tyrosine, respectively; P<.001; Table 1).
Rates of CAD increased with higher nitrotyrosine quartiles (26% vs 58%, lowest
vs highest quartiles; P<.001 for trend). Patients
in the highest quartile of nitrotyrosine levels had increased risk of CAD
compared with patients in the lowest quartile (Table 2; the unadjusted nitrotyrosine fourth quartile OR, 6.1; 95%
CI, 2.6-14.0; P<.001). CAD rates were also higher
with increasing CRP quartiles (25% vs 50%, lowest vs highest quartiles; P<.001 for trend). The proportion of patients with CAD
was higher among those in the upper quartile of both nitrotyrosine and CRP
levels compared with patients in the lower quartiles (76% vs 7%; P<.001).
Nitrotyrosine Levels and CAD Risk Factors. Nitrotyrosine
levels correlated with age (r = 0.14, P = .03), fasting triglycerides (r = 0.14, P = .03), and CRP levels (r =
0.15, P = .02); however, these associations were
small in magnitude and accounted for less than 5% of the observed variance
in nitrotyrosine. There was no significant correlation between nitrotyrosine
and LDL-C, HDL-C, or total cholesterol. Participants with diabetes had higher
nitrotyrosine levels than those who did not have diabetes (median values,
9.6 µmol/mol tyrosine vs 5.7 µmol/mol tyrosine, respectively; P<.001).
Adjusted Models for Nitrotyrosine and CAD. Nitrotyrosine
levels remained significantly associated with CAD following individual adjustments
for age; sex; history of diabetes; current smoking; history of hypertension;
and levels of HDL-C, LDL-C, triglyceride, and CRP with minimal changes observed
in adjusted ORs and CIs (data not shown). After adjustment for the Framingham
Global Risk Score, nitrotyrosine remained a robust predictor of presence of
CAD (Table 2, Model 1; adjusted
nitrotyrosine 4th quartile OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 2.0-14.3; P<.001). Addition of CRP to the model had little effect on the OR
for nitrotyrosine as a predictor of CAD status (Table 2, Model 2; adjusted nitrotyrosine fourth quartile OR, 4.4;
95% CI, 1.8-10.6; P<.001). Likelihood ratio tests
confirmed that introducing nitrotyrosine to multivariable prediction models
that included established markers of cardiovascular risk (eg, Model 2, Table 2) significantly added to prediction
for presence of CAD (χ2 = 10.42; P<.001).
Nitrotyrosine Levels and Atherosclerosis Burden. We
also examined whether nitrotyrosine levels correlate with clinical evidence
of atherosclerotic burden (ie, determine if the correlation of nitrotyrosine
levels with atherosclerosis is even stronger in patients with more extensive
atherosclerosis [CAD plus PAD]). Patients with CAD plus PAD demonstrated increases
in prevalence of atherosclerosis with increasing nitrotyrosine quartiles (3%
vs 46%, lowest vs highest quartiles; P<.001 for
trend). Within this atherosclerosis-laden group, nitrotyrosine served as the
strongest independent predictor associated with atherosclerosis risk following
multivariable adjustments with Framingham Global Risk Score and CRP (adjusted
nitrotyrosine fourth quartile OR, 25.4; 95% CI, 2.8-274; P<.001 [Table 2]; adjusted
Framingham Global Risk Score OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.15-1.36; P<.001; adjusted CRP fourth quartile OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 2.1-16.6; P<.001).
In the case-control study of the entire cohort (n = 208), nitrotyrosine
levels demonstrated a tendency toward being lower in patients taking statins
(P = .06), suggesting that statin therapy may reduce
nitrotyrosin levels. This was directly assessed in an interventional study
comprised of 35 patients with a mean (SD) of 54 (10) years, 49% of whom were
men. Table 3 shows the lipid and
lipoprotein levels, CRP, and nitrotyrosine levels at baseline and after taking
orally 10 mg/d of atorvastatin for 12 weeks. Atorvastatin treatment reduced
total cholesterol levels by 25%, LDL-C by 39%, and apolipoprotein B-100 by
29%. Statin-induced reductions in plasma nitrotyrosine levels (25%; P = .02) were similar in magnitude to decreases in total
cholesterol and LDL particle number (ie, apolipoprotein B-100). A nonsignificant
trend toward statin-induced reductions in CRP levels was also observed (11%
reduction; P = .10).
No significant correlations were noted between baseline levels of nitrotyrosine,
lipid parameters, and CRP. Furthermore, no significant correlations were noted
between statin-induced changes in nitrotyrosine vs changes in lipoprotein
and inflammatory markers including total cholesterol level (95% CI; ρ,
−0.23 to 0.43), LDL-C (95% CI; ρ, −0.2 to 0.45), HDL-C (95%
CI; ρ, −0.18 to 0.47), or CRP (95% CI, ρ −0.22 to 0.44).
In multivariable regression analysis, there was no significant association
between change in nitrotyrosine levels and changes in levels of total cholesterol,
LDL-C, HDL-C, and CRP (F-ratio = 0.71; P = .60).
The results of these preliminary studies suggest that nitrotyrosine,
a marker specific for protein modification by nitric oxide–derived oxidants,
may serve as an inflammatory marker for CAD. Systemic levels of protein-bound
nitrotyrosine were associated with presence of CAD even following multivariable
adjustments for traditional CAD risk factors and CRP. Importantly, statin
therapy promoted significant reductions in nitrotyrosine levels that were
similar in magnitude to reductions in total cholesterol and LDL particle number.
Moreover, reductions in nitrotyrosine promoted by statin therapy were independent
of reductions in lipid parameters and CRP. Taken together, these results suggest
that nitrotyrosine measurements may prove useful both in assessing CAD status
and for monitoring the anti-inflammatory effects of statins.
Numerous lines of evidence support potential links between formation
of nitric oxide–derived oxidants and development of CAD. Current evidence
suggests that an imbalance between superoxide and nitric oxide formation within
diseased artery walls leads to a functional deficiency of nitric oxide, and
consequent generation of nitric oxide-derived oxidants such as peroxynitrite
and myeloperoxidase-generated reactive nitrogen species.1-5,9-11 Enhanced
formation of superoxide in diseased artery walls may occur through vascular,
endothelial (eg, nox), and leukocyte-derived NAD(P)H oxidase complexes,20,21 as well as nitric oxide synthase
that is "uncoupled."22 Superoxide thus formed
may interact with nitric oxide, resulting in formation of nitrating oxidants.
Similarly, myeloperoxidase, a leukocyte-derived heme protein enriched in human
atheroma,23,24 catalytically consumes
nitric oxide as a physiological substrate.9,25 Organ
chamber studies and studies with myeloperoxidase knockout mice suggest that
peroxidase enrichment at sites of inflammation, such as within the subendothelial
space of a diseased vessel wall, inhibits nitric oxide-dependent vasodilation
responses through mechanisms that lead to nitrotyrosine formation.26,27 Human monocytes have been shown to
use both peroxynitrite and myeloperoxidase-dependent pathways for generating
nitric oxide–derived oxidants, as monitored by nitrotyrosine formation.7 One consequence of these reactions appears to be the
oxidative conversion of LDL into a high uptake form for macrophages, leading
to cholesterol accumulation and foam cell formation.4 Alternative
mechanisms have linked nitric oxide–derived oxidants to activation of
matrix metalloproteases and development of unstable plaques28 and
development of prothrombic states.29,30 The
potential contributions of nitric oxide–derived oxidants to CAD development
are thus numerous and varied.
In this study, therapy with low-dose atorvastatin significantly reduced
nitrotyrosine levels. Statins promote systemic effects that extend beyond
simply lowering cholesterol levels.1,14,15 Statin-induced
inhibition in superoxide formation has been shown in cultured vascular smooth
muscle cells.16 We therefore hypothesized that
significant reductions in nitrotyrosine would be noted since pathways leading
to formation of nitric oxide–derived oxidants invariably require superoxide
generation. The mechanism for decreased superoxide formation appears to involve
inhibition of isoprenylation of the protein Rac, a key NAD(P)H oxidase component
that normally requires isoprenylation for appropriate translocation to the
plasma membrane surface during cell stimulation.15,16 Thus,
in contrast to the modest alterations in CRP typically noted relative to those
observed for lipoprotein and cholesterol levels,31-33 these
results demonstrated that nitrotyrosine reductions were comparable in magnitude
to those noted for total cholesterol or LDL particle number with administration
of low-dose statin (Table 3).
The growing appreciation of the pleiotropic actions of statins has underscored
the requirement for new measures that quantify the anti-inflammatory properties
of this widely used class of drugs. Our study suggests that systemic nitrotyrosine
levels may serve as an independent measure of the anti-inflammatory actions
of statins.
A corollary to these findings is that low-dose atorvastatin therapy
promotes potent systemic antioxidant effects by suppressing formation of nitric
oxide–derived oxidants. Further studies of the systemic antioxidant
actions promoted by statin therapy are warranted. Recent randomized trials
with antioxidant vitamins, particularly α-tocopherol, have failed to
demonstrate benefit against cardiovascular disease,34,35 and
it is notable that α-tocopherol is relatively ineffective at blocking
the effects of nitric oxide–derived oxidants.36-38 It
is tempting to speculate that interventional studies with statins, which have
repeatedly demonstrated clinical benefits, have in fact also been "antioxidant"
trials that used therapeutic agents able to suppress generation of more clinically
relevant nitric oxide–derived oxidants.
Elevated nitrotyrosine levels in patients with diabetes were recently
reported,39 a finding also observed in our
cohort. Postprandial elevations in nitrotyrosine levels following consumption
of a high fat or high glucose meal that were attenuated following simvastatin
therapy were also recently reported.40 Although
nitrotyrosine enrichment in human atherosclerotic lesions is well known from
both immunohistochemical and mass spectrometry-based studies,12,13 our
study is the first, to our knowledge, that directly correlates systemic levels
of nitrotyrosine with presence of CAD and response to statin therapy. The
cross-sectional (rather than longitudinal) design of the case-control study
and the pilot nature of the intervention study are important limitations of
our study. However, the results point toward promising potential clinical
utility in use of nitrotyrosine levels as an adjunct for CAD risk stratification
and monitoring of anti-inflammatory actions of statin therapy. Further evaluation
of nitrotyrosine levels as a predictor of future cardiovascular events and
outcomes and as a means of monitoring risk reduction attendant with statin
therapy are warranted.
1.Kinlay S, Libby P, Ganz P. Endothelial function and coronary artery disease.
Curr Opin Lipidol.2001;12:383-389.Google Scholar 2.Moncada S. Nitric oxide: discovery and impact on clinical medicine.
J R Soc Med.1999;92:164-169.Google Scholar 3.Ignarro LJ, Napoli C, Loscalzo J. Nitric oxide donors and cardiovascular agents modulating the bioactivity
of nitric oxide: an overview.
Circ Res.2002;90:21-28.Google Scholar 4.Podrez EA, Schmitt D, Hoff HF, Hazen SL. Myeloperoxidase-generated reactive nitrogen species convert LDL into
an atherogenic form in vitro.
J Clin Invest.1999;103:1547-1560.Google Scholar 5.Cai H, Harrison DG. Endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases: the role of oxidant
stress.
Circ Res.2000;87:840-844.Google Scholar 6.Beckman JS, Koppenol WH. Nitric oxide, superoxide, and peroxynitrite: the good, the bad, and ugly.
Am J Physiol.1996;271(5 Pt 1):C1424-C1437.Google Scholar 7.Hazen SL, Zhang R, Shen Z.
et al. Formation of nitric oxide-derived oxidants by myeloperoxidase in monocytes:
pathways for monocyte-mediated protein nitration and lipid peroxidation in
vivo.
Circ Res.1999;85:950-958.Google Scholar 8.Eiserich JP, Hristova M, Cross CE.
et al. Formation of nitric oxide-derived inflammatory oxidants by myeloperoxidase
in neutrophils.
Nature.1998;391:393-397.Google Scholar 9.Abu-Soud HM, Hazen SL. Nitric oxide is a physiological substrate for mammalian peroxidases.
J Biol Chem.2000;275:37524-37532.Google Scholar 10.Zhang R, Brennan ML, Fu X.
et al. Association between myeloperoxidase levels and risk of coronary artery
disease.
JAMA.2001;286:2136-2142.Google Scholar 11.Brennan ML, Wu W, Fu X.
et al. A tale of two controversies: defining both the role of peroxidases
in nitrotyrosine formation in vivo using eosinophil peroxidase and myeloperoxidase-deficient
mice, and the nature of peroxidase-generated reactive nitrogen species.
J Biol Chem.2002;277:17415-17427.Google Scholar 12.Beckman JS, Ye YZ, Anderson P.
et al. Extensive nitration of protein tyrosines in human atherosclerosis detected
by immunohistochemistry.
Biol Chem Hoppe-Seyler.1993;375:81-88.Google Scholar 13.Leeuwenburgh C, Hardy MM, Hazen SL.
et al. Reactive nitrogen intermediates promote low density lipoprotein oxidation
in human atherosclerotic intima.
J Biol Chem.1997;272:1433-1436.Google Scholar 14.Ridker PM. Are statins anti-inflammatory? issues in the design and conduct of
the pravastatin inflammation C-reactive protein evaluation.
Curr Cardiol Rep.2000;2:269-273.Google Scholar 15.Liao JK. Isoprenoids as mediators of the biological effects of statins.
J Clin Invest.2002;110:285-288.Google Scholar 16.Wassmann S, Laufs U, Muller K.
et al. Cellular antioxidant effects of atorvastatin in vitro and in vivo.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.2002;22:300-305.Google Scholar 17.Laufs U, La Fata V, Plutzky J, Liao JK. Upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by HMG CoA reductase
inhibitors.
Circulation.1998;97:1129-1135.Google Scholar 18.Myers GL, Cooper GR, Winn CL, Smith SJ. The Centers for Disease Control-National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Lipid Standardization Program: an approach to accurate and precise lipid measurements.
Clin Lab Med.1989;9:105-135.Google Scholar 19.Rifai N, Tracy RP, Ridker PM. Clinical efficacy of an automated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein
assay.
Clin Chem.1999;45:2136-2141.Google Scholar 20.Sorescu D, Weiss D, Lassegue B.
et al. Superoxide production and expression of nox family proteins in human
atherosclerosis.
Circulation.2002;105:1429-1435.Google Scholar 22.Stroes E, Hijmering M, van Zandvoort M, Wever R, Rabelink TJ, van Faassen EE. Origin of superoxide production by endothelial nitric oxide synthase.
FEBS Lett.1998;438:161-164.Google Scholar 23.Daugherty A, Dunn JL, Rateri DL, Heinecke JW. Myeloperoxidase, a catalyst for lipoprotein oxidation, is expressed
in human atherosclerotic lesions.
J Clin Invest.1994;94:437-444.Google Scholar 24.Sugiyama S, Okada Y, Sukhova GK, Virmani R, Heinecke JW, Libby P. Macrophage myeloperoxidase regulation by granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating
factor in human atherosclerosis and implications in acute coronary syndromes.
Am J Pathol.2001;158:879-891.Google Scholar 25.Abu-Soud HM, Hazen SL. Nitric oxide modulates the catalytic activity of myeloperoxidase.
J Biol Chem.2000;275:5425-5430.Google Scholar 26.Eiserich JP, Baldus S, Brennan ML.
et al. Myeloperoxidase, a leukocyte-derived vascular NO oxidase.
Science.2002;296:2391-2394.Google Scholar 27.Abu-Soud HM, Hazen SL. Nitric oxide is a physiological substrate of plant and mammalian peroxidases.
Nitric Oxide.2000;4:179.Google Scholar 28.Galis ZS, Khatri JJ. Matrix metalloproteinases in vascular remodeling and atherogenesis:
the good, the bad, and the ugly.
Circ Res.2002;90:251-262.Google Scholar 29.Freedman JE, Ting B, Hankin B, Loscalzo J, Keaney JF, Vita Jr JA. Impaired platelet production of nitric oxide predicts presence of acute
coronary syndromes.
Circulation.1998;98:1481-1486.Google Scholar 30.Loscalzo J. Nitric oxide insufficiency, platelet activation, and arterial thrombosis.
Circ Res.2001;88:756-762.Google Scholar 31.Ridker PM, Rifai N, Pfeffer MA, Sacks F, Braunwald E.for the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) Investigators. Long-term effects of pravastatin on plasma concentration of C-reactive
protein.
Circulation.1999;100:230-235.Google Scholar 32.Ridker PM, Rifai N, Lowenthal SP. Rapid reduction in C-reactive protein with cerivastatin among 785 patients
with primary hypercholesterolemia.
Circulation.2001;103:1191-1193.Google Scholar 33.Ridker PM, Rifai N, Clearfield M.
et al. Measurement of C-reactive protein for the targeting of statin therapy
in the primary prevention of acute coronary events.
N Engl J Med.2001;344:1959-1965.Google Scholar 34.Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais G.for the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on
cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.
N Engl J Med.2000;342:145-153.Google Scholar 35. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin
in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Lancet.2002;360:7-22.Google Scholar 36.Pannala AS, Singh S, Rice-Evans C. Interaction of carotenoids and tocopherols with peroxynitrite.
Methods Enzymol.1999;301:319-332.Google Scholar 37.Podrez EA, Abu-Soud HM, Hazen SL. Myeloperoxidase-generated oxidants and atherosclerosis.
Free Radic Biol Med.2000;28:1717-1725.Google Scholar 38.Heinecke JW. Is the emperor wearing clothes? clinical trials of vitamin E and the
LDL oxidation hypothesis.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.2001;21:1261-1264.Google Scholar 39.Ceriello A, Mercuri F, Quagliaro L.
et al. Detection of nitrotyrosine in the diabetic plasma: evidence of oxidative
stress.
Diabetologia.2001;44:834-838.Google Scholar 40.Ceriello A, Taboga C, Tonutti L.
et al. Evidence for an independent and cumulative effect of postprandial hypertriglyceridemia
and hyperglycemia on endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress generation:
effects of short- and long-term simvastatin treatment.
Circulation.2002;106:1211-1218.Google Scholar