End-of-Life Practices in European Intensive Care Units: The Ethicus Study | Critical Care Medicine | JAMA | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.170.64.36. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Teres D. Trends from the United States with end of life decisions in the intensive care unit.  Intensive Care Med.1993;19:316-322.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=8227721Google Scholar
2.
Task Force on Ethics of The Society of Critical Care Medicine.  Consensus Statement on the ethics of foregoing life-sustaining treatments in the critically ill.  Crit Care Med.1990;18:1435-1439.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=2245622Google Scholar
3.
Richter J, Eisenmann M, Zgonnika E. Doctors' authoritarianism in end of life treatment decisions: a comparison between Russia, Sweden and Germany.  J Med Ethics.2001;27:186-191.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=11417027Google Scholar
4.
Vincent JL. Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: the results of an ethical questionnaire.  Crit Care Med.1999;27:1626-1633.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=10470775Google Scholar
5.
Ferrand E, Robert R, Ingrand P, Lemaire F. Withholding and withdrawing of life support in intensive care units in France: a prospective survey.  Lancet.2001;357:9-14.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=11197395Google Scholar
6.
Klessig J. The effect of values and culture on life-support decisions.  West J Med.1992;157:316-322.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=1413777Google Scholar
7.
Sprung CL, Eidelman LA, Pizov R. Changes in forgoing life-sustaining treatments in the United States: concern for the future.  Mayo Clin Proc.1996;71:512-516.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=8628034Google Scholar
8.
The Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee.  Attitudes of critical care medicine professionals concerning forgoing life-sustaining treatments.  Crit Care Med.1992;20:320-326.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=1541091Google Scholar
9.
Cook D, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R.  et al.  Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill.  JAMA.1995;273:703-708.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=7853627Google Scholar
10.
Prendergast TJ, Luce JM. Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med.1997;155:15-20.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=9001282Google Scholar
11.
Sprung CL, Eidelman LA. Worldwide similarities and differences in the forgoing of life-sustaining treatments.  Intensive Care Med.1996;22:1003-1005.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=8923060Google Scholar
12.
Wilson WC, Smedira NG, Fink C, McDowell JA, Luce JM. Ordering and administration of sedatives and analgesics during the withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patients.  JAMA.1992;267:949-953.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=1370853Google Scholar
13.
Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med.1998;158:1163-1167.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=9769276Google Scholar
14.
Keenan SP, Busche KD, Chen LM, McCarthy L, Inman KJ, Sibbald WJ. A retrospective review of a large cohort of patients undergoing the process of withholding or withdrawal of life support.  Crit Care Med.1997;25:1324-1331.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=9267945Google Scholar
15.
Keenan SP, Busche KD, Chen LM, ESmail R, Inman KJ, Sibbald WJ. Withdrawal and withholding of life support in the intensive care unit: a comparison of teaching and community hospitals.  Crit Care Med.1998;26:245-251.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=9468160Google Scholar
16.
Hall RI, Rocker GM. End of life care in the ICU: treatments provided when life support was or was not withdrawn.  Chest.2000;118:1424-1430.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=11083696Google Scholar
17.
Cook DJ, Guyatt G, Rocker G.  et al.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation directives on admission to intensive care unit: an international observational study.  Lancet.2001;358:1941-1945.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=11747918Google Scholar
18.
Vincent JL, Parquier JN, Preiser JP.  et al.  Terminal events in the intensive care unit: review of 258 fatal cases in one year.  Crit Care Med.1989;17:530-533.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=2721211Google Scholar
19.
Turner JS, Michell WL, Morgan CJ, Benatar SR. Limitation of life support: frequency and practice in a London and a Cape Town intensive care unit.  Intensive Care Med.1996;22:1020-1025.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=8923064Google Scholar
20.
Eidelman LA, Jakobson DJ, Pizov R, Geber D, Leibovitz L, Sprung CL. Forgoing life-sustaining treatment in an Israeli ICU.  Intensive Care Med.1998;24:162-166.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=9539075Google Scholar
21.
Esteban A, Gordo F, Solsona JP.  et al.  Withdrawing and withholding life support in the intensive care unit: a Spanish prospective multi-center observational study.  Intensive Care Med.2001;27:1744-1749.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=11810117Google Scholar
22.
van der Maas PJ, van der Wal G, Haverkate I, de Graaff CL, Kester JG, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, van der Heide A, Bosma JM, Willems DL. Euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and other medical practices involving the end of life in the Netherlands, 1990-1995.  N Engl J Med.1996;335:1699-1705.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=8929370Google Scholar
23.
Delliens L, Mortier F, Bilsen J.  et al.  End-of-life decisions in medical practice in Flanders, Belgium: a nationwide survey.  Lancet.2000;356:1806-1811.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=11117913Google Scholar
24.
McHaffie HE, Cuttini M, Brolz-Voit G.  et al.  Withholding/withdrawing treatment from neonates: legislation and official guidelines across Europe.  J Med Ethics.1999;25:440-446.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=10635495Google Scholar
25.
Christakis NA, Asch DA. Physician characteristics associated with decisions to withdraw life support.  Am J Public Health.1995;85:367-372.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=7892921Google Scholar
26.
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research.  Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: Ethical, Medical and Legal Issues in Treatment DecisionsWashington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1983.
27.
American Thoracic Society.  Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy.  Am Rev Respir Dis.1991;144:726-731.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=1892317Google Scholar
28.
Sprung CL, Eidelman LA, Pizov R.  et al.  Influence of alterations in forgoing life-sustaining treatment practices on a clinical sepsis trial.  Crit Care Med.1997;25:383-387.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=9118650Google Scholar
29.
Truog RD, Cist AFM, Brackett SE.  et al.  Recommendations for end of life care in the intensive care unit: The Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.  Crit Care Med.2001;29:2332-2348.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=11801837Google Scholar
30.
Quill TE. The ambiguity of clinical intentions.  N Engl J Med.1993;329:1039-1040.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=7690111Google Scholar
Caring for the Critically Ill Patient
August 13, 2003

End-of-Life Practices in European Intensive Care Units: The Ethicus Study

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (Dr Sprung); Department of Medicine, University College of London, London, England (Dr Cohen); Department of Anesthesiology, Orebro University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden, (Dr Sjokvist); Department of Social Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem (Dr Baras); Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark (Dr Bulow); Department of Anesthesiology, South Karelia Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland (Dr Hovilehto); Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium (Dr Ledoux); Department of Anesthesiology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark (Dr Lippert); Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Geral Santo Antonio, Porto, Portugal (Dr Maia); Department of Intensive Care, Mater Hospital University College, Dublin, Ireland (Dr Phelan); Division for General and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (Dr Schobersberger); Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden (Dr Wennberg); Critical Care Directorate, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom (Mr Woodcock). Dr Sjokvist is now with Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

 

Caring for the Critically Ill Patient Section Editor: Deborah J. Cook, MD, Consulting Editor, JAMA.

JAMA. 2003;290(6):790-797. doi:10.1001/jama.290.6.790
Abstract

Context While the adoption of practice guidelines is standardizing many aspects of patient care, ethical dilemmas are occurring because of forgoing life-sustaining therapies in intensive care and are dealt with in diverse ways between different countries and cultures.

Objectives To determine the frequency and types of actual end-of-life practices in European intensive care units (ICUs) and to analyze the similarities and differences.

Design and Setting A prospective, observational study of European ICUs.

Participants Consecutive patients who died or had any limitation of therapy.

Intervention Prospectively defined end-of-life practices in 37 ICUs in 17 European countries were studied from January 1, 1999, to June 30, 2000.

Main Outcome Measures Comparison and analysis of the frequencies and patterns of end-of-life care by geographic regions and different patients and professionals.

Results Of 31 417 patients admitted to ICUs, 4248 patients (13.5%) died or had a limitation of life-sustaining therapy. Of these, 3086 patients (72.6%) had limitations of treatments (10% of admissions). Substantial intercountry variability was found in the limitations and the manner of dying: unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 20% (range, 5%-48%), brain death in 8% (range, 0%-15%), withholding therapy in 38% (range, 16%-70%), withdrawing therapy in 33% (range, 5%-69%), and active shortening of the dying process in 2% (range, 0%-19%). Shortening of the dying process was reported in 7 countries. Doses of opioids and benzodiazepines reported for shortening of the dying process were in the same range as those used for symptom relief in previous studies. Limitation of therapy vs continuation of life-sustaining therapy was associated with patient age, acute and chronic diagnoses, number of days in ICU, region, and religion (P<.001).

Conclusion The limiting of life-sustaining treatment in European ICUs is common and variable. Limitations were associated with patient age, diagnoses, ICU stay, and geographic and religious factors. Although shortening of the dying process is rare, clarity between withdrawing therapies and shortening of the dying process and between therapies intended to relieve pain and suffering and those intended to shorten the dying process may be lacking.

×