Context Management of acne vulgaris by nondermatologists is increasing. Current
understanding of the different presentations of acne allows for individualized
treatments and improved outcomes.
Objective To review the best evidence available for individualized treatment of
acne.
Data Sources Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database to search for all
English-language articles on acne treatment from 1966 to 2004.
Study Selection Well-designed randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and other
systematic reviews are the focus of this article.
Data Extraction Acne literature is characterized by a lack of standardization with respect
to outcome measures and methods used to grade disease severity.
Data Synthesis Main outcome measures of 29 randomized double-blind trials that were
evaluated included reductions in inflammatory, noninflammatory, and total
acne lesion counts. Topical retinoids reduce the number of comedones and inflammatory
lesions in the range of 40% to 70%. These agents are the mainstay of therapy
in patients with comedones only. Other agents, including topical antimicrobials,
oral antibiotics, hormonal therapy (in women), and isotretinoin all yield
high response rates. Patients with mild to moderate severity inflammatory
acne with papules and pustules should be treated with topical antibiotics
combined with retinoids. Oral antibiotics are first-line therapy in patients
with moderate to severe inflammatory acne while oral isotretinoin is indicated
for severe nodular acne, treatment failures, scarring, frequent relapses,
or in cases of severe psychological distress. Long-term topical or oral antibiotic
therapy should be avoided when feasible to minimize occurrence of bacterial
resistance. Isotretinoin is a powerful teratogen mandating strict precautions
for use among women of childbearing age.
Conclusions Acne responses to treatment vary considerably. Frequently more than
1 treatment modality is used concomitantly. Best results are seen when treatments
are individualized on the basis of clinical presentation.
The management of acne vulgaris by nondermatologists is
increasing.1 In this article we attempt to answer the question:
what treatments in acne vulgaris have proven efficacy and how are these treatments
best administered and individualized to optimize results and minimize complications?
We considered the efficacy and safety of topical retinoids, topical antimicrobials,
systemic antibiotics, hormonal treatments for women, and oral isotretinoin.
A librarian-assisted literature search was performed for English-language
randomized clinical trials. We used MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify all therapeutic
clinical trials, meta-analyses, and systematic analyses concerning acne vulgaris
from 1966 to 2004. We further cross-referenced bibliographies of identified
articles. This search strategy identified 248 articles. We then evaluated
titles and abstracts, and excluded studies that were not blinded, were not
randomized, had sample sizes of fewer than 50, did not provide adequate information
with respect to objective outcomes measures, contained no original data, pertained
to treatments that are not available, did not involve humans, or were therapeutic
failures. We used the following search words: acne vulgaris, acne, tretinoin, tazarotene, adapalene, clindamycin, erythromycin, tetracycline, azelaic acid, benzoyl
peroxide, minocycline, doxycycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, flutamide, spironolactone, cyproterone-acetate, oral contraceptives, isotretinoin, clinical
trials, review, therapy, treatment, and randomized
controlled trials.
We identified 29 randomized double-blind trials, which comprise the
focus of this article. Where possible, data concerning responses to treatment
were put in terms of percent reduction of inflammatory lesions, noninflammatory
lesions (comedones), and total lesions.
A recent methodological literature review of acne therapy trials over
the last 50 years found that methods of grading acne severity and methods
of assessing outcome measures are highly inconsistent.2 There
are more than 25 methods of assessing acne severity and more than 19 methods
for counting lesions. Our literature review verifies the lack of standardized
of methodology. Nevertheless, analysis of acne therapy data does allow conclusions
to be drawn that can direct therapeutic decisions.
In addition to the randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we reviewed
selected articles that included data collected or analyzed after the trial,
including meta-analyses and other systematic reviews. We also mention selected
non-RCTs when they represent best evidence concerning established therapies
that have not yet been studied in well-designed RCTs.
Quiz Ref IDThe origin of acne vulgaris is complex and incompletely
understood. At least 4 pathophysiologic events take place within acne-infected
hair follicles: (1) androgen-mediated stimulation of sebaceous gland activity,
(2) abnormal keratinization leading to follicular plugging (comedo formation),
(3) proliferation of the bacterium Propionibacterium acnes within the follicle, and (4) inflammation. In addition to
these 4 basic mechanisms, genetic factors,3 stress,4 and possibly diet may influence the development and
severity of acne.5
Treatment of acne vulgaris
Retinoids, first shown in the 1970s to be of value for treating acne,
are derivatives of vitamin A that prevent comedone formation by normalizing
desquamation of follicular epithelium. The 3 main topical retinoids are tretinoin,
adapalene, and tazarotene.
Tretinoin has long been considered the gold standard with which new
products are compared. A meta-analysis of 5 multicenter randomized investigator-blinded
trials involving 900 patients6 confirmed that
total lesion counts reduced by 53% with tretinoin 0.05% gel and 57% with adapalene
0.1% gel (Table 1). Adapalene
gel causes less irritation than tretinoin 0.05% gel, 0.1% microspere gel,
or 0.05% cream.6-9 Tazarotene
0.1% gel had proven efficacy in an RCT showing 52% total acne reduction of
total lesions compared with 33% with vehicle.10 Tretinoin
was compared with tazarotene in a 12-week RCT with 169 patients.11 Tazarotene
0.1% gel produced reductions in acne severity of 36% vs 26% with tretinoin
0.1% gel (P = .02). In another comparison trial,
tazarotene 0.1% gel was more effective than tretinoin 0.025% gel in reducing
noninflammatory lesion counts (55% vs 42%; P = .042)
and equally effective in reducing inflammatory lesions.12 In
a multicenter RCT, adapalene 0.1% cream demonstrated a 38% reduction in total
lesion counts vs 20% with vehicle.13 In a 12-week
RCT with 145 patients tazarotene 0.1% gel was significantly better than adapalene
0.1% gel in terms of mean reductions in overall disease severity (44% vs 24%; P<.001), noninflammatory lesion count (71% vs 48%; P<.0001), and inflammatory lesion count (70% vs 55%; P = .0002).14 Alternate-day
application of tazarotene 0.1% gel was equally effective to daily adapalene
0.1% gel in a 15-week RCT15 (Table 1).
Tretinoin, is available as a gel (0.01% and 0.025%), cream (0.025%,
0.05%, and 0.1%), and liquid (0.05%). Cutaneous erythema, peeling, and edema
with tretinoin are dose-related adverse effects. Adapalene 0.1% is available
as a cream, gel, and solution, all with similar efficacy.16 Tazarotene
is available as 0.1% cream or gel formulations.
Quiz Ref IDIn summary, all topical retinoids effectively reduce
the number of comedones and inflammatory lesions in the range of 40% to 70%
(Table 1). Adapalene is less likely
to cause skin irritation and is better tolerated than tretinoin or tazarotene,
but tazarotene appears to be most efficacious.
Currently available topical antimicrobials include clindamycin, erythromycin,
tetracycline, and benzoyl peroxide. Azelaic acid may also be considered within
this group because it has demonstrated antibacterial activity against intrafollicular P acnes.17 Our discussion
focuses on 5 well-designed, randomized, double-blind trials assessing the
effectiveness of topical antibiotics in acne. Newer formulations have been
studied most rigorously.
Original placebo-controlled RCTs with clindamycin and erythromycin showed
a 46% to 70% reduction in inflammatory lesions18-21 (Table 1). In another RCT, an erythromycin–4%-zinc
combination reduced inflammatory lesions by 85% vs a 46% reduction using 2%
erythromycin alone (P<.001).22 Recent
interest has centered around combinations of topical antimicrobials with benzoyl
peroxide or retinoids. Support for combining erythromycin or clindamycin with
benzoyl peroxide includes a randomized, 10-week, multicenter, single-blind
trial that enrolled 492 patients in which treatment with the combination products
used twice daily was more effective than benzoyl peroxide alone.23 Additionally,
a review of 3 clinical studies involving 1259 patients concluded that the
combination of clindamycin 1% benzoyl–peroxide 5% was more effective
than either drug used alone in reducing lesions and suppressing P acnes.24 In 2 RCTs 334 patients were
treated once nightly with either a combination clindamycin–benzoyl peroxide
gel, benzoyl peroxide alone, clindamycin alone, or vehicle25 (Table 1). After 11 weeks, 66% of patients
in the clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide group experienced a good or excellent
response compared with 41% in the benzoyl peroxide group, 36% in the clindamycin
group, and 10% in the vehicle group. A similar 16-week trial showed a 53%
lesion reduction with clindamycin 1% benzoyl–peroxide 5% vs 28% with
clindamycin alone (P = .013).26
Combining topical antibiotics with topical retinoids is also effective.
Adapalene gel 0.1% plus clindamycin 1% was studied in a 12-week RCT involving
249 patients with mild to moderate acne. A significantly greater reduction
in total (P<.001), inflammatory (P = .004), and noninflammatory lesions (P<.001)
was seen in the clindamycin-plus-adapalene group than in the clindamycin-plus-vehicle
group.27 Other trials with clindamycin-tretinoin
and erythromycin-tretinoin have shown similar results.28-32
Azelaic acid 20%, in an RCT that enrolled patients with moderate acne
resulted in a 72% reduction of inflammatory lesions vs 47% with placebo.33 Two RCTs compared oral tetracycline with topical
azelaic acid 20%.34 Reductions in inflammatory
lesion counts were 83% for azelaic acid and 86% for oral tetracycline in one
study and 79% for both drugs in another (Table 1). The efficacy of azelaic acid in mild to moderate acne
matches that of tretinoin 0.05%, benzoyl peroxide 5%, or topical erythromycin
2%.17
Adverse effects of topical antibiotics include erythema, peeling, dryness,
and burning.35 Benzoyl peroxide can also cause
an irritant dermatitis and bleach hair, clothes, and bed linens. Quiz Ref IDA recent consensus has recommended that topical antibiotics should
not be used alone due to the potential for bacterial resistance and relatively
slow onset of action.35 Antimicrobial resistance
with benzoyl peroxide or azelaic acid has not been reported. Combining
antibiotics with benzoyl peroxide is the most common practice. A minimum of
6 to 8 weeks of treatment is recommended.35
Quiz Ref IDSystemic antibiotics used in acne vulgaris have both
antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties. They reduce P acnes within follicles, thereby inhibiting production of bacterial-induced
inflammatory cytokines.36 Tetracycline and
erythromycin suppress leukocyte chemotaxis37 and
bacterial lipase activity38 while minocycline
and doxycycline inhibit cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases thought to
contribute to inflammation and tissue breakdown.39 The
main systemic antibiotics used in acne vulgaris are tetracycline, doxycycline,
minocycline, and erythromycin.
Relatively few RCTs have studied the use of oral antibiotics in treating
acne. A 12-week RCT involving 200 patients40 showed
a reduction in inflammatory lesions by 64% with tetracycline vs 67% with erythromycin
and a reduction in noninflammatory lesion counts by 34% with tetracycline
vs 22% with erythromycin (Table 2).
In another comparison trial topical clindamycin 1% showed a 72% reduction
vs a 57% reduction using oral tetracycline and a 12% reduction with placebo.41
Doxycycline was recently studied in a RCT in which 51 patients received
either a submicrobicidal dose (20 mg twice daily) for 6 months or placebo.
Mean reduction in total lesions was 52% with doxycycline vs 18% with placebo
(P<.01; Table
2).42 Even low doses of doxycycline
may be effective by inhibition of collagenases including matrix metalloproteinases.39 Doxycycline is frequently dosed at 100 mg/d for acne
treatment although best evidence for those doses comes from small studies.43
The efficacy of minocycline was assessed in a Cochrane review,43 which concluded that minocycline is an effective
therapy for moderate acne, but its efficacy compared with other acne therapies
could not be reliably determined due to methodological flaws in the comparative
trials. In a 3-month double-blind RCT, minocycline was somewhat more effective
in reducing inflammatory lesion counts compared with zinc gluconate (67% vs
50%; P<.001).44 Antimicrobial
effects against P acnes are greater with minocycline
than with doxycycline or tetracycline,45 and
higher lipid solubility favors its bioavailability in pilosebaceous units.
Oral tetracycline is usually prescribed at a dosage of 500 mg twice
a day. The absorption of tetracycline is reduced by food and dairy products;
therefore, it must be taken on an empty stomach. Adverse effects include gastrointestinal
tract dyspepsia, vaginal candidiasis in women, and a small risk of photosensitivity.
In children younger than 10 years, tetracycline can cause enamel hypoplasia
and a yellowish discoloration of the forming teeth.46 Doxycycline
has traditionally been used at a dose of 50 to 100 mg twice daily. Success
with 20 mg/d may change clinical practice over time.42 Doxycycline
causes gastrointestinal tract upset and is more likely than tetracycline to
cause photosensitivity.46 Doxycycline can be
taken with food. Tetracyclines should not be taken immediately before sleep
because the pills may lodge in the esophagus and cause ulceration.
Minocycline is prescribed in a dosage range of 50 to 100 mg twice daily.
Adverse effects include vertigo, dizziness, ataxia, and rarely a bluish discoloration
of the skin.46 Minocycline has also been reported
to be associated with drug induced lupus, autoimmune hepatitis, and a hypersensitivity
syndrome.47 The relative risk of developing
a lupuslike syndrome with minocycline is 8.5 (95% confidence interval [CI],
2.1-35.0) compared with 1.7 (95% CI, 0.4-8.1) for other tetracyclines.48
Antibiotic-resistant strains of P acnes have
increased steadily since the 1970s and are now found in more than 50% of cases
in Europe and the United Kingdom.49 Resistance
of P acnes to oral antibiotics is associated with
treatment failures.50 The effect of resistance
to P acnes with topical antimicrobial use is unclear.51 Resistance to tetracyclines is less common than to
erythromycin49 and is least with minocycline.52
Recommendations for reducing antibiotic resistance in acne have been
published recently and include using combined topical therapy—such as
retinoids, benzoyl peroxide, or both when using topical antibiotics—and
avoiding long-term use of topical or oral antibiotics when feasible.35
Hormonal treatments for acne are tolerated in women only. These treatments,
which decrease androgen expression, are based on the requirement for androgens
in the pathophysiologic development of acne.53,54 A
direct relationship between levels of circulating androgens and acne severity
has not been established although prior studies suggest some degree of hyperandrogenemia
in women with acne.55-57
Antiandrogenic compounds include oral contraceptives (OCs) and androgen-receptor
blockers such as flutamide, spironolactone, and cyproterone acetate. Several
OCs are now approved for use in acne. All contain 35 µg of estrogen
or less. None of the androgen-receptor blockers are approved by the US Food
and Drug Administration for use in the treatment of acne.
Oral contraceptives suppress ovarian androgens and reduce bioavailable
testosterone by an estrogen-mediated increase in steroid hormone binding globulin.
After 6 months, 2 multicenter RCTs involving 507 women with moderate acne
found that triphasic norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol (EE, Orthotri-cyclin
[Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical Inc, Raritan, NJ]) had decreased inflammatory
lesions by approximately 50% compared with a 30% reduction with placebo.58,59 Two RCTs studying the efficacy of
20 µg of EE plus 100 µg of levonorgestrel (Alesse [Wyeth, Madison,
NJ]) showed total acne improvement of 23% to 40% compared with 9% to 23% with
placebo (Table 2).60,61 A
recent RCT involving 128 women showed an acne-lesion count reduction of 63%
using the combination drugs of 35 µg of EE plus 3 mg of drospirenone
(Yasmin [Berlex, Montreal, Quebec]) and a 59% reduction using 35 µg
of EE plus 2 mg of cyproterone acetate (Diane-35 [Berlex]).62 Neither
Alesse nor Yasmin is marketed for acne although both are used extensively
for that indication.
Outside of the United States, the OC containing 35 µg of EE plus
2 mg of cyproterone acetate is the combination to which newer OCs have usually
been compared for acne treatment. The progestin, cyproterone is an effective
androgen-receptor blocker when used at higher doses in men with prostate cancer63 and in women with acne, hirsutism, and polycystic
ovary syndrome.64 Best evidence for the use
of this combination for acne comes from open studies or comparison trials
with newer OCs containing levonorgestrel, drospirenone, and desogestrel. At
least 60% improvement was demonstrated with all the above OCs.62,65,66 In
Europe, the antiandrogen–progestin chlormadinone has been combined with
EE in an oral contraceptive (Belara [Grunenthal, Aachen, Germany]) and has
been shown to be superior to an OC containing levonorgestrel in treating acne.67
Safety profiles are reasonable for OCs containing 35 µg of EE
or less. Cardiovascular risks are not significantly increased in nonsmokers,68 and breast cancer risks have not been shown to be
increased overall.69 The risk of deep-vein
thrombosis increases from 1 per 10 000 woman-years to 3.4 per 10 000
woman-years during the first year and decreases therafter.70 Contraindications
to using OCs in an otherwise healthy woman include smoking, migraine headaches
with aura, and hypertension.71
Androgen-receptor blockers used in acne include spironolactone, flutamide,
and cyproterone acetate. Spironolactone is well established as an aldosterone-blocking
agent at doses of 25 mg/d in patients with heart failure.72 Higher
doses (50-100 mg/d) are required for androgen-receptor blockade. Cyproterone
acetate, in addition to being used as the progestin in the OC Diane-35, is
used in doses of 50 to 100 mg/d in women with hirsutism (not available in
the United States). Flutamide, a nonsteroidal androgen-receptor blocker commonly
used in prostate cancer is used in women with hirsutism and acne at doses
of 250 to 500 mg/d.
Best evidence for the use of spironolactone in acne comes from 4 studies
in which spironolactone alone or as an adjunct in doses of 50 to 200 mg/d
showed 50% to 70% improvement of acne.73-76 A
randomized comparison study of 53 participants showed a 50% improvement in
acne and seborrhea among those who received a combination of 100 mg/d of spironolactone
with an OC vs an 80% improvement among those who received 250 mg of flutamide
with an OC.77 Together with OCs, cyproterone
acetate 50 to 100 mg/d is also effective in treating acne.78,79 Cyproterone
acetate is, however, most commonly used in the low-dose formulation (2 mg)
as part of an oral contraceptive.
Isotretinoin, a naturally occurring metabolite of vitamin A, inhibits
sebaceous gland differentiation and proliferation, reduces sebaceous gland
size, suppresses sebum production, and normalizes follicular epithelial desquamation.
Isotretinoin is indicated in severe nodular acne and acne unresponsive to
other therapies. It is used at a dosage of 0.5 to 1 mg/kg per day with a cumulative
dosage of 120 to 150 mg/kg over a 4- to 6-month treatment period.
Isotretinoin was first shown to be effective in a nonrandomized clinical
trial at an average dose of 2 mg/kg per day for 4 months in 14 patients with
severe acne.80 Complete clearing occurred in
13 of 14 patients and all 14 had prolonged remissions. A dose-response RCT
involving 76 patients showed that at 4 months, total acne lesions were reduced
by 80% with a treatment of 0.1 mg/kg per day or 0.5 mg/kg per day and by 89%
with 1.0 mg/kg per day.81 A significantly greater
treatment failure rate (45%) was observed with the lowest dose (0.1 mg/kg
per day dosage). A related dose-comparison trial in 150 patients found that
retreatment was required in 42% of patients receiving 0.1 mg/kg per day and
only 10% of patients receiving 1 mg/kg per day (Table 2).82 A new micronized formulation
of isotretinoin (0.4 mg/kg per day) was equivalent in efficacy and safety
to standard isotretinoin (1 mg/kg per day).83,84
A 10-year follow-up of 88 patients who received isotretinoin in an initial
dose of 0.5 or 1 mg/kg per day showed that 23% required a second course of
isotretinoin,85 usually within 3 years of stopping
therapy. The daily and cumulative dosage was an important factor in determining
relapse rate. Patients receiving 0.5 mg/kg per day had a relapse rate of 39%
vs 22% in those taking 1 mg/kg per day (P<.05).
A cumulative dosage of less than 120 mg/kg had a significantly higher relapse
rate than those given a larger dose (82% vs 30%, respectively; P<.01). A recent chart review of 179 patients who had received 1
course of isotretinoin revealed that at the 3-year follow up, 35% had no recurrence;
16% required topical therapy; 27% required the use of oral antibiotics, and
23% required more isotretinoin.86
Adverse effects of isotretinoin include dry lips, dry skin, dry eyes,
decreased night vision, headache, epistaxis, and backache. Less common adverse
effects include benign intracranial hypertension, so therapy must be stopped
if a patient experiences persistent headaches. Isotretinoin can also be associated
with a mild to moderate elevation in liver enzymes and in serum lipid indices,
especially triglycerides.87 It is generally
well accepted that baseline cholesterol, fasting triglycerides, and liver
function tests be done. Follow-up tests are recommended at weeks 4 and 8.
If these test results are normal, further testing at week 12 may not be necessary.
Quiz Ref IDIsotretinoin is a proven teratogen, and its use necessitates
adequate contraception during and 6 weeks after therapy, as well as baseline
and monthly pregnancy tests. Major malformations occur in 40% of infants exposed
to isotretinoin in the first trimester.88 It
is strongly recommended that patients have 2 negative pregnancy tests before
starting isotretinoin and regular monthly pregnancy tests thereafter. Current
prescribing regulations in the United States require physicians to identify
on each prescription that patients have met the above qualifications and have
signed a consent form. Further measures are being discussed to mandate a single,
centralized registration and tracking system for all health care professionals
involved with isotretinoin. A recent evidence-based review examined the issue
of an increasing number of reported cases of depression and suicide associated
with isotretinoin.89 Epidemiological evidence
for an association between isotretinoin and depression is currently lacking.89 Furthermore, there is a 24.7% and 13.3% prevalence
of anxiety and depression, respectively, in patients with acne.90 Until
well-designed studies are conducted, patients and their relatives must be
informed about depressive symptoms, and screening for depression should be
an essential part of each visit.
Case-based clinical applications
The diagnosis of acne vulgaris is usually uncomplicated. Differential
diagnoses mainly include rosacea, perioral dermatitis, bacterial folliculitis,
and drug-induced acneiform eruptions. The presence of comedones confirms the
diagnosis of acne vulgaris.
Evidence-based literature in acne treatment is growing, and there is
sufficient evidence to justify specific treatments for most clinical presentations.
Successful outcomes frequently require nuance in management and a thorough
understanding of all treatment modalities. Good outcomes are based on what
is perceived by the patient as well as what can be measured. Since morbidity
in acne is primarily emotional (psychological), different degrees of success
may satisfy different individuals. Acne severity fluctuates over time and
treatments often need to change accordingly.
For this treatment, topical retinoids are the mainstay of treatment.
Choices include tretinoin, adapalene, and tazarotene (Figure 1, A). Treatment response expectations are in the range of
a 40% to 70% reduction in number of comedones within 12 weeks.6,11,14 Creams
and lower concentrations of retinoids are less irritating but may take longer
for a response than higher concentrations and gels. Short-contact therapy,
starting with 30 seconds and building up to 1 hour or more followed by washing,
was demonstrated effective and safe in a study with tazarotene gel91 and could be considered with all topical retinoids.
Application should be to the entire area of involvement. Maintenance treatment
is usually required.
Inflammatory Acne (Papules and Pustules), Mild to Moderate Severity
Topical antibiotics are the treatment of choice for these patients (Figure 1, B). Choices include benzoyl peroxide,
azelaic acid, clindamycin, erythromycin, and dual agents combining benzoyl
peroxide with either erythromycin or clindamycin. Current recommendations
favor combining topical antimicrobial products with topical retinoids if they
can be tolerated by patients.27,35,92 Benzoyl
peroxide, 2% to 10%, is an inexpensive and effective antimicrobial that is
not associated with antimicrobial resistance.93 The
dual-agent products combining topical antibiotics (clindamycin, erythromycin)
with benzoyl peroxide are more effective than antibiotics alone.23-25,93 Best
results require 8 to 12 weeks and maintenance therapy is usually required.
Reasonable response expectations are in the range of 30% to 80%.17-20,25,26
Moderate to Severe Inflammatory Acne
Oral antibiotics including the tetracyclines (minocycline, doxycycline,
tetracycline) are the first-line choices (Figure 1, C). Erythromycin is recommended less often because of
its association with resistant P acnes.94 Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxizole
has been reported to be successful, but there is an unacceptably high risk
of severe adverse events. Response expectations with oral antibiotics are
in the range of 64% to 86%.34,40
All oral antibiotics require a minimum of 6 to 8 weeks of treatment.
There are no strict regulations on duration of use, but the recent increase
in the prevalence of resistant organisms has resulted in current recommendations
to encourage using antibiotics for shorter periods and to avoid the long-term
use of antibiotics for maintenance therapy.35
Severe Papulonodular Acne
Oral isotretinoin is indicated for severe papulonodular acne (Figure 1, D), treatment failures, scarring,
or frequently relapsing acne or in cases where psychological distress is severe.
Isotretinoin is used as a single-drug therapy except for women for whom concomitant
OCs are strongly recommended. Best responses are seen with daily doses of
1 mg/kg per day for a period of 20 weeks or a total accumulative dose of 120
mg/kg.85
A rare adverse effect of isotretinoin is called acne fulminans, characterized
by extensive erosive lesions, fever, arthralgias, and leukocytosis. Treatment
requires systemic corticosteroids. In a recent report of 25 cases of acne
fulminans, best responses were seen with 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg of prednisone daily
for 4 to 6 weeks, with isotretinoin resumed on week 4, starting with 0.5 mg/kg
per day and increasing gradually.95
Hormonal treatments with OCs or androgen-receptor blockers have been
shown to be helpful and are reviewed elsewhere.96 For
a woman with acne who desires birth control, OCs are an excellent initial
choice. Oral contraceptives do not preclude using standard therapies if indicated.
Approved OCs for use for acne include Orthotri-cyclin (in the United States
and Canada), Estrostep (in the United States [Pfizer, New York, NY), and Diane-35
(Canada). The results of RCTs and other best evidence, expected improvement
with OCs alone is from 40% to greater than 70% (Table 3).
For those who do not respond to OCs, androgen-receptor blockers, alone
or as adjuncts to OCs, have response expectation in the range of 50% to 80%.
A treatment dosage of 50 to 100 mg/d of Spironolactone is well tolerated,
with adverse effects including diuretic effect, breast tenderness, and menstrual
irregularities if OCs are not used concomitantly.97 Another
well-tolerated treatment is 250 mg/d flutamide . Its potential adverse effects
include gastrointestinal tract upset and, at higher doses, hepatotoxicity.
Periodic liver function tests are recommended with any dose of flutamide.
Similar to spironolactone is 50 to 100 mg/d of cyproterone acetate. Hepatotoxicity
has been reported rarely in men receiving cyproterone acetate for prostate
cancer98 and in women receiving OCs containing
cyproterone acetate.99 Hormonal treatments
for acne treatment are usually prolonged, depending on response and tolerance.
For women with regular menstrual cycles, serum-androgen measurements
are not necessary. For those with rapid onset of hyperandrogenism and virilization,
an androgen-secreting ovarian or adrenal tumor can be excluded with a normal
total testosterone and dehydroepiandosterone sulfate levels, respectively.
Irregular menses, hirsutism, obesity, or a family history of type 2 diabetes
suggest a possible endocrinopathy, such as polycystic ovary syndrome. Further
studies may be indicated, which could include measurement of gonadotropins,
free testosterone, 17-hydroxy progesterone, prolactin, and androstenedione.57,100 Unfortunately, there is no widely
accepted best laboratory test in this setting.101
Current treatments in acne target one or more of the known mechanisms
involved in the disease. Combining more than 1 treatment frequently yields
optimal responses. Patients may require adjustment of therapies depending
on their degree of improvement and level of tolerance to the treatments.
1.Stern RS. Acne therapy: medication use and sources of care in office-base practice.
Arch Dermatol.1996;132:776-780.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8678569&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 2.Lehmann HP, Robinson KA, Andrews JS.
et al. Acne therapy: a methodologic review.
J Am Acad Dermatol.2002;47:231-240.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12140469&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 3.Bataille V, Snieder H, MacGregor AJ, Sasieni P, Spector TD. The influence of genetics and environmental factors in the pathogenesis
of acne: a twin study of acne in women.
J Invest Dermatol.2002;119:1317-1322.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12485434&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 4.Goulden V, McGeown CH, Cunliffe WJ. The familial risk of adult acne: a comparison between first-degree
relatives of affected and unaffected individuals.
Br J Dermatol.1999;141:297-300.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10468803&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 5.Cordain L, Lindeberg s, Hurtado M, Hill K, Eaton SB, Brand-Miller J. Acne vulgaris: a disease of western civilization.
Arch Dermatol.2002;138:1584-1590.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12472346&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 6.Cunliffe WJ, Poncet M, Loesche C.
et al. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of adapalene 0.1% gel
vs tretinoin 0.025% gel in patients with acne vulgaris: a meta analysis of
five randomized trials.
Br J Dermatol.1998;139(suppl 52):48-56.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9990421&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 7.Egan N, Loesche MC, Baker MM. Randomized controlled bilateral (split-face) comparison trial of the
tolerability and patient preference of adapalene gel 0.1% and tretinoin microsphere
gel 0.1% for the treatment of acne vulgaris.
Cutis.2001;68(suppl 4):20-24.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11845944&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 8.Thiboutot D, Gold MH, Jarratt MT.
et al. Randomized controlled trial of the tolerability, safety and efficacy
of adapalene gel 0.1% and tretinoin microsphere gel 0.1% for the treatment
of acne vulgaris.
Cutis.2001;68(suppl 4):10-19.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11845943&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 9.Cunliffe WJ, Danby FW, Dunlap F.
et al. Randomised controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of adapalene
gel 0.1% and tretinoin cream 0.05% in patients with acne vulgaris.
Eur J Dermatol.2002;12:350-354.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12095880&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 10.Shalita AR, Chalker DK, Griffith RF.
et al. Tazarotene gel is safe and effective in the treatment of acne vulgaris:
a multicenter, double blind, vehicle controlled study.
Cutis.1999;63:349-354.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10388959&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 11.Leyden JL, Tanghetti EA, Miller B.
et al. Once daily tazarotene 0.1% gel versus once daily tretinoin 0.1% microsponge
gel for the treatment of facial acne vulgaris: a double blind randomized trial.
Cutis.2002;69(suppl 2):12-19.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12095064&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 12.Webster GF, Berson D, Stein LF.
et al. Efficacy and tolerability of once daily tazarotene 0.1% gel versus
once daily tretinoin 0.025% gel in the treatment of facial acne vulgaris:
a randomized trial.
Cutis.2001;67(suppl 6):4-9.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11499329&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 13.Lucky A, Jorizzo JL, Rodriguez D.
et al. Efficacy and tolerance of adapalene cream 0.1% compared with its cream
vehicle for the treatment of acne vulgaris.
Cutis.2001;68:34-40.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11845946&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 14.Webster GF, Guenther L, Poulin YP.
et al. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized comparison study of the efficacy
and tolerability of once daily tazarotene 0.1% gel and adapalene 0.1% gel
for the treatment of facial acne vulgaris.
Cutis.2002;69(suppl 2):4-11.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12095066&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 15.Leyden J, Lowe N, Kakita L, Draelos Z. Comparison of treatment of acne vulgaris with alternate-day applications
of tazarotene 0.1% gel and once-daily applications of adapalene 0.1% gel:
a randomized trial.
Cutis.2001;67:10-16.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11499327&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 16.Ellis CN, Millikan LE, Smith EB.
et al. Comparison of adapalene 0.1% solution and tretinoin 0.025% gel in the
topical treatment of acne vulgaris.
Br J Dermatol.1998;139(suppl 52):41-47.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9990420&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 17.Graupe K, Cunliffe WJ, Gollnick HP, Zaumseil RP. Efficacy and safety of topical azelaic acid (20 percent cream): an
overview of results from European clinical trials and experimental reports.
Cutis.1996;57(suppl 1):20-35.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8654128&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 18.Becker LE, Bergstresser PR, Whiting DA.
et al. Topical clindamycin therapy for acne vulgaris.
Arch Dermatol.1981;117:482-485.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6455095&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 19.Dobson RL, Belknap BS. Topical erythromycin solution in acne.
J Am Acad Dermatol.1980;3:478-482.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6452463&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 20.Lesher JL, Chalker DK, Smith JG.
et al. An evaluation of a 2% erythromycin ointment in the topical therapy
of acne vulgaris.
J Am Acad Dermatol.1985;12:526-531.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3157709&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 21.Jones L, Crumley AF. Topical erythromycin vs blank vehicle in a multiclinic acne study.
Arch Dermatol.1981;117:551-553.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6457568&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 22.Habbema L, Koopmans B, Menke HE.
et al. A 4% erythromycin and zinc combination (Zineryt) versus 2% erythromycin
(Eryderm) in acne vulgaris: a randomized, double blind comparative study.
Br J Dermatol.1989;121:497-502.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2533878&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 23.Leyden JL, Hickman JG, Jarratt MT.
et al. The efficacy and safety of a combination benzoyl peroxide/clindamycin
topical gel compared with benzoyl peroxide alone and a benzoyl peroxide/erythromycin
combination product.
J Cutan Med Surg.2001;5(1):37-42.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11281433&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 24.Ellis CN, Leyden J, Katz HI.
et al. Therapeutic studies with a new combination benzoyl peroxide/clindamycin
topical gel in acne vulgaris.
Cutis.2001;67(suppl 2):13-20.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11236210&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 25.Lookingbill DP, Chalker DK, Lindholm JS.
et al. Treatment of acne with a combination clindaymycin/benzoyl peroxide
gel compared with clindamycin gel, benzoyl peroxide gel and vehicle gel: combined
results of two double blind investigations.
J Am Acad Dermatol.1997;37:590-595.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9344199&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 26.Cunliffe WJ, Holland KT, Bojar R.
et al. A randomized double blind comparison of clindamycin phosphate/benzoyl
peroxide gel formulation and a matching clindamycin gel with respect to microbiologic
activity and clinical efficacy in the topical treatment of acne vulgaris.
Clin Ther.2002;24:1117-1133.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12182256&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 27.Wolf Jr JE, Kaplan D, Kraus SJ.
et al. Efficacy and tolerability of combined topical treatment of acne vulgaris
with adapalene and clindamycin: a multicenter, randomized investigator blinded
study.
J Am Acad Dermatol.2003;49:S211-S217.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12963897&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 28.Richter JR, Bousema MT, De Boulle KLVM.
et al. Efficacy of a fixed clindamycin phosphate 1.2%, tretinoin 0.025% gel
formulation (Velac) in the topical control of facial acne lesions.
J Dermatol Treat.1998;9:81-90.Google Scholar 29.Richter JR, Forstrom LR, Kiistala UO, Jung EG. Efficacy of the fixed 1.2% clindamycin phosphate, 0.025% tretinoin
gel formulation (Velac) and a proprietary 0.025% tretinoin gel formulation
(Aberela) in the topical control of facial acne.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.1998;11:227-233.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9883434&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 30.Rietschel RL, Duncan SH. Clindamycin phosphate used in combination with tretinoin in the treatment
of acne.
Int J Dermatol.1983;22:41-43.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6219964&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 31.Mills Jr OH, Kligman AM. Treatment of acne vulgaris with topically applied erythromycin and
tretinoin.
Acta Derm Venereol.1978;58:555-557.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=83088&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 32.Korting HC, Braun-Falco O. Efficacy and tolerability of combined topical treatment of acne vulgaris
with tretinoin and erythromycin in general practice.
Drugs Exp Clin Res.1989;15:447-451.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2534292&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 33.Katsambas A, Graupe K, Stratigos J. Clinical studies of 20% azelaic acid cream in the treatment of acne
vulgaris: comparison with vehicle and topical tretinoin.
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh).1989;143(suppl):35-39.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2528257&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 34.Hjorth N, Graupe K. Azelaic acid for the treatment of acne: a clinical comparison with
oral tetracycline.
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh).1989;143(suppl):45-48.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2528259&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 35.Gollnick H, Cunliffe WJ, Berson D.
et al. Management of acne: a report from a Global Alliance to Improve Outcomes
in Acne.
J Am Acad Dermatol.2003;49(suppl 1):S1-S37.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12833004&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 36.Vowels BR, Yang S, Leyden JJ. Induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines by a soluble factor of propionibacterium
acnes: implications for chronic inflammatory acne.
Infect Immun.1995;63:3158-3165.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7542639&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 37.Esterly NB, Furey NL, Flanagan LE. The effect of antimicrobial agents on chemotaxis.
J Invest Dermatol.1978;70:51-55.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=618981&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 38.Webster GF, McGinley KJ, Leyden JJ. Inhibition of lipase production in Propionibacterium acnes by subminimal
inhibitory concentrations of tetracycline and erythromycin.
Br J Dermatol.1981;104:453-457.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6786318&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 39.Golub LM, Lee HM, Ryan ME.
et al. Tetracyclines inhibit connective tissue breakdown by multiple nonantimicrobial
mechanisms.
Adv Dent Res.1998;12:12-26.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9972117&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 40.Gammon WR, Meyer C, Lantis S.
et al. Comparative efficacy of oral erythromycin versus oral tetracycline
in the treatment of acne vulgaris.
J Am Acad Dermatol.1986;14:183-186.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2936772&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 41.Braathen LR. Topical clindamycin versus oral tetracycline and placebo in acne vulgaris.
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl.1984;43:71-75.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6242073&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 42.Skidmore R, Kovach R, Walker C.
et al. Effects of subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline in the treatment of moderate
acne.
Arch Dermatol.2003;139:459-464.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12707093&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 43.Garner SE, Eady EA, Popescu Not Available.
et al. Minocycline for acne vulgaris: efficacy and safety [Cochrane Database
System Review]. Oxford: England: Cochrane Library; 2002;issue 2:CD002086. Review
update: Cochrane Database System Review. 2003:issue 1:CD002086.
44.Dreno B, Moyse D, Alirezai M.
et al. Multicenter randomized comparative double blind controlled clinical
trial of the safety and efficacy of zinc gluconate versus minocycline hydrochloride
in the treatment of inflammatory acne vulgaris.
Dermatology.2001;203:135-140.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11586012&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 45.Leyden JJ, Kaidbey K, Gans EH. The antimicrobial effects in vivo of minocycline, doxycycline and tetracycline
in humans.
J Dermatol Treat.1996;7:223-225.Google Scholar 46.Tan HH. Antibacterial therapy for acne.
Am J Clin Dermatol.2003;4:307-314.Google Scholar 47.Elkayam O, Yaron M, Capsi D. Minocycline induced autoimmune syndromes: an overview.
Semin Arthritis Rheum.1999;28:392-397.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10406406&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 48.Sturkenboom MC, Meier CR, Jick H.
et al. Minocycline and lupus like syndrome in acne patients.
Arch Intern Med.1999;159:493-497.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10074958&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 49.Ross JI, Snelling AM, Carnegie E.
et al. Antibiotic resistant acne: lessons from Europe.
Br J Dermatol.2003;148:467-478.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12653738&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 50.Eady AE, Cove JH, Holland KT, Cunliffe WJ. Erythromycin resistant propionibacteria in antibiotic treated acne
patients: association with therapeutic failure.
Br J Dermatol.1989;121:51-57.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2527056&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 51.Eady AE, Cove JH, Layton AM. Is antibiotic resistance in cutaneous propionibacteria clinically relevant?
implications of resistance for acne patients and prescribers.
Am J Clin Dermatol.2003;4:813-831.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=14640775&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 52.Eady AE, Jones CE, Gardner KJ.
et al. Tetracycline resistant propionibacteria from acne patients are cross
resistant to doxycycline but sensitive to minocycline.
Br J Dermatol.1993;128:556-560.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8504049&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 53.Hamilton JB. Male hormone substance: a prime factor in acne.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab.1941;1:570-592.Google Scholar 54.Pochi PE, Strauss JS, Mescon H. Sebum secretion and urinary fractional 17-ketosteroid and total 17-hydoxycorticoid
excretion in male castrates.
J Invest Dermatol.1962;39:475-83.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=13944137&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 55.Lookingbill DP, Horton R, Demers LM.
et al. Tissue production of androgens in women with acne.
J Am Acad Dermatol.1985;12:481-487.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3157707&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 56.Thiboutot D, Gilliland K, Light J.
et al. Androgen metabolism in sebaceous glands from subjects with and without
acne.
Arch Dermatol.1999;135:1041-1045.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10490108&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 57.Cibula D, Hill M, Vohradnikova O.
et al. The role of androgens in determining acne severity in adult women.
Br J Dermatol.2000;143:399-404.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10951152&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 58.Lucky AW, Henderson TA, Olson WH.
et al. Effectiveness of norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol in treating moderate
acne vulgaris.
J Am Acad Dermatol.1997;37:746-754.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9366821&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 59.Redmond GP, Olson WH, Lippman JS.
et al. Norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol in the treatment of acne vulgaris:
a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Obstet Gynecol.1997;89:615-622.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9083323&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 60.Thiboutot D, Archer DF, Lemay A.
et al. Randomized, controlled trial of a low-dose contraceptive containing
20 microg of ethinyl estradiol and 100 microg of levonorgestrel for acne treatment.
Fertil Steril.2001;76:461-468.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11532465&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 61.Leyden JJ, Shalita A, Hordinsky M.
et al. Efficacy of a low-dose oral contraceptive containing 20 microg of ethinyl
estradiol and 100 microg of levonorgestrel for the treatment of moderate acne:
a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
J Am Acad Dermatol.2002;47:399-409.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12196750&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 62.van Vloten WA, van Haselen CW, van Zuuren EJ, Gerlinger C, Heithecker R. The effect of 2 combined oral contraceptives containing either drospirenone
or cyproterone acetate on acne and seborrhea.
Cutis.2002;69(suppl 4):2-15.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12096825
Google Scholar 63.Schroder FH, Whelan P, de Reijke TM.
et al. Metastatic prostate cancer treated by flutamide versus cyproterone
acetate: final analysis of the "European organization for research and treatment
of cancer" (EORTC) protocol 30892.
Eur Urol.2004;45:457-464.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15041109&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 64.Falsetti L, Gambera A, Tisi G. Efficacy of the combination ethinyl oestradiol and cyproterone acetate
on endocrine, clinical and ultrasonographic profile in polycystic ovarian
syndrome.
Hum Reprod.2001;16:36-42.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11139533&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 65.Vartiainen M, de Gezelle H, Broekmeulen CJ. Comparison of the effect on acne with a combiphasic desogestrel-containing
oral contraceptive and a preparation containing cyproterone acetate.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care.2001;6:46-53.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11334476&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 66.Carlborg L. Cyproterone acetate versus levonorgestrel combined with ethinyl estradiol
in the treatment of acne: results of a multicenter study.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl.1986;134:29-32.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2949481&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 67.Worrett I, Arp W, Zahradnik HPl.
et al. Acne resolution rates: results of a single blind, randomized, controlled
parallel phase III trial with EE/CMA (Belara) and EE/LNG (Microgynon).
Dermatology.2001;203:38-44.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11549798&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 68.Vessey M, Painter R, Yeates D. Mortality in relation to oral contraceptive use and cigarette smoking.
Lancet.2003;362:185-191.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12885478&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 69.Hawley W, Nuoro J, DeNeef CP, Carter P. Do oral contraceptive agents affect the risk of breast cancer? a meta
analysis of the case control reports.
J Am Board Fam Pract.1993;6:123-135.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8452064&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 70.Lidegaard O. Absolute and attributable risk of venous thromboembolism in women on
combined cyproterone acetate and ethinylestradiol.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can.2003;25:575-577.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12851669&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 71.Stewart FH, Harper CC, Ellertson CE.
et al. Clinical breast and pelvic examination requirements for hormonal contraception:
current practice vs evidence.
JAMA.2001;285:2232-2239.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11325325&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 72.Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ.
et al. for Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients
with severe heart failure.
N Engl J Med.1999;341:709-717.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10471456&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 73.Farquhar C, Lee O, Toomath R, Jepson R. Spironolactone versus placebo or in combination with steroids for hirsutism and/or acne.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2003;(4):CD000194.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=14583916&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 74.Goodfellow A, Alaghband-Zadeh J, Carter G.
et al. Oral spironolactone improves acne vulgaris and reduces sebum excretion.
Br J Dermatol.1984;111:204-214.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6378245&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 75.Muhlemann MF, Carter GD, Cream JJ.
et al. Oral spironolactone: an effective treatment for acne vulgaris in women.
Br J Dermatol.1986;115:227-232.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2943311&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 76.Shaw JC. Low-dose adjunctive spironolactone in the treatment of acne in women:
a retrospective analysis of 85 consecutively treated patients.
J Am Acad Dermatol.2000;43:498-502.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10954662&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 77.Cusan L, Dupont A, Gomez JL.
et al. Comparison of flutamide and spironolactone in the treatment of hirsutism:
a randomized controlled trial.
Fertil Steril.1994;61:281-287.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8299783&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 78.Carmina E, Lobo RA. A comparison of the relative efficacy of antiandrogens for the treatment
of acne in hyperandrogenic women.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf).2002;57:231-234.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12153602&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 79.van Wayjen RG, van den Ende A. Experience in the long-term treatment of patients with hirsutism and/or
acne with cyproterone acetate containing preparations: efficacy, metabolic
and endocrine effects.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes.1995;103:241-251.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7584530&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 80.Peck Gl, Olsen TG, Yoder FW.
et al. Prolonged remissions of cystic and conglobate acne with 13-cis-retinoic
acid.
N Engl J Med.1979;300:329-333.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=153472&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 81.Jones DH, King K, Miller AJ.
et al. A dose-response study of 13-cis retinoic acid in acne vulgaris.
Br J Dermatol.1983;108:333-343.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6219690&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 82.Strauss JS, Rapini RP, Shalita AR.
et al. Isotretinoin therapy for acne: results of a multicenter dose-response
study.
J Am Acad Dermatol.1984;10:490-496.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=6233335&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 83.Strauss JS, Leyden JJ, Lucky AW.
et al. A randomized trial of the efficacy of a new micronized formulation
versus a standard formulation of isotretinoin in patients severe recalcitrant
acne.
J Am Acad Dermatol.2001;45:187-195.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11464179&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 84.Strauss JS, Leyden JJ, Lucky AW.
et al. Safety of a new micronized formulation of isotretinoin in patients
with severe recalcitrant nodular acne: a randomized trial comparing micronized
isotretinoin with standard isotretinoin.
J Am Acad Dermatol.2001;45:196-207.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11464180&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 85.Layton AM, Knaggs H, Taylor J.
et al. Isotretinoin for acne vulgaris–10 years later: a safe and successful
treatment.
Br J Dermatol.1993;129:292-296.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8286227&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 86.White GM, Chen W, Yao J.
et al. Recurrence rates after the first course of isotretinoin.
Arch Dermatol.1998;134:376-378.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9521042&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 87.Barth JH, MacDonald-Hull SP, Mark J.
et al. Isotretinoin therapy for acne vulgaris: a re-evaluation of the need
for measurements of plasma lipids and liver function tests.
Br J Dermatol.1993;129:704-707.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8286255&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 88.Koren G, Avner M, Shear N. Generic isotretinoin: a new risk for unborn children.
CMAJ.2004;170:1567-1568.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15136551&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 89.Hull PR, D'Arcy C. Isotretinoin use and subsequent depression and suicide.
Am J Clin Dermatol.2003;4:493-505.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12814338&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 90.Aktan S, Ozmen E, Sanli B. Anxiety, depression and nature of acne vulgaris in adolescents.
Int J Dermatol.2000;39:354-357.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10849125&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 91.Bershad S, Singer GK, Parente J.
et al. Successful treatment of acne vulgaris using a new method: results of
a randomized vehicle controlled trial of short contact therapy with 0.1% tazarotene
gel.
Arch Dermatol.2002;138:481-489.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11939810&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 92.Cunliffe WJ, Meynandier J, Alirazai M.
et al. Is combined oral and topical therapy better than oral therapy alone
in patients with moderate to moderately severe acne vulgaris? a comparison
of the efficacy and safety of lymecycline plus adapalene gel 0:1%, vs lymecycline
plus gel vehicle.
J Am Acad Dermatol.2003;49(3 suppl):S218-S226.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12963898&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 93.Eady EA, Bojar RA, Jones CE.
et al. The effects of acne treatment with a combination of benzoyl peroxide
and erythromycin on skin carriage of erythromycin-resistant propionibacteria.
Br J Dermatol.1996;134:107-113.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8745894&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 94.Cooper AJ. Systematic review of propionibacterium acnes resistance to systemic
antibiotics.
Med J Aust.1998;169:259-261.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9762064&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 95.Seukeran DC, Cunliffe WJ. The treatment of acne fulminans: a review of 25 cases.
Br J Dermatol.1999;141:307-309.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10468806&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 96.Thiboutot D, Chen W. Update and future of hormonal therapy in acne.
Dermatology.2003;206:57-67.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12566806&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 97.Shaw JC, White LE. Long-term safety of spironolactone in acne: results of an 8-year follow-up
study.
J Cutan Med Surg.2002;6:541-545.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12219252&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 98.Lin AD, Chen Kk, Lin AT.
et al. Antiandrogen associated hepatotoxicity in the management of advanced
prostate cancer.
J Chin Med Assoc.2003;66:735-740.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15015823&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 99.Rudiger T, Beckmann J, Queisser W. Hepatocellular carcinoma after treatment with cyproterone acetate combined
with ethinyloestradiol.
Lancet.1995;345:452-453.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7853970&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 100.Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term
health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome.
Fertil Steril.2004;81:19-25.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=14711538
Google Scholar 101.Legro RS. Polycystic ovary syndrome: the new millenium.
Mol Cell Endocrinol.2001;184:87-93.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11694344&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar