Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
1 figure, 1 table omitted
In 2003, CDC instituted a new surveillance system, the National Violent
Death Reporting System (NVDRS); the system collects detailed information regarding
violent deaths from multiple sources. This report describes preliminary 2003
data from the first six states* that participated in NVDRS and compares these
data with 1993-2002 data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS).
The findings indicate a substantial increase in homicide rates among young
males from 2002 to 2003 and substantial increases in both homicide and suicide
rates among males from 2000 to 2003. These findings underscore the need for
states to have timely information for effective violence-prevention programs.
NVDRS is a state-based, active surveillance system that collects information
on all homicides, suicides, deaths of undetermined intent, deaths resulting
from legal intervention, and deaths from unintentional firearm injuries. State
health departments participating in NVDRS typically identify these violent
deaths as their death certificates are filed and then establish details of
the cases from medical examiner, coroner, and law enforcement records. Details
collected include the circumstances contributing to the deaths, interpersonal
relationships, and toxicology results. The first six states to join NVDRS
in 2003 accounted for 10% of suicides and 11% of homicides in the United States
International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for the underlying cause of deaths in 2003 have not
yet been reported to NVDRS from two of the six states. However, trained coders
in each state routinely assign a cause of death to all cases by using standard
NVDRS definitions after reviewing information from all available sources.
The cause of death, as defined by NVDRS, is consistent with the way most medical
examiners and coroners assign cause of death. The NVDRS cause of death used
for this analysis was consistent with the underlying cause of death from death
certificates in approximately 97% of the homicides and suicides for which
ICD-10 codes were available. This analysis was restricted to occurrent deaths
(i.e., deaths within the state borders of both residents and nonresidents)
because of delays in reporting deaths of state residents that occurred out
of state. All NVDRS 2003 data are preliminary.
NVDRS data for 2003 were compared with data for 1993-2002 from NVSS
for the same six states. In NVSS, a homicide was defined as a death in which
the underlying cause was coded as X85–Y09 or Y87.1; these codes exclude
deaths attributed to legal intervention, operations of war, or terrorism.1 A suicide was defined as a death in which the underlying cause was
coded as X60–X84 or Y87.0. Deaths that occurred in Oregon as a result
of its Death with Dignity Act are not classified as suicides by Oregon law
and were excluded from this analysis.
Rates were calculated by using intercensal and postcensal bridged-race
population estimates compiled by the National Center for Health Statistics2 and were age-adjusted to the 2000 standard U.S. population. Rates
were also stratified by sex and age. Because of limited death counts in some
age groupings, the age categories were collapsed into ages 0-24 years, 25-64
years, and ≥65 years. Percentage changes in rates from 2002 to 2003 and
95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Trends in homicide and suicide
rates in the six states during 2000-2003 were tested for statistical significance
by using Poisson regression analysis.
During 1993-2000, the age-adjusted homicide rate for the six NVDRS states
decreased 29%, from 7.0 to 5.0 per 100,000 population. During 2000-2002, the
age-adjusted homicide rate for the same states increased 6%, from 5.0 to 5.3.
In 2003, the six states recorded 1,952 homicides, representing a further increase
of 4% (95% CI = -2%-11%) above 2002 rates. In four of the six states, homicide
rates increased in 2003, but only an increase in New Jersey was statistically
significant. The largest increase in rates was among males aged 0-24 years
(18%; CI = 5%-32%); young males accounted for nearly all of the overall homicide
increase in 2003. During 2000-2003, the trend test for homicide rates was
significant, primarily because of the substantial increase in homicides among
males aged 0-24 years.
During 1993-2000, the age-adjusted suicide rate for the six states declined
13%, from 10.2 to 8.9 per 100,000 population. During 2000-2002, the age-adjusted
suicide rate was relatively stable in the six states, declining only 0.3%.
However, in 2003, NVDRS recorded 3,415 suicides, representing a significant
increase of 5% (CI = 0.4%-11%) above 2002 rates. From 2002 to 2003, suicide
rates increased in four of six states, but only an increase in Oregon was
statistically significant. From 2002 to 2003, significant increases were observed
among females in all six states combined (19%; CI = 7%-32%) but not among
males. However, during 2000-2003, the trend test for suicide rates was significant
for males but not for females.
TL Serpi, MS, Maryland Dept of Health and Mental Hygiene. B Wiersema,
Univ of Maryland, College Park; H Hackman, MD, L Ortega, MD, Massachusetts
Dept of Health. BJ Jacquemin, MPH, KS Weintraub, MA, New Jersey Dept of Health
and Senior Svcs. M Kohn, MD, L Millet, MSH, Oregon Dept of Human Svcs. LP
Carter, MS, MA Weis, MPH, South Carolina Dept of Health and Environmental
Control. KE Head, V Powell, PhD, Virginia Dept of Health. M Mueller, MPH,
Public Health Prevention Svc; LJ Paulozzi, MD, Div of Violence Prevention;
D White, MPS, G Ryan, PhD, Office of Statistics and Programming, National
Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC.
During 1993-2000, NVSS data indicate that homicide and suicide rates
declined in the United States; the age-adjusted rates of homicide and suicide
declined 38% and 13%, respectively. These declines ended with small, consecutive
increases in homicide and suicide rates in 2001 and 2002, even after exclusion
of the deaths associated with the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.3 A similar pattern was observed during 1993-2002 in the six NVDRS states.
Although preliminary national homicide and suicide rates did not increase
in 2003, preliminary rates typically underestimate final rates for these conditions
by 3%-4%.1 The homicide increase in NVDRS states, however, is consistent
with final data from law enforcement reports compiled by the Federal Bureau
of Investigation, which indicate an increase in the national homicide rate
in 2003.4 The homicide rate increase in NVDRS was caused by a substantial
increase in homicides among males aged ≤24 years. Similarly, fluctuations
in the national homicide rate in the 1980s and early 1990s were caused by
homicides among males aged 15-24 years.5
Although NVDRS collects detailed information about circumstances associated
with these deaths, determining how risk factors might have changed in recent
years with only 1 year of data was not possible. Changes in rates of violence
have been attributed to various risk factors (e.g., changes in the economy,
the availability of drugs and weapons, and gang violence),5,6 particularly
with respect to homicide. NVDRS will monitor future data for changes in the
proportions of violent deaths that involve specific risk factors.
The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations.
First, all death rates were based on deaths by place of occurrence rather
than place of residence, and some decedents might not have resided in the
six states that provided data. However, 2002 NVSS data indicate that the numbers
of resident and occurrent homicides in these six states combined differed
by only 1.7%, and the difference was only 0.7% with respect to suicides. Therefore,
occurrent deaths are acceptable substitutes for resident deaths. Second, preliminary
NVDRS data might differ from final NVDRS data if late cases are added to the
system. Third, NVDRS data might differ from data generated from NVSS because
the NVDRS classification of a death might differ from the way a death is recorded
on a death certificate in a limited number of cases.
Although only six states began collecting data in 2003, NVDRS is now
funding programs in 11 additional states† to collect data on violent
deaths and submit these data to CDC. Further studies using NVDRS data will
allow interpretation of broader trends across more states. Analyzing data
on the circumstances associated with violent deaths should provide a better
understanding of personal and social risk factors for violence and help identify
potential prevention opportunities. Reviews of promising strategies conclude
that those simultaneously addressing multiple risk factors for violence are
most likely to be effective.7-9
The findings in this report are based, in part, on contributions by
L Frazier Jr, MSPH, K Webb, J Vigeant, L Annest, PhD, other staff of the Office
of Statistics and Programming, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control,
REFERENCES: 9 available
*Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Oregon, South Carolina, and Virginia
†Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, New Mexico,
North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Utah, and Wisconsin.
Homicide and Suicide Rates—National Violent Death Reporting System, Six States, 2003. JAMA. 2005;293(20):2464–2465. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.20.2464
Create a personal account or sign in to: