[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
Purchase Options:
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
News From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
March 8, 2006

Two Cases of Toxigenic

JAMA. 2006;295(10):1118-1120. doi:10.1001/jama.295.10.1118
Two Cases of Toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 Infection After Hurricanes Katrina and Rita—Louisiana, October 2005

MMWR. 2006;55:31-32

1 figure omitted

Louisiana was struck by Hurricane Katrina on August 29, 2005, and by Hurricane Rita on September 24, 2005. The two hurricanes caused unprecedented damage from wind and storm surge to the Louisiana Gulf Coast region, and levee breaks resulted in flooding of large residential areas in and around New Orleans. With the flooding, an immediate public health concern was the potential for outbreaks of infectious diseases, including cholera. Nearly all Vibrio infections in the United States are caused by noncholeragenic Vibrio species (e.g., V. parahaemolyticus, V. vulnificus, and non-O1, non-O139 V. cholerae).1,2 Cases of cholera rarely occur in the United States, and cholera epidemics, such as those reported in certain developing countries, are unlikely, even with the extreme flooding caused by the two hurricanes.2 This report describes the investigation by the Louisiana Office of Public Health and CDC into two cases of toxigenic V. cholerae O1 infection in a Louisiana couple; the cases were attributed to consumption of undercooked or contaminated seafood. Although noncholeragenic Vibrio illnesses were reported in 22 residents of Louisiana and Mississippi after Hurricane Katrina,1 no epidemic of cholera was identified, and no evidence exists of increased risk to Gulf Coast residents.

In Louisiana, cases of notifiable diseases, including V. cholerae infections, are reported through the Internet-based Reportable Disease Database (RDD). All health-care providers and diagnostic facilities throughout the state submit reports through this system. A 24-hour telephone line is available to report emergencies. Although the 24-hour telephone line was disrupted immediately after hurricane Katrina, the Internet-based RDD never stopped functioning. In addition, after the hurricanes, morbidity surveillance systems were implemented in acute-care facilities in severely damaged areas and in evacuee centers throughout the state. During August 29–October 30, 2005, a total of 81 reports were investigated by Louisiana infectious-disease epidemiologists; 33 (41%) of these investigations were related to diarrheal illnesses. Five suspected cases of cholera were reported in Louisiana on the basis of presumptive laboratory results from clinical laboratories. However, of the five stool specimens sent to the Louisiana State Public Health Laboratory, only two were confirmed as containing toxigenic V. cholerae O1.

The two cases of toxigenic V. cholerae O1 infection were identified in a Louisiana couple approximately 3 weeks after Hurricane Rita. On October 15, 2005, in southeastern Louisiana, a man aged 43 years and his wife aged 46 years had onset of diarrhea. The husband had a history of high blood pressure, alcoholism, diabetes, brain tumor, and chronic renal failure that required dialysis three times a week. On October 16, 2005, he was hospitalized for fever, muscle pains, nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, and severe diarrhea and dehydration; subsequently he experienced complete loss of renal function and respiratory and cardiac failure. However, after treatment with ciprofloxacin and aggressive rehydration therapy, the man recovered to his previous state of health. His wife had mild diarrhea and was treated as an outpatient with ciprofloxacin and extra fluids.

Because the couple's residence had been severely damaged and flooded by Hurricane Rita, both patients had waded in coastal flood waters in late September, 2-3 weeks before their illness onset. Five days before onset of illness, both had eaten locally caught crabs. On October 14, the day preceding illness onset, both had eaten shrimp purchased from a local fisherman. The shrimp were boiled for 5 minutes; however, at least some of the boiled shrimp were returned to a cooler containing raw shrimp and were eaten later. Two other persons who ate the shrimp reported mild diarrhea and abdominal discomfort; they did not seek medical attention, and no stool or serum specimens were collected from them for testing.

Toxigenic V. cholerae O1, serotype Inaba, biotype El Tor, was isolated at the hospital from stool specimens of the two patients and was confirmed at the Louisiana State Public Health Laboratory and the Foodborne and Diarrheal Diseases Laboratory at CDC. Both isolates were susceptible to all antimicrobial agents tested and were hemolytic on sheep blood agar, two characteristics of the strain of toxigenic V. cholerae O1 that is endemic to the U.S. Gulf Coast. By pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, the isolates were indistinguishable from each other and from other isolates previously associated with the Gulf Coast.

Reported by:

S Straif-Bourgeois, PhD, T Sokol, MPH, A Thomas, MPH, Infectious Disease Epidemiology Section; R Ratard, MD, Louisiana Office of Public Health. KD Greene, E Mintz, MD, P Yu, MPH, Div of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases; P Vranken, MBA, EIS Officer, CDC.

CDC Editorial Note:

Cholera is caused by toxigenic V. cholerae O1 or O139 and is characterized by severe watery diarrhea, sometimes accompanied by vomiting, that can lead to dehydration, electrolyte abnormalities, and hypovolemic shock if fluid losses are not promptly replaced.3 In developing African and Asian countries, where most cholera cases and epidemics occur,4,5 transmission tends to be waterborne. However, because V. cholerae occurs naturally in some marine or estuarine environments, cholera is also occasionally acquired from consumption of inadequately cooked crustaceans or molluscan shellfish.3,6-8

In the United States, epidemic cholera has not occurred during the past 100 years. Although small outbreaks have been identified, most cases have been sporadic. During 1996-2005, a total of 64 cases of toxigenic V. cholerae O1 were reported to CDC from U.S. states and territories. In 35 (55%) cases, cholera infection was acquired during foreign travel. For the remaining 29 (45%) cases, infection was acquired in the United States. Seven (24%) of these 29 cases were attributed to consumption of Gulf Coast seafood (e.g., crabs, shrimp, or oysters); 22 (76%) others could not be attributed to consumption of Gulf Coast seafood.*

Seven of the 11 U.S. cholera cases in 2005 were reported during October-December, after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. In addition to the two Louisiana cases described in this report, two cases occurred in Guam, and three others were attributed to foreign travel. The number and sources of these seven cases are consistent with U.S. reports of cholera in previous years.9 No evidence suggests increased risk for cholera among Gulf Coast residents or consumers of Gulf Coast seafood after the hurricanes.

Illness in the two Louisiana residents was attributed to shellfish that was not prepared or handled properly, perhaps because of difficult living conditions after the hurricanes. Boiling shellfish for >10 minutes is recommended to render the V. cholerae organism nonviable and then placing the shellfish into clean serving dishes to prevent recontamination.3,8


This report is based, in part, on data contributed by P Cuneo and S Silverii, Region Three, and L Kravet and D Haydel, Louisiana State Public Health Laboratory, Louisiana Office of Public Health.

*Among the 22 cases not associated with either foreign travel or Gulf Coast seafood, 13 were associated with consumption of seafood from areas other than the Gulf Coast, and nine exposures were undetermined. Thirteen of the cases occurred in states outside of the Gulf Coast, eight occurred in U.S. territories (seven in Guam and one in the Mariana Islands), and one case occurred in Louisiana.

CDC.  Vibrio illnesses after Hurricane Katrina—multiple states, August-September 2005.  MMWR. 2005;54:928-931Google Scholar
CDC.  Cholera and other Vibrio illness surveillance summaries: summary of human Vibrio isolates reported to CDC, 2004. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2004. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/foodborneoutbreaks/vibrio_sum/cstevibrio2004.pdf
Wachsmuth IK, Blake PA, Olsvik OVibrio cholerae and cholera: molecular to global perspectives. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994
World Health Organization.  Cholera 2004.  Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2005;80:261-26816106791Google Scholar
Global Task Force on Cholera Control.  Cholera outbreak: assessing the outbreak response and improving preparedness. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004. Available at http://www.who.int/topics/cholera/publications/cholera_outbreak/en
Colwell RR, Seidler RJ, Kaper J.  et al.  Occurrence of V. cholerae serotype O1 in Maryland and Louisiana estuaries.  Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981;41:555-5587235699Google Scholar
Powell JL. Vibrio species.  Clin Lab Med. 1999;19:537-55210549425Google Scholar
Rabbani GH, Greenough WB III. Food as a vehicle of transmission of cholera.  J Diarrhoeal Dis Res. 1999;17:1-910892490Google Scholar
Steinberg EB, Greene KD, Bopp CA, Cameron DN, Wells JG, Mintz ED. Cholera in the United States, 1995-2000: trends at the end of the twentieth century.  J Infect Dis. 2001;184:799-80211517445Google ScholarCrossref