Opening of Specialty Cardiac Hospitals and Use of Coronary Revascularization in Medicare Beneficiaries | Acute Coronary Syndromes | JAMA | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.175.212.130. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
General Accounting Office.  Specialty Hospitals: Information on National Market Share, Physician Ownership, and Patients Served. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office; 2003
2.
Dobson A, Haught R, Sen N. Specialty heart hospital care: a comparative study.  Am Heart Hosp J. 2003;1:21-2915785173Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Herzlinger RE. Specialization and its discontents: the pernicious impact of regulations against specialization and physician ownership on the US healthcare system.  Circulation. 2004;109:2376-237815159326Google ScholarCrossref
4.
Voelker R. Specialty hospitals generate revenue and controversy.  JAMA. 2003;289:409-41012533103Google ScholarCrossref
5.
Iglehart JK. The uncertain future of specialty hospitals.  N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1405-140715814875Google ScholarCrossref
6.
Casalino LP, Devers KJ, Brewster LR. Focused factories? physician-owned specialty facilities.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;22:56-6714649432Google ScholarCrossref
7.
Iglehart JK. Congress moves to regulate self-referral and physicians' ownership of clinical laboratories.  N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1682-16872188130Google ScholarCrossref
8.
Hillman BJ, Joseph CA, Mabry MR, Sunshine JH, Kennedy SD, Noether M. Frequency and costs of diagnostic imaging in office practice—a comparison of self-referring and radiologist-referring physicians.  N Engl J Med. 1990;323:1604-16082233949Google ScholarCrossref
9.
Iglehart JK. The emergence of physician-owned specialty hospitals.  N Engl J Med. 2005;352:78-8415635118Google ScholarCrossref
10.
Cram P, Rosenthal GE, Vaughan-Sarrazin MS. Cardiac revascularization in specialty and general hospitals.  N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1454-146215814881Google ScholarCrossref
11.
 The Annual Survey of Hospitals Database: Documentation for 2003 Data. Chicago, Ill: American Hospital Association Press; 2003
12.
 American Hospital Directory. American Hospital Association Web site. http://www.ahd.com/freesearch.php3. Accessed February 6, 2006 
13.
 Final report to Congress implementing the DRA provision affecting specialty hospitals. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Web site. August 2006. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/press/release.asp?Counter=1941. Accessed February 6, 2007
14.
Wennberg DE, Birkmeyer JDThe Dartmouth Atlas of Cardiovascular Health Care. Chicago, Ill: American Hospital Association Press; 1999
15.
Rothman K, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven Publishers;1998:260-262
16.
Greenland S. Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: alternatives to categorical analysis.  Epidemiology. 1995;6:356-3657548341Google ScholarCrossref
17.
Liang K-Y, Zeger S. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models.  Biometrika. 1986;73:13-22Google ScholarCrossref
18.
Dupont W. Statistical Modeling for Biomedical Researchers: A Simple Introduction to the Analysis of Complex Data. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2002:356-368
19.
Diez Roux AV, Merkin SS, Arnett D.  et al.  Neighborhood of residence and incidence of coronary heart disease.  N Engl J Med. 2001;345:99-10611450679Google ScholarCrossref
20.
Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials.  Lancet. 2003;361:13-2012517460Google ScholarCrossref
21.
Mehta SR, Cannon CP, Fox KA.  et al.  Routine vs selective invasive strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.  JAMA. 2005;293:2908-291715956636Google ScholarCrossref
22.
Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.  Circulation. 2005;111:2906-291215927966Google ScholarCrossref
23.
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.  Report to the Congress: Physician-Owned Specialty Hospitals. Washington, DC: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; 2005
24.
Stensland J, Winter A. Do physician-owned cardiac hospitals increase utilization?  Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25:119-12916403751Google ScholarCrossref
25.
Medicare Program.  Physician's referrals to healthcare facilities with which they have financial relationships (42 CFR Parts 411 and 424).  Fed Regist. 2004;69:16084-16085Google Scholar
26.
Devers KJ, Brewster LR, Ginsburg PB. Specialty Hospitals: Focused Factories or Cream Skinners? Issue Brief No. 62. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; 2003
27.
General Accounting Office.  General Hospitals: Operational and Clinical Changes Largely Unaffected by Presence of Competing Specialty Hospitals. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office; 2006
Original Contribution
March 7, 2007

Opening of Specialty Cardiac Hospitals and Use of Coronary Revascularization in Medicare Beneficiaries

Author Affiliations
 

Author Affiliations: VA Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Ann Arbor, Mich (Dr Nallamothu); Department of Internal Medicine (Drs Nallamothu, Rogers, and Eagle) and Department of Surgery (Dr Birkmeyer), University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor; Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (Dr Chernew); and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (Dr Krumholz).

JAMA. 2007;297(9):962-968. doi:10.1001/jama.297.9.962
Abstract

Context Although proponents argue that specialty cardiac hospitals provide high-quality cost-efficient care, strong financial incentives for physicians at these facilities could result in greater procedure utilization.

Objective To determine whether the opening of cardiac hospitals was associated with increasing population-based rates of coronary revascularization.

Design, Setting, and Patients In a study of Medicare beneficiaries from 1995 through 2003, we calculated annual population-based rates for total revascularization (coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] plus percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]), CABG, and PCI. Hospital referral regions (HRRs) were used to categorize health care markets into those where (1) cardiac hospitals opened (n = 13), (2) new cardiac programs opened at general hospitals (n = 142), and (3) no new programs opened (n = 151).

Main Outcome Measures Rates of change in total revascularization, CABG, and PCI using multivariable linear regression models with generalized estimating equations.

Results Overall, rates of change for total revascularization were higher in HRRs after cardiac hospitals opened when compared with HRRs where new cardiac programs opened at general hospitals and HRRs with no new programs (P<.001 for both comparisons). Four years after their opening, the relative increase in adjusted rates was more than 2-fold higher in HRRs where cardiac hospitals opened (19.2% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 6.1%-32.2%], P<.001) when compared with HRRs where new cardiac programs opened at general hospitals (6.5% [95% CI, 3.2%-9.9%], P<.001) and HRRs with no new programs (7.4% [95% CI, 3.2%-11.5%], P<.001). These findings were consistent when rates for CABG and PCI were considered separately. For PCI, this growth appeared largely driven by increased utilization among patients without acute myocardial infarction (42.1% [95% CI, 21.4%-62.9%], P<.001).

Conclusion The opening of a cardiac hospital within an HRR is associated with increasing population-based rates of coronary revascularization in Medicare beneficiaries.

×