Efficacy of a Hip Protector to Prevent Hip Fracture in Nursing Home Residents: The HIP PRO Randomized Controlled Trial | Geriatrics | JAMA | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
US Department of Health and Human Services.  Hospital Inpatient Statistics, 1996-1999. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1999. AHCPR Publication 99-0034
Grisso  JA, Kelsey  JL, Strom  BL,  et al.  Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in women.  N Engl J Med. 1991;324(19):1326-1331. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hedlund  R, Lindgren  U.  Trauma type, age and gender as determinants of hip fracture.  J Orthop Res. 1987;5(2):242-246. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Schneider  EL, Guralnik  JM.  The aging of America: impact on health care costs.  JAMA. 1990;263(17):2335-2340. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Broe  KE, Hannan  MT, Kiely  DK, Cali  CM, Cupples  LA, Kiel  DP.  Predicting fractures using bone mineral density: a prospective study of long-term care residents.  Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(9):765-771. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Cali  CM, Kiel  DP.  An epidemiologic study of fall-related fractures among institutionalized older people.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43(12):1336-1340. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Chandler  JM, Zimmerman  SI, Girman  CJ,  et al.  Low bone mineral density and risk of fracture in white female nursing home residents.  JAMA. 2000;284(8):972-977. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Thapa  PB, Brockman  KG, Gideon  P, Fought  RL, Ray  WA.  Injurious falls in nonambulatory nursing home residents: a comparative study of circumstances, incidence, and risk factors.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44(3):273-278. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Tinetti  ME, Liu  W, Ginter  SF.  Mechanical restraint use and fall-related injuries among residents of skilled nursing facilities.  Ann Intern Med. 1992;116(5):369-374. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kaptoge  S, Benevolenskaya  LI, Bhalla  AK,  et al.  Low BMD is less predictive than reported falls for future limb fractures in women across Europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study.  Bone. 2005;36(3):387-398. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hayes  WC, Myers  ER, Morris  JN, Gerhart  TN, Yett  HS, Lipsitz  LA.  Impact near the hip dominates fracture risk in elderly nursing home residents who fall.  Calcif Tissue Int. 1993;52(3):192-198. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Greenspan  SL, Myers  E, Kiel  DP, Parker  RA, Hayes  WC, Resnick  NM.  Fall direction, bone mineral density, and function: risk factors for hip fracture in frail nursing home elderly.  Am J Med. 1998;104(6):539-545. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Parker  MJ, Gillespie  LD, Gillespie  WJ.  Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in the elderly  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD001255 [update of: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(2):CD001255; update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD001255]. PubMedGoogle Scholar
Parker  MJ, Gillespie  WJ, Gillespie  LD.  Effectiveness of hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in elderly people: systematic review.  BMJ. 2006;332(7541):571-574. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hahn  S, Puffer  S, Torgerson  DJ, Watson  J.  Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials.  BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5(1):10PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kannus  P, Parkkari  J, Poutala  J.  Comparison of force attenuation properties of four different hip protectors under simulated falling conditions in the elderly: an in vitro biomechanical study.  Bone. 1999;25(2):229-235. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Robinovitch  SN, McMahon  TA, Hayes  WC.  Energy-shunting hip padding system improved femoral impact force attenuation in a simulated fall.  J Biomech Eng. 1995;117(4):409-413. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
van Schoor  NM, van der Veen  AJ, Schaap  LA, Smit  TH, Lips  P.  Biomechanical comparison of hard and soft hip protectors, and the influence of soft tissue.  Bone. 2006;39(2):401-407. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kurrle  SE, Cameron  ID, Quine  S, Cumming  RG.  Adherence with hip protectors: a proposal for standardised definitions.  Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(1):1-4. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Warnke  A, Meyer  G, Bender  R, Muhlhauser  I.  Predictors of adherence to the use of hip protectors in nursing home residents.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(3):340-345. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Wiener  SL, Andersson  GB, Nyhus  LM, Czech  J.  Force reduction by an external hip protector on the human hip after falls.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;398:157-168. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Melton  LJ  III, Ilstrup  DM, Beckenbaugh  RD, Riggs  BL.  Hip fracture recurrence. A population-based study.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;167:131-138. PubMedGoogle Scholar
Efron  B.  The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. Philadelphia, PA: Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 1982.
Blessed  G, Tomlinson  BE, Roth  M.  The association between quantitative measures of dementia and of senile change in the cerebral grey matter of elderly subjects.  Br J Psychiatry. 1968;114(512):797-811. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Thal  LJ, Grundman  M, Golden  R.  Alzheimer's disease: a correlational analysis of the Blessed Information-Memory-Concentration Test and the Mini-Mental State Exam.  Neurology. 1986;36(2):262-264. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Lach  H, Ball  L, Birge  S.  Validation of a measure of fear of falling for nursing home residents.  The Gerontologist. 2002;42(1, special issue):171.Google Scholar
Hollander  M, Wolfe  DA.  Nonparametric Statistical Methods. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.
Rosner  B.  Fundamentals of Biostatistics. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury; 2000.
Lan  KG, DeMets  DL.  Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials.  Biometrika. 1983;70:659-663. 10.1093/biomet/70.3.659Google ScholarCrossref
O'Brien  KD, Kuusisto  J, Reichenbach  DD,  et al.  Osteopontin is expressed in human aortic valvular lesions.  Circulation. 1995;92(8):2163-2168. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Tsiatis  A, Pampallona  S, Kim  K.  Interim monitoring of group sequential trials using spending functions for type I and type II error probabilities.  Drug Inf J. 2001;35:1113-1121.Google ScholarCrossref
Birks  YF, Hildreth  R, Campbell  P, Sharpe  C, Torgerson  DJ, Watt  I.  Randomised controlled trial of hip protectors for the prevention of second hip fractures.  Age Ageing. 2003;32(4):442-444. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Cameron  ID, Venman  J, Kurrle  SE,  et al.  Hip protectors in aged-care facilities: a randomized trial of use by individual higher-risk residents.  Age Ageing. 2001;30(6):477-481. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Cameron  ID, Cumming  RG, Kurrle  SE,  et al.  A randomised trial of hip protector use by frail older women living in their own homes.  Inj Prev. 2003;9(2):138-141. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Chan  DK, Hillier  G, Coore  M,  et al.  Effectiveness and acceptability of a newly designed hip protector: a pilot study.  Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2000;30(1):25-34. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hubacher  M, Wettstein  A.  Acceptance of hip protectors for hip fracture prevention in nursing homes.  Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(9):794-799. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Jantti  PO, Aho  HJ, Maki-Jokela  PL, Heikinheimo  RJ.  Hip protectors and hip fractures.  Age Ageing. 1998;27(6):3387-3389. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
van Schoor  NM, Smit  JH, Twisk  JW, Bouter  LM, Lips  P.  Prevention of hip fractures by external hip protectors: a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA. 2003;289(15):1957-1962. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Birks  YF, Porthouse  J, Addie  C,  et al.  Randomized controlled trial of hip protectors among women living in the community.  Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(9):701-706. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Ekman  A, Mallmin  H, Michaelsson  K, Ljunghall  S.  External hip protectors to prevent osteoporotic hip fractures.  Lancet. 1997;350(9077):563-564. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Harada  A, Mizuno  M, Takemura  M, Tokuda  H, Okuizumi  H, Niino  N.  Hip fracture prevention trial using hip protectors in Japanese nursing homes.  Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(3):215-221. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kannus  P, Parkkari  J, Niemi  S,  et al.  Prevention of hip fracture in elderly people with use of a hip protector.  N Engl J Med. 2000;343(21):1506-1513. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Lauritzen  JB, Petersen  MM, Lund  B.  Effect of external hip protectors on hip fractures.  Lancet. 1993;341(8836):11-13. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Meyer  G, Warnke  A, Bender  R, Muhlhauser  I.  Effect on hip fractures of increased use of hip protectors in nursing homes: cluster randomised controlled trial.  BMJ. 2003;326(7380):76-80. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Birge  S, Wiener  SL, Smith  HR, Biloff  RM.  Biomechanical properties of external hip protectors.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(suppl):S113.Google Scholar
Parkkari  J, Kannus  P, Heikkila  J, Pontala  J, Sievanen  H, Vuori  I.  Energy-shunting external hip protector attenuates the peak femoral impact force below the theoretical fracture threshold.  J Bone Miner Res. 1995;10(10):1437-1442. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Parkkari  J, Kannus  P, Poutala  J, Vuori  I.  Force attenuation properties of various trochanteric padding materials under typical falling conditions of the elderly.  J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9(9):1391-1396. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Contribution
July 25, 2007

Efficacy of a Hip Protector to Prevent Hip Fracture in Nursing Home Residents: The HIP PRO Randomized Controlled Trial

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Kiel and Mss Stone and Dewkett); Division of Gerontology, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore (Dr Magaziner); Program on Aging, Disability and Long-Term Care, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Dr Zimmerman); Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri (Drs Ball and Birge); Maryland Medical Research Institute, Baltimore (Drs Barton and Brown).

JAMA. 2007;298(4):413-422. doi:10.1001/jama.298.4.413

Context  Past studies of the efficacy of hip protectors to prevent hip fracture in nursing home residents have had conflicting results, possibly due to potential biases from clustered randomization designs and modest adherence to intervention.

Objective  To determine whether an energy-absorbing and energy-dispersing hip protector would reduce the risk of hip fracture when worn by nursing home residents.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial in which 37 nursing homes were randomly assigned to having residents wear a 1-sided hip protector on the left or right hip. Participants were 1042 nursing home residents (mean [SD] aged 85 [7] years; 79% women) who consented and adhered to the hip protector use during a 2-week run-in period and were enrolled. Participating facilities were in greater Boston, Massachusetts, St Louis, Missouri, and Baltimore, Maryland from October 2002 to October 2004. Mean duration of participation for nursing home residents was 7.8 months. None were withdrawn because of adverse effects.

Intervention(s)  Undergarments with a 1-sided hip protector made of a 0.32-cm outer layer of polyethylene (2.7 kg/m3) backed by a hard high-density polyethylene shield (0.95 cm) that was backed by 0.9 kg/m3 of 1.27-kg ethylene vinyl acetate foam. Each facility was visited 3 times per week to assess adherence and provide staff support.

Main Outcome Measure  Adjudicated hip fracture occurrences on padded vs unpadded hips.

Results  After a 20-month follow-up (676 person-years of observation), the study was terminated due to a lack of efficacy. The incidence rate of hip fracture on protected vs unprotected hips did not differ (3.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8%-4.4% vs 2.5%; 95% CI, 1.3%-3.7%; P = .70). For the 334 nursing home residents with greater than 80% adherence to hip protector use, the incidence rate of hip fracture on protected vs unprotected hips did not differ (5.3%; 95% CI, 2.6%-8.8% vs 3.5%; 95% CI, 1.3%-5.7%; P = .42). Overall adherence was 73.8%.

Conclusions  In this clinical trial of an energy-absorbing/shunting hip protector conducted in US nursing homes, we were unable to detect a protective effect on the risk of hip fracture, despite good adherence to protocol. These results add to the increasing body of evidence that hip protectors, as currently designed, are not effective for preventing hip fracture among nursing home residents.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00058864