Context Endogenous hormones are a primary cause of breast cancer. Adiposity affects circulating hormones, particularly in postmenopausal women, and may be a modifiable risk factor for breast cancer.
Objective To assess the associations of adult weight change since age 18 years and since menopause with the risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women.
Design, Setting, and Participants Prospective cohort study within the Nurses' Health Study. A total of 87 143 postmenopausal women, aged 30 to 55 years and free of cancer, were followed up for up to 26 years (1976-2002) to assess weight change since age 18 years. Weight change since menopause was assessed among 49 514 women who were followed up for up to 24 years.
Main Outcome Measure Incidence of invasive breast cancer.
Results Overall, 4393 cases of invasive breast cancer were documented. Compared with those who maintained weight, women who gained 25.0 kg or more since age 18 years were at an increased risk of breast cancer (relative risk [RR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-1.66; P<.001 for trend), with a stronger association among women who have never taken postmenopausal hormones (RR,1.98; 95% CI, 1.55-2.53). Compared with weight maintenance, women who gained 10.0 kg or more since menopause were at an increased risk of breast cancer (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.35; P = .002 for trend). Women who had never used postmenopausal hormones, lost 10.0 kg or more since menopause, and kept the weight off were at a lower risk than those who maintained weight (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.21-0.86; P = .01 for weight loss trend). Overall, 15.0% (95% CI, 12.8%-17.4%) of breast cancer cases in this population may be attributable to weight gain of 2.0 kg or more since age 18 years and 4.4% (95% CI, 3.6%-5.5%) attributable to weight gain of 2.0 kg or more since menopause. Among those who did not use postmenopausal hormones, the population attributable risks are 24.2% (95% CI, 19.8%-29.1%) for a weight gain since age 18 years and 7.6% (95% CI, 5.9%-9.7%) for weight gain since menopause.
Conclusions These data suggest that weight gain during adult life, specifically since menopause, increases the risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women, whereas weight loss after menopause is associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer. Thus, in addition to other known benefits of healthy weight, our results provide another reason for women approaching menopause to maintain or lose weight, as appropriate.
Obesity is associated with many chronic diseases, including cancer, and postmenopausal breast cancer in particular.1,2 Weight loss is associated with several short-term benefits, such as improvements in lipid levels, blood pressure, and blood glucose metabolism,3 but thus far there has been little evidence of longer-term effects on cancer risk.4 Postmenopausal weight loss lowers circulating estrogens,5 and given that these hormones are directly related to the risk of breast cancer,6-8 weight loss is suspected to decrease risk. However, this has not been consistently shown.
Weight gain since early adulthood (eg, age 18 years) has been associated with increased postmenopausal breast cancer risk in several prospective studies,9-15 particularly among women not taking postmenopausal hormones (PMH).11,12,14,15 Among the few prospective studies of weight loss since early adulthood, null or nonsignificant inverse associations have been observed.10,15,16 Weight change in later years (eg, since age 50 years) has been less extensively studied, but collectively the results of prospective and case-control studies suggest that weight gain increases postmenopausal breast cancer risk.11,12,17-19 Few studies of later weight loss have been conducted, with null17,20 and nonsignificant inverse19 associations observed. If weight change since menopause indeed can alter risk, it would be important to advise women reaching menopause to maintain or lose weight to decrease their risk of breast cancer.
We conducted a prospective analysis within the Nurses' Health Study to examine the associations of weight gain and loss, both since age 18 years and since menopause, with postmenopausal breast cancer risk.
In 1976, 121 700 female, married, registered nurses, ages 30 to 55 years, were enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study.21,22 Information on lifestyle factors, including many breast cancer risk factors, and new disease diagnoses was collected by biennial mailed questionnaires. Follow-up data through June 2002 are available for 95% of the study population. This analysis expands on a previous analysis of adult weight change within the Nurses' Health Study,11 with an additional 10 years of follow-up and nearly 3 times the number of postmenopausal breast cancer cases. This study was approved by the Committee on the Use of Human Subjects in Research at the Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, Mass); completion of the self-administered questionnaire was considered to imply informed consent.
We assessed weight change for 2 different periods: since age 18 years and since menopause. The analysis of change since age 18 years included women who were either postmenopausal at the start of follow-up in 1976 or became postmenopausal during follow-up. After excluding women with a history of cancer, other than nonmelanoma skin cancer, 87 143 women (1 245 416 person-years) contributed to the analysis. The analysis of change since menopause was restricted to women who were premenopausal in 1976 and had either natural menopause or bilateral oophorectomy during follow-up and therefore reported their weight at menopause. Women joined the study population as they became postmenopausal during follow-up. After excluding women with a history of cancer, other than nonmelanoma skin cancer, 49 514 women (649 061 person-years) were included.
Weight at age 18 years was queried in 1980. Recall of weight at age 18 years has been validated previously in the Nurses' Health Study II cohort, with a correlation of 0.87 between recalled weight and weight recorded on college or nursing school records at age 18 years (mean difference, −1.4 kg [recalled− measured]).23 With adjustment for current weight, a similar correlation was observed, suggesting minimal systematic bias. Current weight was queried biennially; self-reported weight in this cohort was validated previously, with a correlation of 0.97 between reported and measured weight (mean difference, −1.5 kg [reported−measured]).24 Weight at menopause was defined as the weight reported one questionnaire cycle prior to the first report of natural menopause or bilateral oophorectomy.
Weight change since age 18 years was calculated as the difference between current weight and weight at age 18 years. The primary analyses used updated weight change for each questionnaire cycle, categorized into 9 groups. Cut points for weight change categories are comparable with those used in previous literature.10,11,14,15,20 To capture the impact of maintaining a stable weight, we used a more restricted definition in secondary analyses. Women were categorized as having lost, gained, or maintained weight since age 18 years and their weight was considered stable if they remained in the same category at the next questionnaire cycle. Thus, a woman who gained weight in one cycle and lost weight in the next was not considered stable until she maintained the loss in the following cycle. Within the stable groups, women were categorized further by the amount of weight change.
Weight change since menopause was calculated as the difference between current postmenopausal weight and weight at menopause and was categorized into 7 groups. The primary and secondary analyses were similar to those described above, with a simple update in the primary analyses and restriction to stable change in the secondary analyses.
Breast Cancer Case Ascertainment
Cases of invasive breast cancer, diagnosed from the start of follow-up in 1976 through May 2002, were identified on biennial questionnaires; the National Death Index was searched for those who did not nonrespond. To confirm cancer reports and abstract information on invasiveness and hormone receptor status, medical records were reviewed by investigators blinded to exposure status. Records were unavailable for 241 (5.5%) of 4393 cases. Given that pathology reports confirmed 99% of the reported cases, diagnoses confirmed by the participant but missing medical record confirmation were included as cases in this analysis. The observed incidence of breast cancer in the total Nurses' Health Study cohort is comparable with the expected incidence based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) rates25 for white women, 1988-1992 (O/E, 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.03).
Age was calculated from birth date to questionnaire return date. Age at menarche, height, and age at first birth were queried in 1976. Information on parity and oral contraceptive use was collected biennially from 1976 until 1984. Diagnosis of benign breast disease was assessed biennially. History of breast cancer in the participants' mothers and sisters was queried in 1976, 1982, and every 4 years since 1988. Alcohol consumption was assessed with a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire in 1980, 1984, 1986, 1990, 1994, and 1998. Physical activity data were collected in 1980, 1982, 1986, 1988, and biennially since 1994.
Menopausal status, age at menopause, and PMH use were assessed biennially. Women were classified as postmenopausal at the first report of natural menopause or surgery with bilateral oophorectomy. Accuracy and reproducibility of self-report of natural menopause and ovarian surgery in this cohort has been previously validated.26 Women who reported hysterectomy without bilateral oophorectomy or whose type of menopause was unknown were not classified as postmenopausal until they reached the age at which 90% of the cohort had reached natural menopause (54 years for current smokers, 56 years for nonsmokers).
We calculated person-years from the baseline questionnaire return date to the first date of diagnosis of breast or other cancer (except nonmelanoma skin cancer), death, or June 1, 2002. Cox proportional hazards models, stratified jointly by age in months and calendar year of follow-up at the beginning of each 2-year questionnaire cycle, were used to calculate adjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs. Multivariate models controlled for several breast cancer risk factors.
Tests for trend were performed using the medians of weight change categories, modeled continuously; tests for trend across weight loss were restricted to women who maintained or lost weight. To assess whether the associations between weight change and breast cancer varied across levels of other risk factors, we tested interaction terms between weight change and the potential modifier in multivariate models using the Wald test. To test whether associations differed by estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) status of the tumor, we used polytomous logistic regression27 with 3 end points (ER+/PR+, ER−/PR−, and no breast cancer). We used a likelihood ratio test to compare a model with separate weight-change slopes in each case group to a model with a common slope. We calculated incidence rates for categories of weight change using the incidence rate in women who maintained weight and the RR estimates from the multivariate analyses. To estimate the absolute risk of breast cancer by category of weight change, we applied the multivariate RRs to the number of expected cases in the referent group of weight maintenance obtained from the incidence rates.28 We calculated the population attributable risk conferred by weight gain (≥2 kg) to estimate the percentage of cases of invasive breast cancer in our cohort that, theoretically, would not have occurred if women had maintained or lost weight, assuming a causal relationship between weight gain and breast cancer incidence, holding all other risk-factor distributions constant.29,30 These calculations use multivariate-adjusted RRs and take into account the joint distribution of weight change along with the other risk factors included in the multivariate model. Variance estimates account for the variability in both the estimated RRs as well as in the joint prevalences of the risk factors. All analyses were conducted using SAS software, version 8 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). All P values were based on 2-sided tests and were considered statistically significant at P≤.05.
We documented 4393 cases of invasive breast cancer among postmenopausal women from 1976 through 2002; the analysis of weight change since menopause, among women with known age at menopause, included 2376 cases from 1978 through 2002. Women gained an average of 12 kg since age 18 years and 3 kg since menopause (mean years since menopause, 11). Compared with women who maintained their weight (lost or gained <2.0 kg) since age 18 years, those who gained weight had a higher body mass index (BMI), calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, through follow-up and a lower daily alcohol intake (Table 1). They were also less likely to exercise and to use PMH for more than 5 years. Women who lost weight since age 18 years were heavier at that age, more likely to have had their first birth after age 30 years, less likely to have used PMH long-term, and less likely to have a history of benign breast disease than those who maintained weight. Among women included in the analysis of weight change since menopause, characteristics by change since menopause were similar to those noted in Table 1, with the exception that women who gained weight were more likely to have used PMH long-term than women who maintained weight (data not shown).
Weight change since age 18 years was associated with breast cancer risk among all postmenopausal women (P <.001 for trend; Table 2). Compared with women who maintained weight, women who gained 25.0 kg or more were at increased risk (multivariate-adjusted RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.27-1.66). The association varied by PMH use; for women who had a 25.0-kg or more weight gain and who had ever used PMH, the multivariate-adjusted RR was 1.20 (95% CI, 1.01-1.43) vs 1.98 (95% CI, 1.55-2.53) among those who never used it (P <.001 for interaction). Weight loss was associated with a decreased breast cancer risk among all postmenopausal women (P = .02 for trend), and among women who had ever used PMH (P = .04 for trend). Restricting the analyses to those with stable change since age 18 years yielded similar results.
Analyses of weight change since age 18 years among those who never used PMH were further stratified by BMI at age 18 years (<21 vs ≥21) and by receptor status of the tumor. The association with a weight gain of 25.0 kg or more was stronger among leaner women (multivariate-adjusted RR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.62-3.54) than among heavier women (multivariate-adjusted RR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.19-2.32; P = .05 for interaction). The association with a weight gain of 25.0 kg or more was apparent among ER+/PR+ cases (multivariate-adjusted RR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.93-4.58) but not among ER−/PR− cases (multivariate-adjusted RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.65-2.20; P = .01 for heterogeneity).
Weight change since menopause was also associated with breast cancer risk (P = .002 for trend; Table 3). Among all postmenopausal women, a weight gain of 10.0 kg or more was associated with an increased risk (multivariate-adjusted RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.35) compared with women who had maintained weight since menopause. Weight loss of 10.0 kg or more since menopause was associated with a suggested decreased breast cancer risk (multivariate-adjusted RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.56-1.08), although there was not a clear trend across categories of weight loss. Results were similar when the analysis was restricted to women who maintained a stable change since menopause. The association again varied by PMH use, although the interaction was not significant (P = .13). Among women who had ever used PMH, weight change since menopause was not associated with breast cancer risk (P = .22 for trend). Among those who never used PMH, the association with weight gain was similar to the overall results but the association with weight loss was stronger; for a weight loss of 10.0 kg or more, the multivariate-adjusted RR was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.38-1.05; P = .04 for weight loss trend; Figure). Among those who had never used PMH and who maintained stable change since menopause, the association with a 10.0 kg or more weight loss was even stronger (multivariate-adjusted RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.21-0.86; P = .01 for weight loss trend; Table 3).
Analyses of weight change since menopause among women who had never used PMH were further stratified by BMI at menopause (<25 vs ≥25) and by receptor status of the tumor. We observed a stronger association with weight gain among women who were leaner at menopause (multivariate-adjusted RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.94-1.90 for a weight gain of ≥10.0 kg) and a stronger association with weight loss among heavier women (multivariate-adjusted RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.97 for a weight loss of ≥10.0 kg), although the interaction was nonsignificant (P = .23). The associations were stronger for ER+/PR+ than for ER−/PR− tumors (P=.02 for heterogeneity). For ER+/PR+ tumors, a weight gain of 10.0 kg or more was associated with an increased risk (multivariate-adjusted RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.07-2.15) and a weight loss of 2.0 kg or more was suggestively inversely associated with risk (multivariate-adjusted RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.55-1.15). For ER−/PR− tumors, neither a weight gain of 10.0 kg or more (age-adjusted RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.47-1.67) nor a weight loss of 2.0 kg or more (age-adjusted RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.66-1.86) was associated with risk.
To more thoroughly examine timing of weight change through adult life, we analyzed the associations of 5-kg increases in weight from age 18 years to menopause and since menopause with breast cancer risk in the same statistical model (Table 4). Among all postmenopausal women, breast cancer risk increased with gains during both periods (18 years to menopause multivariate-adjusted RR, 1.04 per 5 kg; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; since menopause multivariate-adjusted RR, 1.06 per 5 kg; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09). Among those who had ever used PMH, no association was observed with gain between age 18 years and menopause, although there was a suggested, but nonsignificant, association after menopause. Among women who never used PMH, the risk before menopause was stronger (multivariate-adjusted RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16) but the risk after menopause was similar to the overall risk (multivariate-adjusted RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.13). When women who had never used PMH were stratified by BMI, the results were again stronger among women who were leaner at age 18 years (BMI <21; multivariate-adjusted RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.24, for a 5-kg increase between age 18 years and menopause). Although the interaction between BMI at age 18 years and weight gain was significant (P = .04), weight gain remained significantly associated with risk among women heavier at age 18 years (BMI ≥21; multivariate-adjusted RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.13). The association with each 5-kg gain since menopause was stronger among women who were lean at menopause (BMI <25; multivariate-adjusted RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.30) while there was no association among heavier women (multivariate-adjusted RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95-1.09; P = .08 for interaction).
We did not include physical activity as a covariate in our analyses because our primary interest was weight change, regardless of how weight change occurred. However, adding physical activity to the models did not alter the results. Including past oral contraceptive use in our model also did not alter the results. To ensure that our results were not dependent on the weight-change categories chosen, we repeated the trend test analyses using continuous weight change instead of using the medians of the categories; results were unchanged. Analyses of weight gain as a percentage of baseline weight produced results similar to the primary analyses; this also was true when stratified by baseline BMI. To ensure that weight change due to preclinical disease did not induce a spurious association, we repeated the analyses using weight change from either 2 or 4 years before the questionnaire cycle in which the cases were diagnosed; results were essentially unchanged.
To assess the implications of our findings in terms of absolute rates, we calculated incidence rates for categories of weight change, using the incidence rate in women who maintained weight and the RR estimates from our multivariate analyses. Overall, incidence rates for women who maintained weight and women who gained 25.0 kg or more since age 18 years were 296 and 429 cases per 100 000 person-years, respectively (228 and 451 per 100 000 person-years among women who had never used PMH, respectively). The incidence rates for women who maintained weight since menopause and women who gained 10.0 kg or more since menopause were 339 and 400 per 100 000 person-years, respectively (281 and 334 cases per 100 000 person-years, respectively, among women who had never used PMH). Among women who had never used PMH, the rates were 177 cases per 100 000 person-years for women who lost 10.0 kg or more since menopause and 121 cases per 100 000 person-years among women who lost weight and kept it off. Applying these rates over 5 years to 100 000 women who had not used PMH translates into 1145 cases among women who maintained weight since age 18 years and an excess of 1122 cases (2267 total) among women who gained 25.0 kg or more since age 18 years. For weight change since menopause, the numbers of cases would be 1392 among those who maintained their weight and an excess of 265 cases (1657 total) among women who gained 10.0 kg or more since menopause. For those who lost weight since menopause, 515 cases would be avoided among women who lost 10.0 kg or more; 793 cases would be avoided among women who lost 10.0 kg or more and kept it off. In addition, we estimated that 15.0% (95% CI, 12.8%-17.4%) of postmenopausal breast cancer cases in our population may be attributable to weight gain of 2.0 kg or more since age 18 years, and 4.4% (95% CI, 3.6%-5.5%) attributable to weight gain of 2.0 kg or more since menopause. Among women who had not used PMH, the population attributable risks are 24.2% (95% CI, 19.8%-29.1%) for gain since age 18 years and 7.6% (95% CI, 5.9%-9.7%) for gain since menopause.
In this large, prospective cohort study of postmenopausal women, weight gains since age 18 years and since menopause were associated with increased breast cancer risk. Weight loss since menopause was associated with a decreased risk among women who never used PMH, with stronger associations among women who lost and kept off weight and among those who were heavier at menopause. When weight changes in each time period were included in the same statistical model, gains both before and after menopause were associated with increased risk.
Hormones are directly related to breast cancer risk6-8 and weight likely affects risk, at least in part, through a hormonal pathway. Higher weight at younger ages (ie, before age 18 years) decreases breast cancer risk for both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, possibly due to slower pubertal growth or a greater likelihood of irregular menstrual cycles and ovulatory infertility in adulthood.31-34 Although the ovaries produce endogenous hormones in premenopausal women, ovarian hormone production declines after menopause and adipose tissue becomes the primary estrogen source by aromatization of adrenal androgens.35-37 Compared with normal weight postmenopausal women, those with higher BMI have 2-fold higher circulating estrogens38-41 and lower sex hormone–binding globulin levels,39,42 and thus more bioavailable estrogens. Weight reduction in postmenopausal women decreases circulating estrogen levels5 and increases sex hormone–binding globulin levels.43
The observed increased risk associated with weight gain since age 18 years among all postmenopausal women is consistent with many cohort9-15 and case-control18,20,32,44-52 studies. Similar to the results of other studies,11,12,14,15 we observed no association among women who had ever used PMH. Stronger associations among never or past users have been observed in prior studies,11,12,14,15 with RRs ranging from 1.5215 to 2.1314 in the highest categories of weight gain, similar to the 2-fold increased risk that we observed among those who never used PMH. This interaction between weight change and PMH use is likely because exogenous hormones increase circulating estrogen levels among all women, regardless of adiposity, and thus obscure the gradient due to adipose tissue alone.38,53,54 Thus, an association between weight change and breast cancer is most clearly observed in women who have never used PMH.
To our knowledge, this prospective study is the largest to date to examine the effect of recent weight gain among postmenopausal women. The observed significant risk associated with increasing weight gain confirms results of prior studies.11,12,17-19,45 Our findings of significant increased risks with gains both before and since menopause are consistent with 2 other studies with time-period analyses.17,19 Regardless of whether weight gain occurs before or after menopause, adipose tissue produces hormones after menopause; thus, women should be advised to avoid weight gain both before and after menopause to decrease their postmenopausal breast cancer risk.
We observed stronger associations with weight gain in both time periods among women who were leaner at age 18 years or at menopause. Results of a few other studies showed stronger associations among leaner women, although the interactions were not significant.11,18 However, associations did not vary across levels of BMI in a few other studies.9,15,50 The interaction between BMI at age 18 years and weight change likely reflects the fact that women who were lean at age 18 years do not benefit from earlier weight that is ultimately protective. The stronger association among women leaner at menopause suggests that the effect of weight gain may be more pronounced with the initial addition of adipose tissue. The plateau of the BMI and breast cancer association in higher BMI categories55 and the lack of association between PMH and breast cancer in obese women56-58 support this.
While null11,44,45,47 or weak, nonsignificant inverse10,15,16,46,48-50 associations with weight loss since early adulthood have been observed in most studies, significant decreased risks were observed in 3 case-control studies.17,20,32 In the context of these suggestive studies, we observed a significant trend of decreased breast cancer risk with weight loss since age 18 years among all postmenopausal women. Weight loss in later life has not been extensively studied, with a few studies reporting null17,20 or nonsignificant inverse19 associations. To our knowledge, ours is the first study to show a significant decreased risk with weight loss after menopause for women who maintained their loss. Although there were few cases in the highest weight loss category, the trend of decreasing risk with more weight lost also was statistically significant. Given the low prevalence of weight loss after menopause in this study and the modest results of and low adherence to weight loss programs,59 women should avoid weight gain throughout adult life rather than count on losing weight after menopause.
While weight loss was not an aim of the recently published Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial,60 women in the intervention group, who had a nearly significant breast cancer risk reduction (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83-1.01), experienced significantly greater weight loss over 6 years than the control group by about 1.4 kg (estimated by the mean of group differences in weight change at years 1, 3, and 6). Although the trial was designed to assess the low-fat intervention, the 9% reduction in risk is compatible with the greater weight loss in the intervention group, as each 1.4-kg loss after menopause in our data was associated with a 4% reduction in risk among women who had never used PMH and an 8% risk reduction among those who kept weight off.
Our absolute risk and population attributable risk calculations suggest that weight gain since age 18 years and since menopause contributes substantially to the incidence of breast cancer, and many cases could be avoided by maintaining weight throughout adult life. Importantly, many breast cancer cases also could be avoided by weight loss after menopause.
This study has several strengths, including the cohort size and length of follow-up. Validated, updated weight information allowed us to calculate change in weight. Although weight reflects both lean body mass and adipose tissue, weight gain after young adulthood more likely reflects a gain in adipose tissue.43 With biennially adjusted weight and menopausal status, we were able to determine weight at menopause and assess postmenopausal weight change. Biennial information also allowed for the identification of women with stable gain or loss since age 18 years and since menopause. There are also limitations, including recalled weight at age 18 years. However, the recall is likely quite accurate given its previous validation study .23 Although exposure was assessed by self-reported weight, reliability of self-reported anthropometric measures in this population is high and does not vary substantially by BMI.24 Another limitation is that relatively few women lose weight, particularly after menopause. Although we were able to assess weight loss in a few categories and stratify the analyses by PMH use and BMI, more follow-up is needed to confirm our findings and characterize the benefits more precisely. Although the homogeneity of the study population is a potential limitation, it is unlikely that the observed association between weight change and breast cancer differs substantially from the general population. However, these findings will need to be confirmed in other populations.
In summary, our results confirm the direct association between weight gain since age 18 years and postmenopausal breast cancer, particularly among women who had never used PMH. In addition, our data suggest that weight gain in adult life increases postmenopausal breast cancer risk, regardless of whether the gain occurs before or after menopause. An important finding from this study is that weight loss may reduce breast cancer risk, even if weight is not lost until after menopause. Although weight loss leads to several short-term benefits, these data provide another reason women should be advised to avoid weight gain and counseled on the potential benefit of weight loss after menopause. Although these data suggest that it is never too late to lose weight to decrease risk, given the difficulty in losing weight, the emphasis must also remain on weight maintenance throughout adult life.
Corresponding Author: A. Heather Eliassen, ScD, Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 181 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (email@example.com).
Author Contributions: Dr Eliassen had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: Eliassen, Colditz, Willett, Hankinson.
Acquisition of data: Colditz, Willett, Hankinson.
Analysis and interpretation of data: Eliassen, Colditz, Rosner, Willett, Hankinson.
Drafting of the manuscript: Eliassen.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Eliassen, Colditz, Rosner, Willett, Hankinson.
Statistical analysis: Eliassen, Rosner.
Obtained funding: Colditz, Hankinson.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Colditz, Willett, Hankinson.
Study supervision: Colditz, Hankinson.
Financial Disclosures: None reported.
Funding/Support: This study was supported by research grant CA87969 from the National Cancer Institute. Dr Eliassen was supported by training grant DAMD17-00-1-0165 from the Department of Defense and Cancer Education and Career Development grant R25 CA098566-02 from the National Cancer Institute. Dr Colditz was supported in part by a Cissy Hornug Clinical Research Professorship from the American Cancer Society.
Role of the Sponsor: The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
Acknowledgment: We gratefully acknowledge the Nurses' Health Study participants for their continuing cooperation.
Stein CJ, Colditz GA. The epidemic of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
. 2004;89:2522-252515181019Google ScholarCrossref
Calle EE, Kaaks R. Overweight, obesity and cancer: epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer
. 2004;4:579-59115286738Google ScholarCrossref
US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for obesity in adults: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med
. 2003;139:930-93214644896Google ScholarCrossref
International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention: Weight Control and Physical Activity. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2002
de Waard F, Poortman J, de Pedro-Alvarez Ferrero M, Baanders-van Halewijn EA. Weight reduction and oestrogen excretion in obese post-menopausal women. Maturitas
. 1982;4:155-1627121295Google ScholarCrossref
Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group. Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst
. 2002;94:606-61611959894Google ScholarCrossref
Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer. Lancet
. 1997;350:1047-105910213546Google ScholarCrossref
Missmer SA, Eliassen AH, Barbieri RL, Hankinson SE. Endogenous estrogen, androgen, and progesterone concentrations and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst
. 2004;96:1856-186515601642Google ScholarCrossref
Barnes-Josiah D, Potter JD, Sellers TA, Himes JH. Early body size and subsequent weight gain as predictors of breast cancer incidence (Iowa, United States). Cancer Causes Control
. 1995;6:112-1187749050Google ScholarCrossref
van den Brandt PA, Dirx MJ, Ronckers CM, van den Hoogen P, Goldbohm RA. Height, weight, weight change, and postmenopausal breast cancer risk: the Netherlands Cohort Study. Cancer Causes Control
. 1997;8:39-479051321Google ScholarCrossref
Huang Z, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA.
et al. Dual effects of weight and weight gain on breast cancer risk. JAMA
. 1997;278:1407-14119355998Google ScholarCrossref
Morimoto LM, White E, Chen Z.
et al. Obesity, body size, and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: the Women's Health Initiative (United States). Cancer Causes Control
. 2002;13:741-75112420953Google ScholarCrossref
Lahmann PH, Lissner L, Gullberg B, Olsson H, Berglund G. A prospective study of adiposity and postmenopausal breast cancer risk: the Malmo Diet and Cancer Study. Int J Cancer
. 2003;103:246-25212455040Google ScholarCrossref
Feigelson HS, Jonas CR, Teras LR, Thun MJ, Calle EE. Weight gain, body mass index, hormone replacement therapy, and postmenopausal breast cancer in a large prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
. 2004;13:220-22414973094Google ScholarCrossref
Lahmann PH, Schulz M, Hoffmann K.
et al. Long-term weight change and breast cancer risk: the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC). Br J Cancer
. 2005;93:582-58916136032Google ScholarCrossref
Parker ED, Folsom AR. Intentional weight loss and incidence of obesity-related cancers: the Iowa Women's Health Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
. 2003;27:1447-145214634673Google ScholarCrossref
Eng SM, Gammon MD, Terry MB.
et al. Body size changes in relation to postmenopausal breast cancer among women on Long Island, New York. Am J Epidemiol
. 2005;162:229-23715987723Google ScholarCrossref
Shu XO, Jin F, Dai Q.
et al. Association of body size and fat distribution with risk of breast cancer among Chinese women. Int J Cancer
. 2001;94:449-45511745429Google ScholarCrossref
Harvie M, Howell A, Vierkant RA.
et al. Association of gain and loss of weight before and after menopause with risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in the Iowa women's health study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
. 2005;14:656-66115767346Google ScholarCrossref
Trentham-Dietz A, Newcomb PA, Egan KM.
et al. Weight change and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control
. 2000;11:533-54210880035Google ScholarCrossref
Belanger CF, Hennekens CH, Rosner B, Speizer FE. The Nurses' Health Study. Am J Nurs
. 1978;78:1039-1040248266Google Scholar
Colditz GA, Hankinson SE. The Nurses' Health Study: lifestyle and health among women. Nat Rev Cancer
. 2005;5:388-39615864280Google ScholarCrossref
Troy LM, Hunter DJ, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. The validity of recalled weight among younger women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
. 1995;19:570-5727489028Google Scholar
Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Chute CG, Litin LB, Willett WC. Validity of self-reported waist and hip circumferences in men and women. Epidemiology
. 1990;1:466-4732090285Google ScholarCrossref
National Cancer Institute. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1997. Washington, DC: National Cancer Institute
Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC.
et al. Reproducibility and validity of self-reported menopausal status in a prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol
. 1987;126:319-3253605058Google ScholarCrossref
Marshall RJ, Chisholm EM. Hypothesis testing in the polychotomous logistic model with an application to detecting gastrointestinal cancer. Stat Med
. 1985;4:337-3444059720Google ScholarCrossref
Hamajima N, Hirose K, Tajima K.
et al. Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer–collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease. Br J Cancer
. 2002;87:1234-124512439712Google ScholarCrossref
Bruzzi P, Green SB, Byar DP, Brinton LA, Schairer C. Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data. Am J Epidemiol
. 1985;122:904-9144050778Google Scholar
Spiegelman D, Wand HC, Hertzmark E. Point and interval estimation of partial population attributable risks in cohort studies. Cancer Causes ControlIn pressGoogle Scholar
Baer HJ, Colditz GA, Rosner B.
et al. Body fatness during childhood and adolescence and incidence of breast cancer in premenopausal women: a prospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res
. 2005;7:R314-R32515987426Google ScholarCrossref
Magnusson C, Baron J, Persson I.
et al. Body size in different periods of life and breast cancer risk in post-menopausal women. Int J Cancer
. 1998;76:29-349533758Google ScholarCrossref
Berkey CS, Frazier AL, Gardner JD, Colditz GA. Adolescence and breast carcinoma risk. Cancer
. 1999;85:2400-240910357411Google ScholarCrossref
Rich-Edwards JW, Goldman MB, Willett WC.
et al. Adolescent body mass index and infertility caused by ovulatory disorder. Am J Obstet Gynecol
. 1994;171:171-1778030695Google ScholarCrossref
Grodin JM, Siiteri PK, MacDonald PC. Source of estrogen production in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
. 1973;36:207-2144688315Google ScholarCrossref
Judd HL, Shamonki IM, Frumar AM, Lagasse LD. Origin of serum estradiol in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol
. 1982;59:680-6867078905Google Scholar
Siiteri PK. Adipose tissue as a source of hormones. Am J Clin Nutr
. 1987;45:277-2823541569Google Scholar
Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Manson JE.
et al. Alcohol, height, and adiposity in relation to estrogen and prolactin levels in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst
. 1995;87:1297-13027658481Google ScholarCrossref
Potischman N, Swanson CA, Siiteri P, Hoover RN. Reversal of relation between body mass and endogenous estrogen concentrations with menopausal status. J Natl Cancer Inst
. 1996;88:756-7588637031Google ScholarCrossref
Thomas HV, Key TJ, Allen DS.
et al. Reversal of relation between body mass and endogenous estrogen concentrations with menopausal status. J Natl Cancer Inst
. 1997;89:396-3989060964Google ScholarCrossref
Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group. Body mass index, serum sex hormones, and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst
. 2003;95:1218-122612928347Google ScholarCrossref
Newcomb PA, Klein R, Klein BE.
et al. Association of dietary and life-style factors with sex hormones in postmenopausal women. Epidemiology
. 1995;6:318-3217619943Google ScholarCrossref
Enriori CL, Orsini W, del Carmen Cremona M, Etkin AE, Cardillo LR, Reforzo-Membrives J. Decrease of circulating level of SHBG in postmenopausal obese women as a risk factor in breast cancer: reversible effect of weight loss. Gynecol Oncol
. 1986;23:77-863943755Google ScholarCrossref
Brinton LA, Swanson CA. Height and weight at various ages and risk of breast cancer. Ann Epidemiol
. 1992;2:597-6091342311Google ScholarCrossref
Ziegler RG, Hoover RN, Nomura AM.
et al. Relative weight, weight change, height, and breast cancer risk in Asian-American women. J Natl Cancer Inst
. 1996;88:650-6608627641Google ScholarCrossref
Hirose K, Tajima K, Hamajima N.
et al. Effect of body size on breast-cancer risk among Japanese women. Int J Cancer
. 1999;80:349-3559935173Google ScholarCrossref
Chu SY, Lee NC, Wingo PA, Senie RT, Greenberg RS, Peterson HB. The relationship between body mass and breast cancer among women enrolled in the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study. J Clin Epidemiol
. 1991;44:1197-12061941014Google ScholarCrossref
Li CI, Stanford JL, Daling JR. Anthropometric variables in relation to risk of breast cancer in middle-aged women. Int J Epidemiol
. 2000;29:208-21310817115Google ScholarCrossref
Shoff SM, Newcomb PA, Trentham-Dietz A.
et al. Early-life physical activity and postmenopausal breast cancer: effect of body size and weight change. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
. 2000;9:591-59510868694Google Scholar
Trentham-Dietz A, Newcomb PA, Storer BE.
et al. Body size and risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol
. 1997;145:1011-10199169910Google ScholarCrossref
Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, Bryant HE. Case-control study of anthropometric measures and breast cancer risk. Int J Cancer
. 2002;99:445-45211992416Google ScholarCrossref
Wenten M, Gilliland FD, Baumgartner K, Samet JM. Associations of weight, weight change, and body mass with breast cancer risk in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. Ann Epidemiol
. 2002;12:435-44412160603Google ScholarCrossref
Chetkowski RJ, Meldrum DR, Steingold KA.
et al. Biologic effects of transdermal estradiol. N Engl J Med
. 1986;314:1615-16203012339Google ScholarCrossref
Jurgens RW Jr, Downey LJ, Abernethy WD, Cutler NR, Conrad J. A comparison of circulating hormone levels in postmenopausal women receiving hormone replacement therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol
. 1992;167:459-4601497051Google ScholarCrossref
van den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS.
et al. Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol
. 2000;152:514-52710997541Google ScholarCrossref
Magnusson C, Baron JA, Correia N, Bergstrom R, Adami HO, Persson I. Breast-cancer risk following long-term oestrogen- and oestrogen-progestin-replacement therapy. Int J Cancer
. 1999;81:339-34410209946Google ScholarCrossref
Chen WY, Hankinson SE, Schnitt SJ, Rosner BA, Holmes MD, Colditz GA. Association of hormone replacement therapy to estrogen and progesterone receptor status in invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer
. 2004;101:1490-150015378477Google ScholarCrossref
Chlebowski RT, Hendrix SL, Langer RD.
et al. Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial. JAMA
. 2003;289:3243-325312824205Google ScholarCrossref
Dansinger ML, Gleason JA, Griffith JL, Selker HP, Schaefer EJ. Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction: a randomized trial. JAMA
. 2005;293:43-5315632335Google ScholarCrossref
Prentice RL, Caan B, Chlebowski RT.
et al. Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of invasive breast cancer: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial. JAMA
. 2006;295:629-64216467232Google ScholarCrossref