AAMI indicates age-associated memory impairment. “Allocated to treatment incorrectly” indicates that the individuals were found to be ineligible after they received treatment allocation.
aThe number analyzed is based on the primary outcome variable for the Cognitive Function Trial (delayed paragraph recall score).
AAMI indicates age-associated memory impairment. Error bars indicate 95% CIs. The score range for the delayed paragraph recall test (Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised Logical Memory II) was 0 to 50. Benton Visual Retention Test scores could range from 0 to 26 but were inverted to −26 to 0 so that higher scores indicated better performance. Possible scores for the Trail-Making Test B minus A range from −290 to 290. The range of possible scores for the Card Rotation Test was −80 to 80. Some participants completed the Delayed Paragraph Recall Test at baseline but not the secondary assessments.
eTable 1. Overlap of Participation in the 3 Main Trials (Sexual Function, Physical Function, and Vitality) with AAMI Status by Treatment Group
eTable 2. Characteristics of Men Enrolled in the Testosterone Trials who Were Normal for Age at Baseline
eTable 3. Change from Baseline and Treatment Effects for Cognitive Outcomes in Men Normal for Age
eFigure 1. Serum Concentrations of Hormones in Men With Age-Associated Memory Impairment in the Cognitive Function Trial From Baseline Through 12 Months of Treatment With Testosterone or Placebo
eFigure 2. Mean Change From Baseline to 12 Months of Treatment With Testosterone or Placebo in Men Normal for Age in Verbal Memory (Delayed Paragraph Recall), Visual Memory, Executive Function, and Spatial Ability
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Resnick SM, Matsumoto AM, Stephens-Shields AJ, et al. Testosterone Treatment and Cognitive Function in Older Men With Low Testosterone and Age-Associated Memory Impairment. JAMA. 2017;317(7):717–727. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.21044
Is treatment with testosterone for 1 year associated with improved memory in older men with low testosterone and age-associated memory impairment?
In this placebo-controlled study of 788 older men with symptomatic hypogonadism, 493 had age-associated memory impairment, defined by subjective memory complaints and impaired performance on tests of verbal and visual memory. Compared with placebo, 1 year of testosterone treatment was not significantly associated with improved memory or other cognitive functions in these men.
This study does not support the use of testosterone for the treatment of age-associated memory decline in older men with symptomatic hypogonadism.
Most cognitive functions decline with age. Prior studies suggest that testosterone treatment may improve these functions.
To determine if testosterone treatment compared with placebo is associated with improved verbal memory and other cognitive functions in older men with low testosterone and age-associated memory impairment (AAMI).
Design, Setting, and Participants
The Testosterone Trials (TTrials) were 7 trials to assess the efficacy of testosterone treatment in older men with low testosterone levels. The Cognitive Function Trial evaluated cognitive function in all TTrials participants. In 12 US academic medical centers, 788 men who were 65 years or older with a serum testosterone level less than 275 ng/mL and impaired sexual function, physical function, or vitality were allocated to testosterone treatment (n = 394) or placebo (n = 394). A subgroup of 493 men met criteria for AAMI based on baseline subjective memory complaints and objective memory performance. Enrollment in the TTrials began June 24, 2010; the final participant completed treatment and assessment in June 2014.
Testosterone gel (adjusted to maintain the testosterone level within the normal range for young men) or placebo gel for 1 year.
Main Outcomes and Measures
The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline to 6 months and 12 months for delayed paragraph recall (score range, 0 to 50) among men with AAMI. Secondary outcomes were mean changes in visual memory (Benton Visual Retention Test; score range, 0 to −26), executive function (Trail-Making Test B minus A; range, −290 to 290), and spatial ability (Card Rotation Test; score range, −80 to 80) among men with AAMI. Tests were administered at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months.
Among the 493 men with AAMI (mean age, 72.3 years [SD, 5.8]; mean baseline testosterone, 234 ng/dL [SD, 65.1]), 247 were assigned to receive testosterone and 246 to receive placebo. Of these groups, 247 men in the testosterone group and 245 men in the placebo completed the memory study. There was no significant mean change from baseline to 6 and 12 months in delayed paragraph recall score among men with AAMI in the testosterone and placebo groups (adjusted estimated difference, −0.07 [95% CI, −0.92 to 0.79]; P = .88). Mean scores for delayed paragraph recall were 14.0 at baseline, 16.0 at 6 months, and 16.2 at 12 months in the testosterone group and 14.4 at baseline, 16.0 at 6 months, and 16.5 at 12 months in the placebo group. Testosterone was also not associated with significant differences in visual memory (−0.28 [95% CI, −0.76 to 0.19]; P = .24), executive function (−5.51 [95% CI, −12.91 to 1.88]; P = .14), or spatial ability (−0.12 [95% CI, −1.89 to 1.65]; P = .89).
Conclusions and Relevance
Among older men with low testosterone and age-associated memory impairment, treatment with testosterone for 1 year compared with placebo was not associated with improved memory or other cognitive functions.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00799617
Aging is associated with declines in some cognitive functions, including verbal and visual memory, executive function, and spatial ability.1-3 Aging in men is also associated with a reduction in serum testosterone,4,5 raising the possibility that reduced circulating testosterone concentration may contribute to age-related cognitive decline. Support for this hypothesis comes from studies of clinical conditions that cause low testosterone levels,6,7 epidemiological investigations,8,9 and small randomized trials showing improved memory with testosterone supplementation.10 Together, these studies suggest that lower testosterone levels may be associated with poorer cognitive functioning in older men and that testosterone treatment may improve cognitive functioning, especially memory.
An Institute of Medicine panel11 recommended investigating the effects of testosterone treatment on conditions, including cognitive impairment, that might be caused by the decrease in testosterone. Men with age-associated memory impairment (AAMI) represent a clinically important group at risk for developing more severe memory impairment (eg, mild cognitive impairment and dementia)12 for whom testosterone intervention may be beneficial. AAMI is defined by subjective complaints of memory decline and scores at least 1 SD below the mean for young adults on objective memory testing.13 A large percentage of community-dwelling older adults meets these criteria.14
The Cognitive Function Trial determined the efficacy of testosterone treatment on cognitive outcomes among older men enrolled in the Testosterone Trials (TTrials) with low testosterone likely due to age.15 The primary hypothesis of the Cognitive Function Trial was that testosterone treatment for 1 year would improve or slow decline in verbal memory in the subgroup of men 65 years or older with an average testosterone level of less than 275 ng/dL and AAMI. Secondary aims were to determine if testosterone treatment affects other cognitive functions in these men with AAMI, and exploratory aims were to determine the effect of testosterone treatment on cognitive function in all men in the TTrials.
The TTrials are a coordinated set of 7 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials conducted at 12 US academic medical centers.15 To qualify for the TTrials, participants had to qualify for the Sexual Function Trial, the Physical Function Trial, or the Vitality Trial.16 Cognitive tests were administered to all participants, but the Cognitive Function Trial’s primary focus was the subgroup of men with AAMI.
The trial protocol (Supplement 1) and consent form were approved by the institutional review boards of the University of Pennsylvania and all trial sites. All participants provided written, informed consent. An unblinded data and safety monitoring board monitored accumulating safety data every 3 months.
Participants for the TTrials were recruited and screened as described.16 Respondents were screened first by telephone and then at 2 clinic visits. Inclusion criteria for the TTrials overall were 65 years or older and the mean of 2 morning serum testosterone concentrations less than 275 ng/dL (to convert to nmol/L, multiply by 0.0347). Additionally, inclusion in the Sexual Function Trial required self-reported decreased libido and sexual activity, inclusion in the Physical Function Trial required self-reported difficulty walking or climbing stairs and low gait speed, and inclusion in the Vitality Trial required self-reported fatigue and reduced vitality.16 Exclusion criteria included a recent history or evidence of increased risk of conditions that testosterone might exacerbate, cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination score <24), and severe depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] score ≥20) (eAppendix in Supplement 2).17
Men were classified as having AAMI if they had both subjective memory complaints and relative impairment on objective tests of memory performance. Subjective memory complaints were indicated by a score of 4 or 5 on at least 1 item of the Memory Assessment Clinics Questionnaire (MAC-Q).18 Objective memory impairment was defined by a score more than 1 SD below the performance for young men (aged 20-24 years) but not greater than 2 SD below the scores of age-matched men on tests of delayed paragraph recall or visual memory. Men were “normal for age” if they did not meet criteria for AAMI and had scores of 80 or more on the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MSE) measure of global cognitive function. Demographic characteristics including self-reported race (white, African American, or other) and ethnicity (Hispanic or non-Hispanic) were collected because there are race differences in genetic risk factors for some conditions that affect cognitive function.
In the TTrials overall, participants were allocated to treatment by minimization, with participants assigned to the optimally balanced treatment with 80% probability.19,20 Balancing variables included participation in each of the 3 main trials of the TTrials (Sexual Function Trial, Physical Function Trial, or Vitality Trial), trial site, screening testosterone concentration (≤200 ng/dL or >200 ng/dL), age (≤75 years or >75 years), and use of antidepressants and phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors. AAMI was not included as a balancing factor.
The testosterone gel was 1% concentration in a pump bottle (AndroGel, AbbVie). The initial dose was 5 g daily. The placebo gel was similar in appearance, smell, and consistency. Serum testosterone concentration was measured at month 1, 2, 3, 6, and 9 in a central laboratory (Quest Clinical Trials, Valencia, California). The dose of testosterone gel was adjusted by an unblinded staff person at the University of Pennsylvania data coordinating center following a prespecified algorithm after each measurement to keep the concentration within the mid-normal range for young men (500-800 ng/dL). To maintain blinding when the dose was adjusted in a participant taking testosterone, the dose was changed simultaneously in a participant taking placebo gel.
Serum concentrations of testosterone, free testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, estradiol, and sex hormone–binding globulin were measured at the end of the trial in sera frozen at −80°C. Steroid assays were performed in the Brigham Research Assay Core Laboratory in Boston, Massachusetts, using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy and free testosterone was measured by equilibrium dialysis.16 All samples from each participant were measured in the same assay run.
The primary outcome was mean change from baseline to 6 months and to 12 months in delayed paragraph recall score among men with AAMI. Secondary outcomes were change from baseline in visual memory, executive function, and spatial ability among men with AAMI. Exploratory outcomes included change from baseline on these measures among all men enrolled in the TTrials, as well as change in global cognition, subjective memory complaints, and immediate paragraph recall. We also performed additional exploratory analyses of the subgroup of men who were normal for age (normal for age subgroup) because recent trials in Alzheimer disease suggest that treatments may be less effective in the presence of cognitive impairment and irreversible neuronal damage that may be present among men with AAMI.21
The methods for cognitive assessments are detailed in Supplement 2. The cognitive battery was administered at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months and included measures of subjective memory complaints (MAC-Q); verbal memory by immediate paragraph recall (Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised Logical Memory I) and delayed paragraph recall (Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised Logical Memory II); visual memory (Benton Visual Retention Test [BVRT]; score range, 0 to −26)22; executive function (Trail-Making Test B minus A [TMT B − A]; range, −290 to 290); and spatial ability (Card Rotation Test; score range, −80 to 80). TMT B − A was used as an outcome because it provides a purer measure of executive function, adjusting for visuomotor speed and attention. Global cognitive function (3MSE) was assessed at baseline and 12 months. To minimize practice effects, 3 versions (A, B, and C) of Logical Memory, BVRT, and the Card Rotations Test were used in the test battery. All participants in the TTrials, regardless of AAMI status, were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 test battery orders for baseline, 6-month, and 12-month assessments (ABC, BCA, or CAB).
The Cognition Reading Center (CRC) at Wake Forest School of Medicine provided training, oversight, and quality control of cognitive testing following established procedures.23,24 CRC and National Institute on Aging investigators conducted a centralized in-person training session of testers from the 12 clinic sites. Subsequently, testers audio-taped a practice administration and submitted it for CRC certification. Recertification was required every 6 months for the first year and annually thereafter. During the trial, the CRC staff monitored the certified testers and assisted in training new testers. The CRC scored the cognitive measures and entered the data.
The statistical analytic plan is available in Supplement 1. Data from earlier studies of delayed paragraph recall showed testosterone-associated effect sizes ranging from 0.13 to 0.62.10,25 Based on our estimate of the proportion of men recruited who would meet the AAMI criteria, we determined that we would be able to detect an effect size of 0.3 (based on change from baseline to 12 months), corresponding to a 3-point difference between testosterone and placebo groups in change from baseline to 12 months in delayed paragraph recall. A 3-point difference is equivalent to a change in score from the 50th percentile performance for a man aged 70 to 74 years to that of a man aged 45 to 54 years.26
Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they had been allocated, following the intention-to-treat principle. Primary analyses of outcomes from all time points were performed with mixed-effects models for longitudinal data. Models entered visit time (6 months or 12 months) as a categorical variable. Models initially included a main effect of treatment and treatment by visit interaction, but interaction terms were removed if they did not achieve statistical significance at the .05 level. Additional fixed effects were the baseline value for each outcome, balancing variables, and PHQ-9 depressive symptom score. Random intercepts were included for participants. After removing the treatment by visit interaction (nonsignificant for all cognitive outcomes), the estimated difference denotes the difference in the mean change from baseline to 6 months and to 12 months between treatment groups. All hypothesis tests were 2-sided and conducted at an α level of .05. We did not adjust analyses of the primary and secondary outcomes for multiple comparisons because the correlations among outcomes were expected to be high, making such adjustment excessively conservative. Mixed-effects models provide unbiased estimates of estimated differences under the assumption of data missing at random, meaning that missingness is associated at most with observed data and not unobserved responses. No additional sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the influence of missing data on results given the small amount of missingness and nature of the results. We used the same statistical approach for analysis of outcomes for AAMI, all men, and the normal for age subgroup.
We also investigated whether the potential association between testosterone treatment and cognitive function was related to baseline testosterone levels (continuous variable) and to baseline global cognitive function (baseline 3MSE score groups: <90, 90-94, 95-100). All analyses were performed in SAS (SAS Institute), version 9.4.
Recruitment began in June 2010, and planned accrual was completed in June 2013. Treatment was completed in June 2014. Of 788 men enrolled in the TTrials, 493 men (62.6%) met the criteria for AAMI, 247 in the testosterone group and 246 in the placebo group (Figure 1). Baseline characteristics by treatment group for men with AAMI and all men are presented in Table 1 and Table 2 and those for the normal for age subgroup are in eTable 2 in Supplement 2. In the AAMI group, placebo and testosterone treatment groups did not differ at baseline in most demographic and medical characteristics or in sex hormone levels or cognitive performance. Among all men enrolled in the TTrials, executive function performance at baseline was slightly better among those assigned to placebo than those assigned to testosterone.
Adherence to treatment in the TTrials was assessed by weighing gel bottles at each visit and was judged as excellent (mean adherence >92% at each site). Testosterone treatment increased the serum concentrations of total and free testosterone and estradiol in men with AAMI (eFigure 1 in Supplement 2) and in all men16 to levels in the mid-normal range for healthy young men aged 19 to 40 years. These levels were unchanged in men receiving placebo.
Among men with AAMI, testosterone treatment compared with placebo was not associated with significant differences in the mean change from baseline to month 6 and to month 12 in delayed paragraph recall (adjusted estimated difference, −0.07 [95% CI, −0.92 to 0.79]; P = .88) (Table 3 and Figure 2). Mean delayed paragraph recall scores (score range, 0 to 50) were 14.0 at baseline, 16.0 at month 6, and 16.2 at month 12 in the testosterone group and 14.4 at baseline, 16.2 at month 6, and 16.5 at month 12 in the placebo group. The difference in mean change between treatment groups did not vary significantly by visit month. Analyses evaluating whether the association of testosterone treatment with memory and cognitive function varied by baseline testosterone level and by baseline global cognition yielded similar results.
Among men with AAMI, there was no significant association between testosterone treatment and mean change from baseline to month 6 and month 12 in visual memory (adjusted estimated difference, −0.28 [95% CI, −0.76 to 0.19]; P = .24), executive function (adjusted estimated difference, −5.51 [95% CI, −12.91 to 1.88]; P = .14), or spatial ability (adjusted estimated difference, −0.12 [95% CI, −1.89 to 1.65]; P = .89) (Table 3 and Figure 2). Mean scores for visual memory were −8.2 at baseline, −7.7 at 6 months, and −7.7 at 12 months in the testosterone group and −8.2 at baseline, −7.7 at 6 months, and −7.3 at 12 months in the placebo group. Mean scores for spatial ability were 28.7 at baseline, 30.8 at 6 months, and 31.1 at 12 months in the testosterone group and 30.0 at baseline, 31.6 at 6 months, and 32.4 at 12 months in the placebo group. Mean scores for executive function were 86.4 at baseline, 74.5 at 6 months, 76.0 at 12 months in the testosterone group and 76.7 at baseline, 74.3 at 6 months, and 78.5 at 12 months in the placebo group.
Among all men in the TTrials (with and without AAMI), there were also no significant associations of testosterone treatment with mean change from baseline to month 6 and month 12 in delayed paragraph recall (adjusted estimated difference, 0.09 [95% CI, −0.57 to 0.75]; P = .80), visual memory (adjusted estimated difference, −0.34 [95% CI, −0.70 to 0.01]; P = .06), or spatial ability (adjusted estimated difference, −0.08 [95% CI, −1.44 to 1.28]; P = .91) (Table 4). Mean scores among all men for delayed paragraph recall were 15.3 at baseline, 17.3 at 6 months, and 17.6 at 12 months in the testosterone group and 15.7 at baseline, 17.3 at 6 months, and 17.5 at 12 months in the placebo group. Mean scores among all men for visual memory were −7.5 at baseline, −7.3 at 6 months, and −7.1 at 12 months in the testosterone group and −7.3 at baseline, −7.1 at 6 months, and −6.6 at 12 months in the placebo group. Mean scores among all men for spatial ability were 29.7 at baseline, 31.8 at 6 months, and 32.7 at 12 months in the testosterone group and 31.4 at baseline, 33.0 at 6 months, and 34.0 at 12 months in the placebo group. In all men, executive function showed a small improvement in the testosterone group compared with the placebo group (adjusted estimated difference, −5.68 [95% CI, −11.18 to −0.17]; P = .04). Mean scores among all men for executive function were 83.1 at baseline, 69.2 at 6 months, and 70.5 at 12 months in the testosterone group and 73.3 at baseline, 70.6 at 6 months, and 72.9 at 12 months in the placebo group.
Testosterone and placebo groups did not differ significantly in any of the exploratory outcomes of immediate paragraph recall, subjective memory complaints, and global cognitive function (AAMI shown in Table 2, all men shown in Table 3). There was no significant association of testosterone treatment with any cognitive outcomes for the normal for age subgroup (eTable 3 and eFigure 2 in Supplement 2).
Among all TTrials participants, men treated with testosterone compared with placebo were more likely to experience erythrocytosis (hemoglobin level, ≥17.5 g/dL), but the 2 groups did not differ in other adverse events, as previously reported.16
Among older men with symptomatic hypogonadism and low baseline testosterone, testosterone treatment compared with placebo for 1 year was not associated with significant improvement in memory and other cognitive functions. The lack of association between testosterone treatment and cognition was apparent across all cognitive domains assessed among men with AAMI, in spite of an increase in circulating total and free testosterone concentrations in the testosterone group to levels typical of men aged 19 to 40 years.16
Verbal memory by delayed paragraph recall performance among men with AAMI was selected a priori as the primary outcome based on prior findings in small clinical trials and its clinical importance. Verbal memory declines with age,1-3 and the decline is accelerated in the years preceding clinical dementia, including Alzheimer disease.26-28 Delayed paragraph recall performance requires integrity of the hippocampus, which contains both androgen and estrogen receptors, providing a biological basis for the actions of testosterone or its active metabolite, estradiol.29-31 In addition, verbal memory has been associated with circulating testosterone levels in epidemiologic studies of aging men,8,32,33 may be impaired with androgen deprivation,6,7,34 and has shown improvement after testosterone treatment in some previous short-term trials among older men.10,35
Cognitive assessments were performed among all men in the TTrials, although the principal analyses focused on the subgroup of men who met criteria for AAMI, which defined a sample of men with subjective symptoms of memory decline and objective reductions in memory performance. Testosterone-treated men did show a small increase in executive function with the increased statistical power in all men combined but no other outcomes; it is difficult to interpret this difference in a single exploratory outcome given the multiple outcomes assessed. We found no significant association between testosterone treatment and memory or other cognitive function in the normal for age subgroup.
In spite of previously reported associations between testosterone and verbal memory, the results of this Cognitive Function Trial offers no support for a benefit to memory and little or no support for a benefit to other cognitive functions in older hypogonadal men. It is possible that the mode of treatment and participant characteristics might have contributed to differences between the current findings and those reported previously. Some prior studies used doses of injectable testosterone preparations that cause supraphysiological peak and higher average testosterone levels over time than in our study of testosterone gels. Testosterone gels provide more stable physiological levels. Effects of injectable testosterone may reflect acutely changing testosterone levels, depending on timing of cognitive testing relative to testosterone peaks and troughs. However, our findings are consistent with the lack of significant cognitive effects in a smaller, but longer-term (36 months), placebo-controlled trial of biweekly intramuscular testosterone injections in older men.36 Another difference between men enrolled in the TTrials and those studied in many prior trials was the selection of men with subjective memory complaints and unequivocally low baseline testosterone levels.
The Cognitive Function Trial of the TTrials is, to our knowledge, the largest placebo-controlled study conducted to date of testosterone effects on cognition in older men with low testosterone levels. The trial addresses limitations of prior studies including small sample sizes, variability in baseline testosterone levels and cognitive function of participants, variability in dose and duration of testosterone treatment, and sensitivity of the cognitive outcome measures to hormone action and practice effects. The Cognitive Function Trial had more than 90% power to detect a clinically meaningful increase in verbal memory performance, although it was not powered to detect very small effects, and was conducted in older men who had unequivocally low testosterone and well-defined cognitive function at baseline. The testosterone treatment increased circulating total and free testosterone and estradiol levels to within the normal ranges for young men. The Cognitive Function Trial included assessment of a range of cognitive functions, including verbal and visual memory, spatial ability, and executive function, with alternate forms and randomized test orders to minimize practice effects with repeated use of the same test. The cognitive domains and specific measures were selected based on prior studies showing associations with circulating testosterone in observational studies8,9,32,33 as well as beneficial effects of testosterone on memory function in small randomized trials of younger and older men.10,35,37 The procedures for cognitive assessment and scoring were rigorous and followed established procedures for centralized training, certification, and scoring.23,24 One year of testosterone treatment had no or little effect on cognition.
This study had several limitations. First, AAMI status was not a balancing factor in treatment allocation, although the 2 treatment groups did not differ with respect to baseline demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, or cognitive performance. Second, the participants in this study were older men with symptomatic hypogonadism and unequivocally low baseline testosterone with no known cause other than aging, so the findings may not generalize to other populations, such as men with normal testosterone or older or younger men, or men with more severe androgen deficiency due to testicular or pituitary disease. Third, it is possible that a longer treatment duration could yield a different result.
Among older men with low testosterone and AAMI, testosterone treatment for 1 year was not associated with improved memory or other cognitive functions.
Corresponding Author: Peter J. Snyder, MD, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (email@example.com).
Author Contributions: Dr Resnick had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Resnick and Matsumoto contributed equally to this work.
Concept and design: Resnick, Matsumoto, Ellenberg, Bhasin, Cunningham, Farrar, Cifelli, Snyder.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: Resnick, Matsumoto, Pleasants, Hou.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Matsumoto, Stephens-Shields, Ellenberg, Gill, Shumaker, Barrett-Connor, Bhasin, Cauley, Cella, Crandall, Cunningham, Ensrud, Farrar, Lewis, Molitch, Pahor, Swerdloff, Cifelli, Anton, Basaria, Diem, Wang, Snyder.
Statistical analysis: Stephens-Shields, Ellenberg, Cella, Swerdloff, Hou.
Obtained funding: Matsumoto, Ellenberg, Bhasin, Snyder.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Shumaker, Cauley, Lewis, Cifelli, Basaria, Snyder.
No additional contributions: Farrar, Anton.
Other - liaison to cognition reading center, including training and monitoring: Resnick.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Resnick reports receiving grants from the National Institute on Aging (NIA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and AbbVie (formerly Solvay & Abbott Lab) and being an intramural employee of NIA/NIH. Dr Matsumoto reports receiving personal fees from AbbVie, Endo, Lilly, Lipocine, and Clarus Therapeutics. Dr Stephens-Shields reports receiving grants from NIA, NIH, and AbbVie. Dr Ellenberg reports receiving grants from NIH and AbbVie. Dr Gill reports receiving grants from NIH. Dr Bhasin reports receiving grants from NIA, AbbVie, Lilly, and Transition Therapeutics; personal fees from AbbVie, Lilly, and Regeneron; a patent pending for a free testosterone calculator; and holding equity interest in FPC, LLC. Dr Cunningham reports receiving personal fees from AbbVie, Apricus Biosciences, Besins Healthcare, Clarus Therapeutics, Endo, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Pfizer, Repros Therapeutics. Dr Ensrud reports receiving grants from NIA. Dr Farrar reports receiving grants from NIA, NIH, and AbbVie. Dr Lewis reports receiving grants from NIH and AbbVie. Dr Molitch reports receiving grants from NIH and Abbott Laboratories and personal fees from AbbVie, Lilly, and Pfizer. Dr Swerdloff reports receiving grant funding from the Bone Trial of the Testosterone Trial, Clarus Therapeutics, Lipocine, and Antares Pharma and personal fees from Clarus Therapeutics and Antares Pharma. Dr Basaria reports receiving personal fees from Lilly and Takeda. Dr Diem reports receiving grants from NIA. Dr Wang reports receiving grants from Besins Health International, Clarus Therapeutics, and Lipocine and personal fees from Antares, TesoRx, and Besins Health International. Dr Snyder reports receiving grants from NIA, NIH, and AbbVie and personal fees from Watson Laboratories. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: The Testosterone Trials were supported by grant U01 AG030644 from the NIA/NIH, supplemented by funds from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; and National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. AbbVie provided funding, AndroGel, and placebo gel. The Boston site was partially supported by grant P30-AG013679 from the Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC). The Yale Field Center was partially supported by grant P30AG021342 from the Claude D. Pepper OAIC and grant UL1TR000142 from the Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award. Additional support was from the Department of Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System (Dr Matsumoto); the Academic Leadership Award (K07AG043587) from the NIA (Dr Gill); the Intramural Research Program of NIA/NIH (Dr Resnick); grant DK079626 from the National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of NIH to the University of Alabama at Birmingham Diabetes Research and Training Center (Dr Lewis); grant R01 AG37679 from NIA/NIH (Dr Cauley); and grant 5P30AG031679 from the Boston Claude D. Pepper OAIC (Dr Bhasin).
Role of the Funder/Sponsors: The NIA gave advice on the design and conduct of the study. None of the sponsoring organizations participated in collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Additional Contributions: We thank Evan Hadley, MD, and Sergei Romashkan, MD, PhD (both from NIA), for their support throughout the trials. We also thank Monique Cherrier, PhD, and Suzanne Craft, PhD (both from University of Washington); Jeri Janowsky, PhD (Oregon Health Sciences University); and Scott Moffat, PhD (Wayne State University), for their contributions during the planning phase of the Cognitive Function Trial. There was no compensation provided for their contributions.
Create a personal account or sign in to: