[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In

Featured Clinical Reviews

March 24, 2020

COVID-19 and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: What Is the Evidence?

Author Affiliations
  • 1Renal Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA. 2020;323(18):1769-1770. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.4812

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a current pandemic infection caused by a positive-sense RNA virus named the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The particularly infectious capacity of the virus, along with mortality rates ranging from 1% to above 5%, has raised concerns across the globe.1 Older patients with comorbid conditions including pulmonary disease, cardiac disease, kidney disease, diabetes, and hypertension have been associated with even higher mortality rates, suggesting particularly susceptible populations.

The increased mortality and morbidity of COVID-19 in patients with hypertension is an association that has been observed in a number of initial epidemiological studies outlining the characteristics of the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Wu et al2 found hypertension to have a hazard ratio of 1.70 for death and 1.82 for acute respiratory distress syndrome in 201 patients with COVID-19. Zhou et al3 found hypertension to have a hazard ratio of 3.05 for in-hospital mortality in 191 patients with COVID-19.

Neither of these studies2,3 adjusted for confounding variables and thus it remains unclear if this association is related to the pathogenesis of hypertension or another associated comorbidity or treatment. There has been a growing concern that this association with hypertension is confounded by treatment with specific antihypertensive medications: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).

The link with ACEIs and ARBs is because of the known association between angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and SARS-CoV-2. ACE2 has been shown4 to be a co-receptor for viral entry for SARS-CoV-2 with increasing evidence that it has a protracted role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. ACE2 has a broad expression pattern in the human body with strong expression noted in the gastrointestinal system, heart, and kidney with more recent data identifying expression of ACE2 in type II alveolar cells in the lungs. The concern that ACEIs and ARBs affect the severity and mortality of COVID-19 is 2-fold. One suggestion is that ACEIs could directly inhibit ACE2; however, ACE2 functions as a carboxypeptidase and is not inhibited by clinically prescribed ACEIs.5

In addition, there is concern that the use of ACEIs and ARBs will increase expression of ACE2 and increase patient susceptibility to viral host cell entry and propagation. There has been considerable evidence in animal models as well as some evidence in humans showing increased expression of ACE2 in the heart, brain, and even in urine after treatment with ARBs; however, there is limited evidence showing changes in serum or pulmonary ACE2 levels. More relevant, the significance of ACE2 expression on COVID-19 pathogenesis and mortality is not specifically known.

ACE2 primarily acts to counterbalance the effect of ACE. As ACE generates angiotensin II from angiotensin I, ACE2 generates angiotensin (1-7) from angiotensin II which, after binding to the Mas receptor broadly, shifts the balance from vasoconstriction with angiotensin II to vasodilation with Mas receptor activation in the effected vascular bed. The role this vasodilatory effect has in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 is unclear but some animal data suggest a link. ACE2 and angiotensin (1-7) have been found to be protective in a number of different lung injury models.

In an acid lung injury model in mice, ACE2 downregulation by SARS-CoV, the SARS virus responsible for the SARS outbreak in 2003, worsened lung injury that was improved by treatment with ARB. This suggested SARS-CoV exacerbates lung injury by decreasing ACE2 that is reversed by ARB treatment.6 Although these preclinical data suggest that increasing ACE2 expression can attenuate SARS-CoV-2–induced lung injury, there is no direct clinical evidence that has proven ACE2 to be an effective treatment for viral-induced lung injury. Of note, a preliminary trial of ACE2 infusion in 10 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome was completed in humans but was not powered to show efficacy on pulmonary function.7 There is even less evidence to demonstrate that treatment with ACEIs or ARBs can decrease severity of pulmonary injury by SARS-CoV-2, though preclinical data suggest a potential mechanism of benefit.

Despite the lack of evidence, there have been advocates for both the use and cessation of ACEIs, ARBs, or both during the treatment for COVID-19 in patients with hypertension. This has prompted some individuals to solicit changes in their hypertensive medications and growing uncertainty from physicians on what should be done. Changes in antihypertensive medications would require patients to visit their pharmacy and possibly obtain blood work, which would increase their exposure and risk of infection. Antihypertensive medication changes between classes additionally require frequent dose adjustment and management of adverse effects and increases the risk of medical errors.

In response, the Council on Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology made the following statement, “The Council on Hypertension strongly recommends that physicians and patients should continue treatment with their usual anti-hypertensive therapy because there is no clinical or scientific evidence to suggest that treatment with ACEIs or ARBs should be discontinued because of the COVID-19 infection.”8 This statement has been followed by similar statements from a number of different societies suggesting patients continue their current hypertensive medication regimen. On March 17, 2020, the American Heart Association, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the American College of Cardiology put out a joint statement advocating for patients to continue ACEIs and ARBs as prescribed and that changes in medications in the setting of COVID-19 should be completed only after careful assessment.9

There is insufficient clinical or scientific evidence to determine how to appropriately manage hypertension in the setting of COVID-19. As such, this provides an opportunity for the research community to better outline the renin-angiotensin system and specifically ACE2 in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 while clinical data are accumulated to determine if there is a link between the use of ACEIs, ARBs, or both and COVID-19 mortality and morbidity. Until more substantial data are available to guide decision-making one way or the other, physicians should be available to listen to patients’ concerns and provide reassuring advice about antihypertensive medications in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Ankit B. Patel, MD, PhD, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (apatel38@bwh.harvard.edu).

Published Online: March 24, 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.4812

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Wu  Z, McGoogan  JM.  Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.   JAMA. Published online February 24, 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2648 PubMedGoogle Scholar
Wu  C, Chen  X, Cai  Y,  et al.  Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China.   JAMA Intern Med. Published online March 13, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994PubMedGoogle Scholar
Zhou  F, Yu  T, Du  R,  et al.  Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.   Lancet. 2020;S0140-6736(20)30566-3. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3PubMedGoogle Scholar
Zhou  P, Yang  X-L, Wang  X-G,  et al.  A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin.   Nature. 2020;579(7798):270-273. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Rice  GI, Thomas  DA, Grant  PJ, Turner  AJ, Hooper  NM.  Evaluation of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), its homologue ACE2 and neprilysin in angiotensin peptide metabolism.   Biochem J. 2004;383(pt 1):45-51. doi:10.1042/BJ20040634PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kuba  K, Imai  Y, Rao  S,  et al.  A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury.   Nat Med. 2005;11(8):875-879. doi:10.1038/nm1267PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Khan  A, Benthin  C, Zeno  B,  et al.  A pilot clinical trial of recombinant human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in acute respiratory distress syndrome.   Crit Care. 2017;21(1):234.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
European Society of Cardiology. Position statement of the ESC Council on Hypertension on ACE-inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. Published March 13, 2020. Accessed March 20, 2020. https://www.escardio.org/Councils/Council-on-Hypertension-(CHT)/News/position-statement-of-the-esc-council-on-hypertension-on-ace-inhibitors-and-ang
American Heart Association. HFSA/ACC/AHA statement addresses concerns re: using RAAS antagonists in COVID-19. Accessed March 20, 2020. https://professional.heart.org/professional/ScienceNews/UCM_505836_HFSAACCAHA-statement-addresses-concerns-re-using-RAAS-antagonists-in-COVID-19.jsp
1 Comment for this article
ARBs and ACE 1 Inhibitors used in the field
Paul Winter, M.Sc. Health Studies. | Open University
May I draw the authors' attention to a paper and its references of profound relevance regarding these drugs (1). The reference refers to the effect of altered host response using the drugs in question to Ebola infection. 3 of 100 patients with EVD treated with atorvastain and irbesartan in Sierra Leone died. The author postulates that statins and ARBs could be transformational in treating the next flu pandemic and emergent coronavirus similar to SARS. I would suggest that we will now have the data if someone has the wherewithal to seek it out, in that if the author is correct, patients routinely receiving these drugs will be largely absent from intensive care units and mortality data. I have little doubt that South Korea if requested could interrogate their datasets and come up with a definitive answer in days if not hours. The link to the article published through the University of Edinburgh in Scotland is here:


1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571110/?fbclid=IwAR2u1jB_zIZ4hU3h4olHpUjZnhR9okYWFz82moXqoZH2M6dZrvsFRFKZmno