Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Baggett TP, Keyes H, Sporn N, Gaeta JM. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Residents of a Large Homeless Shelter in Boston. JAMA. 2020;323(21):2191–2192. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.6887
In the United States, 567 715 people were homeless on a single night in January 2019.1 The congregate nature and hygienic challenges of shelter life create the potential for rapid transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in this vulnerable population.
On March 13, 2020, the Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program (BHCHP), in partnership with city and state public health agencies and community partners, rolled out a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response strategy that included respiratory symptom screening at shelter front doors, expedited referrals for SARS-CoV-2 testing and isolation for those with respiratory symptoms, dedicated treatment settings for individuals with positive test results, and contact tracing of confirmed COVID-19 cases.
Between March 28, 2020, and April 1, 2020, BHCHP identified an increasing number of COVID-19 cases from a single large homeless shelter in Boston, prompting SARS-CoV-2 testing of all remaining shelter residents. We describe the results of this investigation.
Participants were adults aged at least 18 years residing in a large homeless shelter in Boston on April 2, 2020, and April 3, 2020. Residents diagnosed with COVID-19 prior to April 2, 2020 (n = 16), or concurrently diagnosed with COVID-19 at outside facilities on April 2, 2020, or April 3, 2020 (n = 6), had been removed from the shelter population and were excluded from this study.
Participants were asked to report their age, sex, race, ethnicity, and history of cough and shortness of breath and were given the option to report other symptoms. Race and ethnicity were based on fixed response categories. Other reported symptoms were grouped into categories by the investigators. Body temperature measurements were obtained using oral thermometers, with fever defined as a body temperature of at least 100 °F (37.8 °C). Nasopharyngeal specimens were collected by BHCHP clinical staff using a polyester swab and sent to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health State Public Health Laboratory for SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing.
We used descriptive statistics to characterize the study sample, the percentage of positive PCR test results, and the symptom profile of individuals with PCR-confirmed infections. This study was exempted by the Partners HealthCare Human Research Committee with a waiver of informed consent.
All individuals residing in the shelter (N = 408) underwent symptom assessment and SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing. There were no known refusals. The mean age of the participants was 51.6 years; 71.6% of participants were men, 33.1% were black or African American, and 18.6% were Hispanic or Latino (Table). Among all participants, 1.0% had fever; 8.1% reported cough; 0.7% reported shortness of breath; and 5.9% reported other symptoms, including 1.5% with nasal or sinus symptoms and 1.2% with diarrhea. Overall, 361 individuals (88.5%) reported no symptoms.
A total of 147 participants (36.0%) had PCR test results positive for SARS-CoV-2. Men constituted 84.4% of individuals with PCR-positive results and 64.4% of individuals with PCR-negative results. Among individuals with PCR test results positive for SARS-CoV-2, cough (7.5%), shortness of breath (1.4%), and fever (0.7%) were all uncommon, and 87.8% were asymptomatic.
Universal SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing of an adult homeless shelter population in Boston shortly after the identification of a COVID-19 case cluster yielded a 36% positivity rate. The majority of individuals with newly identified infections had no symptoms and no fever at the time of diagnosis, suggesting that symptom screening in homeless shelters2 may not adequately capture the extent of disease transmission in this high-risk setting. Limitations of this study include the cross-sectional nature of the study at a single shelter in Boston where several symptomatic individuals had been removed through prior symptom screening or self-referrals to outside care. These results support PCR testing of asymptomatic shelter residents if a symptomatic individual with COVID-19 is identified in the same shelter.
Corresponding Author: Travis P. Baggett, MD, MPH, Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge St, 16th Floor, Boston, MA 02114 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Accepted for Publication: April 16, 2020.
Published Online: April 27, 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.6887
Author Contributions: Dr Baggett had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: Baggett, Gaeta.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: Baggett.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: Baggett.
Administrative, technical, or material support: All authors.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Baggett reported receiving royalties from UpToDate for authorship of a topic review on homeless health care. Mr Keyes reported receiving nonfinancial support from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and the shelter where the testing was conducted during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
Previous Posting: This manuscript was posted as a preprint on medRxiv.org on April 15, 2020. doi:10.1101/2020.04.12.20059618
Additional Contributions: We thank Alfred DeMaria, MD, and colleagues at the Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Infectious Disease for facilitating the testing described in this article. We thank Joana Barbosa Teixeira, MA, Andrea Joyce, MA, Elijah Rodriguez, BA, and Erin Ford, BA (Massachusetts General Hospital), and Alexei Alvarado, BA (Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program), for their assistance with data entry. None of these individuals were compensated for their contributions.