Diagnosis, Management, and Pathophysiology of Arterial and Venous Thrombosis in COVID-19 | Cerebrovascular Disease | JAMA | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
JAMA Insights
November 23, 2020

Diagnosis, Management, and Pathophysiology of Arterial and Venous Thrombosis in COVID-19

Author Affiliations
  • 1Vascular Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 2Critical Care Cardiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA. 2020;324(24):2548-2549. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.23422

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is associated with arterial and venous thrombotic complications. In a US registry of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), thrombotic complications occurred in 2.6% of 229 non–critically ill hospitalized patients and in 35.3% of 170 hospitalized critically ill patients.1 The risk of thromboembolism in SARS-CoV-2 infection in nonhospitalized patients is unknown. Thrombotic complications include myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Autopsy findings of microthrombi in multiple organ systems, including the lungs, heart, and kidneys, suggest that thrombosis may contribute to multisystem organ dysfunction in severe COVID-19.2

Although the pathophysiology is not fully defined, prothrombotic abnormalities have been identified in patients with COVID-19. In a study of 19 critically ill patients with COVID-19, elevated levels of the following markers of hypercoagulability were identified: D-dimer in 100% of participants, fibrinogen in 74% of participants, and factor VIII in 100% of participants.3 Antiphospholipid antibodies were detected in 53% of participants, and decreased protein C, protein S, and antithrombin levels were detected in all participants.3 Coagulation abnormalities were associated with stroke, peripheral arterial ischemia, and VTE.3 A study of 115 patients with COVID-19 (71 with nonsevere and 44 with severe disease) documented the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in platelets and high platelet-associated cytokine levels.4 In this study, platelet aggregation occurred at lower than expected thrombin concentrations.4 Histopathology from 38 autopsies of patients with COVID-19 demonstrated microvascular thrombi, neutrophil extracellular traps (networks of extracellular neutrophil-derived DNA), and neutrophil-platelet aggregates.5 In vitro assays performed on peripheral blood samples in 3 patients with COVID-19 documented excessive platelet and neutrophil activation, assessed by degranulation and integrin IIb-IIIa activation and immunofluorescence, compared with samples from 5 healthy control patients.5

Direct viral infection of endothelial cells with dense perivascular T-cell infiltration along with aberrant macrophage activation, endothelial and inflammatory cell death, thrombotic microangiopathy, and angiogenesis further distinguish COVID-19 histopathologically from other respiratory viruses.6 The pathophysiology of thromboembolism in COVID-19 compared with non–COVID-19 disorders may be more platelet-dependent and related to viral-mediated endothelial inflammation, in addition to hypercoagulability associated with increased concentrations of coagulation factors, acquired antiphospholipid antibodies, and decreased concentrations of endogenous anticoagulant proteins.

More severe systemic inflammation and respiratory compromise in COVID-19 are associated with a higher prevalence of thrombotic complications. Among 388 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (16% were critically ill), despite low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) thromboprophylaxis in all patients in the intensive care unit and in 75% of those not in intensive care, symptomatic VTE occurred in 4.4% of patients, ischemic stroke in 2.5%, and MI in 1.1%.7

The extent to which SARS-CoV-2 increases the risk of thromboembolism is unclear. A UK-based study of 1877 hospital discharges related to COVID-19 and 18 159 related to non–COVID-19 medical illness did not differ in rates of hospital-associated VTE (4.8/1000 vs 3.1/1000; odds ratio, 1.6 [95% CI, 0.77-3.1]; P = .20).8 The high rate of VTE in COVID-19 may be less specific to the virus and predominantly due to the overall illness severity and complications.

Although multiple trials testing interventions to prevent thrombotic complications in COVID-19 are underway, current clinical guidelines have relied on previous studies of VTE prophylaxis in acute non–COVID-19 medical illness. Pending completion of ongoing trials, guidelines for COVID-19 are derived from recommendations in medically ill populations (Table). Whether these guidelines are optimal for COVID-19–related thrombosis remains unclear. Guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) suggest prophylaxis with LMWH or fondaparinux instead of unfractionated heparin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for all hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in the absence of contraindications, such as active bleeding.9 Once-daily injectable LMWH, 40 mg, and fondaparinux, 2.5 mg, are preferred to unfractionated heparin (2-3 times per day), because the former options limit clinician exposure to infected patients. These drugs are preferred to DOACs because of drug-drug interactions with antiviral agents. Although double-dose or therapeutic-dose LMWHs have been proposed, given the high VTE incidence despite standard thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19, the ACCP suggests standard-dose LWMH based on the absence of clinical trial data.9 Guidance from the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) suggests that half–therapeutic-dose LMWH (1 mg/kg daily) can be considered for prophylaxis in high-risk patients with COVID-19, and that a 50% higher dose be considered in patients with obesity; however, optimal prophylactic therapy remains unclear.10 Full-dose antithrombotic therapy as prophylaxis for high-risk patients with COVID-19 is being evaluated in clinical trials (eTable in the Supplement). Although the pathophysiology of thromboembolism in COVID-19 involves platelet hyperreactivity, evaluation of antiplatelet therapy for prophylaxis is ongoing.

Table.  Current Guideline Recommendations for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019
Current Guideline Recommendations for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019

The risk of VTE persists after discharge in high-risk patients hospitalized for COVID-19.10 However, the ACCP does not recommend postdischarge thromboprophylaxis.9 In contrast, the ISTH recommends postdischarge thromboprophylaxis with LMWH or a DOAC for all high-risk hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who have a low risk of bleeding.10 High-risk features in COVID-19 include older than 65 years, critical illness, cancer, prior VTE, thrombophilia, severe immobility, and elevated D-dimer (>2 times the upper limit of normal).10 The ISTH suggests a duration of 14 to 30 days for postdischarge thromboprophylaxis, although optimal duration remains unclear. Thromboprophylaxis for patients who do not require hospitalization is not currently recommended.

Diagnosis of thromboembolic complications, such as pulmonary embolism and MI, should use methods validated for patients without COVID-19. Given no evidence of benefit, surveillance ultrasonography for VTE is not recommended.9,10 Patients with COVID-19 diagnosed with arterial or venous thrombosis should be treated according to guidelines, recognizing the practical advantages of LMWH in the inpatient setting and of DOACs in the outpatient setting.10 At this time, neither the ISTH nor ACCP recommend measuring D-dimer to screen for VTE or for determining intensity of prophylaxis or treatment.9,10

Conclusions

Arterial and venous thrombosis are common in COVID-19, especially in critically ill patients. Thromboprophylaxis should be considered for all hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in the absence of contraindications. Ongoing investigation will determine optimal preventive regimens in COVID-19 in the intensive care unit, at hospital discharge, and in nonhospitalized patients at high-risk for thrombosis.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Gregory Piazza, MD, MS, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 (gpiazza@partners.org).

Published Online: November 23, 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.23422

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Piazza reported receiving grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Boston Scientific Corporation, Portola, and Bayer and personal fees from the Prairie Education and Research Cooperative, Amgen, Pfizer, and Agile outside the submitted work. Dr Morrow reported receiving grants from Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Anthos Therapeutics, Esai, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, and The Medicines Company; grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Merck, Novartis, and Roche Diagnostics; and personal fees from Bayer Pharma and InCarda outside the submitted work and being a member of the TIMI Study Group, which has received institutional research grant support through Brigham and Women's Hospital from Abbott, Amgen, Anthos Therapeutics, Aralez, AstraZeneca, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Intarcia, Janssen, MedImmune, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Poxel, Quark Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, Roche, Siemens, Takeda, The Medicines Company, and Zora Biosciences.

References
1.
Piazza  G, Campia  U, Hurwitz  S,  et al.  Registry of arterial and venous thromboembolic complications in patients with COVID-19.   J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(18):2060-2072. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.070PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Fox  SE, Akmatbekov  A, Harbert  JL, Li  G, Quincy Brown  J, Vander Heide  RS.  Pulmonary and cardiac pathology in African American patients with COVID-19: an autopsy series from New Orleans.   Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(7):681-686. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30243-5PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Zhang  Y, Cao  W, Jiang  W,  et al.  Profile of natural anticoagulant, coagulant factor and anti-phospholipid antibody in critically ill COVID-19 patients.   J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020;50(3):580-586. doi:10.1007/s11239-020-02182-9PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Zaid  Y, Puhm  F, Allaeys  I,  et al.  Platelets can associate with SARS-Cov-2 RNA and are hyperactivated in COVID-19.   Circ Res. 2020. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317703PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Nicolai  L, Leunig  A, Brambs  S,  et al.  Immunothrombotic dysregulation in COVID-19 pneumonia is associated with respiratory failure and coagulopathy.   Circulation. 2020;142(12):1176-1189. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048488PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Ackermann  M, Verleden  SE, Kuehnel  M,  et al.  Pulmonary vascular endothelialitis, thrombosis, and angiogenesis in Covid-19.   N Engl J Med. 2020;383(2):120-128. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2015432PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Lodigiani  C, Iapichino  G, Carenzo  L,  et al; Humanitas COVID-19 Task Force.  Venous and arterial thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 patients admitted to an academic hospital in Milan, Italy.   Thromb Res. 2020;191:9-14. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.024PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Roberts  LN, Whyte  MB, Georgiou  L,  et al.  Postdischarge venous thromboembolism following hospital admission with COVID-19.   Blood. 2020;136(11):1347-1350. doi:10.1182/blood.2020008086PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Moores  LK, Tritschler  T, Brosnahan  S,  et al  Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.   Chest. 2020;158:1143-1163. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.559PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Spyropoulos  AC, Levy  JH, Ageno  W,  et al; Subcommittee on Perioperative, Critical Care Thrombosis, Haemostasis of the Scientific, Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.  Scientific and Standardization Committee communication: Clinical guidance on the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.   J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(8):1859-1865. doi:10.1111/jth.14929PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    3 Comments for this article
    EXPAND ALL
    SARS-CoV-2 Thromboembolism
    W. Ross Prince, MD, FRCSC | Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital
    I have read the above article which is very good and does give good clinical pearls. It mentions good study results but has no great conclusions for the non-academic front line doctor. Other articles have mentioned lowly aspirin as an addition to the treatment of Covid-19 in a community hospital (1), so should the addition of lowly ASA be considered when treating patients in whom disseminated thromboembolism is suspected?

    Reference

    1. Aspirin Use is Associated with Decreased Mechanical Ventilation, ICU Admission, and In-Hospital Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19, Anesthesia & Analgesia: October 21, 2020 - Volume
    Publish Ahead of Print - Issue - doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005292
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    READ MORE
    Aspirin
    James Whiting, MD,CM | PVAMC
    It would be interesting to know how many of the thrombotic complications occurred in those routinely taking a daily dose of low-dose or standard-dose ASA relative to the general populatuon.
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    Aspirin
    George Anstadt, MD | U of Rochester
    These authors give us important insight that platelet activation plays a central role in Covid-19 coagulopathy. Aspirin is a potent inhibitor of platelet activation. It bind irreversibly and permanently to platelets, preventing activation. A small dose can bind all the platelets in circulation. This occurs quickly, during the short plasma residence of a dose of aspirin. So a larger dose only adds side effects, not efficacy. More frequent doses add to efficacy because the body makes a lot of new activation-capable platelets in 24 hours. Historically, aspirin has been given as often as four times a day for platelet-driven coagulopathies. I use a 41-82 mg dose twice or three times a day in any symptomatic Covid-19 patient without an aspirin contraindication. Covid-19 has a multi-pronged pathophysiology which requires combination therapy- aspirin is no silver bullet, but in combination with other preventive / therapeutic agents begun early in the course of the infection might help prevent poor outcomes.
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    READ MORE
    ×