Evaluating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines After Emergency Use Authorization or Licensing of Initial Candidate Vaccines | Infectious Diseases | JAMA | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.239.150.57. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Viewpoint
December 14, 2020

Evaluating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines After Emergency Use Authorization or Licensing of Initial Candidate Vaccines

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
JAMA. 2021;325(3):221-222. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.25127

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will likely issue emergency use authorizations for 2 vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), one developed jointly by Pfizer and BioNTech and the other by Moderna. According to company press releases and data made available by the FDA,1 both vaccines have shown approximately 95% efficacy in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 infections in phase 3 trials, without significant safety concerns that might hinder authorization by the FDA. Additional phase 3 trials of vaccines manufactured by Janssen and AstraZeneca are underway; with rapidly rising case counts in the US, initial results from those trials may not be far behind. All of these trials compare the incidence of symptomatic infection among vaccine recipients with that among a placebo control group. However, once authorized vaccines become widely available, conducting placebo-controlled trials of subsequent vaccine candidates may become challenging.2 Alternative strategies to evaluate those vaccines, and to compare their safety and efficacy with those of authorized products, are needed.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×