Reactogenicity Following Receipt of mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines | Vaccination | JAMA | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Views 90,226
Citations 0
JAMA Insights
April 5, 2021

Reactogenicity Following Receipt of mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines

Author Affiliations
  • 1CDC COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
JAMA. Published online April 5, 2021. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.5374

In December 2020, 2 mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) were granted Emergency Use Authorization by the US Food and Drug Administration as 2-dose series and recommended for use by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.1-3 In late February 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration granted Emergency Use Authorization for a third COVID-19 vaccine, a single-dose adenovirus vector-based vaccine from Janssen (Johnson & Johnson).

In clinical trials of the mRNA-based 2-dose vaccines, participants reported local and systemic reactions (reactogenicity).4,5 Frequently reported reactions included injection site pain, fatigue, and headache; greater reactogenicity was reported following the second dose.4,5 Continued monitoring of reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines outside of clinical trial settings may provide additional information for health care practitioners and the public about transient local and systemic reactions following COVID-19 vaccination.

V-safe Active Surveillance System

To facilitate rapid assessment of COVID-19 vaccines, in 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established v-safe, a new active surveillance system for collecting near–real-time data from COVID-19 vaccine recipients in the US. V-safe participants voluntarily self-enroll and receive periodic smartphone text messages to initiate web-based health surveys from the day of vaccination (day 0) through 12 months after the final dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.6 From day 0 through day 7 after each vaccine dose, participants are asked questions about solicited local and systemic reactions (eg, injection site pain, fatigue, headache). These solicited reactions do not include allergic reactions or anaphylaxis; however, v-safe does allow participants to enter free-text information about their postvaccination experience and asks about adverse health events (eg, received medical care). Medically attended events are followed up on through active telephone outreach; future analyses will address these adverse vaccine experiences. This report describes information on solicited local and systemic reactogenicity reported to v-safe on days 0 to 7 after each dose of vaccine from December 14, 2020, through February 28, 2021. Responses were limited to individuals who were vaccinated by February 21, 2021, to allow a 7-day reporting period after the day of vaccination. Preliminary data from v-safe through January 13, 2021, have been previously reported.7 This activity was reviewed by the CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy (see Additional Information).

Self-reported Local and Systemic Reactions Among V-safe Participants

By February 21, 2021, more than 46 million persons received at least 1 dose of an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine.8 A total of 3 643 918 persons were enrolled in v-safe and completed at least 1 health survey within 7 days following their first vaccine dose; 1 920 872 v-safe participants reported receiving a second vaccine dose and completed at least 1 daily health survey within 7 days following the second dose. Solicited local and systemic reactions during days 0 to 7 after each dose were assessed.

Most v-safe participants reported an injection site reaction (dose 1: 70.0%; dose 2: 75.2%) or a systemic reaction (dose 1: 50.0%; dose 2: 69.4%) during days 0 to 7 after vaccination (Table). The most frequently reported solicited local and systemic reactions after the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine were injection site pain (67.8%), fatigue (30.9%), headache (25.9%), and myalgia (19.4%). Reactogenicity was substantially greater after the second dose for both vaccines, particularly for systemic reactions, including fatigue (53.9%), headache (46.7%), myalgia (44.0%), chills (31.3%), fever (29.5%), and joint pain (25.6%).

Table.  Solicited Local and Systemic Reactionsa to mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines Reported 0 to 7 Days After Vaccination—Centers for Disease Control and Prevention V-safe Surveillance System, December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021
Solicited Local and Systemic Reactionsa to mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines Reported 0 to 7 Days After Vaccination—Centers for Disease Control and Prevention V-safe Surveillance System, December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021

A greater percentage of participants who received the Moderna vaccine, compared with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, reported reactogenicity; this pattern was more pronounced after the second dose (Table). When stratified by age (<65 vs ≥65 years), differences in reactogenicity by vaccine remained consistent with overall findings (data not shown). Local and systemic reactions were less commonly reported by v-safe participants 65 years and older compared with those younger than 65 years, but greater reactogenicity after the second dose was observed for both age groups (eFigure in the Supplement). For both doses of both vaccines, the percentage of v-safe participants who reported local and systemic reactions was highest on day 1 after vaccination and declined markedly through day 7.

The frequency of reported reactions was generally consistent with results observed in clinical trials.4,5 Data from millions of v-safe participants indicate that injection site pain is common after both the first and second doses of either mRNA-based vaccine. Systemic reactions, including fatigue, headache, myalgia, chills, fever, and joint pain, occurred in participants after the first dose, although they were more frequently reported after the second dose among both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccine recipients. Persons 65 years and older reported less reactogenicity than younger persons. Limitations of v-safe include voluntary participation via an opt-in smartphone-based system that includes less than 10% of vaccinated persons.

Although local and systemic reactions are expected and often transient, they may have the most immediate influence on patients’ perceptions of the vaccination experience. Setting expectations with patients may alleviate some of the potential anxiety elicited by postvaccination reactogenicity. Clinicians should counsel vaccine recipients that these solicited local and systemic reactions are most commonly reported during the first day following their second dose; a short period before symptom resolution can be expected.9

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Johanna Chapin-Bardales, PhD, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30329 (wif3@cdc.gov).

Published Online: April 5, 2021. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.5374

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Chapin-Bardales, Gee, and Myers reported receiving nonfinancial technical support to build and maintain the v-safe infrastructure for data capture and messaging to participants from Oracle during the conduct of the study.

Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Mention of a product or company name is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the CDC.

Additional Contributions: We thank investigators from the CDC COVID-19 Response Team and the CDC v-safe team, members of the Oracle v-safe development team, and v-safe participants who contributed to these data.

Additional Information: See eg, 45 CFR part 46.102(l)(2); 21 CFR part 56; 42 USC §241(d); 5 USC §552a; 44 USC §3501 et seq.

References
1.
Creech  CB, Walker  SC, Samuels  RJ.  SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.   JAMA. 2021. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.3199PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Oliver  SE, Gargano  JW, Marin  M,  et al.  The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ interim recommendation for use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine: United States, December 2020.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(50):1922-1924. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6950e2PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Oliver  SE, Gargano  JW, Marin  M,  et al.  The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ interim recommendation for use of Moderna COVID-19 vaccine: United States, December 2020.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;69(5152):1653-1656. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm695152e1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Polack  FP, Thomas  SJ, Kitchin  N,  et al; C4591001 Clinical Trial Group.  Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine.   N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2603-2615. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2034577PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Baden  LR, El Sahly  HM, Essink  B,  et al; COVE Study Group.  Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.   N Engl J Med. 2021;384(5):403-416. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2035389PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
V-safe protocol: version 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published January 28, 2021. Accessed March 25, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/pdf/V-safe-Protocol-508.pdf
7.
Gee  J, Marquez  P, Su  J,  et al.  First month of COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring: United States, December 14, 2020-January 13, 2021.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(8):283-288. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7008e3PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Trends in number of COVID-19 vaccinations in the US. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed March 20, 2021. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccination-trends
9.
Vaccines and immunizations: answering patients’ questions. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated November 2, 2020. Accessed March 25, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/hcp/answering-questions.html
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    Covid Vaccine Reactogenicity
    Charles Brill, MD | Thomas Jefferson University
    Does excess reactogenicity indicate prior infection?
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    ×